Related
One of the most talked-about features in Python 3.5 is type hints.
An example of type hints is mentioned in this article and this one while also mentioning to use type hints responsibly. Can someone explain more about them and when they should be used and when not?
I would suggest reading PEP 483 and PEP 484 and watching this presentation by Guido on type hinting.
In a nutshell: Type hinting is literally what the words mean. You hint the type of the object(s) you're using.
Due to the dynamic nature of Python, inferring or checking the type of an object being used is especially hard. This fact makes it hard for developers to understand what exactly is going on in code they haven't written and, most importantly, for type checking tools found in many IDEs (PyCharm and PyDev come to mind) that are limited due to the fact that they don't have any indicator of what type the objects are. As a result they resort to trying to infer the type with (as mentioned in the presentation) around 50% success rate.
To take two important slides from the type hinting presentation:
Why type hints?
Helps type checkers: By hinting at what type you want the object to be the type checker can easily detect if, for instance, you're passing an object with a type that isn't expected.
Helps with documentation: A third person viewing your code will know what is expected where, ergo, how to use it without getting them TypeErrors.
Helps IDEs develop more accurate and robust tools: Development Environments will be better suited at suggesting appropriate methods when know what type your object is. You have probably experienced this with some IDE at some point, hitting the . and having methods/attributes pop up which aren't defined for an object.
Why use static type checkers?
Find bugs sooner: This is self-evident, I believe.
The larger your project the more you need it: Again, makes sense. Static languages offer a robustness and control that
dynamic languages lack. The bigger and more complex your application becomes the more control and predictability (from
a behavioral aspect) you require.
Large teams are already running static analysis: I'm guessing this verifies the first two points.
As a closing note for this small introduction: This is an optional feature and, from what I understand, it has been introduced in order to reap some of the benefits of static typing.
You generally do not need to worry about it and definitely don't need to use it (especially in cases where you use Python as an auxiliary scripting language). It should be helpful when developing large projects as it offers much needed robustness, control and additional debugging capabilities.
Type hinting with mypy:
In order to make this answer more complete, I think a little demonstration would be suitable. I'll be using mypy, the library which inspired Type Hints as they are presented in the PEP. This is mainly written for anybody bumping into this question and wondering where to begin.
Before I do that let me reiterate the following: PEP 484 doesn't enforce anything; it is simply setting a direction for function
annotations and proposing guidelines for how type checking can/should be performed. You can annotate your functions and
hint as many things as you want; your scripts will still run regardless of the presence of annotations because Python itself doesn't use them.
Anyways, as noted in the PEP, hinting types should generally take three forms:
Function annotations (PEP 3107).
Stub files for built-in/user modules.
Special # type: type comments that complement the first two forms. (See: What are variable annotations? for a Python 3.6 update for # type: type comments)
Additionally, you'll want to use type hints in conjunction with the new typing module introduced in Py3.5. In it, many (additional) ABCs (abstract base classes) are defined along with helper functions and decorators for use in static checking. Most ABCs in collections.abc are included, but in a generic form in order to allow subscription (by defining a __getitem__() method).
For anyone interested in a more in-depth explanation of these, the mypy documentation is written very nicely and has a lot of code samples demonstrating/describing the functionality of their checker; it is definitely worth a read.
Function annotations and special comments:
First, it's interesting to observe some of the behavior we can get when using special comments. Special # type: type comments
can be added during variable assignments to indicate the type of an object if one cannot be directly inferred. Simple assignments are
generally easily inferred but others, like lists (with regard to their contents), cannot.
Note: If we want to use any derivative of containers and need to specify the contents for that container we must use the generic types from the typing module. These support indexing.
# Generic List, supports indexing.
from typing import List
# In this case, the type is easily inferred as type: int.
i = 0
# Even though the type can be inferred as of type list
# there is no way to know the contents of this list.
# By using type: List[str] we indicate we want to use a list of strings.
a = [] # type: List[str]
# Appending an int to our list
# is statically not correct.
a.append(i)
# Appending a string is fine.
a.append("i")
print(a) # [0, 'i']
If we add these commands to a file and execute them with our interpreter, everything works just fine and print(a) just prints
the contents of list a. The # type comments have been discarded, treated as plain comments which have no additional semantic meaning.
By running this with mypy, on the other hand, we get the following response:
(Python3)jimmi#jim: mypy typeHintsCode.py
typesInline.py:14: error: Argument 1 to "append" of "list" has incompatible type "int"; expected "str"
Indicating that a list of str objects cannot contain an int, which, statically speaking, is sound. This can be fixed by either abiding to the type of a and only appending str objects or by changing the type of the contents of a to indicate that any value is acceptable (Intuitively performed with List[Any] after Any has been imported from typing).
Function annotations are added in the form param_name : type after each parameter in your function signature and a return type is specified using the -> type notation before the ending function colon; all annotations are stored in the __annotations__ attribute for that function in a handy dictionary form. Using a trivial example (which doesn't require extra types from the typing module):
def annotated(x: int, y: str) -> bool:
return x < y
The annotated.__annotations__ attribute now has the following values:
{'y': <class 'str'>, 'return': <class 'bool'>, 'x': <class 'int'>}
If we're a complete newbie, or we are familiar with Python 2.7 concepts and are consequently unaware of the TypeError lurking in the comparison of annotated, we can perform another static check, catch the error and save us some trouble:
(Python3)jimmi#jim: mypy typeHintsCode.py
typeFunction.py: note: In function "annotated":
typeFunction.py:2: error: Unsupported operand types for > ("str" and "int")
Among other things, calling the function with invalid arguments will also get caught:
annotated(20, 20)
# mypy complains:
typeHintsCode.py:4: error: Argument 2 to "annotated" has incompatible type "int"; expected "str"
These can be extended to basically any use case and the errors caught extend further than basic calls and operations. The types you
can check for are really flexible and I have merely given a small sneak peak of its potential. A look in the typing module, the
PEPs or the mypy documentation will give you a more comprehensive idea of the capabilities offered.
Stub files:
Stub files can be used in two different non mutually exclusive cases:
You need to type check a module for which you do not want to directly alter the function signatures
You want to write modules and have type-checking but additionally want to separate annotations from content.
What stub files (with an extension of .pyi) are is an annotated interface of the module you are making/want to use. They contain
the signatures of the functions you want to type-check with the body of the functions discarded. To get a feel of this, given a set
of three random functions in a module named randfunc.py:
def message(s):
print(s)
def alterContents(myIterable):
return [i for i in myIterable if i % 2 == 0]
def combine(messageFunc, itFunc):
messageFunc("Printing the Iterable")
a = alterContents(range(1, 20))
return set(a)
We can create a stub file randfunc.pyi, in which we can place some restrictions if we wish to do so. The downside is that
somebody viewing the source without the stub won't really get that annotation assistance when trying to understand what is supposed
to be passed where.
Anyway, the structure of a stub file is pretty simplistic: Add all function definitions with empty bodies (pass filled) and
supply the annotations based on your requirements. Here, let's assume we only want to work with int types for our Containers.
# Stub for randfucn.py
from typing import Iterable, List, Set, Callable
def message(s: str) -> None: pass
def alterContents(myIterable: Iterable[int])-> List[int]: pass
def combine(
messageFunc: Callable[[str], Any],
itFunc: Callable[[Iterable[int]], List[int]]
)-> Set[int]: pass
The combine function gives an indication of why you might want to use annotations in a different file, they some times clutter up
the code and reduce readability (big no-no for Python). You could of course use type aliases but that sometime confuses more than it
helps (so use them wisely).
This should get you familiarized with the basic concepts of type hints in Python. Even though the type checker used has been
mypy you should gradually start to see more of them pop-up, some internally in IDEs (PyCharm,) and others as standard Python modules.
I'll try and add additional checkers/related packages in the following list when and if I find them (or if suggested).
Checkers I know of:
Mypy: as described here.
PyType: By Google, uses different notation from what I gather, probably worth a look.
Related Packages/Projects:
typeshed: Official Python repository housing an assortment of stub files for the standard library.
The typeshed project is actually one of the best places you can look to see how type hinting might be used in a project of your own. Let's take as an example the __init__ dunders of the Counter class in the corresponding .pyi file:
class Counter(Dict[_T, int], Generic[_T]):
#overload
def __init__(self) -> None: ...
#overload
def __init__(self, Mapping: Mapping[_T, int]) -> None: ...
#overload
def __init__(self, iterable: Iterable[_T]) -> None: ...
Where _T = TypeVar('_T') is used to define generic classes. For the Counter class we can see that it can either take no arguments in its initializer, get a single Mapping from any type to an int or take an Iterable of any type.
Notice: One thing I forgot to mention was that the typing module has been introduced on a provisional basis. From PEP 411:
A provisional package may have its API modified prior to "graduating" into a "stable" state. On one hand, this state provides the package with the benefits of being formally part of the Python distribution. On the other hand, the core development team explicitly states that no promises are made with regards to the the stability of the package's API, which may change for the next release. While it is considered an unlikely outcome, such packages may even be removed from the standard library without a deprecation period if the concerns regarding their API or maintenance prove well-founded.
So take things here with a pinch of salt; I'm doubtful it will be removed or altered in significant ways, but one can never know.
** Another topic altogether, but valid in the scope of type-hints: PEP 526: Syntax for Variable Annotations is an effort to replace # type comments by introducing new syntax which allows users to annotate the type of variables in simple varname: type statements.
See What are variable annotations?, as previously mentioned, for a small introduction to these.
Adding to Jim's elaborate answer:
Check the typing module -- this module supports type hints as specified by PEP 484.
For example, the function below takes and returns values of type str and is annotated as follows:
def greeting(name: str) -> str:
return 'Hello ' + name
The typing module also supports:
Type aliasing.
Type hinting for callback functions.
Generics - Abstract base classes have been extended to support subscription to denote expected types for container elements.
User-defined generic types - A user-defined class can be defined as a generic class.
Any type - Every type is a subtype of Any.
The newly released PyCharm 5 supports type hinting. In their blog post about it (see Python 3.5 type hinting in PyCharm 5) they offer a great explanation of what type hints are and aren't along with several examples and illustrations for how to use them in your code.
Additionally, it is supported in Python 2.7, as explained in this comment:
PyCharm supports the typing module from PyPI for Python 2.7, Python 3.2-3.4. For 2.7 you have to put type hints in *.pyi stub files since function annotations were added in Python 3.0.
Type hints are for maintainability and don't get interpreted by Python. In the code below, the line def add(self, ic:int) doesn't result in an error until the next return... line:
class C1:
def __init__(self):
self.idn = 1
def add(self, ic: int):
return self.idn + ic
c1 = C1()
c1.add(2)
c1.add(c1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<input>", line 1, in <module>
File "<input>", line 5, in add
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'int' and 'C1'
Python has dynamic type checking, hence the types are known at runtime and not compile time (as is the case in static type checked languages like C#).
With TypeHints, Python supports type annotation for the basic variable types supported by the language str, int, float, bool and None. It also comes with a typing library batteries included; this typing libraries provides us with means to use more special types.
from typing import List
name: str = 'Tommy'
age: int = 24
height_in_meters: float = 1.7
Read more: https://tomisin.dev/blog/improving-your-python-projects-with-type-hints
One of the most talked-about features in Python 3.5 is type hints.
An example of type hints is mentioned in this article and this one while also mentioning to use type hints responsibly. Can someone explain more about them and when they should be used and when not?
I would suggest reading PEP 483 and PEP 484 and watching this presentation by Guido on type hinting.
In a nutshell: Type hinting is literally what the words mean. You hint the type of the object(s) you're using.
Due to the dynamic nature of Python, inferring or checking the type of an object being used is especially hard. This fact makes it hard for developers to understand what exactly is going on in code they haven't written and, most importantly, for type checking tools found in many IDEs (PyCharm and PyDev come to mind) that are limited due to the fact that they don't have any indicator of what type the objects are. As a result they resort to trying to infer the type with (as mentioned in the presentation) around 50% success rate.
To take two important slides from the type hinting presentation:
Why type hints?
Helps type checkers: By hinting at what type you want the object to be the type checker can easily detect if, for instance, you're passing an object with a type that isn't expected.
Helps with documentation: A third person viewing your code will know what is expected where, ergo, how to use it without getting them TypeErrors.
Helps IDEs develop more accurate and robust tools: Development Environments will be better suited at suggesting appropriate methods when know what type your object is. You have probably experienced this with some IDE at some point, hitting the . and having methods/attributes pop up which aren't defined for an object.
Why use static type checkers?
Find bugs sooner: This is self-evident, I believe.
The larger your project the more you need it: Again, makes sense. Static languages offer a robustness and control that
dynamic languages lack. The bigger and more complex your application becomes the more control and predictability (from
a behavioral aspect) you require.
Large teams are already running static analysis: I'm guessing this verifies the first two points.
As a closing note for this small introduction: This is an optional feature and, from what I understand, it has been introduced in order to reap some of the benefits of static typing.
You generally do not need to worry about it and definitely don't need to use it (especially in cases where you use Python as an auxiliary scripting language). It should be helpful when developing large projects as it offers much needed robustness, control and additional debugging capabilities.
Type hinting with mypy:
In order to make this answer more complete, I think a little demonstration would be suitable. I'll be using mypy, the library which inspired Type Hints as they are presented in the PEP. This is mainly written for anybody bumping into this question and wondering where to begin.
Before I do that let me reiterate the following: PEP 484 doesn't enforce anything; it is simply setting a direction for function
annotations and proposing guidelines for how type checking can/should be performed. You can annotate your functions and
hint as many things as you want; your scripts will still run regardless of the presence of annotations because Python itself doesn't use them.
Anyways, as noted in the PEP, hinting types should generally take three forms:
Function annotations (PEP 3107).
Stub files for built-in/user modules.
Special # type: type comments that complement the first two forms. (See: What are variable annotations? for a Python 3.6 update for # type: type comments)
Additionally, you'll want to use type hints in conjunction with the new typing module introduced in Py3.5. In it, many (additional) ABCs (abstract base classes) are defined along with helper functions and decorators for use in static checking. Most ABCs in collections.abc are included, but in a generic form in order to allow subscription (by defining a __getitem__() method).
For anyone interested in a more in-depth explanation of these, the mypy documentation is written very nicely and has a lot of code samples demonstrating/describing the functionality of their checker; it is definitely worth a read.
Function annotations and special comments:
First, it's interesting to observe some of the behavior we can get when using special comments. Special # type: type comments
can be added during variable assignments to indicate the type of an object if one cannot be directly inferred. Simple assignments are
generally easily inferred but others, like lists (with regard to their contents), cannot.
Note: If we want to use any derivative of containers and need to specify the contents for that container we must use the generic types from the typing module. These support indexing.
# Generic List, supports indexing.
from typing import List
# In this case, the type is easily inferred as type: int.
i = 0
# Even though the type can be inferred as of type list
# there is no way to know the contents of this list.
# By using type: List[str] we indicate we want to use a list of strings.
a = [] # type: List[str]
# Appending an int to our list
# is statically not correct.
a.append(i)
# Appending a string is fine.
a.append("i")
print(a) # [0, 'i']
If we add these commands to a file and execute them with our interpreter, everything works just fine and print(a) just prints
the contents of list a. The # type comments have been discarded, treated as plain comments which have no additional semantic meaning.
By running this with mypy, on the other hand, we get the following response:
(Python3)jimmi#jim: mypy typeHintsCode.py
typesInline.py:14: error: Argument 1 to "append" of "list" has incompatible type "int"; expected "str"
Indicating that a list of str objects cannot contain an int, which, statically speaking, is sound. This can be fixed by either abiding to the type of a and only appending str objects or by changing the type of the contents of a to indicate that any value is acceptable (Intuitively performed with List[Any] after Any has been imported from typing).
Function annotations are added in the form param_name : type after each parameter in your function signature and a return type is specified using the -> type notation before the ending function colon; all annotations are stored in the __annotations__ attribute for that function in a handy dictionary form. Using a trivial example (which doesn't require extra types from the typing module):
def annotated(x: int, y: str) -> bool:
return x < y
The annotated.__annotations__ attribute now has the following values:
{'y': <class 'str'>, 'return': <class 'bool'>, 'x': <class 'int'>}
If we're a complete newbie, or we are familiar with Python 2.7 concepts and are consequently unaware of the TypeError lurking in the comparison of annotated, we can perform another static check, catch the error and save us some trouble:
(Python3)jimmi#jim: mypy typeHintsCode.py
typeFunction.py: note: In function "annotated":
typeFunction.py:2: error: Unsupported operand types for > ("str" and "int")
Among other things, calling the function with invalid arguments will also get caught:
annotated(20, 20)
# mypy complains:
typeHintsCode.py:4: error: Argument 2 to "annotated" has incompatible type "int"; expected "str"
These can be extended to basically any use case and the errors caught extend further than basic calls and operations. The types you
can check for are really flexible and I have merely given a small sneak peak of its potential. A look in the typing module, the
PEPs or the mypy documentation will give you a more comprehensive idea of the capabilities offered.
Stub files:
Stub files can be used in two different non mutually exclusive cases:
You need to type check a module for which you do not want to directly alter the function signatures
You want to write modules and have type-checking but additionally want to separate annotations from content.
What stub files (with an extension of .pyi) are is an annotated interface of the module you are making/want to use. They contain
the signatures of the functions you want to type-check with the body of the functions discarded. To get a feel of this, given a set
of three random functions in a module named randfunc.py:
def message(s):
print(s)
def alterContents(myIterable):
return [i for i in myIterable if i % 2 == 0]
def combine(messageFunc, itFunc):
messageFunc("Printing the Iterable")
a = alterContents(range(1, 20))
return set(a)
We can create a stub file randfunc.pyi, in which we can place some restrictions if we wish to do so. The downside is that
somebody viewing the source without the stub won't really get that annotation assistance when trying to understand what is supposed
to be passed where.
Anyway, the structure of a stub file is pretty simplistic: Add all function definitions with empty bodies (pass filled) and
supply the annotations based on your requirements. Here, let's assume we only want to work with int types for our Containers.
# Stub for randfucn.py
from typing import Iterable, List, Set, Callable
def message(s: str) -> None: pass
def alterContents(myIterable: Iterable[int])-> List[int]: pass
def combine(
messageFunc: Callable[[str], Any],
itFunc: Callable[[Iterable[int]], List[int]]
)-> Set[int]: pass
The combine function gives an indication of why you might want to use annotations in a different file, they some times clutter up
the code and reduce readability (big no-no for Python). You could of course use type aliases but that sometime confuses more than it
helps (so use them wisely).
This should get you familiarized with the basic concepts of type hints in Python. Even though the type checker used has been
mypy you should gradually start to see more of them pop-up, some internally in IDEs (PyCharm,) and others as standard Python modules.
I'll try and add additional checkers/related packages in the following list when and if I find them (or if suggested).
Checkers I know of:
Mypy: as described here.
PyType: By Google, uses different notation from what I gather, probably worth a look.
Related Packages/Projects:
typeshed: Official Python repository housing an assortment of stub files for the standard library.
The typeshed project is actually one of the best places you can look to see how type hinting might be used in a project of your own. Let's take as an example the __init__ dunders of the Counter class in the corresponding .pyi file:
class Counter(Dict[_T, int], Generic[_T]):
#overload
def __init__(self) -> None: ...
#overload
def __init__(self, Mapping: Mapping[_T, int]) -> None: ...
#overload
def __init__(self, iterable: Iterable[_T]) -> None: ...
Where _T = TypeVar('_T') is used to define generic classes. For the Counter class we can see that it can either take no arguments in its initializer, get a single Mapping from any type to an int or take an Iterable of any type.
Notice: One thing I forgot to mention was that the typing module has been introduced on a provisional basis. From PEP 411:
A provisional package may have its API modified prior to "graduating" into a "stable" state. On one hand, this state provides the package with the benefits of being formally part of the Python distribution. On the other hand, the core development team explicitly states that no promises are made with regards to the the stability of the package's API, which may change for the next release. While it is considered an unlikely outcome, such packages may even be removed from the standard library without a deprecation period if the concerns regarding their API or maintenance prove well-founded.
So take things here with a pinch of salt; I'm doubtful it will be removed or altered in significant ways, but one can never know.
** Another topic altogether, but valid in the scope of type-hints: PEP 526: Syntax for Variable Annotations is an effort to replace # type comments by introducing new syntax which allows users to annotate the type of variables in simple varname: type statements.
See What are variable annotations?, as previously mentioned, for a small introduction to these.
Adding to Jim's elaborate answer:
Check the typing module -- this module supports type hints as specified by PEP 484.
For example, the function below takes and returns values of type str and is annotated as follows:
def greeting(name: str) -> str:
return 'Hello ' + name
The typing module also supports:
Type aliasing.
Type hinting for callback functions.
Generics - Abstract base classes have been extended to support subscription to denote expected types for container elements.
User-defined generic types - A user-defined class can be defined as a generic class.
Any type - Every type is a subtype of Any.
The newly released PyCharm 5 supports type hinting. In their blog post about it (see Python 3.5 type hinting in PyCharm 5) they offer a great explanation of what type hints are and aren't along with several examples and illustrations for how to use them in your code.
Additionally, it is supported in Python 2.7, as explained in this comment:
PyCharm supports the typing module from PyPI for Python 2.7, Python 3.2-3.4. For 2.7 you have to put type hints in *.pyi stub files since function annotations were added in Python 3.0.
Type hints are for maintainability and don't get interpreted by Python. In the code below, the line def add(self, ic:int) doesn't result in an error until the next return... line:
class C1:
def __init__(self):
self.idn = 1
def add(self, ic: int):
return self.idn + ic
c1 = C1()
c1.add(2)
c1.add(c1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<input>", line 1, in <module>
File "<input>", line 5, in add
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'int' and 'C1'
Python has dynamic type checking, hence the types are known at runtime and not compile time (as is the case in static type checked languages like C#).
With TypeHints, Python supports type annotation for the basic variable types supported by the language str, int, float, bool and None. It also comes with a typing library batteries included; this typing libraries provides us with means to use more special types.
from typing import List
name: str = 'Tommy'
age: int = 24
height_in_meters: float = 1.7
Read more: https://tomisin.dev/blog/improving-your-python-projects-with-type-hints
One of the most talked-about features in Python 3.5 is type hints.
An example of type hints is mentioned in this article and this one while also mentioning to use type hints responsibly. Can someone explain more about them and when they should be used and when not?
I would suggest reading PEP 483 and PEP 484 and watching this presentation by Guido on type hinting.
In a nutshell: Type hinting is literally what the words mean. You hint the type of the object(s) you're using.
Due to the dynamic nature of Python, inferring or checking the type of an object being used is especially hard. This fact makes it hard for developers to understand what exactly is going on in code they haven't written and, most importantly, for type checking tools found in many IDEs (PyCharm and PyDev come to mind) that are limited due to the fact that they don't have any indicator of what type the objects are. As a result they resort to trying to infer the type with (as mentioned in the presentation) around 50% success rate.
To take two important slides from the type hinting presentation:
Why type hints?
Helps type checkers: By hinting at what type you want the object to be the type checker can easily detect if, for instance, you're passing an object with a type that isn't expected.
Helps with documentation: A third person viewing your code will know what is expected where, ergo, how to use it without getting them TypeErrors.
Helps IDEs develop more accurate and robust tools: Development Environments will be better suited at suggesting appropriate methods when know what type your object is. You have probably experienced this with some IDE at some point, hitting the . and having methods/attributes pop up which aren't defined for an object.
Why use static type checkers?
Find bugs sooner: This is self-evident, I believe.
The larger your project the more you need it: Again, makes sense. Static languages offer a robustness and control that
dynamic languages lack. The bigger and more complex your application becomes the more control and predictability (from
a behavioral aspect) you require.
Large teams are already running static analysis: I'm guessing this verifies the first two points.
As a closing note for this small introduction: This is an optional feature and, from what I understand, it has been introduced in order to reap some of the benefits of static typing.
You generally do not need to worry about it and definitely don't need to use it (especially in cases where you use Python as an auxiliary scripting language). It should be helpful when developing large projects as it offers much needed robustness, control and additional debugging capabilities.
Type hinting with mypy:
In order to make this answer more complete, I think a little demonstration would be suitable. I'll be using mypy, the library which inspired Type Hints as they are presented in the PEP. This is mainly written for anybody bumping into this question and wondering where to begin.
Before I do that let me reiterate the following: PEP 484 doesn't enforce anything; it is simply setting a direction for function
annotations and proposing guidelines for how type checking can/should be performed. You can annotate your functions and
hint as many things as you want; your scripts will still run regardless of the presence of annotations because Python itself doesn't use them.
Anyways, as noted in the PEP, hinting types should generally take three forms:
Function annotations (PEP 3107).
Stub files for built-in/user modules.
Special # type: type comments that complement the first two forms. (See: What are variable annotations? for a Python 3.6 update for # type: type comments)
Additionally, you'll want to use type hints in conjunction with the new typing module introduced in Py3.5. In it, many (additional) ABCs (abstract base classes) are defined along with helper functions and decorators for use in static checking. Most ABCs in collections.abc are included, but in a generic form in order to allow subscription (by defining a __getitem__() method).
For anyone interested in a more in-depth explanation of these, the mypy documentation is written very nicely and has a lot of code samples demonstrating/describing the functionality of their checker; it is definitely worth a read.
Function annotations and special comments:
First, it's interesting to observe some of the behavior we can get when using special comments. Special # type: type comments
can be added during variable assignments to indicate the type of an object if one cannot be directly inferred. Simple assignments are
generally easily inferred but others, like lists (with regard to their contents), cannot.
Note: If we want to use any derivative of containers and need to specify the contents for that container we must use the generic types from the typing module. These support indexing.
# Generic List, supports indexing.
from typing import List
# In this case, the type is easily inferred as type: int.
i = 0
# Even though the type can be inferred as of type list
# there is no way to know the contents of this list.
# By using type: List[str] we indicate we want to use a list of strings.
a = [] # type: List[str]
# Appending an int to our list
# is statically not correct.
a.append(i)
# Appending a string is fine.
a.append("i")
print(a) # [0, 'i']
If we add these commands to a file and execute them with our interpreter, everything works just fine and print(a) just prints
the contents of list a. The # type comments have been discarded, treated as plain comments which have no additional semantic meaning.
By running this with mypy, on the other hand, we get the following response:
(Python3)jimmi#jim: mypy typeHintsCode.py
typesInline.py:14: error: Argument 1 to "append" of "list" has incompatible type "int"; expected "str"
Indicating that a list of str objects cannot contain an int, which, statically speaking, is sound. This can be fixed by either abiding to the type of a and only appending str objects or by changing the type of the contents of a to indicate that any value is acceptable (Intuitively performed with List[Any] after Any has been imported from typing).
Function annotations are added in the form param_name : type after each parameter in your function signature and a return type is specified using the -> type notation before the ending function colon; all annotations are stored in the __annotations__ attribute for that function in a handy dictionary form. Using a trivial example (which doesn't require extra types from the typing module):
def annotated(x: int, y: str) -> bool:
return x < y
The annotated.__annotations__ attribute now has the following values:
{'y': <class 'str'>, 'return': <class 'bool'>, 'x': <class 'int'>}
If we're a complete newbie, or we are familiar with Python 2.7 concepts and are consequently unaware of the TypeError lurking in the comparison of annotated, we can perform another static check, catch the error and save us some trouble:
(Python3)jimmi#jim: mypy typeHintsCode.py
typeFunction.py: note: In function "annotated":
typeFunction.py:2: error: Unsupported operand types for > ("str" and "int")
Among other things, calling the function with invalid arguments will also get caught:
annotated(20, 20)
# mypy complains:
typeHintsCode.py:4: error: Argument 2 to "annotated" has incompatible type "int"; expected "str"
These can be extended to basically any use case and the errors caught extend further than basic calls and operations. The types you
can check for are really flexible and I have merely given a small sneak peak of its potential. A look in the typing module, the
PEPs or the mypy documentation will give you a more comprehensive idea of the capabilities offered.
Stub files:
Stub files can be used in two different non mutually exclusive cases:
You need to type check a module for which you do not want to directly alter the function signatures
You want to write modules and have type-checking but additionally want to separate annotations from content.
What stub files (with an extension of .pyi) are is an annotated interface of the module you are making/want to use. They contain
the signatures of the functions you want to type-check with the body of the functions discarded. To get a feel of this, given a set
of three random functions in a module named randfunc.py:
def message(s):
print(s)
def alterContents(myIterable):
return [i for i in myIterable if i % 2 == 0]
def combine(messageFunc, itFunc):
messageFunc("Printing the Iterable")
a = alterContents(range(1, 20))
return set(a)
We can create a stub file randfunc.pyi, in which we can place some restrictions if we wish to do so. The downside is that
somebody viewing the source without the stub won't really get that annotation assistance when trying to understand what is supposed
to be passed where.
Anyway, the structure of a stub file is pretty simplistic: Add all function definitions with empty bodies (pass filled) and
supply the annotations based on your requirements. Here, let's assume we only want to work with int types for our Containers.
# Stub for randfucn.py
from typing import Iterable, List, Set, Callable
def message(s: str) -> None: pass
def alterContents(myIterable: Iterable[int])-> List[int]: pass
def combine(
messageFunc: Callable[[str], Any],
itFunc: Callable[[Iterable[int]], List[int]]
)-> Set[int]: pass
The combine function gives an indication of why you might want to use annotations in a different file, they some times clutter up
the code and reduce readability (big no-no for Python). You could of course use type aliases but that sometime confuses more than it
helps (so use them wisely).
This should get you familiarized with the basic concepts of type hints in Python. Even though the type checker used has been
mypy you should gradually start to see more of them pop-up, some internally in IDEs (PyCharm,) and others as standard Python modules.
I'll try and add additional checkers/related packages in the following list when and if I find them (or if suggested).
Checkers I know of:
Mypy: as described here.
PyType: By Google, uses different notation from what I gather, probably worth a look.
Related Packages/Projects:
typeshed: Official Python repository housing an assortment of stub files for the standard library.
The typeshed project is actually one of the best places you can look to see how type hinting might be used in a project of your own. Let's take as an example the __init__ dunders of the Counter class in the corresponding .pyi file:
class Counter(Dict[_T, int], Generic[_T]):
#overload
def __init__(self) -> None: ...
#overload
def __init__(self, Mapping: Mapping[_T, int]) -> None: ...
#overload
def __init__(self, iterable: Iterable[_T]) -> None: ...
Where _T = TypeVar('_T') is used to define generic classes. For the Counter class we can see that it can either take no arguments in its initializer, get a single Mapping from any type to an int or take an Iterable of any type.
Notice: One thing I forgot to mention was that the typing module has been introduced on a provisional basis. From PEP 411:
A provisional package may have its API modified prior to "graduating" into a "stable" state. On one hand, this state provides the package with the benefits of being formally part of the Python distribution. On the other hand, the core development team explicitly states that no promises are made with regards to the the stability of the package's API, which may change for the next release. While it is considered an unlikely outcome, such packages may even be removed from the standard library without a deprecation period if the concerns regarding their API or maintenance prove well-founded.
So take things here with a pinch of salt; I'm doubtful it will be removed or altered in significant ways, but one can never know.
** Another topic altogether, but valid in the scope of type-hints: PEP 526: Syntax for Variable Annotations is an effort to replace # type comments by introducing new syntax which allows users to annotate the type of variables in simple varname: type statements.
See What are variable annotations?, as previously mentioned, for a small introduction to these.
Adding to Jim's elaborate answer:
Check the typing module -- this module supports type hints as specified by PEP 484.
For example, the function below takes and returns values of type str and is annotated as follows:
def greeting(name: str) -> str:
return 'Hello ' + name
The typing module also supports:
Type aliasing.
Type hinting for callback functions.
Generics - Abstract base classes have been extended to support subscription to denote expected types for container elements.
User-defined generic types - A user-defined class can be defined as a generic class.
Any type - Every type is a subtype of Any.
The newly released PyCharm 5 supports type hinting. In their blog post about it (see Python 3.5 type hinting in PyCharm 5) they offer a great explanation of what type hints are and aren't along with several examples and illustrations for how to use them in your code.
Additionally, it is supported in Python 2.7, as explained in this comment:
PyCharm supports the typing module from PyPI for Python 2.7, Python 3.2-3.4. For 2.7 you have to put type hints in *.pyi stub files since function annotations were added in Python 3.0.
Type hints are for maintainability and don't get interpreted by Python. In the code below, the line def add(self, ic:int) doesn't result in an error until the next return... line:
class C1:
def __init__(self):
self.idn = 1
def add(self, ic: int):
return self.idn + ic
c1 = C1()
c1.add(2)
c1.add(c1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<input>", line 1, in <module>
File "<input>", line 5, in add
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'int' and 'C1'
Python has dynamic type checking, hence the types are known at runtime and not compile time (as is the case in static type checked languages like C#).
With TypeHints, Python supports type annotation for the basic variable types supported by the language str, int, float, bool and None. It also comes with a typing library batteries included; this typing libraries provides us with means to use more special types.
from typing import List
name: str = 'Tommy'
age: int = 24
height_in_meters: float = 1.7
Read more: https://tomisin.dev/blog/improving-your-python-projects-with-type-hints
Does python have a stance on the PEP-484 type annotation for a property setter's argument? I see two options, both of which seem valid (according to me, and to mypy).
Consider:
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import Any
#dataclass
class Foo:
_bar: int = 1
#property
def bar(self) -> int:
return self._bar
#bar.setter
def bar(self, value) -> None:
self._bar = value
The question is:
Should #bar.setter's value argument be typed with typing.Any or with int?
On one hand, within the setter, having the expected type hint would be nice for performing validations, but on the other hand, the incoming value could be of any type.
One thing of note, though; mypy does warn about the incorrect assignment to a property setter:
f = Foo()
f.bar = 2 # Ok
f.bar = "baz" # Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "str", variable has type "int")
I believe this comes from the revealed type of Foo.bar being an int, not from the type of the value argument of #bar.setter.
I searched through the python/cpython and python/typeshed projects for examples, but didn't come up with anything definitive.
I'm very experienced with modern python, and am comfortable reading cpython sources (beit in C or python itself). An answer that references a PEP, or includes input from a cpython or mypy maintainer would be ideal.
This question lends itself very well to being strongly opinion based, however, I think there may be a stronger argument for mutators annotated with the expected type (ie def bar(self, value: int) -> None:). First, annotations were implemented to aid in static analysis rather than prviding any real runtime benefit (they currently do not to my knowledge. From PEP 484 rationale:
Of these goals, static analysis is the most important. This includes support for off-line type checkers such as mypy, as well as providing a standard notation that can be used by IDEs for code completion and refactoring.
If type annotations are largely meant to benefit in static analysis, linting, etc it would make sense that you would want to be able to check that you are passing in the wrong type rather than potentially discover at runtime that you have not handled the parameter properly with type checks using isinstance for example.
This would also mean that we can do more with less, since the more specific int annotation would remove the need for us to add those type guards:
def bigger_fun(n: Any) -> None:
if isinstance(n, float):
# do something...
else
# dosomething else...
def smaller_fun(n: int) -> None:
# do something
You will know exactly what type you will receive and how to handle it, rather than needing to implement different multiple conditional branches to first cast the parameter to an expected value before operating on it. This will allow allow you to make your mutators as slim as possible with only minimal internal logic / processing.
If you were to pass it the wrong type, your IDE or static analysis tool will at the very least warn you when passing a float for smaller_fun for example. On the other hand, using Any might produce unexpected behavior for some types, which introduces runtime bugs which could be difficult to track down.
Now more specifically to your question, the same PEP touches upon the use of #property annotations in The Meaning of Annotations
Type checkers are expected to attempt to infer as much information as necessary. The minimum requirement is to handle the builtin decorators #property, #staticmethod and #classmethod.
This means that you can expect the #property annotation should function normally as you'd expect. Without any special treatment.
While python is at heart a dynamically typed language, methods like a mutator are very strongly tied to a specific value (and therfore type) and should only really do one thing rather than one of many things. So while it probably makes since for a comparison method like __gt__, which will likely perform different operations for different types, to take an Any value, a mutator should take as narrow a scope as possible.
Finally, even though type hints are not and probably should never be mandatory, all of the most popular python IDEs such as Pycharm automatically support type hints. They will often give warnings even when another programmer may not be annotating types, but the type can be safely inferred. This means that even when using a library with types hints, mutators with an int annotation, will still be more informative and useful to the end-user than an Any annotation.
I'm starting to get into type hints (aka annotations) in python 3.6, and I can't figure some of the dynamic aspects of this feature.
I wrote the following piece of code, and I want to add annotation and not sure how, even after looking through the docs on type hinting.
This is the function:
def validate_expression(expression: ?):
try:
assert expression
except AssertionError as e:
...
expression needs to be anything that an assert works on (assuming any expression for which bool(expression) is valid).
What should I write instead of the question mark?
UPDATE:
I know that most python expressions can be cast as a Boolean, but the context in which I write this code is one where it is reasonable to expect an expression to not be a assertable.
The relevant example in my case is pandas.DataFrame. Running
bool(pandas.DataFrame()) raises an error, and I have good reason to expect that someone might try to pass a dataframe to the validation function.
UPDATE 2:
Following Chepner's comments and answer, I understand now that:
1. In the vast majority of cases, any python expression will have a valid casting to Boolean, and this is either covered by typing.Any or by not adding annotation at all.
2. In the edge case I was interested in, which is bool(pandas.DataFrame()) # --> ValueError, annotations won't help since this is a runtime error.
3. If there is another edge case that is relevant for static type hinting, I am not aware of it.
4. Given the rarity/non-existence of a relevant example, there's no out of the box type that generically describes just the quality of the ability to be casted to boolean (similar to typing.Iterable), and as far as I'm concerned it is not worth bending over backwards to address such an edge case (although it would be interesting to hear of relevant example and a bend-y solution!)
Any value whatsoever can be used in a boolean context. An instance of object is considered to be a truthy value unless a descendent class provides an alternate definition; anything that is considered false (like an empty list, an empty str, an empty dict, False itself, etc) does so because it has been specially defined to be so.
As such, the only type hint you could use is typing.Any:
from typing import Any
def validate_expression(expression: Any):
try:
assert expression
except AssertionError as e:
...
which, really, is barely worth stating explicitly.
Regarding your update 2: here's a somewhat janky way of accomplishing what you want to do:
Create a custom Protocol that matches any type that defines a __bool__ method. (And perhaps also the __nonzero__ method, if you also want to support Python 2.)
Find or create stubs for the pandas library. Ensure that the type hints for DataFrame do not contain the __bool__ method. That is, will not match the protocol.
Create a function that uses your custom protocol as the type hint.
For example:
# If you're using Python 3.8+
from typing import Protocol
# If you're not, run 'pip install typing_extensions' and do the below instead
from typing_extensions import Protocol
class SupportsBool(Protocol):
def __bool__(self) -> bool: ...
class MyFakeDataFrame:
# ...snip...
pass
class MyFakeBoolableThing:
def __bool__(self) -> bool:
return True
def validate_expression(x: SupportsBool) -> None:
bool(x)
# These all type-check!
validate_expression(True)
validate_expression(0)
validate_expression(MyFakeBoolableThing())
# This will *not* typecheck
validate_expression(MyFakeDataFrame())
# Perhaps surprisingly, these will also not typecheck:
validate_expression("foobar")
validate_expression([1, 2, 3])
The reason why the latter two expressions will not type-check is because neither strings nor lists actually define a custom __bool__ method (or __nonzero__ method in Python 2): instead, they define a __len__ method, and the bool(...) function will fall back to checking __len__ if __bool__/__nonzero__ doesn't exist.
If you do want your validate function to accept such expressions, you'd need to use a type like Union[SupportsBool, SupportsInt] -- but unfortunately, I believe the pandas DataFrame class does implement a functional __len__ method, so you're back to square zero if you take that approach.
So basically, in this case you're either (1) forced into rejecting certain types like str or list that do meaningful things when bool'd, or (2) forced into accepting pandas.DataFrame as an acceptable boolable thing.