Are there any examples of python bindings that call code written in swift on MacOS?
I found ways to call python within swift, but not the other way around
Specifically, my python application needs to make a call to DARegisterDiskDisappearedCallback() in apple's Disk Arbitration framework since the libusb implementation of registering hotplug callbacks is broken in MacOS. Unfortunately, this framework is only accessible in swift and objective c.
Is there a way to have a python module make calls to swift code?
Related
I have a python app and java app. The python app generates input for the java app and invokes it on the command line.
I'm sure there must be a more elegant solution to this; just like using JNI to invoke C code from Java.
Any pointers?
(FYI I'm v. new to Python)
Clarification (at the cost of a long question: apologies)
The py app (which I don't own) takes user input in the form of a number of configuration files. It then interprits these and farms work off to a number of (hidden) tools via a plugin mechanism. I'm looking to add support for the functionality provided by the legacy Java app.
So it doesn't make sense to call the python app from the java app and I can't run the py app in a jython environment (on the JVM).
Since there is no obvious mechanism for this I think the simple CL invocation is the best solution.
Sorry to ressurect the thread, but there was no accepted answer...
You could also use Py4J. There is an example on the frontpage and lots of documentation, but essentially, you just call Java methods from your python code as if they were python methods:
>>> from py4j.java_gateway import JavaGateway
>>> gateway = JavaGateway() # connect to the JVM
>>> java_object = gateway.jvm.mypackage.MyClass() # invoke constructor
>>> other_object = java_object.doThat()
>>> other_object.doThis(1,'abc')
>>> gateway.jvm.java.lang.System.out.println('Hello World!') # call a static method
As opposed to Jython, Py4J runs in the Python VM so it is always "up to date" with the latest version of Python and you can use libraries that do not run well on Jython (e.g., lxml). The communication is done through sockets instead of JNI.
Disclaimer: I am the author of Py4J
Take a look at Jython. It's kind of like JNI, but replace C with Python, i.e. you can call Python from Java and vice versa. It's not totally clear what you're trying to do or why your current approach isn't what you want.
Wrap your Java-Code in a Container (Servlet / EJB).
So you don´t loose time in the vm-startup and you go the way to more service-oriented.
For the wraping you can use jython (only make sense if you are familiar with python)
Choose a communication-protocoll in which python and java can use:
json (see www.json.org)
rmi (Python: JPype)
REST
SOAP (only for the brave)
Choose something you or your partners are familliar with!
If you really want to embed your Java app within your Python process, have a look at JPype. It provides access to Java through JNI.
How about using swig: http://www.swig.org/Doc1.3/Java.html ?
Give JCC a try http://pypi.python.org/pypi/JCC/2.1
JCC is a code generator for calling Java directly from CPython. It supports CPython 2.3+, several JREs (Sun JDK 1.4+, Apple JRE 1.4+, and OpenJDK 1.7) on OS X, Linux, Solaris, and Windows. It's produced by the Open Source Application Foundation (OSAF, the people making Chandler) and is released under an Apache-style license.
From the package description:
JCC is a C++ code generator for producing the glue code necessary to call into Java classes from CPython via Java's Native Invocation Interface (JNI).
JCC generates C++ wrapper classes that hide all the gory details of JNI access as well Java memory and object reference management.
JCC generates CPython types that make these C++ classes accessible from a Python interpreter. JCC attempts to make these Python types pythonic by detecting iterators and property accessors. Iterators and mappings may also be declared to JCC.
I am making an app in kotlin. But I know python a lot and made the logic in python. The kotlin is only used for the display. Is there a way to call a python function in kotlin?. A python script can call python scripts but can a Kotlin script call one?
The easiest solution – Chaquopy
https://chaquo.com/chaquopy/
Works for me
I think there are two normal solutions.
Using Polyglot API of GraalVM (https://www.graalvm.org/sdk/javadoc/org/graalvm/polyglot/package-summary.html).
Creating a C interface implemented with Python (https://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8497) and calling it with JNI (https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/jni/). However, this option needs you to manage your objects and memory very carefully (dispose all C pointers properly etc.)
I would like to know if i can have a mobile application written on Python(for example, for interface), but with embedded C++ for some tasks or functions of the app? For example, an application written with Kivy Framework for its interface, and with C++ for some AI features. Thanks.
It is possible to write the necessary library in C++ and then use it in Python. Though this is going to require some tricks that you can find online as you make your library. One example of this (since you want to use AI) is TensorFlow; it is used in Python while its core is written in C++
Although I found many answers and discussions about this question, I am unable to find a solution particular to my situation. Here it is:
I have a main program written in FORTRAN.
I have been given a set of python scripts that are very useful.
My goal is to access these python scripts from my main FORTRAN program. Currently, I simply call the scripts from FORTRAN as such:
CALL SYSTEM ('python pyexample.py')
Data is read from .dat files and written to .dat files. This is how the python scripts and the main FORTRAN program communicate to each other.
I am currently running my code on my local machine. I have python installed with numpy, scipy, etc.
My problem:
The code needs to run on a remote server. For strictly FORTRAN code, I compile the code locally and send the executable to the server where it waits in a queue. However, the server does not have python installed. The server is being used as a number crunching station between universities and industry. Installing python along with the necessary modules on the server is not an option. This means that my “CALL SYSTEM ('python pyexample.py')” strategy no longer works.
Solution?:
I found some information on a couple of things in thread Is it feasible to compile Python to machine code?
Shedskin, Psyco, Cython, Pypy, Cpython API
These “modules”(? Not sure if that's what to call them) seem to compile python script to C code or C++. Apparently not all python features can be translated to C. As well, some of these appear to be experimental. Is it possible to compile my python scripts with my FORTRAN code? There exists f2py which converts FORTRAN code to python, but it doesn't work the other way around.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time.
Vincent
PS: I'm using python 2.6 on Ubuntu
One way or another, you'll need to get the Python runtime on your server, otherwise it won't be possible to execute Python bytecode. Ignacio is on the right track with suggesting invoking libpython directly, but due to Fortran's parameter-passing conventions, it will be a lot easier for you to write a C wrapper to handle the interface between Fortran and the CPython embedding API.
Unfortunately, you're doing this the hard way -- it's a lot easier to write a Python program that can call Fortran subroutines than the other way around.
You don't want any of those. What you should do is use FORTRAN's FFI to talk with libpython and frob its API.
bbum posted an outline of how to do this, but I'm unable to complete the details. Where does the Python code go, and how will my Objective-C code know about it? How would I do it compiling on the command line?
Source here:
Calling Python From Objective-C
I have posted a full explanation of how to do this to my weblog as it is quite a bit longer than something I would post here.
The abstract summary remains the same: use an abstract class to provide the type information necessary to make the C compiler happy and the metadata necessary to make the bridge happy.
Unfortunately the story for using Python via PyObjC from within an Objective-C app is not very good at the moment. py2app which ships with PyObjC can compile loadable bundles (i.e. can be loaded via NSBundle), which seems like the best approach: define an NSObject subclass in python that implements a protocol (obtained via objc.protocolNamed) that you define in Objective-C, then compile this python file into a loadable bundle via py2app (which uses a standard setup.py). Unfortunately, py2app hasn't had much love, especially the plugin (loadable bundle) target, and a serious memory leak was introduced sometime around 10.5 such that any data passed from python to Objective-C from a py2app-compiled bundle leaks. Yuck.
PyObjC manipulates the Objective-C runtime in accordance with the ObjC-related code executed in Python, thus to be able to call python code from Objective-C, the general outline goes like
Write PyObjC wrapper around python code
Execute code declaring PyObjC wrapper to add these definitions to the ObjC runtime
Call PyObjC wrapper from Objective-C. Because it's declared at runtime, the symbols aren't available at compile time, so you'll have to use NSClassFromString et al. to instantiate the class. It's helpful to declare a #protocol with the appropriate methods so that the Objective-C compiler doesn't complain about missing methods.
If you have flexibility, the best option is to use the Cocoa-Python app templates (i.e. create a Python app), and then load your Objective-C code as a loadable bundle from within Python. This takes care of managing the Python interpreter for you.
Otherwise, with the code in main.m of the Cocoa-Python app template, you should be able to create a Python interpreter, execute your PyObjC code and then continue on. Obviously, the interpreter needs to be kept running so that your python code can execute, so you'll likely have to do this from a separate thread. As you can see this can get a little hairy. Better to go with the Python app, as described above.
Keep in mind that PyObjC is not guaranteed to play well with the Objective-C garbage collector, so all of these options require that your Objective-C code not use GC.
Google is your friend. Performing a search on the string "Cocoa Python" quickly turned up PyObjc.