I am trying to run a script that sequentially changes some parameters in a config file (MET_config_EEv40.cfg) and runs a script ('IS_MET_EEv40_RAW.py') that retrieves these new config parameters:
config_filename = os.getcwd() + '/MET_config_EEv40.cfg'
import sys
parser = configparser.ConfigParser()
parser.read('MET_config_EEv40.cfg')
parser.set('RAW', 'product', 'ERA')
parser.set('RAW', 'gee_product', 'ECMWF/ERA5_LAND/HOURLY')
parser.set('RAW', 'indicator', 'PRCP')
parser.set('RAW', 'resolution', '11110')
with open('MET_config_EEv40.cfg', 'w') as configfile:
parser.write(configfile)
## execute file
import sys
os.system(exec(open('IS_MET_EEv40_RAW.py').read()))
#exec(open('IS_MET_EEv40_RAW.py').read())
print('I am here')
After this execution, I get the output of my script as expected:
Period of Reference: 2005 - 2019
Area of Interest: /InfoSequia/GIS/ink/shp_basin_wgs84.shp
Raw data is up to date. No new dates available in raw data
Press any key to continue . . .
But it never prints the end line: I am here, so that means that after the execution of the script, the algorithm is terminated. That is not what I want it to do, as I would like to be able to change some other config parameters and run the script again.
That output is showed because of this line of the code:
if (delta.days<=1):
sys.exit('Raw data is up to date. No new dates available in raw data')
So could be that sys.exit is ending both processes? Any ideas to replace sys.exit() inside the code to avoid this?
Im executing this file from a .bat file that contains the following:
#echo OFF
docker exec container python MET/PRCPmain.py
pause
exec(source, globals=None, locals=None, /) does
Execute the given source in the context of globals and locals.
So
import sys
exec("sys.exit(0)")
print("after")
is same as writing
import sys
sys.exit(0)
print("after")
which obviously terminate and does not print after.
exec has optional argument globals which you can use to provide your alternative to sys for example
class MySys:
def exit(self, *args):
pass
exec("sys.exit(0)",{"sys":MySys()})
print("after")
which does output
after
as it does use exit from MySys instance. If your codes make use of other things from sys and want it to work normally you would need method mimicking sys function in MySys class
I am working with Robot Operating System (ROS) and am attempting to make a server/client where the server will boot up ROS nodes that are specified by the client. To perform the "boot up" I am using roslaunch based on the recommendations found here: http://wiki.ros.org/roslaunch/API%20Usage
I can run the roscore in a window and then I can run the server which boots up fine. However, as soon as I try to send the node names I want to boot up via the client, I get the following error:
"Error processing request: signal only works in main thread"
It then points to a bunch of files in various areas that I have not yet tracked down.
I have tried using a simple roslaunch call on each of the launch files I made individually for the nodes I want to launch (in this case turtlesim_node and turtle_teleop_key) and they boot up fine and work by just running roslaunch [package] turtlesim_launch.launch, etc.
Below is the code for my server:
#!/usr/bin/env python
#Filename: primary_server.py
import rospy
import roslaunch
from robot_man.srv import *
class StartUpServer(object):
def __init__(self):
self._nodes = []
def handle_startup(self, names):
self._temp = names.nodes.split(",") #This reades in the
# information from the srv file sent by the client and
# separates each node/package pair
#This loop separates the input from pairs of 2 corresponding
# to the package and node names the user inputs
for i in range(len(self._temp)):
self._nodes.append(self._temp[i].split())
#This loop will launch each node that the user has specified
for package, executable in self._nodes:
print('package is: {0}, executable is: {1}'.format(package, executable))
node = roslaunch.core.Node(package, executable)
launch = roslaunch.scriptapi.ROSLaunch()
launch.start()
process = launch.launch(node)
print('running node: %s'%executable)
return StartUpResponse(self._nodes) #I will change this later
if __name__ == '__main__':
rospy.init_node('startup_node')
server = StartUpServer()
rospy.Service('startup', StartUp, server.handle_startup)
print('The servers are up and running')
rospy.spin()
Here is the code for my client:
#!/usr/bin/env python
#Filename: primary_client_startup.py
import rospy
from robot_man.srv import *
def main(nodes):
rospy.wait_for_service('startup')
proxy = rospy.ServiceProxy('startup', StartUp)
response = proxy(nodes)
return response
if __name__ == '__main__':
nodes = input('Please enter the node packages followed by \
node names separated by spaces. \n To activate multiple nodes \
separate entries with a comma > ')
main(nodes)
Here is my srv file:
#This should be a string of space/comma separated values
string nodes
---
#This should return "success" if node/s start up successfully, else "fail"
string status
And finally, here are the two launch files I have made to launch the turtle simulator:
turtlesim_launch.launch
<launch>
<node name="turtlesim_node" pkg="turtlesim" type="turtlesim_node" />
</launch>
turtle_teleop_launch.launch
<launch>
<node name="turtle_teleop_key" pkg="turtlesim" type="turtle_teleop_key" />
</launch>
I have done a bit of google searching and found no similar problems for ROS (though there are some similar errors for Django and the like but they don't relate).
I appreciate the help!
P.S. It is worth noting that I make it to line 34 when the error occurs (process = launch.launch(node)).
actually that is mentioned in the documentation
You're not calling init_node() from the Python Main thread. Python only allows signals to be registered from the Main thread.
Look here rospyOverviewInitialization and Shutdown
A solution that works (but is quite dirty) is to remove the signal handler registration function:
def dummy_function(): pass
roslaunch.pmon._init_signal_handlers = dummy_function
This way you'll lose the ability to kill the node with CTRL+C, but at least you can start it.
I believe the problem is that you are trying to launch a node in a callback, which as user3732793 says isn't allowed.
If you use append to Queue (or just a list) in the callback, then instead of just rospy.spin() check for items in the queue and then launch if they are there. I believe it will work.
Here is an example
Let's say I create this simple module and call it MyModule.py:
import threading
import multiprocessing
import time
def workerThreaded():
print 'thread working...'
time.sleep(2)
print 'thread complete'
def workerProcessed():
print 'process working...'
time.sleep(2)
print 'process complete'
def main():
workerThread = threading.Thread(target=workerThreaded)
workerThread.start()
workerProcess = multiprocessing.Process(target=workerProcessed)
workerProcess.start()
workerThread.join()
workerProcess.join()
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
And then I throw this together to unit test it:
import unittest
import MyModule
class MyModuleTester(unittest.TestCase):
def testMyModule(self):
MyModule.main()
unittest.main()
(I know this isn't a good unit test because it doesn't actually TEST it, it just runs it, but that's not relevant to my question)
If I run this unit test in PyCharm with code coverage, then it only shows the code inside the workerThreaded() and main() functions as being covered, even though it clearly covers the workerProcessed() function as well.
How do I get PyCharm to include code that was started in a new process process in its code coverage? Also, how can I get it to include the if __name__ == '__main__': block as well?
I'm running PyCharm 2.7.3, as well as Python 2.7.3.
Coverage.py can measure code run in subprocesses, details are at http://nedbatchelder.com/code/coverage/subprocess.html
I managed to make it work with subprocesses, not sure if this will work with threads or with python 2.
Create .covergerc file in your project root
[run]
concurrency=multiprocessing
Create sitecustomize.py file in your project root
import atexit
from glob import glob
import os
from functools import partial
from shutil import copyfile
from tempfile import mktemp
def combine_coverage(coverage_pattern, xml_pattern, old_coverage, old_xml):
from coverage.cmdline import main
# Find newly created coverage files
coverage_files = [file for file in glob(coverage_pattern) if file not in old_coverage]
xml_files = [file for file in glob(xml_pattern) if file not in old_xml]
if not coverage_files:
raise Exception("No coverage files generated!")
if not xml_files:
raise Exception("No coverage xml file generated!")
# Combine all coverage files
main(["combine", *coverage_files])
# Convert them to xml
main(["xml"])
# Copy combined xml file over PyCharm generated one
copyfile('coverage.xml', xml_files[0])
os.remove('coverage.xml')
def enable_coverage():
import coverage
# Enable subprocess monitoring by providing rc file and enable coverage collecting
os.environ['COVERAGE_PROCESS_START'] = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), '.coveragerc')
coverage.process_startup()
# Get current coverage files so we can process only newly created ones
temp_root = os.path.dirname(mktemp())
coverage_pattern = '%s/pycharm-coverage*.coverage*' % temp_root
xml_pattern = '%s/pycharm-coverage*.xml' % temp_root
old_coverage = glob(coverage_pattern)
old_xml = glob(xml_pattern)
# Register atexit handler to collect coverage files when python is shutting down
atexit.register(partial(combine_coverage, coverage_pattern, xml_pattern, old_coverage, old_xml))
if os.getenv('PYCHARM_RUN_COVERAGE'):
enable_coverage()
This basically detects if the code is running in PyCharm Coverage and collects newly generated coverage files. There are multiple files, one for the main process and one for each subprocess. So we need to combine them with "coverage combine" then convert them to xml with "coverage xml" and copy the resulted file over PyCharm's generated xml file.
Note that if you kill the child process in you tests coverage.py will not write the data file.
It does not require anything else just hit "Run unittests with Coverage" button in PyCharm.
That's it.
I have a directory that contains my Python unit tests. Each unit test module is of the form test_*.py. I am attempting to make a file called all_test.py that will, you guessed it, run all files in the aforementioned test form and return the result. I have tried two methods so far; both have failed. I will show the two methods, and I hope someone out there knows how to actually do this correctly.
For my first valiant attempt, I thought "If I just import all my testing modules in the file, and then call this unittest.main() doodad, it will work, right?" Well, turns out I was wrong.
import glob
import unittest
testSuite = unittest.TestSuite()
test_file_strings = glob.glob('test_*.py')
module_strings = [str[0:len(str)-3] for str in test_file_strings]
if __name__ == "__main__":
unittest.main()
This did not work, the result I got was:
$ python all_test.py
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 0 tests in 0.000s
OK
For my second try, I though, ok, maybe I will try to do this whole testing thing in a more "manual" fashion. So I attempted to do that below:
import glob
import unittest
testSuite = unittest.TestSuite()
test_file_strings = glob.glob('test_*.py')
module_strings = [str[0:len(str)-3] for str in test_file_strings]
[__import__(str) for str in module_strings]
suites = [unittest.TestLoader().loadTestsFromName(str) for str in module_strings]
[testSuite.addTest(suite) for suite in suites]
print testSuite
result = unittest.TestResult()
testSuite.run(result)
print result
#Ok, at this point I have a result
#How do I display it as the normal unit test command line output?
if __name__ == "__main__":
unittest.main()
This also did not work, but it seems so close!
$ python all_test.py
<unittest.TestSuite tests=[<unittest.TestSuite tests=[<unittest.TestSuite tests=[<test_main.TestMain testMethod=test_respondes_to_get>]>]>]>
<unittest.TestResult run=1 errors=0 failures=0>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 0 tests in 0.000s
OK
I seem to have a suite of some sort, and I can execute the result. I am a little concerned about the fact that it says I have only run=1, seems like that should be run=2, but it is progress. But how do I pass and display the result to main? Or how do I basically get it working so I can just run this file, and in doing so, run all the unit tests in this directory?
With Python 2.7 and higher you don't have to write new code or use third-party tools to do this; recursive test execution via the command line is built-in. Put an __init__.py in your test directory and:
python -m unittest discover <test_directory>
# or
python -m unittest discover -s <directory> -p '*_test.py'
You can read more in the python 2.7
or python 3.x unittest documentation.
Update for 2021:
Lots of modern python projects use more advanced tools like pytest. For example, pull down matplotlib or scikit-learn and you will see they both use it.
It is important to know about these newer tools because when you have more than 7000 tests you need:
more advanced ways to summarize what passes, skipped, warnings, errors
easy ways to see how they failed
percent complete as it is running
total run time
ways to generate a test report
etc etc
In python 3, if you're using unittest.TestCase:
You must have an empty (or otherwise) __init__.py file in your test directory (must be named test/)
Your test files inside test/ match the pattern test_*.py.
They can be inside a subdirectory under test/. Those subdirs can be named as anything, but they all need to have an __init__.py file in them
Then, you can run all the tests with:
python -m unittest
Done! A solution less than 100 lines. Hopefully another python beginner saves time by finding this.
You could use a test runner that would do this for you. nose is very good for example. When run, it will find tests in the current tree and run them.
Updated:
Here's some code from my pre-nose days. You probably don't want the explicit list of module names, but maybe the rest will be useful to you.
testmodules = [
'cogapp.test_makefiles',
'cogapp.test_whiteutils',
'cogapp.test_cogapp',
]
suite = unittest.TestSuite()
for t in testmodules:
try:
# If the module defines a suite() function, call it to get the suite.
mod = __import__(t, globals(), locals(), ['suite'])
suitefn = getattr(mod, 'suite')
suite.addTest(suitefn())
except (ImportError, AttributeError):
# else, just load all the test cases from the module.
suite.addTest(unittest.defaultTestLoader.loadTestsFromName(t))
unittest.TextTestRunner().run(suite)
This is now possible directly from unittest: unittest.TestLoader.discover.
import unittest
loader = unittest.TestLoader()
start_dir = 'path/to/your/test/files'
suite = loader.discover(start_dir)
runner = unittest.TextTestRunner()
runner.run(suite)
Well by studying the code above a bit (specifically using TextTestRunner and defaultTestLoader), I was able to get pretty close. Eventually I fixed my code by also just passing all test suites to a single suites constructor, rather than adding them "manually", which fixed my other problems. So here is my solution.
import glob
import unittest
test_files = glob.glob('test_*.py')
module_strings = [test_file[0:len(test_file)-3] for test_file in test_files]
suites = [unittest.defaultTestLoader.loadTestsFromName(test_file) for test_file in module_strings]
test_suite = unittest.TestSuite(suites)
test_runner = unittest.TextTestRunner().run(test_suite)
Yeah, it is probably easier to just use nose than to do this, but that is besides the point.
If you want to run all the tests from various test case classes and you're happy to specify them explicitly then you can do it like this:
from unittest import TestLoader, TextTestRunner, TestSuite
from uclid.test.test_symbols import TestSymbols
from uclid.test.test_patterns import TestPatterns
if __name__ == "__main__":
loader = TestLoader()
tests = [
loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(test)
for test in (TestSymbols, TestPatterns)
]
suite = TestSuite(tests)
runner = TextTestRunner(verbosity=2)
runner.run(suite)
where uclid is my project and TestSymbols and TestPatterns are subclasses of TestCase.
I have used the discover method and an overloading of load_tests to achieve this result in a (minimal, I think) number lines of code:
def load_tests(loader, tests, pattern):
''' Discover and load all unit tests in all files named ``*_test.py`` in ``./src/``
'''
suite = TestSuite()
for all_test_suite in unittest.defaultTestLoader.discover('src', pattern='*_tests.py'):
for test_suite in all_test_suite:
suite.addTests(test_suite)
return suite
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()
Execution on fives something like
Ran 27 tests in 0.187s
OK
I tried various approaches but all seem flawed or I have to makeup some code, that's annoying. But there's a convinient way under linux, that is simply to find every test through certain pattern and then invoke them one by one.
find . -name 'Test*py' -exec python '{}' \;
and most importantly, it definitely works.
In case of a packaged library or application, you don't want to do it. setuptools will do it for you.
To use this command, your project’s tests must be wrapped in a unittest test suite by either a function, a TestCase class or method, or a module or package containing TestCase classes. If the named suite is a module, and the module has an additional_tests() function, it is called and the result (which must be a unittest.TestSuite) is added to the tests to be run. If the named suite is a package, any submodules and subpackages are recursively added to the overall test suite.
Just tell it where your root test package is, like:
setup(
# ...
test_suite = 'somepkg.test'
)
And run python setup.py test.
File-based discovery may be problematic in Python 3, unless you avoid relative imports in your test suite, because discover uses file import. Even though it supports optional top_level_dir, but I had some infinite recursion errors. So a simple solution for a non-packaged code is to put the following in __init__.py of your test package (see load_tests Protocol).
import unittest
from . import foo, bar
def load_tests(loader, tests, pattern):
suite = unittest.TestSuite()
suite.addTests(loader.loadTestsFromModule(foo))
suite.addTests(loader.loadTestsFromModule(bar))
return suite
This is an old question, but what worked for me now (in 2019) is:
python -m unittest *_test.py
All my test files are in the same folder as the source files and they end with _test.
I use PyDev/LiClipse and haven't really figured out how to run all tests at once from the GUI. (edit: you right click the root test folder and choose Run as -> Python unit-test
This is my current workaround:
import unittest
def load_tests(loader, tests, pattern):
return loader.discover('.')
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()
I put this code in a module called all in my test directory. If I run this module as a unittest from LiClipse then all tests are run. If I ask to only repeat specific or failed tests then only those tests are run. It doesn't interfere with my commandline test runner either (nosetests) -- it's ignored.
You may need to change the arguments to discover based on your project setup.
Based on the answer of Stephen Cagle I added support for nested test modules.
import fnmatch
import os
import unittest
def all_test_modules(root_dir, pattern):
test_file_names = all_files_in(root_dir, pattern)
return [path_to_module(str) for str in test_file_names]
def all_files_in(root_dir, pattern):
matches = []
for root, dirnames, filenames in os.walk(root_dir):
for filename in fnmatch.filter(filenames, pattern):
matches.append(os.path.join(root, filename))
return matches
def path_to_module(py_file):
return strip_leading_dots( \
replace_slash_by_dot( \
strip_extension(py_file)))
def strip_extension(py_file):
return py_file[0:len(py_file) - len('.py')]
def replace_slash_by_dot(str):
return str.replace('\\', '.').replace('/', '.')
def strip_leading_dots(str):
while str.startswith('.'):
str = str[1:len(str)]
return str
module_names = all_test_modules('.', '*Tests.py')
suites = [unittest.defaultTestLoader.loadTestsFromName(mname) for mname
in module_names]
testSuite = unittest.TestSuite(suites)
runner = unittest.TextTestRunner(verbosity=1)
runner.run(testSuite)
The code searches all subdirectories of . for *Tests.py files which are then loaded. It expects each *Tests.py to contain a single class *Tests(unittest.TestCase) which is loaded in turn and executed one after another.
This works with arbitrary deep nesting of directories/modules, but each directory in between needs to contain an empty __init__.py file at least. This allows the test to load the nested modules by replacing slashes (or backslashes) by dots (see replace_slash_by_dot).
I just created a discover.py file in my base test directory and added import statements for anything in my sub directories. Then discover is able to find all my tests in those directories by running it on discover.py
python -m unittest discover ./test -p '*.py'
# /test/discover.py
import unittest
from test.package1.mod1 import XYZTest
from test.package1.package2.mod2 import ABCTest
...
if __name__ == "__main__"
unittest.main()
Encountered the same issue.
The solution is to add an empty __init__.py to each folder and uses python -m unittest discover -s
Project Structure
tests/
__init__.py
domain/
value_object/
__init__.py
test_name.py
__init__.py
presentation/
__init__.py
test_app.py
And running the command
python -m unittest discover -s tests/domain
To get the expected outcome
.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.007s
Because Test discovery seems to be a complete subject, there is some dedicated framework to test discovery :
nose
Py.Test
More reading here : https://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonTestingToolsTaxonomy
This BASH script will execute the python unittest test directory from ANYWHERE in the file system, no matter what working directory you are in: its working directory always be where that test directory is located.
ALL TESTS, independent $PWD
unittest Python module is sensitive to your current directory, unless you tell it where (using discover -s option).
This is useful when staying in the ./src or ./example working directory and you need a quick overall unit test:
#!/bin/bash
this_program="$0"
dirname="`dirname $this_program`"
readlink="`readlink -e $dirname`"
python -m unittest discover -s "$readlink"/test -v
SELECTED TESTS, independent $PWD
I name this utility file: runone.py and use it like this:
runone.py <test-python-filename-minus-dot-py-fileextension>
#!/bin/bash
this_program="$0"
dirname="`dirname $this_program`"
readlink="`readlink -e $dirname`"
(cd "$dirname"/test; python -m unittest $1)
No need for a test/__init__.py file to burden your package/memory-overhead during production.
I have no package and as mentioned on this page, this is creating issue while issing dicovery. So, I used the following solution. All the test result will be put in a given output folder.
RunAllUT.py:
"""
The given script is executing all the Unit Test of the project stored at the
path %relativePath2Src% currently fixed coded for the given project.
Prerequired:
- Anaconda should be install
- For the current user, an enviornment called "mtToolsEnv" should exists
- xmlrunner Library should be installed
"""
import sys
import os
import xmlrunner
from Repository import repository
relativePath2Src="./../.."
pythonPath=r'"C:\Users\%USERNAME%\.conda\envs\YourConfig\python.exe"'
outputTestReportFolder=os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))+r'\test-reports' #subfolder in current file path
class UTTesting():
"""
Class tto run all the UT of the project
"""
def __init__(self):
"""
Initiate instance
Returns
-------
None.
"""
self.projectRepository = repository()
self.UTfile = [] #List all file
def retrieveAllUT(self):
"""
Generate the list of UT file in the project
Returns
-------
None.
"""
print(os.path.realpath(relativePath2Src))
self.projectRepository.retriveAllFilePaths(relativePath2Src)
#self.projectRepository.printAllFile() #debug
for file2scan in self.projectRepository.devfile:
if file2scan.endswith("_UT.py"):
self.UTfile.append(file2scan)
print(self.projectRepository.devfilepath[file2scan]+'/'+file2scan)
def runUT(self,UTtoRun):
"""
Run a single UT
Parameters
----------
UTtoRun : String
File Name of the UT
Returns
-------
None.
"""
print(UTtoRun)
if UTtoRun in self.projectRepository.devfilepath:
UTtoRunFolderPath=os.path.realpath(os.path.join(self.projectRepository.devfilepath[UTtoRun]))
UTtoRunPath = os.path.join(UTtoRunFolderPath, UTtoRun)
print(UTtoRunPath)
#set the correct execution context & run the test
os.system(" cd " + UTtoRunFolderPath + \
" & " + pythonPath + " " + UTtoRunPath + " " + outputTestReportFolder )
def runAllUT(self):
"""
Run all the UT contained in self
The function "retrieveAllUT" sjould ahve been performed before
Returns
-------
None.
"""
for UTfile in self.UTfile:
self.runUT(UTfile)
if __name__ == "__main__":
undertest=UTTesting()
undertest.retrieveAllUT()
undertest.runAllUT()
In my project specific, I have a class that I used in other script. This might be an overkill for your usecase.
Repository.py
import os
class repository():
"""
Class that decribed folder and file in a repository
"""
def __init__(self):
"""
Initiate instance
Returns
-------
None.
"""
self.devfile = [] #List all file
self.devfilepath = {} #List all file paths
def retriveAllFilePaths(self,pathrepo):
"""
Retrive all files and their path in the class
Parameters
----------
pathrepo : Path used for the parsin
Returns
-------
None.
"""
for path, subdirs, files in os.walk(pathrepo):
for file_name in files:
self.devfile.append(file_name)
self.devfilepath[file_name] = path
def printAllFile(self):
"""
Display all file with paths
Parameters
----------
def printAllFile : TYPE
DESCRIPTION.
Returns
-------
None.
"""
for file_loop in self.devfile:
print(self.devfilepath[file_loop]+'/'+file_loop)
In your test files, you need to have a main like this:
if __name__ == "__main__":
import xmlrunner
import sys
if len(sys.argv) > 1:
outputFolder = sys.argv.pop() #avoid conflic with unittest.main
else:
outputFolder = r'test-reports'
print("Report will be created and store there: " + outputFolder)
unittest.main(testRunner=xmlrunner.XMLTestRunner(output=outputFolder))
Here is my approach by creating a wrapper to run tests from the command line:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import os, sys, unittest, argparse, inspect, logging
if __name__ == '__main__':
# Parse arguments.
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(add_help=False)
parser.add_argument("-?", "--help", action="help", help="show this help message and exit" )
parser.add_argument("-v", "--verbose", action="store_true", dest="verbose", help="increase output verbosity" )
parser.add_argument("-d", "--debug", action="store_true", dest="debug", help="show debug messages" )
parser.add_argument("-h", "--host", action="store", dest="host", help="Destination host" )
parser.add_argument("-b", "--browser", action="store", dest="browser", help="Browser driver.", choices=["Firefox", "Chrome", "IE", "Opera", "PhantomJS"] )
parser.add_argument("-r", "--reports-dir", action="store", dest="dir", help="Directory to save screenshots.", default="reports")
parser.add_argument('files', nargs='*')
args = parser.parse_args()
# Load files from the arguments.
for filename in args.files:
exec(open(filename).read())
# See: http://codereview.stackexchange.com/q/88655/15346
def make_suite(tc_class):
testloader = unittest.TestLoader()
testnames = testloader.getTestCaseNames(tc_class)
suite = unittest.TestSuite()
for name in testnames:
suite.addTest(tc_class(name, cargs=args))
return suite
# Add all tests.
alltests = unittest.TestSuite()
for name, obj in inspect.getmembers(sys.modules[__name__]):
if inspect.isclass(obj) and name.startswith("FooTest"):
alltests.addTest(make_suite(obj))
# Set-up logger
verbose = bool(os.environ.get('VERBOSE', args.verbose))
debug = bool(os.environ.get('DEBUG', args.debug))
if verbose or debug:
logging.basicConfig( stream=sys.stdout )
root = logging.getLogger()
root.setLevel(logging.INFO if verbose else logging.DEBUG)
ch = logging.StreamHandler(sys.stdout)
ch.setLevel(logging.INFO if verbose else logging.DEBUG)
ch.setFormatter(logging.Formatter('%(asctime)s %(levelname)s: %(name)s: %(message)s'))
root.addHandler(ch)
else:
logging.basicConfig(stream=sys.stderr)
# Run tests.
result = unittest.TextTestRunner(verbosity=2).run(alltests)
sys.exit(not result.wasSuccessful())
For sake of simplicity, please excuse my non-PEP8 coding standards.
Then you can create BaseTest class for common components for all your tests, so each of your test would simply look like:
from BaseTest import BaseTest
class FooTestPagesBasic(BaseTest):
def test_foo(self):
driver = self.driver
driver.get(self.base_url + "/")
To run, you simply specifying tests as part of the command line arguments, e.g.:
./run_tests.py -h http://example.com/ tests/**/*.py