Let's take this sample dataframe and this list of ids :
df=pd.DataFrame({'Id':['A','A','A','B','C','C','D','D'], 'Weight':[50,20,30,1,2,8,3,2], 'Value':[100,100,100,10,20,20,30,30]})
Id Weight Value
0 A 50 100
1 A 20 100
2 A 30 100
3 B 1 10
4 C 2 20
5 C 8 20
6 D 3 30
7 D 2 30
L = ['A','C']
Value column has same values for each id in Id column. For the specific ids of L, I would like to apply the weights of Weight column to Value column. I am currently doing the following way but it is extremely slow with my real big dataframe :
for i in L :
df.loc[df["Id"]==i,"Value"] = (df.loc[df["Id"]==i,"Value"] * df.loc[df["Id"]==i,"Weight"] /
df[df["Id"]==i]["Weight"].sum())
How please could I do that efficiently ?
Expected output :
Id Weight Value
0 A 50 50
1 A 20 20
2 A 30 30
3 B 1 10
4 C 2 4
5 C 8 16
6 D 3 30
7 D 2 30
Idea is working only for filtered rows by Series.isin with GroupBy.transform and sum for sum per groups with same size like original DataFrame:
L = ['A','C']
m = df['Id'].isin(L)
df1 = df[m].copy()
s = df1.groupby('Id')['Weight'].transform('sum')
df.loc[m, 'Value'] = df1['Value'].mul(df1['Weight']).div(s)
print (df)
Id Weight Value
0 A 50 50.0
1 A 20 20.0
2 A 30 30.0
3 B 1 10.0
4 C 2 4.0
5 C 8 16.0
6 D 3 30.0
7 D 2 30.0
Related
I am working on pandas manipulation and want to select only the last two rows for each column "B".
How to do without reset_index and filter (do inside groupby)
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame({
'A': list('aaabbbbcccc'),
'B': [0,1,2,5,7,2,1,4,1,0,2],
'V': range(10,120,10)
})
df
My attempt
df.groupby(['A','B'])['V'].sum()
Required output
A B
a
1 20
2 30
b
5 40
7 50
c
2 110
4 80
IIUC, you want to get the rows the highest two B per A.
You can compute a descending rank per group and keep those ≤ 2.
df[df.groupby('A')['B'].rank('first', ascending=False).le(2)]
Output:
A B V
1 a 1 20
2 a 2 30
3 b 5 40
4 b 7 50
7 c 4 80
10 c 2 110
Try:
df.sort_values(['A', 'B']).groupby(['A']).tail(2)
Output:
A B V
1 a 1 20
2 a 2 30
3 b 5 40
4 b 7 50
10 c 2 110
7 c 4 80
def function1(dd:pd.DataFrame):
return dd.sort_values('B').iloc[-2:,1:]
df.groupby(['A']).apply(function1).droplevel(1)
out
B V
A
a 1 20
a 2 30
b 5 40
b 7 50
c 2 110
c 4 80
I have the following dataframe:
df = pd.DataFrame({'timestamp' : [10,10,10,20,20,20], 'idx': [1,2,3,1,2,3], 'v1' : [1,2,4,5,1,9], 'v2' : [1,2,8,5,1,2]})
timestamp idx v1 v2
0 10 1 1 1
1 10 2 2 2
2 10 3 4 8
3 20 1 5 5
4 20 2 1 1
5 20 3 9 2
I'd like to group data by timestamp and calculate the following cumulative statistic:
np.sum(v1*v2) for every timestamp. I'd like to see the following result:
timestamp idx v1 v2 stat
0 10 1 1 1 37
1 10 2 2 2 37
2 10 3 4 8 37
3 20 1 5 5 44
4 20 2 1 1 44
5 20 3 9 2 44
I'm trying to do the following:
def calc_some_stat(d):
return np.sum(d.v1 * d.v2)
df.loc[:, 'stat'] = df.groupby('timestamp').apply(calc_some_stat)
But for stat columns I receive all NaN values - what is wrong in my code?
We want groupby transform here not groupby apply:
df['stat'] = (df['v1'] * df['v2']).groupby(df['timestamp']).transform('sum')
If we really want to use the function we need to join back to scale up the aggregated DataFrame:
def calc_some_stat(d):
return np.sum(d.v1 * d.v2)
df = df.join(
df.groupby('timestamp').apply(calc_some_stat)
.rename('stat'), # Needed to use join but also sets the col name
on='timestamp'
)
df:
timestamp idx v1 v2 stat
0 10 1 1 1 37
1 10 2 2 2 37
2 10 3 4 8 37
3 20 1 5 5 44
4 20 2 1 1 44
5 20 3 9 2 44
The issue is that groupby apply is producing summary information:
timestamp
10 37
20 44
dtype: int64
This does not assign back to the DataFrame naturally as there are only 2 rows when the initial DataFrame has 6. We either need to use join to scale these 2 rows up to align with the original DataFrame, or we can avoid all of this using groupby transform which is designed to produce a:
like-indexed DataFrame on each group and return a DataFrame having the same indexes as the original object filled with the transformed values
My input dataframe;
MinA MinB MaxA MaxB
0 1 2 5 7
1 1 0 8 6
2 2 15 15
3 3
4 10
I want to merge "min" and "max" columns amongst themselves with priority (A columns have more priority than B columns).
If both columns are null, they should have default values, for min=0 for max=100.
Desired output is;
MinA MinB MaxA MaxB Min Max
0 1 2 5 7 1 5
1 1 0 8 6 1 8
2 2 15 15 2 15
3 3 3 100
4 10 0 10
Could you please help me about this?
This can be accomplished using mask. With your data that would look like the following:
df = pd.DataFrame({
'MinA': [1,1,2,None,None],
'MinB': [2,0,None,3,None],
'MaxA': [5,8,15,None,None],
'MaxB': [7,6,15,None,10],
})
# Create new Column, using A as the base, if it is Nan, then use B.
# Then do the same again using specified values
df['Min'] = df['MinA'].mask(pd.isna, df['MinB']).mask(pd.isna, 0)
df['Max'] = df['MaxA'].mask(pd.isna, df['MaxB']).mask(pd.isna, 100)
The above would result in the desired output:
MinA MinB MaxA MaxB Min Max
0 1 2 5 7 1 5
1 1 0 8 6 1 8
2 2 NaN 15 15 2 15
3 NaN 3 NaN NaN 3 100
4 NaN NaN NaN 10 0 10
Just use fillna() will be fine.
df['Min'] = df['MinA'].fillna(df['MinB']).fillna(0)
df['Max'] = df['MaxA'].fillna(df['MaxB']).fillna(100)
I have a base dataframe df1:
id name count
1 a 10
2 b 20
3 c 30
4 d 40
5 e 50
Here I have a new dataframe with updates df2:
id name count
1 a 11
2 b 22
3 f 30
4 g 40
I want to overwrite and append these two dataframes on column name.
for Eg: a and b are present in df1 but also in df2 with updated count values. So we update df1 with new counts for a and b. Since f and g are not present in df1, so we append them.
Here is an example after the desired operation:
id name count
1 a 11
2 b 22
3 c 30
4 d 40
5 e 50
3 f 30
4 g 40
I tried df.merge or pd.concat but nothing seems to give me the output that I require.? Can any one
Using combine_first
df2=df2.set_index(['id','name'])
df2.combine_first(df1.set_index(['id','name'])).reset_index()
Out[198]:
id name count
0 1 a 11.0
1 2 b 22.0
2 3 c 30.0
3 3 f 30.0
4 4 d 40.0
5 4 g 40.0
6 5 e 50.0
I have a csv like
A,B,C,D
1,2,,
1,2,30,100
1,2,40,100
4,5,,
4,5,60,200
4,5,70,200
8,9,,
In row 1 and row 4 C value is missing (NaN). I want to take their value from row 2 and 5 respectively. (First occurrence of same A,B value).
If no matching row is found, just put 0 (like in last line)
Expected op:
A,B,C,D
1,2,30,
1,2,30,100
1,2,40,100
4,5,60,
4,5,60,200
4,5,70,200
8,9,0,
using fillna I found bfill: use NEXT valid observation to fill gap but the NEXT observation has to be taken logically (looking at col A,B values) and not just the upcoming C column value
You'll have to call df.groupby on A and B first and then apply the bfill function:
In [501]: df.C = df.groupby(['A', 'B']).apply(lambda x: x.C.bfill()).reset_index(drop=True)
In [502]: df
Out[502]:
A B C D
0 1 2 30 NaN
1 1 2 30 100.0
2 1 2 40 100.0
3 4 5 60 NaN
4 4 5 60 200.0
5 4 5 70 200.0
6 8 9 0 NaN
You can also group and then call dfGroupBy.bfill directly (I think this would be faster):
In [508]: df.C = df.groupby(['A', 'B']).C.bfill().fillna(0).astype(int); df
Out[508]:
A B C D
0 1 2 30 NaN
1 1 2 30 100.0
2 1 2 40 100.0
3 4 5 60 NaN
4 4 5 60 200.0
5 4 5 70 200.0
6 8 9 0 NaN
If you wish to get rid of NaNs in D, you could do:
df.D.fillna('', inplace=True)