How to find duplicate subtrees - python

I am having trouble find the duplicate subtrees.
In the following leetcode problem 652. Find Duplicate Subtrees
Given the root of a binary tree, return all duplicate subtrees. For each kind of duplicate subtrees, you only need to return the root node of any one of them. Two trees are duplicate if they have the same structure with the same node values.
My implementation is as follows:
# Definition for a binary tree node.
# class TreeNode:
# def __init__(self, val=0, left=None, right=None):
# self.val = val
# self.left = left
# self.right = right
class Solution:
def __init__(self):
self.duplicates = []
def isSameSubtree(self, left, right):
if left is None or right is None:
return True
elif left is None:
return False
elif right is None:
return False
if left.val != right.val:
return False
return self.isSameSubtree(left.left, right.left) or \
self.isSameSubtree(left.right, right.right)
def helper(self, node):
if node is None:
return node
left = self.helper(node.left)
right = self.helper(node.right)
if self.isSameSubtree(left, right):
self.duplicates.append(left)
return left
def findDuplicateSubtrees(self, root: Optional[TreeNode]) -> List[Optional[TreeNode]]:
self.helper(root)
return self.duplicates
My thought process was that I would check both left and right subtrees by passing each parent node of each subtree into isSameSubtree method. Problem is I don't feel like I am doing any of this correctly. What I want is to analyze both left and right subtrees by doing what I am doing in my helper function and when I go back up the stack and find a parent node with both left and right subtrees that match return that parent node.


Here is a solution that is related to Merkle Trees. In fact, we can define a helper function (no need to modify the Node or Tree class, although of course that is also a possibility if preferred) as follow:
def sign(t):
"""depth-first iterator; for each node, yield (hash, node) tuple"""
hashes = (hash(t.data), )
for c in t.children or []:
for h, n in sign(c):
yield h, n
hashes = hashes + (h, )
yield hash(hashes), t
Usage example, on a simplistic Node structure:
class Node:
def __init__(self, data, children=None):
self.data = data
self.children = children
def __repr__(self):
if self.children:
return f'{self.data}:{self.children}'
return str(self.data)
Then, for example:
t = Node('a', (Node('b', (Node('c'), Node('d'))), (Node('b', (Node('c'), Node('d'))))))
>>> t
a:(b:(c, d), b:(c, d))
>>> list(sign(t))
[(-8022040514780200320, c),
(-5838450013443269355, d),
(-6612941109014678970, b:(c, d)),
(-8022040514780200320, c),
(-5838450013443269355, d),
(-6612941109014678970, b:(c, d)),
(-3704690573080571573, a:(b:(c, d), b:(c, d)))]
As you can see, the subtrees Node('d') all have the same fingerprint: -5838450013443269355, and all b:(c, d) nodes have -6612941109014678970 (Note: actual numerical values will depend on your PYTHONHASHSEED, the values given here are just examples). One very nice property of this is to be very lightweight, it is O[n] for n nodes (there are no needlessly repeated hash computations).
From there, it is trivial to detect repeated subtrees:
seen = set()
for h, c in sign(t):
if h in seen:
print(f'duplicate: {c}')
seen.add(h)
# on the example tree above, this prints:
# duplicate: c
# duplicate: d
# duplicate: b:(c, d)
Note, if you are allowed to modify your Node structure, then the solution is even simpler: add this to your Node structure:
def __hash__(self):
return hash((self.data, tuple(hash(c) for c in self.children or [])))
def __eq__(self, other):
return isinstance(other, Node) and self.data == other.data and self.children == other.children
You can then compute the hash of any Node and compare for equality between nodes that have the same hash. In practice, your duplicate detection becomes:
def dupes(t, seen=None):
if seen is None:
seen = set()
for c in t.children or []:
yield from dupes(c, seen)
if t in seen:
yield t
else:
seen.add(t)
Example:
>>> list(dupes(t))
[c, d, b:(c, d)]

Related

Find matrix row elements in a binary tree

I am trying to write a function which given a binary search tree T of integers and a rectangular matrix M of integers, verify if there exists a row of M whose values belong to T.
This is my code:
M = [
[1, 2, 3],
[4, 5, 6]
]
class Tree:
def __init__(self, root=None, left=None, right=None):
self.root = root
self.left = left
self.rigth = right
def FindRowInTree(T, M):
if T is None:
return False
else:
for r in M:
for e in r:
if e == T.root and FindRowInTree(T.left, M) is True and FindRowInTree(T.right, M) is True:
return True
FindRowInTree(T.left, M) and FindRowInTree(T.right,M)
return False
t = Tree(4, Tree(5, None, None), Tree(6, None, None))
x = FindRowInTree(t, M)
print(x)
It always returns False.
What would I need to change to make it work properly?

Break the problem into pieces. First write a function to find a single value in the tree:
class Tree:
def __init__(self, root=None, left=None, right=None):
self.root = root
self.left = left
self.right = right
def __contains__(self, value):
return (
self.root == value
or self.left is not None and value in self.left
or self.right is not None and value in self.right
)
Note that with an ordered binary tree, you could make this function more efficient by having it only check left or right depending on how the value you're looking for compares to the root value; that's what a "binary search" is. Since your tree is unordered, though, you just need to search both children at each node, meaning you're traversing the entire tree.
In any case, once you have a function that looks up a single value, all you need to do is call it in a loop:
def find_row_in_tree(tree, matrix):
return any(
all(i in tree for i in row)
for row in matrix
)
If you're trying to do this in a more efficient way, an unordered binary tree is not doing you any favors; I'd just write a utility function to convert it to something more useful, like a set:
def tree_to_set(tree):
if tree is None:
return set()
return {tree.root} | tree_to_set(tree.left) | tree_to_set(tree.right)
def find_row_in_tree(tree, matrix):
tree_as_set = tree_to_set(tree)
return any(tree_as_set.issuperset(row) for row in matrix)

Leetcode Same Tree

I'm trying to solve same tree from leetcode with python.
original problem. https://leetcode.com/problems/same-tree/
My code was able to pass a few test cases but not all. It couldn't pass the submission. My idea is to flatten the tree and compare the two lists. The failed case is at the bottom of the code.
# Definition for a binary tree node.
# class TreeNode(object):
# def __init__(self, x):
# self.val = x
# self.left = None
# self.right = None
class Solution(object):
def isSameTree(self, p, q):
"""
:type p: TreeNode
:type q: TreeNode
:rtype: bool
"""
def flatten(root):
if root is None:
return ["null"]
if root.left is None and root.right is None:
return [root.val]
if root.left is None:
# print 'left', [root.val, "null", flatten(root.right)]
return [root.val, "null", flatten(root.right)]
if root.right is None:
# print 'right', [root.val, flatten(root.left), "null"]
return [root.val, flatten(root.left), "null"]
else:
# print flatten(root.right) + flatten(root.right)
return flatten(root.right) + flatten(root.right)
return flatten(p) == flatten(q)
## Failed test case
## [390,255,2266,-273,337,1105,3440,-425,4113,null,null,600,1355,3241,4731,-488,-367,16,null,565,780,1311,1755,3075,3392,4725,4817,null,null,null,null,-187,152,395,null,728,977,1270,null,1611,1786,2991,3175,3286,null,164,null,null,4864,-252,-95,82,null,391,469,638,769,862,1045,1138,null,1460,1663,null,1838,2891,null,null,null,null,3296,3670,4381,null,4905,null,null,null,-58,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,734,null,843,958,null,null,null,1163,1445,1533,null,null,null,2111,2792,null,null,null,3493,3933,4302,4488,null,null,null,null,null,null,819,null,null,null,null,1216,null,null,1522,null,1889,2238,2558,2832,null,3519,3848,4090,4165,null,4404,4630,null,null,null,null,null,null,1885,2018,2199,null,2364,2678,null,null,null,3618,3751,null,4006,null,null,4246,null,null,4554,null,null,null,1936,null,null,null,null,2444,2642,2732,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,4253,null,null,null,null,2393,2461,null,null,null,null,4250,null,null,null,null,2537]
## [390,255,2266,-273,337,1105,3440,-425,4113,null,null,600,1355,3241,4731,-488,-367,16,null,565,780,1311,1755,3075,3392,4725,4817,null,null,null,null,-187,152,395,null,728,977,1270,null,1611,1786,2991,3175,3286,null,164,null,null,4864,-252,-95,82,null,391,469,638,769,862,1045,1138,null,1460,1663,null,1838,2891,null,null,null,null,3296,3670,4381,null,4905,null,null,null,-58,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,734,null,843,958,null,null,null,1163,1445,1533,null,null,null,2111,2792,null,null,null,3493,3933,4302,4488,null,null,null,null,null,null,819,null,null,null,null,1216,null,null,1522,null,1889,2238,2558,2832,null,3519,3848,4090,4165,null,4404,4630,null,null,null,null,null,null,1885,2018,2199,null,2364,2678,null,null,null,3618,3751,null,4006,null,null,4246,null,null,4554,null,null,null,1936,null,null,null,null,2444,2642,2732,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,4253,null,null,null,null,2461,2393,null,null,null,null,4250,null,null,null,null,2537]

To determine if two trees are identical, you need to determine that the structure is the same i.e equal nodes at the same level and branch. You can write a recursive function that loops over the tree and creates a Huffman encoding, which can later be used to compare the nodes:
class Solution(object):
#classmethod
def tree_paths(cls, _tree:TreeNode, _paths = []):
yield [_tree.val, _paths]
if _tree.left is not None:
yield from cls.tree_paths(_tree.left, _paths+[0])
if _tree.right is not None:
yield from cls.tree_paths(_tree.right, _paths+[1])
def isSameTree(self, p, q):
if p is None and q is None:
return True
if not all([p, q]):
return False
_tree1, _tree2 = list(self.__class__.tree_paths(p)), list(self.__class__.tree_paths(q))
if len(_tree1) != len(_tree2):
return False
return all(a == b and all(c ==d for c, d in zip(j, l)) for [a, j], [b, l] in zip(_tree1, _tree2))
To test, a tree with the same attributes as the original TreeNode can be created:
class TreeNode:
def __init__(self, **kwargs:dict) -> None:
self.__dict__ = {i:kwargs.get(i) for i in ['val', 'left', 'right']}
t1 = TreeNode(val=1, left=TreeNode(val=2), right=TreeNode(val=3))
t2 = TreeNode(val=1, left=TreeNode(val=2), right=TreeNode(val=3))
t3 = TreeNode(val=1, left=TreeNode(val=2), right=TreeNode(val=4))
print(Solution().isSameTree(t1, t2))
print(Solution().isSameTree(t1, t3))
Output:
True
False
This answer was successfully accepted on LeetCode.
Edit: Your code is close, however, flatten(root.right) + flatten(root.right) must be changed, as you are finding the path of nodes on the right subtree twice. Also, you have to include the value of the current tree instance passed to isSameTree. Thus, flatten(root.right) + flatten(root.right) must become:
return flatten(root.left)+[root.val]+flatten(root.right)

How do I traverse binary tree made up of nodes? (code inside)

I am given a class that creates a binary tree filled with nodes.each node is given a parent and a pointer to its left or right child.
Binary tree node class:
class BTNode():
''' a class that represents a binary tree node'''
def __init__(self, data, parent=None, left_child=None, right_child=None):
'''(BTNode, obj, BTNode, BTNode, BTNode) -> NoneType
Constructs a binary tree nodes with the given data'''
self._parent = parent
self._left = left_child
self._data = data
self._right = right_child
def set_parent(self, parent):
'''(BTNode, BTNode) -> NoneType
set the parent to the given node'''
self._parent = parent
def set_left(self, left_child):
'''(BTNode, BTNode) -> NoneType
set the left child to the given node'''
self._left = left_child
def set_right(self, right_child):
'''(BTNode, BTNode) -> NoneType
set the right child to the given node'''
self._right = right_child
def set_data(self, data):
'''(BTNode, obj) -> NoneType
set the data at this node to the given data'''
self._data = data
def get_parent(self):
'''(BTNode) -> BTNode
return the pointer to the parent of this node'''
return self._parent
def get_left(self):
'''(BTNode) -> BTNode
return the pointer to the left child'''
return self._left
def get_right(self):
'''(BTNode) -> BTNode
return the pointer to the right child'''
return self._right
def get_data(self):
'''(BTNode) -> obj
return the data stored in this node'''
return self._data
def has_left(self):
'''(BTNode) -> bool
returns true if this node has a left child'''
return (self.get_left() is not None)
def has_right(self):
'''(BTNode) -> bool
returns true if this node has a right child'''
return (self.get_right() is not None)
def is_left(self):
'''(BTNode) -> bool
returns true if this node is a left child of its parent'''
# you need to take care of exception here, if the given node has not parent
return (self.get_parent().get_left() is self)
def is_right(self):
'''(BTNode) -> bool
returns true if the given node is a right child of its parent'''
# you need to take care of exception here, if the given node has not parent
return (self.get_parent().get_right() is self)
def is_root(self):
'''(BTNode) -> bool
returns true if the given node has not parent i.e. a root '''
return (self.get_parent() is None)
code example of how to create a tree:
''' create this BT using BTNode
A
/ \
B C
/\ \
D E F
/
G
'''
node_G = BTNode("G")
node_F = BTNode("F", None,node_G)
node_G.set_parent(node_F)
node_C = BTNode("C", None, None, node_F)
node_F.set_parent(node_C)
node_D = BTNode("D")
node_E = BTNode("E")
node_B = BTNode("B",None, node_D, node_E)
node_D.set_parent(node_B)
node_E.set_parent(node_B)
node_A = BTNode("A",None, node_B, node_C)
node_B.set_parent(node_A)
I dont know how to traverse this tree. I was suggested using recursion but Im not sure how. For example, I need to return True if the tree differs in height by at most 1 level,so the tree above would return true. How do I do this? Thanks!

Try to think recursively. Let's start off with a few definitions.
A tree is balanced if its left and right trees have the same height and each of it's subtrees is balanced. Also we will define an empty tree as being balanced.
The height of a tree, h(t) = 1 + max(h(t.left), h(t.right)). In English, the height of a tree is 1 + the height of its taller child tree. Also we will assume that an empty tree has a height of 0.
So for every node in the tree we can check the height of both of its children and compare them. If they aren't equal we know the tree is not balanced and we return false.
Let's start by defining the code to check if a tree is balanced.
def is_balanced(node):
if node is None:
return True
left_height = get_height(node.get_left())
right_height = get_height(node.get_right())
return left_height == right_height and is_balanced(node.get_left()) and is_balanced(node.get_right())
Now let's define the function get_height that we used above. Since the height of a tree is a function of a height of it's subtrees we can use recursion. Since recursion requires a base case so we do not recurse infinitely we can use the fact that an empty tree has a height of 0.
def get_height(node):
if node is None:
return 0 # Assuming empty tree has a height of 0
return 1 + max(get_height(node.get_left()), get_height(node.get_right()))
Now to put it all together we can recursively iterate through the tree and check that every node is balanced by calling is_balanced on the root.
is_balanced(node_A)
BONUS Exercise:
The code I gave you will work but it won't scale well. If the tree gets very large it will run much slower. Why is it slow and what can you do to make it faster?

You can traverse the left and right sides of the tree to find the maximum path length to a leaf:
class Tree:
def __init__(self, **kwargs):
self.__dict__ = {i:kwargs.get(i) for i in ['value', 'left', 'right']}
def get_length(self, current=[]):
yield current+[1]
yield from getattr(self.left, 'get_length', lambda _:[])(current+[1])
yield from getattr(self.right, 'get_length', lambda _:[])(current+[1])
def right_length(self):
return len(max(getattr(self.right, 'get_length', lambda :[[]])(), key=len))
def left_length(self):
return len(max(getattr(self.left, 'get_length', lambda :[[]])(), key=len))
t = Tree(value = 'A', left=Tree(value='B', left=Tree(value='D'), right=Tree(value='E')), right = Tree(value='C', left = Tree(value='F', left=Tree(value='G'))))
print(t.right_length() - t.left_length())
Output:
1

Reconstructing a tree using inorder and preorder traversals in Python

I need to make a function that builds a tree from a preorder and inorder traversal, but I'm not sure where I should put the MakeNode and recursive calls to construct the tree properly.
Assuming inorder and preorder are both a list of ints, is the following algorithm correct to reconstruct the tree using the traversals?
def build(preorder, inorder):
root = preorder[0]
left subtree = inorder[:root-1]
right subtree = inorder[root+1:]
If so - How can one take that and construct a heap (ArrayHeap) using that algorithm recursively?
I have a class designed to construct nodes and then I can simply use heap.add(node) to create the heap.
Say my class to build a node is named "MakeNode" and is constructed as follows (for syntax purposes):
Class MakeNode():
def __init__(self, character, left=None, right=None):
To create the root node I would need to edit the function like this:
def build(preorder, inorder, heap):
root = preorder[0]
node = MakeNode(root) # Creating root node here
heap.add(node) # Adding to heap
left subtree = inorder[:root-1]
right subtree = inorder[root+1:]
But how should I use recursion to build the rest of the tree?
I can incorporate the left and right preorder for ordering purposes by doing this:
def build(preorder, inorder, heap):
root = preorder[0]
node = MakeNode(root)
heap.add(node)
left subtree = inorder[:root-1]
# order of left subtree = preorder[1:1+left subtree]
right subtree = inorder[root+1:]
# order of right subtree = preorder[root+1:]
I don't really know how to incorporate the recursive calls to build the tree or what exactly to put for the left or right parameters when doing so.
If anybody has any suggestions I would appreciate them, and I'm sorry if I've been unclear.

What you need to do is add the root of the pre-ordered list to the tree, and removing it from preorder list. Split the in order list as you are doing, then passing both the left and right branches recursively. Keep adding the first element of pre-order to the left of the previous node unless left_subtree is empty, then you need to add it to the right.
This is python code (already tested):
class Tree():
def __init__(self, inorder, preorder):
self.root = preorder[0]
lt = inorder[:inorder.index(self.root)]
rt = inorder[inorder.index(self.root) + 1:]
self.build(self.root, lt, rt, preorder[1:])
def build(self, last_node, left_subtree, right_subtree, preorder):
left_preorder = [node for node in preorder if node in left_subtree]
right_preorder = [node for node in preorder if node in right_subtree]
if len(left_subtree) > 0:
last_node.left = left_preorder[0]
lt = left_subtree[:left_subtree.index(last_node.left)]
rt = left_subtree[left_subtree.index(last_node.left) + 1:]
self.build(last_node.left, lt, rt, left_preorder)
if len(right_subtree) > 0:
last_node.right = right_preorder[0]
lt = right_subtree[:right_subtree.index(last_node.right)]
rt = right_subtree[right_subtree.index(last_node.right) + 1:]
self.build(last_node.right, lt, rt, right_preorder)

From http://www.cse.hut.fi/en/research/SVG/TRAKLA2/tutorials/heap_tutorial/taulukkona.html, you have:
parent(i) = i/2
left(i) = 2i
right(i) = 2i+1
so you can define a class:
class ArrayHeapNode:
def __init__(self, elements, index):
self.elements = elements
self.index = index
def left(self):
next = self.index * 2
if next >= len(self.elements):
return None
return ArrayHeapNode(self.elements, next)
def right(self):
next = (self.index * 2) + 1
if next >= len(self.elements):
return None
return ArrayHeapNode(self.elements, next)
def value(self):
return self.elements[self.index]
def set_value(self, _value):
self.elements[self.index] = _value
This gives you a class that can then function as a tree on an array representation of a binary heap according to the article. If there is no element in that branch, None is returned.
You can now create tree traversal algorithms (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_traversal):
def inorder_traversal(node, action):
if not node: return
inorder_traversal(node.left(), action)
action(node.value())
inorder_traversal(node.right(), action)
def preorder_traversal(node, action):
if not node: return
action(node.value())
preorder_traversal(node.left(), action)
preorder_traversal(node.right(), action)
These will also work with a traditional binary tree node:
class BinaryTreeNode:
def __init__(self, value, left, right):
self._value = value
self._left = left
self._right = right
def left(self):
return self._left
def right(self):
return self._right
def value(self):
return self._value
def set_value(self, _value):
self._value = _value
Now, you can make the traversal algorithms more flexible and python-like by doing:
def inorder(node):
if node:
for item in inorder(node.left()):
yield item
yield node.value()
for item in inorder(node.right()):
yield item
This allows you to write things like:
for item in inorder(tree):
print item
You can then count the elements from the node by doing:
n = sum(1 for e in inorder(root))
This then allows you to create an empty array capable of holding n elements for the elements in the heap:
elements = [0 for x in range(n)]
or combined:
elements = [0 for x in inorder(root)]
heap = ArrayHeapNode(elements, 0)
Now, you can iterate over both trees at the same time using:
for a, b in zip(inorder(root), inorder(heap)):
b = a
This should then assign all elements in the binary tree (root) to the correct elements in the array heap (heap) using inorder traversal. The same can be done by implementing a preorder function.
NOTE: I have not tested this code.

def pre_order(node):
print node #pre order ... print ourself first
pre_order(node.left)
pre_order(node.right)
def post_order(node):
post_order(node.left)
post_order(node.right)
print node # post order print self last...
def in_order(node):
in_order(node.left)
print node #in order ... between its children
in_order(node.right)
if you have any one of these you should be able to reproduce the tree
assume we have a tree like this
0
1 2
3 4 5 6
our traversals would be
0,1,3,4,2,5,6 #pre order
3,1,4,0,5,2,6 #in order
so from this we know that
zero is our root
3 is our left most deepest node
6 is our right most deepest node
0
...
3 6
our left over nodes are
1,4,2,5 # preorder
1,4,5,2 # in-order
from this we know that
1 is a child of zero
1 is the next level leftmost node
2 is the next level rightmost node
so we now have
0
1 2
3 6
leaving us with
4,5 # pre order
4,5 # in order
from this we know that 4 is a child of 1, and therefore 5 must be a child of 2 ...
now write a function that does all that
this article may help
http://leetcode.com/2011/04/construct-binary-tree-from-inorder-and-preorder-postorder-traversal.html

In order BST traversal: find

I am trying to find the kth smallest element of binary search tree and I have problems using recursion. I understand how to print the tree inorder/postorder etc. but I fail to return the rank of the element. Can someone point where I am making a mistake? In general, I am having hard time understanding recursion in trees.
Edit: this is an exercise, so I am not looking for using built-in functions. I have another solution where I keep track of number of left and right children as I insert nodes and that code is working fine. I am wondering if it is possible to do this using inorder traversal because it seems to be a simpler solution.
class BinaryTreeNode:
def __init__(self, data, left=None, right=None):
self.data = data
self.left = left
self.right = right
def traverseInOrder(root,order):
if root == None:
return
traverseInOrder(root.left,order+1)
print root.data,
print order
traverseInOrder(root.right,order)
"""
a
/ \
b c
/ \ / \
d e f g
/ \
h i
"""
h = BinaryTreeNode("h")
i = BinaryTreeNode("i")
d = BinaryTreeNode("d", h, i)
e = BinaryTreeNode("e")
f = BinaryTreeNode("f")
g = BinaryTreeNode("g")
b = BinaryTreeNode("b", d, e)
c = BinaryTreeNode("c", f, g)
a = BinaryTreeNode("a", b, c)
print traverseInOrder(a,0)

If this is an academic exercise, make traverseInOrder (or similar method tailored to the purpose) return the number of children it visited. From there things get simpler.
If this isn't academic, have a look at http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~dstromberg/datastructures/ - the dictionary-like objects are all trees, and support iterators - so finding the nth is a matter of zip(tree, range(n)).

You could find the smallets element in the binary search tree first. Then from that element call a method to give you the next element k times.
For find_smallest_node method, note that you can traverse all the nodes "in-order" until reach to smallest. But that approach takes O(n) time.
However, you do not need a recursion to find the smallest node, because in BST smallest node is simply the left most node, so you can traverse the nodes until finding a node that has no left child and it takes O(log n) time:
class BST(object):
def find_smallest_node(self):
if self.root == None:
return
walking_node = self.root
smallest_node = self.root
while walking_node != None:
if walking_node.data <= smallest_node.data:
smallest_node = walking_node
if walking_node.left != None:
walking_node = walking_node.left
elif walking_node.left == None:
walking_node = None
return smallest_node
def find_k_smallest(self, k):
k_smallest_node = self.find_smallest_node()
if k_smallest_node == None:
return
else:
k_smallest_data = k_smallest_node.data
count = 1
while count < k:
k_smallest_data = self.get_next(k_smallest_data)
count += 1
return k_smallest_data
def get_next (self, key):
...
It just requires to keep the parent of the nodes when inserting them to the tree.
class Node(object):
def __init__(self, data, left=None, right=None, parent=None):
self.data = data
self.right = right
self.left = left
self.parent = parent
An implementation of the bst class with the above methods and also def get_next (self, key) function is here. The upper folder contains the test cases for it and it worked.

Categories

Resources