how to send event to main thread in jupyter notebook - python

I'm using threading and I want to start a tkinter loop within a secondary thread.
I've learnt that this causes troubles, and that tkinter should be run always in the main thread.
I wonder if it is possible to send ann event to the main thread from a secondary thread.
I've come with a solution like this, which involves sending a signal from the secondary thread setting a main class-variable, as a condition to run the code I want to be run in the main thread:
import threading as th
import tkinter as tk
class Interfaz:
def __init__(self):
self.lock=False
th.Thread(name='main_th',target=main).start()
while True:
if self.lock==False:
if 'main_th' not in [t.getName() for t in th.enumerate()]:
th.Thread(name='main_th',target=main).start()
else:
pass
else:
self.stkinter()
def main(self):
if user_click() == True:
self.lock==True
#send_tkinter_to_main_thread()...
else:
show_or_update_interfaz()
do_something_else()
def stkinter(self):
self.master=tk.Tk()
tk.Button(self.master,command=self.Done).grid()
self.master.mainloop()
def Done(self):
self.master.destroy()
self.lock=False
What I would like to do is to excecute 'stkinter' from 'main', sending it to the main thread... is that possible?

Related

tkinter, master window does not loop after I start a thread [duplicate]

My interface is freezing on pressing the button. I am using threading but I am not sure why is still hanging. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks in advance
class magic:
def __init__(self):
self.mainQueue=queue.Queue()
def addItem(self,q):
self.mainQueue.put(q)
def startConverting(self,funcName):
if(funcName=="test"):
while not self.mainQueue.empty():
t = Thread(target = self.threaded_function)
t.start()
t.join()
def threaded_function(self):
time.sleep(5)
print(self.mainQueue.get())
m=magic()
def helloCallBack():
m.addItem("asd")
m.startConverting("test") //this line of code is freezing
B = tkinter.Button(top, text ="Hello", command = helloCallBack)
B.pack()
top.mainloop()
Here's a recipe for doing an asynchronous task with a tkinter-based GUI. I adapted it from a recipe in the cited book. You should be able to modify it to do what you need.
To keep the GUI responsive requires not interfering with its mainloop() by doing something like join()ing a background thread—which makes the GUI "hang" until the thread is finished. This is accomplished by using the universal after() widget method to poll a Queue at regular intervals.
# from "Python Coobook 2nd Edition", section 11.9, page 439.
# Modified to work in Python 2 & 3.
from __future__ import print_function
try:
import Tkinter as tk, time, threading, random, Queue as queue
except ModuleNotFoundError: # Python 3
import tkinter as tk, time, threading, random, queue
class GuiPart(object):
def __init__(self, master, queue, end_command):
self.queue = queue
# Set up the GUI
tk.Button(master, text='Done', command=end_command).pack()
# Add more GUI stuff here depending on your specific needs
def processIncoming(self):
""" Handle all messages currently in the queue, if any. """
while self.queue.qsize():
try:
msg = self.queue.get_nowait()
# Check contents of message and do whatever is needed. As a
# simple example, let's print it (in real life, you would
# suitably update the GUI's display in a richer fashion).
print(msg)
except queue.Empty:
# just on general principles, although we don't expect this
# branch to be taken in this case, ignore this exception!
pass
class ThreadedClient(object):
"""
Launch the main part of the GUI and the worker thread. periodic_call()
and end_application() could reside in the GUI part, but putting them
here means that you have all the thread controls in a single place.
"""
def __init__(self, master):
"""
Start the GUI and the asynchronous threads. We are in the main
(original) thread of the application, which will later be used by
the GUI as well. We spawn a new thread for the worker (I/O).
"""
self.master = master
# Create the queue
self.queue = queue.Queue()
# Set up the GUI part
self.gui = GuiPart(master, self.queue, self.end_application)
# Set up the thread to do asynchronous I/O
# More threads can also be created and used, if necessary
self.running = True
self.thread1 = threading.Thread(target=self.worker_thread1)
self.thread1.start()
# Start the periodic call in the GUI to check the queue
self.periodic_call()
def periodic_call(self):
""" Check every 200 ms if there is something new in the queue. """
self.master.after(200, self.periodic_call)
self.gui.processIncoming()
if not self.running:
# This is the brutal stop of the system. You may want to do
# some cleanup before actually shutting it down.
import sys
sys.exit(1)
def worker_thread1(self):
"""
This is where we handle the asynchronous I/O. For example, it may be
a 'select()'. One important thing to remember is that the thread has
to yield control pretty regularly, be it by select or otherwise.
"""
while self.running:
# To simulate asynchronous I/O, create a random number at random
# intervals. Replace the following two lines with the real thing.
time.sleep(rand.random() * 1.5)
msg = rand.random()
self.queue.put(msg)
def end_application(self):
self.running = False # Stops worker_thread1 (invoked by "Done" button).
rand = random.Random()
root = tk.Tk()
client = ThreadedClient(root)
root.mainloop()
For anyone having a problem with sys.exit(1) in #martineau's code - if you replace sys.exit(1) with self.master.destroy() the program ends gracefully. I lack the reputation to add a comment, hence the seperate answer.

How do I exit my python3 application cleanly from asyncio event loop run_forever() when user clicks tkinter root window close box?

I'm trying to make a python3 application for my Raspberry Pi 4B and I have the tkinter windows working fine, but need to add asynchronous handling to allow tkinter widgets to respond while processing asynchronous actions initiated by the window's widgets.
The test code is using asyncio and tkinter. However, without root.mainloop(), since asyncio loop.run_forever() is called at the end instead. The idea is that when the user clicks the main window's close box, RequestQuit() gets called to set the quitRequested flag and then when control returns to the event loop, root.after_idle(AfterIdle) would cause AfterIdle to be called, where the flag is checked and if true, the event loop is stopped, or that failing, the app is killed with exit(0).
The loop WM_DELETE_WINDOW protocol coroutine RequestQuit is somehow not getting called when the user clicks the main window close box, so the AfterIdle coroutine never gets the flag to quit and I have to kill the app by quitting XQuartz.
I'm using ssh via Terminal on MacOS X Big Sur 11.5.2, connected to a Raspberry Pi 4B with Python 3.7.3.
What have I missed here?
(I haven't included the widgets or their handlers or the asynchronous processing here, for brevity, since they aren't part of the problem at hand.)
from tkinter import *
from tkinter import messagebox
import aiotkinter
import asyncio
afterIdleProcessingIntervalMsec = 500 # Adjust for UI responsiveness here.
busyProcessing = False
quitRequested = False
def RequestQuit():
global quitRequested
global busyProcessing
if busyProcessing:
answer = messagebox.askquestion('Exit application', 'Do you really want to abort the ongoing processing?', icon='warning')
if answer == 'yes':
quitRequested = True
def AfterIdle():
global quitRequested
global loop
global root
if not quitRequested:
root.after(afterIdleProcessingIntervalMsec, AfterIdle)
else:
print("Destroying GUI at: ", time.time())
try:
loop.stop()
root.destroy()
except:
exit(0)
if __name__ == '__main__':
global root
global loop
asyncio.set_event_loop_policy(aiotkinter.TkinterEventLoopPolicy())
loop = asyncio.get_event_loop()
root = Tk()
root.protocol("WM_DELETE_WINDOW", RequestQuit)
root.after_idle(AfterIdle)
# Create and pack widgets here.
loop.run_forever()
The reason why your program doesn't work is that there is no Tk event loop, or its equivalent. Without it, Tk will not process events; no Tk callback functions will run. So your program doesn't respond to the WM_DELETE_WINDOW event, or any other.
Fortunately Tk can be used to perform the equivalent of an event loop as an asyncio.Task, and it's not even difficult. The basic concept is to write a function like this, where "w" is any tk widget:
async def new_tk_loop():
while some_boolean:
w.update()
await asyncio.sleep(sleep_interval_in_seconds)
This function should be created as an asyncio.Task when you are ready to start processing tk events, and should continue to run until you are ready to stop doing that.
Here is a class, TkPod, that I use as the basic foundation of any Tk + asyncio program. There is also a trivial little demo program, illustrating how to close the Tk loop from another Task. If you click the "X" before 5 seconds pass, the program will close immediately by exiting the mainloop function. After 5 seconds the program will close by cancelling the mainloop task.
I use a default sleep interval of 0.05 seconds, which seems to work pretty well.
When exiting such a program there are a few things to think about.
When you click on the "X" button on the main window, the object sets its app_closing variable to false. If you need to do some other clean-up, you can subclass Tk and over-ride the method close_app.
Exiting the mainloop doesn't call the destroy function. If you need to do that, you must do it separately. The class is a context manager, so you can make sure that destroy is called using a with block.
Like any asyncio Task, mainloop can be cancelled. If you do that, you need to catch that exception to avoid a traceback.
#! python3.8
import asyncio
import tkinter as tk
class TkPod(tk.Tk):
def __init__(self, sleep_interval=0.05):
self.sleep_interval = sleep_interval
self.app_closing = False
self.loop = asyncio.get_event_loop()
super().__init__()
self.protocol("WM_DELETE_WINDOW", self.close_app)
# Globally suppress the Tk menu tear-off feature
# In the following line, "*tearOff" works as documented
# while "*tearoff" does not.
self.option_add("*tearOff", 0)
def __enter__(self):
return self
def __exit__(self, *_x):
self.destroy()
def close_app(self):
self.app_closing = True
# I don't know what the argument n is for.
# I include it here because pylint complains otherwise.
async def mainloop(self, _n=0):
while not self.app_closing:
self.update()
await asyncio.sleep(self.sleep_interval)
async def main():
async def die_in5s(t):
await asyncio.sleep(5.0)
t.cancel()
print("It's over...")
with TkPod() as root:
label = tk.Label(root, text="Hello")
label.grid()
t = asyncio.create_task(root.mainloop())
asyncio.create_task(die_in5s(t))
try:
await t
except asyncio.CancelledError:
pass
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())

Freezing/Hanging tkinter GUI in waiting for the thread to complete

My interface is freezing on pressing the button. I am using threading but I am not sure why is still hanging. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks in advance
class magic:
def __init__(self):
self.mainQueue=queue.Queue()
def addItem(self,q):
self.mainQueue.put(q)
def startConverting(self,funcName):
if(funcName=="test"):
while not self.mainQueue.empty():
t = Thread(target = self.threaded_function)
t.start()
t.join()
def threaded_function(self):
time.sleep(5)
print(self.mainQueue.get())
m=magic()
def helloCallBack():
m.addItem("asd")
m.startConverting("test") //this line of code is freezing
B = tkinter.Button(top, text ="Hello", command = helloCallBack)
B.pack()
top.mainloop()
Here's a recipe for doing an asynchronous task with a tkinter-based GUI. I adapted it from a recipe in the cited book. You should be able to modify it to do what you need.
To keep the GUI responsive requires not interfering with its mainloop() by doing something like join()ing a background thread—which makes the GUI "hang" until the thread is finished. This is accomplished by using the universal after() widget method to poll a Queue at regular intervals.
# from "Python Coobook 2nd Edition", section 11.9, page 439.
# Modified to work in Python 2 & 3.
from __future__ import print_function
try:
import Tkinter as tk, time, threading, random, Queue as queue
except ModuleNotFoundError: # Python 3
import tkinter as tk, time, threading, random, queue
class GuiPart(object):
def __init__(self, master, queue, end_command):
self.queue = queue
# Set up the GUI
tk.Button(master, text='Done', command=end_command).pack()
# Add more GUI stuff here depending on your specific needs
def processIncoming(self):
""" Handle all messages currently in the queue, if any. """
while self.queue.qsize():
try:
msg = self.queue.get_nowait()
# Check contents of message and do whatever is needed. As a
# simple example, let's print it (in real life, you would
# suitably update the GUI's display in a richer fashion).
print(msg)
except queue.Empty:
# just on general principles, although we don't expect this
# branch to be taken in this case, ignore this exception!
pass
class ThreadedClient(object):
"""
Launch the main part of the GUI and the worker thread. periodic_call()
and end_application() could reside in the GUI part, but putting them
here means that you have all the thread controls in a single place.
"""
def __init__(self, master):
"""
Start the GUI and the asynchronous threads. We are in the main
(original) thread of the application, which will later be used by
the GUI as well. We spawn a new thread for the worker (I/O).
"""
self.master = master
# Create the queue
self.queue = queue.Queue()
# Set up the GUI part
self.gui = GuiPart(master, self.queue, self.end_application)
# Set up the thread to do asynchronous I/O
# More threads can also be created and used, if necessary
self.running = True
self.thread1 = threading.Thread(target=self.worker_thread1)
self.thread1.start()
# Start the periodic call in the GUI to check the queue
self.periodic_call()
def periodic_call(self):
""" Check every 200 ms if there is something new in the queue. """
self.master.after(200, self.periodic_call)
self.gui.processIncoming()
if not self.running:
# This is the brutal stop of the system. You may want to do
# some cleanup before actually shutting it down.
import sys
sys.exit(1)
def worker_thread1(self):
"""
This is where we handle the asynchronous I/O. For example, it may be
a 'select()'. One important thing to remember is that the thread has
to yield control pretty regularly, be it by select or otherwise.
"""
while self.running:
# To simulate asynchronous I/O, create a random number at random
# intervals. Replace the following two lines with the real thing.
time.sleep(rand.random() * 1.5)
msg = rand.random()
self.queue.put(msg)
def end_application(self):
self.running = False # Stops worker_thread1 (invoked by "Done" button).
rand = random.Random()
root = tk.Tk()
client = ThreadedClient(root)
root.mainloop()
For anyone having a problem with sys.exit(1) in #martineau's code - if you replace sys.exit(1) with self.master.destroy() the program ends gracefully. I lack the reputation to add a comment, hence the seperate answer.

Exiting a tkinter app with Ctrl-C and catching SIGINT

Ctrl-C/SIGTERM/SIGINT seem to be ignored by tkinter. Normally it can be captured again with a callback. This doesn't seem to be working, so I thought I'd run tkinter in another thread since its mainloop() is an infinite loop and blocks. I actually also want to do this to read from stdin in a separate thread. Even after this, Ctrl-C is still not processed until I close the window. Here's my MWE:
#! /usr/bin/env python
import Tkinter as tk
import threading
import signal
import sys
class MyTkApp(threading.Thread):
def run(self):
self.root = tk.Tk()
self.root.mainloop()
app = MyTkApp()
app.start()
def signal_handler(signal, frame):
sys.stderr.write("Exiting...\n")
# think only one of these is needed, not sure
app.root.destroy()
app.root.quit()
signal.signal(signal.SIGINT, signal_handler)
Results:
Run the app
Ctrl-C in the terminal (nothing happens)
Close the window
"Exiting..." is printed and I get an error about the loop already having exited.
What's going on here and how can I make Ctrl-C from the terminal close the app?
Update: Adding a poll, as suggested, works in the main thread but does not help when started in another thread...
class MyTkApp(threading.Thread):
def poll(self):
sys.stderr.write("poll\n")
self.root.after(50, self.poll)
def run(self):
self.root = tk.Tk()
self.root.after(50, self.poll)
self.root.mainloop()
here's a working example that catches control c in the windows or from the command line. this was tested with 3.7.2 this seems simpler than the other solutions. I almost feel like I'm missing something.
import tkinter as TK
import signal
def hello():
print("Hello")
root = TK.Tk()
TK.Button(root, text="Hi", command=(hello)).pack( )
def handler(event):
root.destroy()
print('caught ^C')
def check():
root.after(500, check) # time in ms.
# the or is a hack just because I've shoving all this in a lambda. setup before calling main loop
signal.signal(signal.SIGINT, lambda x,y : print('terminal ^C') or handler(None))
# this let's the terminal ^C get sampled every so often
root.after(500, check) # time in ms.
root.bind_all('<Control-c>', handler)
root.mainloop()
Since your tkinter app is running in another thread, you do not need to set up the signal handler in the main thread and just use the following code block after the app.start() statement:
import time
while app.is_alive():
try:
time.sleep(0.5)
except KeyboardInterrupt:
app.root.destroy()
break
You can then use Ctrl-C to raise the KeyboardInterrupt exception to close the tkinter app and break the while loop. The while loop will also be terminated if you close your tkinter app.
Note that the above code is working only in Python 2 (as you use Tkinter in your code).
Proper CTRL-C & SIGINT Usage in Python
The problem is that you are exiting the main thread, so the signal handler is basically useless. You need to keep it running, in a while loop, or my personal preference, Events from threading module. You can also just catch the KeyboardInterrupt exception generated by the CTRL-C event, rather than dealing with signal handlers.
SIGINT in Tkinter
Using tkinter, you must have the tkinter app run in a separate thread, so that it doesn't interfere with the signal handler or KeyboardInterrupt exception. In the handler, to exit, you need to destroy then update tkinter root. Update allows the tkinter to update so that it closes, without waiting for mainloop. Otherwise, user has to click on the active window to activate mainloop.
# Python 3
from tkinter import *
from threading import Thread
import signal
class MyTkApp(Thread):
def run(self):
self.root = Tk()
self.root.mainloop()
def sigint_handler(sig, frame):
app.root.quit()
app.root.update()
app = MyTkApp()
# Set signal before starting
signal.signal(signal.SIGINT, sigint_handler)
app.start()
Note: SIGINTs can also be caught if you set handler in same thread as tkinter mainloop, but you need to make tkinter window active after the signal so that it's mainloop can run. There is no way around this unless you run in new thread.
More Information on Tkinter & Command Line Communication
For more on communicating between tkinter and the command line, see Using Tkinter Without Mainloop. Basically, you can use update method in your loop, and then communicate with other threads and processes, etc. I would personally NOT recommend this, as you are essentially doing the job of the python thread control system, which is probably opposite of what you want to do. (python has a process that runs all internal threads in one external thread, so you are not taking advantage of multitheading, unless using multiprocessing module)
# Python 2
from Tkinter import *
ROOT = Tk()
LABEL = Label(ROOT, text="Hello, world!")
LABEL.pack()
LOOP_ACTIVE = True
while LOOP_ACTIVE:
ROOT.update()
USER_INPUT = raw_input("Give me your command! Just type \"exit\" to close: ")
if USER_INPUT == "exit":
ROOT.quit()
LOOP_ACTIVE = False
else:
LABEL = Label(ROOT, text=USER_INPUT)
LABEL.pack()

PyQT and threads

I am developing an application that uses multiple threads to gather data from a variety of network devices. I'm using PyQT to display the collected data on a GUI. I am using regular python threads (from thread, threading) in my app (instead of QThread). In order to update the GUI on the different threads, I use a lock (thread.allocate_lock()). So, anytime a GUI update will happen, I call with lock, update GUI. Any concerns about this?
I'm pretty sure that updating the GUI from different threads is dangerous in Qt, even if you try to lock things in your own code. For one thing, Qt might be doing its own event processing on the main thread, and it will not acquire your lock to protect objects that it might modify. On this page in the Qt docs, the fact that QWidget is not reentrant or thread-safe is explicitly mentioned.
I recommend that you post the collected data, or a processed version of it, back to the main thread. Use a queued signal/slot connection, or a custom QEvent and QApplication::postEvent to do this. In the previous question that jkerian mentions, it says that you'll have to use QThread instead of python's threads if you want event posting to work correctly.
This is a late reply but I wanted to share what I found. This is code from WickedDevice Blog that I found useful to understand threads and PyQt:
#authors: Dirk Swart, Doudewijn Rempt, Jacob Hallen
import sys, time, threading, random, Queue
from PyQt4 import QtGui, QtCore as qt
import serial
SERIALPORT = 'COM6'
class GuiPart(QtGui.QMainWindow):
def __init__(self, queue, endcommand, *args):
QtGui.QMainWindow.__init__(self, *args)
self.setWindowTitle('Arduino Serial Demo')
self.queue = queue
# We show the result of the thread in the gui, instead of the console
self.editor = QtGui.QTextEdit(self)
self.setCentralWidget(self.editor)
self.endcommand = endcommand
def closeEvent(self, ev):
self.endcommand()
def processIncoming(self):
"""
Handle all the messages currently in the queue (if any).
"""
while self.queue.qsize():
try:
msg = self.queue.get(0)
# Check contents of message and do what it says
# As a test, we simply print it
self.editor.insertPlainText(str(msg))
except Queue.Empty:
pass
class ThreadedClient:
"""
Launch the main part of the GUI and the worker thread. periodicCall and
endApplication could reside in the GUI part, but putting them here
means that you have all the thread controls in a single place.
"""
def __init__(self):
# Create the queue
self.queue = Queue.Queue()
# Set up the GUI part
self.gui=GuiPart(self.queue, self.endApplication)
self.gui.show()
# A timer to periodically call periodicCall :-)
self.timer = qt.QTimer()
qt.QObject.connect(self.timer,
qt.SIGNAL("timeout()"),
self.periodicCall)
# Start the timer -- this replaces the initial call to periodicCall
self.timer.start(100)
# Set up the thread to do asynchronous I/O
# More can be made if necessary
self.running = 1
self.thread1 = threading.Thread(target=self.workerThread1)
self.thread1.start()
def periodicCall(self):
"""
Check every 100 ms if there is something new in the queue.
"""
self.gui.processIncoming()
if not self.running:
root.quit()
def endApplication(self):
self.running = 0
def workerThread1(self):
"""
This is where we handle the asynchronous I/O.
Put your stuff here.
"""
while self.running:
#This is where we poll the Serial port.
#time.sleep(rand.random() * 0.3)
#msg = rand.random()
#self.queue.put(msg)
ser = serial.Serial(SERIALPORT, 115200)
msg = ser.readline();
if (msg):
self.queue.put(msg)
else: pass
ser.close()
if __name__ == "__main__":
#rand = random.Random()
root = QtGui.QApplication(sys.argv)
client = ThreadedClient()
sys.exit(app.exec_())
I use pyqtSignal and Python's threading. You can create threads and when the thread is completed have it send a signal to update your GUI.

Categories

Resources