I have a dataframe (called my_df1) and want to drop several rows based on certain dates. How can I create a new dataframe (my_df2) without the dates '2020-05-01' and '2020-05-04'?
I tried the following which did not work as you can see below:
my_df2 = mydf_1[(mydf_1['Date'] != '2020-05-01') | (mydf_1['Date'] != '2020-05-04')]
my_df2.head()
The problem seems to be with your logical operator.
You should be using and here instead of or since you have to select all the rows which are not 2020-05-01 and 2020-05-04.
The bitwise operators will not be short circuiting and hence the result.
You can use isin with negation ~ sign:
dates=['2020-05-01', '2020-05-04']
my_df2 = mydf_1[~mydf_1['Date'].isin(dates)]
The short explanation about your mistake AND and OR was addressed by kanmaytacker.
Following a few additional recommendations:
Indexing in pandas:
By label .loc
By index .iloc
By label also works without .loc but it's slower as it's composed of chained operations instead of a single internal operation consisting on nested loops (see here). Also, with .loc you can select on more than one axis at a time.
# example with rows. Same logic for columns or additional axis.
df.loc[(df['a']!=4) & (df['a']!=1),:] # ".loc" is the only addition
>>>
a b c
2 0 4 6
Your index is a boolean set. This is true for numpy and as a consecuence, pandas too.
(df['a']!=4) & (df['a']!=1)
>>>
0 False
1 False
2 True
Name: a, dtype: bool
How can I find the row for which the value of a specific column is maximal?
df.max() will give me the maximal value for each column, I don't know how to get the corresponding row.
Use the pandas idxmax function. It's straightforward:
>>> import pandas
>>> import numpy as np
>>> df = pandas.DataFrame(np.random.randn(5,3),columns=['A','B','C'])
>>> df
A B C
0 1.232853 -1.979459 -0.573626
1 0.140767 0.394940 1.068890
2 0.742023 1.343977 -0.579745
3 2.125299 -0.649328 -0.211692
4 -0.187253 1.908618 -1.862934
>>> df['A'].idxmax()
3
>>> df['B'].idxmax()
4
>>> df['C'].idxmax()
1
Alternatively you could also use numpy.argmax, such as numpy.argmax(df['A']) -- it provides the same thing, and appears at least as fast as idxmax in cursory observations.
idxmax() returns indices labels, not integers.
Example': if you have string values as your index labels, like rows 'a' through 'e', you might want to know that the max occurs in row 4 (not row 'd').
if you want the integer position of that label within the Index you have to get it manually (which can be tricky now that duplicate row labels are allowed).
HISTORICAL NOTES:
idxmax() used to be called argmax() prior to 0.11
argmax was deprecated prior to 1.0.0 and removed entirely in 1.0.0
back as of Pandas 0.16, argmax used to exist and perform the same function (though appeared to run more slowly than idxmax).
argmax function returned the integer position within the index of the row location of the maximum element.
pandas moved to using row labels instead of integer indices. Positional integer indices used to be very common, more common than labels, especially in applications where duplicate row labels are common.
For example, consider this toy DataFrame with a duplicate row label:
In [19]: dfrm
Out[19]:
A B C
a 0.143693 0.653810 0.586007
b 0.623582 0.312903 0.919076
c 0.165438 0.889809 0.000967
d 0.308245 0.787776 0.571195
e 0.870068 0.935626 0.606911
f 0.037602 0.855193 0.728495
g 0.605366 0.338105 0.696460
h 0.000000 0.090814 0.963927
i 0.688343 0.188468 0.352213
i 0.879000 0.105039 0.900260
In [20]: dfrm['A'].idxmax()
Out[20]: 'i'
In [21]: dfrm.iloc[dfrm['A'].idxmax()] # .ix instead of .iloc in older versions of pandas
Out[21]:
A B C
i 0.688343 0.188468 0.352213
i 0.879000 0.105039 0.900260
So here a naive use of idxmax is not sufficient, whereas the old form of argmax would correctly provide the positional location of the max row (in this case, position 9).
This is exactly one of those nasty kinds of bug-prone behaviors in dynamically typed languages that makes this sort of thing so unfortunate, and worth beating a dead horse over. If you are writing systems code and your system suddenly gets used on some data sets that are not cleaned properly before being joined, it's very easy to end up with duplicate row labels, especially string labels like a CUSIP or SEDOL identifier for financial assets. You can't easily use the type system to help you out, and you may not be able to enforce uniqueness on the index without running into unexpectedly missing data.
So you're left with hoping that your unit tests covered everything (they didn't, or more likely no one wrote any tests) -- otherwise (most likely) you're just left waiting to see if you happen to smack into this error at runtime, in which case you probably have to go drop many hours worth of work from the database you were outputting results to, bang your head against the wall in IPython trying to manually reproduce the problem, finally figuring out that it's because idxmax can only report the label of the max row, and then being disappointed that no standard function automatically gets the positions of the max row for you, writing a buggy implementation yourself, editing the code, and praying you don't run into the problem again.
You might also try idxmax:
In [5]: df = pandas.DataFrame(np.random.randn(10,3),columns=['A','B','C'])
In [6]: df
Out[6]:
A B C
0 2.001289 0.482561 1.579985
1 -0.991646 -0.387835 1.320236
2 0.143826 -1.096889 1.486508
3 -0.193056 -0.499020 1.536540
4 -2.083647 -3.074591 0.175772
5 -0.186138 -1.949731 0.287432
6 -0.480790 -1.771560 -0.930234
7 0.227383 -0.278253 2.102004
8 -0.002592 1.434192 -1.624915
9 0.404911 -2.167599 -0.452900
In [7]: df.idxmax()
Out[7]:
A 0
B 8
C 7
e.g.
In [8]: df.loc[df['A'].idxmax()]
Out[8]:
A 2.001289
B 0.482561
C 1.579985
Both above answers would only return one index if there are multiple rows that take the maximum value. If you want all the rows, there does not seem to have a function.
But it is not hard to do. Below is an example for Series; the same can be done for DataFrame:
In [1]: from pandas import Series, DataFrame
In [2]: s=Series([2,4,4,3],index=['a','b','c','d'])
In [3]: s.idxmax()
Out[3]: 'b'
In [4]: s[s==s.max()]
Out[4]:
b 4
c 4
dtype: int64
df.iloc[df['columnX'].argmax()]
argmax() would provide the index corresponding to the max value for the columnX. iloc can be used to get the row of the DataFrame df for this index.
A more compact and readable solution using query() is like this:
import pandas as pd
df = pandas.DataFrame(np.random.randn(5,3),columns=['A','B','C'])
print(df)
# find row with maximum A
df.query('A == A.max()')
It also returns a DataFrame instead of Series, which would be handy for some use cases.
Very simple: we have df as below and we want to print a row with max value in C:
A B C
x 1 4
y 2 10
z 5 9
In:
df.loc[df['C'] == df['C'].max()] # condition check
Out:
A B C
y 2 10
If you want the entire row instead of just the id, you can use df.nlargest and pass in how many 'top' rows you want and you can also pass in for which column/columns you want it for.
df.nlargest(2,['A'])
will give you the rows corresponding to the top 2 values of A.
use df.nsmallest for min values.
The direct ".argmax()" solution does not work for me.
The previous example provided by #ely
>>> import pandas
>>> import numpy as np
>>> df = pandas.DataFrame(np.random.randn(5,3),columns=['A','B','C'])
>>> df
A B C
0 1.232853 -1.979459 -0.573626
1 0.140767 0.394940 1.068890
2 0.742023 1.343977 -0.579745
3 2.125299 -0.649328 -0.211692
4 -0.187253 1.908618 -1.862934
>>> df['A'].argmax()
3
>>> df['B'].argmax()
4
>>> df['C'].argmax()
1
returns the following message :
FutureWarning: 'argmax' is deprecated, use 'idxmax' instead. The behavior of 'argmax'
will be corrected to return the positional maximum in the future.
Use 'series.values.argmax' to get the position of the maximum now.
So that my solution is :
df['A'].values.argmax()
mx.iloc[0].idxmax()
This one line of code will give you how to find the maximum value from a row in dataframe, here mx is the dataframe and iloc[0] indicates the 0th index.
Considering this dataframe
[In]: df = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randn(4,3),columns=['A','B','C'])
[Out]:
A B C
0 -0.253233 0.226313 1.223688
1 0.472606 1.017674 1.520032
2 1.454875 1.066637 0.381890
3 -0.054181 0.234305 -0.557915
Assuming one want to know the rows where column "C" is max, the following will do the work
[In]: df[df['C']==df['C'].max()])
[Out]:
A B C
1 0.472606 1.017674 1.520032
The idmax of the DataFrame returns the label index of the row with the maximum value and the behavior of argmax depends on version of pandas (right now it returns a warning). If you want to use the positional index, you can do the following:
max_row = df['A'].values.argmax()
or
import numpy as np
max_row = np.argmax(df['A'].values)
Note that if you use np.argmax(df['A']) behaves the same as df['A'].argmax().
Use:
data.iloc[data['A'].idxmax()]
data['A'].idxmax() -finds max value location in terms of row
data.iloc() - returns the row
If there are ties in the maximum values, then idxmax returns the index of only the first max value. For example, in the following DataFrame:
A B C
0 1 0 1
1 0 0 1
2 0 0 0
3 0 1 1
4 1 0 0
idxmax returns
A 0
B 3
C 0
dtype: int64
Now, if we want all indices corresponding to max values, then we could use max + eq to create a boolean DataFrame, then use it on df.index to filter out indexes:
out = df.eq(df.max()).apply(lambda x: df.index[x].tolist())
Output:
A [0, 4]
B [3]
C [0, 1, 3]
dtype: object
what worked for me is:
df[df['colX'] == df['colX'].max()
You then get the row in your df with the maximum value of colX.
Then if you just want the index you can add .index at the end of the query.
This question already has answers here:
Pandas conditional creation of a series/dataframe column
(13 answers)
Closed 3 years ago.
I don't know how to right properly the following idea:
I have a dataframe that has two columns, and many many rows.
I want to create a new column based on the data in these two columns, such that if there's 1 in one of them the value will be 1, otherwise 0.
Something like that:
if (df['col1']==1 | df['col2']==1):
df['newCol']=1
else:
df['newCol']=0
I tried to use .loc function in different ways but i get different errors, so either I'm not using it correctly, or this is not the right solution...
Would appreciate your help. Thanks!
Simply use np.where or np.select
df['newCol'] = np.where((df['col1']==1 | df['col2']==1), 1, 0)
OR
df['newCol'] = np.select([cond1, cond2, cond3], [choice1, choice2, choice3], default=def_value)
When a particular condition is true replace with the corresponding choice(np.select).
one way to solve this using .loc,
df.loc[(df['col1'] == 1 | df['col2']==1) ,'newCol'] = 1
df['newCol'].fillna(0,inplace=True)
incase if you want newcol as string use,
df.loc[(df['col1'] == 1 | df['col2']==1) ,'newCol'] = '1'
df['newCol'].fillna('0',inplace=True)
or
df['newCol']=df['newCol'].astype(str)
This question already has answers here:
How to add multiple columns to pandas dataframe in one assignment?
(13 answers)
Closed 4 years ago.
I recently answered a question where the OP was looking multiple columns with multiple different values to an existing dataframe (link). And it's fairly succinct, but I don't think very fast.
Ultimately I was hoping I could do something like:
# Existing dataframe
df = pd.DataFrame({'a':[1,2]})
df[['b','c']] = 0
Which would result in:
a b c
1 0 0
2 0 0
But it throws an error.
Is there a super simple way to do this that I'm missing? Or is the answer I posted earlier the fastest / easiest way?
NOTE
I understand this could be done via loops, or via assigning scalars to multiple columns, but am trying to avoid that if possible. Assume 50 columns or whatever number you wouldn't want to write:
df['b'], df['c'], ..., df['xyz'] = 0, 0, ..., 0
Not a duplicate:
The "Possible duplicate" question suggested to this shows multiple different values assigned to each column. I'm simply asking if there is a very easy way to assign a single scalar value to multiple new columns. The answer could correctly and very simply be, "No" - but worth knowing so I can stop searching.
Why not using assign
df.assign(**dict.fromkeys(['b','c'],0))
Out[781]:
a b c
0 1 0 0
1 2 0 0
Or create the dict by d=dict(zip([namelist],[valuelist]))
I think you want to do
df['b'], df['c'] = 0, 0
For a df table like below,
A B C D
0 0 1 1 1
1 2 3 5 7
3 3 1 2 8
why are the double brackets needed for selecting specific columns after boolean indexing?
the [['A','C']] part of
df[df['A'] < 3][['A','C']]
For pandas objects (Series, DataFrame), the indexing operator [] only accepts
colname or list of colnames to select column(s)
slicing or Boolean array to select row(s), i.e. it only refers to one dimension of the dataframe.
For df[[colname(s)]], the interior brackets are for list, and the outside brackets are indexing operator, i.e. you must use double brackets if you select two or more columns. With one column name, single pair of brackets returns a Series, while double brackets return a dataframe.
Also, df.ix[df['A'] < 3,['A','C']] or df.loc[df['A'] < 3,['A','C']] is better than the chained selection for avoiding returning a copy versus a view of the dataframe.
Please refer pandas documentation for details
Because you have no columns named 'A','C', which is what you'd be trying to do which will raise a KeyError, so you have to use an iterable to sub-select from the df.
So
df[df['A'] < 3]['A','C']
raises
KeyError: ('A', 'C')
Which is different to
In [261]:
df[df['A'] < 3][['A','C']]
Out[261]:
A C
0 0 1
1 2 5
This is no different to trying:
df['A','C']
hence why you need double square brackets:
df[['A','C']]
Note that the modern way is to use .ix:
In [264]:
df.ix[df['A'] < 3,['A','C']]
Out[264]:
A C
0 0 1
1 2 5
So that you're operating on a view rather than potentially a copy
Because inner brackets are just python syntax (literal) for list.
The outer brackets are the indexer operation of pandas dataframe object.
In this use case inner ['A', 'B'] defines the list of columns to pass as single argument to the indexer operation, which is denoted by outer brackets.
Adding to previous responses, you could also use df.iloc accessor if you need to select index positions. It's also making the code more reproducible, which is nice.