I wanted to know if there is any way to oversample the data using pyspark.
I have dataset with target variable of 10 classes. As of Now I am taking each class and oversampling like below to match
transformed_04=transformed.where(F.col('nps_score')==4)
transformed_03=transformed.where(F.col('nps_score')==3)
transformed_02=transformed.where(F.col('nps_score')==2)
transformed_01=transformed.where(F.col('nps_score')==1)
transformed_00=transformed.where(F.col('nps_score')==0)
transformed_04_more_rows=transformed_04.sample(True,11.3,9)
transformed_03_more_rows=transformed_03.sample(True,16.3,9)
transformed_02_more_rows=transformed_03.sample(True,12,9)
And finally joining all dataframes with union all
transformed_04_more_rows.unionAll(transformed_03_more_rows).unionAll(transformed_02_more_rows)
Sampling values I am checking manually . For ex if 4th class has 2000 rows and second class has 10 rows checking manually and providing values 16,12 accordingly as provided in code above
Forgive me about mentioned code is not complete one . Just to give an view I had put. I wanted to know if there is any automated way like SMOTE in pyspark .
I have seen below link ,
Oversampling or SMOTE in Pyspark
It says my target class has to be only two . If I remove the condition it throws me some datatype issues
Can anyone help me with this implementation in pyspark checking every class and providing sampling values is very painful please help
check out the sampleBy function of spark, this enables us stratified samplint. https://spark.apache.org/docs/2.4.0/api/python/pyspark.sql.html?highlight=sampleby#pyspark.sql.DataFrame.sampleBy
in your case for each of the class you can provide the fraction of sample that you want in a dictionary and use it in sampleBy, try it out.
To decide the fraction, you can do an aggregation count based on your target column , normalize to (0,1) and tune it.
Related
I am working on logistic regression project where I have 850 observations and 8 variables and in this, I found 150 missing values and I have decided to use these values as test data. How can I take only missing values as test data in python?
I am still learning data science if there's a mistake in this approach please let me know.
Thank you :)
You could use the pd.isna() from pandas library.
It will return a boolean array that you can use for filtering your data.
You can select all rows, having any missing value in that, using following code
df[df.isnull().values.any(axis=1)]
I do not recommend you to use all data with missing values for testing. You should either fill the missing values completely or at least partial values should be filled in the test dataset.
Let's see what other Machine Learning experts advise you.
I am facing a dilemma with a project of mine. Few of the variables don't have enough data that means almost 99% data observations are missing.
I am thinking of couple of options -
Impute missing value with mean/knn imputation
Impute missing value with 0.
I couldn't think of anything in this direction. If someone can help that would be great.
P.S. I am not feeling comfortable using mean imputation when 99% of the data is missing. Does someone have a reasoning for that? kindly let me know.
Data has 397576 Observations out of which below are the missing values
enter image description here
99% of the data is missing!!!???
Well, if your dataset has less than 100,000 examples, then you may want to remove those columns instead of imputing through any methods.
If you have a larger dataset then using mean imputing or knn imputing would be ...OK. These methods don't catch the statistics of your data and can eat up memory. Instead use Bayesian methods of Machine Learning like fitting a Gaussian Process through your data or a Variational Auto-Encoder to those sparse columns.
1.) Here are a few links to learn and use gaussian processes to samples missing values from the dataset:
What is a Random Process?
How to handle missing values with GP?
2.) You can also use a VAE to impute the missing values!!!
Try reading this paper
I hope this helps!
My first question to give a good answer would be:
What you are actually trying to archive with the completed data?
.
People impute data for different reasons and the use case makes a big difference for example you could use imputation as:
Preprocessing step for training a machine learning model
Solution to have a nice Graphic/Plot that does not have gaps
Statistical inference tool to evaluate scientific or medical studies
99% of missing data is a lot - in most cases you can expect, that nothing meaningful will come out of this.
For some variables it still might make sense and produce at least something meaningful - but you have to handle this with care and think a lot about your solution.
In general you can say, imputation does not create entries out of thin air. A pattern must be present in the existing data - which then is applied to the missing data.
You probably will have to decide on a variable basis what makes sense.
Take your variable email as an example:
Depending how your data - it might be that each row represents a different customer that has a specific email address. So that every row is supposed to be a unique mail address. In this case imputation won't have any benefits - how should the algorithm guess the email. But if the data is structured differently and customers appear in multiple rows - then an algorithm can still fill in some meaningful data. Seeing that Customer number 4 always has the same mail address and filling it for rows where only customer number 4 is given and the mail is missing.
Tensorflow beginner here.
My data is split into two csv files, a.csv and b.csv, relating to two different events a and b. Both files contain information on the users concerned and, in particular, they both have a user_id field that I can use to merge the data sets.
I want to train a model to predict the probability of b happening based on the features of a. For doing this, I need to append a label column 'has_b_happened' to the data A retrieved from a.csv. In scala spark, I would do something like:
val joined = A
.join(B.groupBy("user_id").count, A("user_id") === B("user_id"), "left_outer")
.withColumn("has_b_happened", col("count").isNotNull.cast("double"))
In tensorflow, however, I haven't found anything comparable to spark's join. Is there a way of achieving the same result or am I trying to use the wrong tool for it?
For instance, column x has 50 values and all of these values are the same.
Is it a good idea to delete variables like these for building machine learning models? If so, how can I spot these variables in a large data set?
I guess a formula/function might be required to do so. I am thinking of using nunique that can take account of the whole dataset.
You should be deleting such columns because it will provide no extra information about how each data point is different from another. It's fine to leave the column for some machine learning models (due to the nature of how the algorithms work), like random forest, because this column will actually not be selected to split the data.
To spot those, especially for categorical or nominal variables (with fixed number of possible values), you can count the occurrence of each unique value, and if the mode is larger than a certain threshold (say 95%), then you delete that column from your model.
I personally will go through variables one by one if there aren't any so that I can fully understand each variable in the model, but the above systematic way is possible if the feature size is too large.
[]
Hi ,
Attached is the data, can you please help me to handle the missing data in the "Outlet_Size" column.
So that i can use this complete data for preparing the datascience models.
Thanks,
These are one of the major challenges of Data Mining problems (or Machine Learning). YOU decide what to do with the missing data based on PURE EXPERIENCE. You mustn't look at Data Science as a blackbox that follows a series of steps to be successful at it!
Some guidelines about missing data.
A. If more than 40% of the data is missing from a column, drop it! (Again, the 40% depends on what type of problem you're working with! If the data is super crucial or its very trivial that you can ignore it).
B. Check if there is someway you can impute the missing data from the internet. You're looking at item weight! If there is anyway you could know which product you're dealing with instead of hashed coded Item_Identifier, then you can always literally Google it and figure it out.
C. Missing data can be classified into two types:
MCAR: missing completely at random. This is the desirable scenario in case of missing data.
MNAR: missing not at random. Missing not at random data is a more serious issue and in this case it might be wise to check the data gathering process further and try to understand why the information is missing. For instance, if most of the people in a survey did not answer a certain question, why did they do that? Was the question unclear?
Assuming data is MCAR, too much missing data can be a problem too. Usually a safe maximum threshold is 5% of the total for large datasets. If missing data for a certain feature or sample is more than 5% then you probably should leave that feature or sample out. We therefore check for features (columns) and samples (rows) where more than 5% of the data is missing using a simple function
D. As posted in the comments, you can simply drop the rows using df.dropna() or fill them with infinity, or fill them with mean using df["value"] = df.groupby("name").transform(lambda x: x.fillna(x.mean()))
This groups the column value from dataframe df by category name, finds the mean in each category and fills the missing value in value with the corresponding mean of that category!
E. Apart from just either dropping missing values, replacing with mean or median, there are other advanced regression techniques you can use that has a way to predict missing values and fill it, E.G (mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations), you should browse and read more about where advanced imputation technique will be helpful.
The accepted answer is really nice.
In your specific case I'd say either drop the column or assign a new value called Missing. Since that's a Categorical variable, there's a good chance it ends up going into a OneHot or Target Encoder (or being understandable by the model as a category directly). Also, the fact the value is NaN is an info itself, it can come from multiple factors (from bad data to technical difficulties getting an answer, etc). Be careful and watch this doesn't brings bias or some information you shouldn't know (example : the products have NaN due to not being into a certain base, thing that will never happen in a real situation, which will make your result non-representative of a true situation)
The column "Outlet_Size" contains the categorical data, so instead of dropping the data use measures to fill data.
Since it is categorical data use Measures of Central Tendency, Mode.
Use mode to find which category occurs more or frequently and fill the column with the corresponding value.
Code:
Dataframe['Outlet_Size'].mode()
Datarame['Outlet_Size'].fillna(Dataframe['Outlet_Size'].mode(), inplace=True)