I'm referencing one dict, protocol_dict, in the dict comprehension construction of another:
for drug_id in drug_dict.keys():
drug_name = Drugs.get_drug_name_from_id(drug_id)
# Error happens here:
frontend_forward_dict[drug_name] = {pid: protocol_dict[pid] for pid in drug_dict[drug_id]}
When I run this code, I get the error message that protocol_dict is not defined. Yet it clearly is, and moreover, when I debug my code, I can verify that python has a stored value for protocol_dict right up until it runs the dict comprehension. But the dict comprehension throws this error the very first time it's called.
When I replaced the dict comprehension with a for-constructor, the problem vanishes, and everything works as expected:
for drug_id in drug_dict.keys():
drug_name = Drugs.get_drug_name_from_id(drug_id)
target_dict = {}
for pid in drug_dict[drug_id]:
target_dict[pid] = protocol_dict[pid]
frontend_forward_dict[drug_name] = target_dict
Does anyone know what's going on here? In case it's useful, here's the definition of protocol_dict:
protocol_dict = {}
for p, val in protocol_data.items():
versions = []
if len(val) == 1:
if "VERSION NUMBER" in val[0]["metadata"].keys():
vers = val[0]["metadata"]["VERSION NUMBER"]
versions.append(vers)
else:
versions.append("-1")
else:
# Multiple versions. Can assume each one comes with the right tag.
for version in val:
vers = version["metadata"]["VERSION NUMBER"]
versions.append(vers)
protocol_dict[p] = versions
protocol_dict needs to be defined before the code that is using it.
Is it defined in the same file, or is it imported?
If it is in the same file then it needs to be in the same scope, you might be defining the protocol_dict in such way that it is not visible by the code that is trying to use it.
There is nothing magical about the dict comprehension, you can test it by running this snipet:
foo = dict(a=1, b=2)
print({x: foo[x] for x in "ab"})
Related
I've followed a tutorial to write a Flask REST API and have a special request about a Python code.
The offered code is following:
# data list is where my objects are stored
def put_one(name):
list_by_id = [list for list in data_list if list['name'] == name]
list_by_id[0]['name'] = [new_name]
print({'list_by_id' : list_by_id[0]})
It works, which is nice, and even though I understand what line 2 is doing, I would like to rewrite it in a way that it's clear how the function iterates over the different lists. I already have an approach but it returns Key Error: 0
def put(name):
list_by_id = []
list = []
for list in data_list:
if(list['name'] == name):
list_by_id = list
list_by_id[0]['name'] = request.json['name']
return jsonify({'list_by_id' : list_by_id[0]})
My goal with this is also to be able to put other elements, that don't necessarily have the type 'name'. If I get to rewrite the function in an other way I'll be more likely to adapt it to my needs.
I've looked for tools to convert one way of coding into the other and answers in forums before coming here and couldn't find it.
It may not be beatiful code, but it gets the job done:
def put(value):
for i in range(len(data_list)):
key_list = list(data_list[i].keys())
if data_list[i][key_list[0]] == value:
print(f"old value: {key_list[0], data_list[i][key_list[0]]}")
data_list[i][key_list[0]] = request.json[test_key]
print(f"new value: {key_list[0], data_list[i][key_list[0]]}")
break
Now it doesn't matter what the key value is, with this iteration the method will only change the value when it finds in the data_list. Before the code breaked at every iteration cause the keys were different and they played a role.
Let's say we have a Python dictionary d, and we're iterating over it like so:
for k, v in d.iteritems():
del d[f(k)] # remove some item
d[g(k)] = v # add a new item
(f and g are just some black-box transformations.)
In other words, we try to add/remove items to d while iterating over it using iteritems.
Is this well defined? Could you provide some references to support your answer?
See also How to avoid "RuntimeError: dictionary changed size during iteration" error? for the separate question of how to avoid the problem.
Alex Martelli weighs in on this here.
It may not be safe to change the container (e.g. dict) while looping over the container.
So del d[f(k)] may not be safe. As you know, the workaround is to use d.copy().items() (to loop over an independent copy of the container) instead of d.iteritems() or d.items() (which use the same underlying container).
It is okay to modify the value at an existing index of the dict, but inserting values at new indices (e.g. d[g(k)] = v) may not work.
It is explicitly mentioned on the Python doc page (for Python 2.7) that
Using iteritems() while adding or deleting entries in the dictionary may raise a RuntimeError or fail to iterate over all entries.
Similarly for Python 3.
The same holds for iter(d), d.iterkeys() and d.itervalues(), and I'll go as far as saying that it does for for k, v in d.items(): (I can't remember exactly what for does, but I would not be surprised if the implementation called iter(d)).
You cannot do that, at least with d.iteritems(). I tried it, and Python fails with
RuntimeError: dictionary changed size during iteration
If you instead use d.items(), then it works.
In Python 3, d.items() is a view into the dictionary, like d.iteritems() in Python 2. To do this in Python 3, instead use d.copy().items(). This will similarly allow us to iterate over a copy of the dictionary in order to avoid modifying the data structure we are iterating over.
I have a large dictionary containing Numpy arrays, so the dict.copy().keys() thing suggested by #murgatroid99 was not feasible (though it worked). Instead, I just converted the keys_view to a list and it worked fine (in Python 3.4):
for item in list(dict_d.keys()):
temp = dict_d.pop(item)
dict_d['some_key'] = 1 # Some value
I realize this doesn't dive into the philosophical realm of Python's inner workings like the answers above, but it does provide a practical solution to the stated problem.
The following code shows that this is not well defined:
def f(x):
return x
def g(x):
return x+1
def h(x):
return x+10
try:
d = {1:"a", 2:"b", 3:"c"}
for k, v in d.iteritems():
del d[f(k)]
d[g(k)] = v+"x"
print d
except Exception as e:
print "Exception:", e
try:
d = {1:"a", 2:"b", 3:"c"}
for k, v in d.iteritems():
del d[f(k)]
d[h(k)] = v+"x"
print d
except Exception as e:
print "Exception:", e
The first example calls g(k), and throws an exception (dictionary changed size during iteration).
The second example calls h(k) and throws no exception, but outputs:
{21: 'axx', 22: 'bxx', 23: 'cxx'}
Which, looking at the code, seems wrong - I would have expected something like:
{11: 'ax', 12: 'bx', 13: 'cx'}
Python 3 you should just:
prefix = 'item_'
t = {'f1': 'ffw', 'f2': 'fca'}
t2 = dict()
for k,v in t.items():
t2[k] = prefix + v
or use:
t2 = t1.copy()
You should never modify original dictionary, it leads to confusion as well as potential bugs or RunTimeErrors. Unless you just append to the dictionary with new key names.
This question asks about using an iterator (and funny enough, that Python 2 .iteritems iterator is no longer supported in Python 3) to delete or add items, and it must have a No as its only right answer as you can find it in the accepted answer. Yet: most of the searchers try to find a solution, they will not care how this is done technically, be it an iterator or a recursion, and there is a solution for the problem:
You cannot loop-change a dict without using an additional (recursive) function.
This question should therefore be linked to a question that has a working solution:
How can I remove a key:value pair wherever the chosen key occurs in a deeply nested dictionary? (= "delete")
Also helpful as it shows how to change the items of a dict on the run: How can I replace a key:value pair by its value wherever the chosen key occurs in a deeply nested dictionary? (= "replace").
By the same recursive methods, you will also able to add items as the question asks for as well.
Since my request to link this question was declined, here is a copy of the solution that can delete items from a dict. See How can I remove a key:value pair wherever the chosen key occurs in a deeply nested dictionary? (= "delete") for examples / credits / notes.
import copy
def find_remove(this_dict, target_key, bln_overwrite_dict=False):
if not bln_overwrite_dict:
this_dict = copy.deepcopy(this_dict)
for key in this_dict:
# if the current value is a dict, dive into it
if isinstance(this_dict[key], dict):
if target_key in this_dict[key]:
this_dict[key].pop(target_key)
this_dict[key] = find_remove(this_dict[key], target_key)
return this_dict
dict_nested_new = find_remove(nested_dict, "sub_key2a")
The trick
The trick is to find out in advance whether a target_key is among the next children (= this_dict[key] = the values of the current dict iteration) before you reach the child level recursively. Only then you can still delete a key:value pair of the child level while iterating over a dictionary. Once you have reached the same level as the key to be deleted and then try to delete it from there, you would get the error:
RuntimeError: dictionary changed size during iteration
The recursive solution makes any change only on the next values' sub-level and therefore avoids the error.
I got the same problem and I used following procedure to solve this issue.
Python List can be iterate even if you modify during iterating over it.
so for following code it will print 1's infinitely.
for i in list:
list.append(1)
print 1
So using list and dict collaboratively you can solve this problem.
d_list=[]
d_dict = {}
for k in d_list:
if d_dict[k] is not -1:
d_dict[f(k)] = -1 # rather than deleting it mark it with -1 or other value to specify that it will be not considered further(deleted)
d_dict[g(k)] = v # add a new item
d_list.append(g(k))
Today I had a similar use-case, but instead of simply materializing the keys on the dictionary at the beginning of the loop, I wanted changes to the dict to affect the iteration of the dict, which was an ordered dict.
I ended up building the following routine, which can also be found in jaraco.itertools:
def _mutable_iter(dict):
"""
Iterate over items in the dict, yielding the first one, but allowing
it to be mutated during the process.
>>> d = dict(a=1)
>>> it = _mutable_iter(d)
>>> next(it)
('a', 1)
>>> d
{}
>>> d.update(b=2)
>>> list(it)
[('b', 2)]
"""
while dict:
prev_key = next(iter(dict))
yield prev_key, dict.pop(prev_key)
The docstring illustrates the usage. This function could be used in place of d.iteritems() above to have the desired effect.
Let's say we have a Python dictionary d, and we're iterating over it like so:
for k, v in d.iteritems():
del d[f(k)] # remove some item
d[g(k)] = v # add a new item
(f and g are just some black-box transformations.)
In other words, we try to add/remove items to d while iterating over it using iteritems.
Is this well defined? Could you provide some references to support your answer?
See also How to avoid "RuntimeError: dictionary changed size during iteration" error? for the separate question of how to avoid the problem.
Alex Martelli weighs in on this here.
It may not be safe to change the container (e.g. dict) while looping over the container.
So del d[f(k)] may not be safe. As you know, the workaround is to use d.copy().items() (to loop over an independent copy of the container) instead of d.iteritems() or d.items() (which use the same underlying container).
It is okay to modify the value at an existing index of the dict, but inserting values at new indices (e.g. d[g(k)] = v) may not work.
It is explicitly mentioned on the Python doc page (for Python 2.7) that
Using iteritems() while adding or deleting entries in the dictionary may raise a RuntimeError or fail to iterate over all entries.
Similarly for Python 3.
The same holds for iter(d), d.iterkeys() and d.itervalues(), and I'll go as far as saying that it does for for k, v in d.items(): (I can't remember exactly what for does, but I would not be surprised if the implementation called iter(d)).
You cannot do that, at least with d.iteritems(). I tried it, and Python fails with
RuntimeError: dictionary changed size during iteration
If you instead use d.items(), then it works.
In Python 3, d.items() is a view into the dictionary, like d.iteritems() in Python 2. To do this in Python 3, instead use d.copy().items(). This will similarly allow us to iterate over a copy of the dictionary in order to avoid modifying the data structure we are iterating over.
I have a large dictionary containing Numpy arrays, so the dict.copy().keys() thing suggested by #murgatroid99 was not feasible (though it worked). Instead, I just converted the keys_view to a list and it worked fine (in Python 3.4):
for item in list(dict_d.keys()):
temp = dict_d.pop(item)
dict_d['some_key'] = 1 # Some value
I realize this doesn't dive into the philosophical realm of Python's inner workings like the answers above, but it does provide a practical solution to the stated problem.
The following code shows that this is not well defined:
def f(x):
return x
def g(x):
return x+1
def h(x):
return x+10
try:
d = {1:"a", 2:"b", 3:"c"}
for k, v in d.iteritems():
del d[f(k)]
d[g(k)] = v+"x"
print d
except Exception as e:
print "Exception:", e
try:
d = {1:"a", 2:"b", 3:"c"}
for k, v in d.iteritems():
del d[f(k)]
d[h(k)] = v+"x"
print d
except Exception as e:
print "Exception:", e
The first example calls g(k), and throws an exception (dictionary changed size during iteration).
The second example calls h(k) and throws no exception, but outputs:
{21: 'axx', 22: 'bxx', 23: 'cxx'}
Which, looking at the code, seems wrong - I would have expected something like:
{11: 'ax', 12: 'bx', 13: 'cx'}
Python 3 you should just:
prefix = 'item_'
t = {'f1': 'ffw', 'f2': 'fca'}
t2 = dict()
for k,v in t.items():
t2[k] = prefix + v
or use:
t2 = t1.copy()
You should never modify original dictionary, it leads to confusion as well as potential bugs or RunTimeErrors. Unless you just append to the dictionary with new key names.
This question asks about using an iterator (and funny enough, that Python 2 .iteritems iterator is no longer supported in Python 3) to delete or add items, and it must have a No as its only right answer as you can find it in the accepted answer. Yet: most of the searchers try to find a solution, they will not care how this is done technically, be it an iterator or a recursion, and there is a solution for the problem:
You cannot loop-change a dict without using an additional (recursive) function.
This question should therefore be linked to a question that has a working solution:
How can I remove a key:value pair wherever the chosen key occurs in a deeply nested dictionary? (= "delete")
Also helpful as it shows how to change the items of a dict on the run: How can I replace a key:value pair by its value wherever the chosen key occurs in a deeply nested dictionary? (= "replace").
By the same recursive methods, you will also able to add items as the question asks for as well.
Since my request to link this question was declined, here is a copy of the solution that can delete items from a dict. See How can I remove a key:value pair wherever the chosen key occurs in a deeply nested dictionary? (= "delete") for examples / credits / notes.
import copy
def find_remove(this_dict, target_key, bln_overwrite_dict=False):
if not bln_overwrite_dict:
this_dict = copy.deepcopy(this_dict)
for key in this_dict:
# if the current value is a dict, dive into it
if isinstance(this_dict[key], dict):
if target_key in this_dict[key]:
this_dict[key].pop(target_key)
this_dict[key] = find_remove(this_dict[key], target_key)
return this_dict
dict_nested_new = find_remove(nested_dict, "sub_key2a")
The trick
The trick is to find out in advance whether a target_key is among the next children (= this_dict[key] = the values of the current dict iteration) before you reach the child level recursively. Only then you can still delete a key:value pair of the child level while iterating over a dictionary. Once you have reached the same level as the key to be deleted and then try to delete it from there, you would get the error:
RuntimeError: dictionary changed size during iteration
The recursive solution makes any change only on the next values' sub-level and therefore avoids the error.
I got the same problem and I used following procedure to solve this issue.
Python List can be iterate even if you modify during iterating over it.
so for following code it will print 1's infinitely.
for i in list:
list.append(1)
print 1
So using list and dict collaboratively you can solve this problem.
d_list=[]
d_dict = {}
for k in d_list:
if d_dict[k] is not -1:
d_dict[f(k)] = -1 # rather than deleting it mark it with -1 or other value to specify that it will be not considered further(deleted)
d_dict[g(k)] = v # add a new item
d_list.append(g(k))
Today I had a similar use-case, but instead of simply materializing the keys on the dictionary at the beginning of the loop, I wanted changes to the dict to affect the iteration of the dict, which was an ordered dict.
I ended up building the following routine, which can also be found in jaraco.itertools:
def _mutable_iter(dict):
"""
Iterate over items in the dict, yielding the first one, but allowing
it to be mutated during the process.
>>> d = dict(a=1)
>>> it = _mutable_iter(d)
>>> next(it)
('a', 1)
>>> d
{}
>>> d.update(b=2)
>>> list(it)
[('b', 2)]
"""
while dict:
prev_key = next(iter(dict))
yield prev_key, dict.pop(prev_key)
The docstring illustrates the usage. This function could be used in place of d.iteritems() above to have the desired effect.
I would like to dynamically create multiple filenames in a nested loop let's say for 2 participants where each participant has different 4 sessions. My goal is to create filenames like:
Learning_S1_P1.xlsx; Learning_S2_P1.xlsx; Learning_S3_P1.xlsx; Learning_S4_P1.xlsx
Learning_S1_P2.xlsx; ... Learning_S4_P2.xlsx
My code is:
filename = {}
for y in range(0,4):
for i in range(0,2):
filename[y][i] = 'Learning_S%s_P%s.xlsx' % (1+y,1+i)
However, I receive KeyError: 0. I am blocked and couldn't find out the solution. Any help would be appreciated.
Many thanks,
The issue has nothing at all to do with your string formatting. The error is coming when you attempt to set items in your dict. That's because you're attempting to set items in a nested dict, without ever creating the inner dictionary: filename[y] does not exist, so you can't do filename[y][i].
You could fix this by creating a dict in the outer loop:
filename = {}
for y in range(0,4):
filename[y] = {}
for i in range(0,2):
filename[y][i] = 'Learning_S%s_P%s.xlsx' % (1+y,1+i)
although I would question whether dicts are the right data structure here: seems like nested lists would be more appropriate:
filename = []
for y in range(0,4):
inner = []
for i in range(0,2):
inner.append('Learning_S%s_P%s.xlsx' % (1+y,1+i))
filename.append(inner)
Nothing to do with strings.
You get KeyError because you write
filename[y][i]
write
filename[y] = {}
filename[y][i] = 'whatever'
(And you may use format() instead of the %s syntax.)
Advice: when facing this kind of issue, try to separate the line in several statements.
This line is fine by itself:
filename[y][i] = 'Learning_S%s_P%s.xlsx' % (1+y,1+i)
but when it raises an Exception, cut it in two:
value = 'Learning_S%s_P%s.xlsx' % (1+y,1+i)
filename[y][i] = value
It will be obvious that the error is raised by the second line, and has nothing to do with strings.
Hi want to understand how to make this code shorter using dictionary comprehension:
for e in list_of_tuples:
tmp = mydict.copy()
tmp[e[0]] = tmp[e[1]]
if someFunction(tmp):
mydict = tmp
I would like to pass a dictionary comprehension to someFunction instead of relying on a temporary dictionary whose values are changed in the loop. Is it possible?
This answer assumes that someFunction does not alter the dictionary
The dictionary passed to someFunction is still going to be a basic copy of mydict, but this is the only way I can think of answering the question with comprehension.
for e in list_of_tuples:
if someFunction({key: val if key != e[0] else mydict[e[1]] for key,val in mydict }):
mydict[e[0]] = mydict[e[1]]
However the faster/ easier way would be to just make a temp variable for mydict[e[0]], and change it back after if someFunction fails. Also having extra lines isn't always a bad thing. It can usually help readability, solving bugs and maintenance.. especially for newer programmers.
for e in list_of_tuples:
temp = mydict[e[0]]
mydict[e[0]] = mydict[e[1]]
if not someFunction(mydict):
mydict[e[0]] = temp