Develop Reference

run two python scripts with docker compose

My folder structure looked like this:
My Dockerfile looked like this:
FROM python:3.8-slim-buster
WORKDIR /src
COPY src/requirements.txt requirements.txt
RUN pip install --no-cache-dir -r requirements.txt
COPY src/ .
CMD [ "python", "main.py"]
When I ran these commands:
docker build --tag FinTechExplained_Python_Docker .
docker run free
my main.pyfile ran and gave the correct print statements as well. Now, I have added another file tests.py in the src folder. I want to run the tests.py first and then main.py.
I tried modifying the cmdwithin my docker file like this:
CMD [ "python", "test.py"] && [ "python", "main.py"]
but then it gives me the print statements from only the first test.pyfile.
I read about docker-compose and added this docker-compose.yml file to the root folder:
version: '3'
services:
main:
image: free
command: >
/bin/sh -c 'python tests.py'
main:
image: free
command: >
/bin/sh -c 'python main.py'
then I changed my docker file by removing the cmd:
FROM python:3.8-slim-buster
WORKDIR /src
COPY src/requirements.txt requirements.txt
RUN pip install --no-cache-dir -r requirements.txt
COPY src/ .
Then I ran the following commands:
docker compose build
docker compose run tests
docker compose run main
When I run these commands separately, I get the correct print statements for both testsand main. However, I am not sure if I am using docker-composecorrectly or not.
Am I supposed to run both scripts separately? Or is there a way to run one after another using a single docker command?
How is my Dockerfile supposed to look like if I am running the python scripts from the docker-compose.yml instead?
Edit:
Ideally looking for solutions based on docker-compose

In the Bourne shell, in general, you can run two commands in sequence by putting && between them. It sounds like you're already aware of this.
# without Docker, at a normal shell prompt
python test.py && python main.py
The Dockerfile CMD has two syntactic forms. The JSON-array form does not run a shell, and so it is slightly more efficient and has slightly more consistent escaping rules. If it's not a JSON array then Docker automatically runs it via a shell. So for your use you can use the shell form:
CMD python test.py && python main.py
In comments to other answers you ask about providing this as an override in the docker-compose.yml file. Compose will not normally run a shell for you, so you need to explicitly specify it as part of the command: override.
command: /bin/sh -c 'python test.py && python main.py'
Your Dockerfile should generally specify a CMD and the docker-compose.yml often will not include a command:. This makes it easier to run the image in other contexts (via docker run without Compose; in Kubernetes) since you won't have to retype the command every different way you want to run the container. The entrypoint wrapper pattern highlighted in #sytech's answer is very useful in general and it's easy to add to a container that uses a CMD without an ENTRYPOINT; but it requires the Dockerfile to use CMD as a normal well-formed shell command.

You have to change CMD to ENTRYPOINT. And run the 1st script as daemon in the background using &.
ENTRYPOINT ["/docker_entrypoint.sh"]
docker_entrypoint.sh
#!/bin/bash
set -e
exec python tests.py &
exec python main.py

In general, it is a good rule of thumb that a container should only a single process and that essential process should be pid 1
Using an entrypoint can help you do multiple things at runtime and optionally run user-defined commands using exec, as according to the best practices guide.
For example, if you always want the tests to run whenever the container starts, then execute the defined command in CMD.
First, create an entrypoint script (be sure to make it executable with chmod +x):
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# always run tests first
python /src/tests.py
# then run user-defined command
exec "$#"
Then configure the dockerfile to copy the script and set it as the entrypoint:
#...
COPY entrypoint.sh /docker-entrypoint.sh
ENTRYPOINT ["/docker-entrypoint.sh"]
CMD ["python", "main.py"]
Then when you build an image from this dockerfile and run it, the entrypoint will first execute the tests then run the command to run main.py
The command can also still be overridden by the user when running the image like docker run ... myimage <new command> which will still result in the entrypoint tests being executed, but the user can change the command being run.

You can achieve this by creating a bash script(let's name entrypoint.sh) which is containing the python commands. If you want, you can create background processes of those.
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -e
python tests.py
python main.py
Edit your docker file as follows:
FROM python:3.8-slim-buster
# Create workDir
RUN mkdir code
WORKDIR code
ENV PYTHONPATH = /code
#upgrade pip if you like here
COPY requirements.txt .
RUN pip install -r requirements.txt
# Copy Code
COPY . .
RUN chmod +x entrypoint.sh
ENTRYPOINT ["./entrypoint.sh"]
In the docker compose file, add the following line to the service.
entrypoint: [ "./entrypoint.sh" ]

Have you try this in your docker-compose.yaml?
version: '3'
services:
main:
image: free
command: >
/bin/sh -c 'python3 tests.py & && python3 main.py &'
both will run in the background
then run in terminal
docker-compose up --build

Python script in Docker Container Attach_Socket send not on separate line

I am trying to compile and run python code in Docker.
Dockerfile
FROM python:3
WORKDIR /app
USER root
ADD . .
RUN chmod a+x ./main.py
RUN chmod a+x ./run.sh
ENTRYPOINT ["sh","./run.sh"]
run.sh
#! usr/bin/env bash
timeout --signal=SIGTERM --foreground 500 python3 main.py
exit $?
python code (using docker sdk for python):
client = docker.from_env()
client.images.build(path="./Dockerimagefolder/",tag="sample322")
container = client.containers.create(image="sample322", stdin_open = True)
container.start()
time.sleep(5)
s = container.attach_socket(params={'stdin': 1, 'stream': 1})
s.send('test'.encode())
container log:
Begin script
Enter your nameyou entered
test
as you can see, "you entered" is not shown on the next line, instead, it's placed in the same line as input. It also doesn't show the input that was sent i.e test
I am also unable to get the output, the log I shown above is from the docker app
print(container.logs())

Passing multiple parameters to docker container

I'm trying to pass 2 parameters to a docker container for a dash app (via a shell script). Passing one parameter works, but two doesn't. Here's what happens when I pass two parameters:
command:
sudo sh create_dashboard.sh 6 4
Error:
creating docker
Running for parameter_1: 6
Running for parameter_2: 4
usage: app.py [-h] [-g parameter_1] [-v parameter_2]
app.py: error: argument -g/--parameter_1: expected one argument
The shell script:
echo "creating docker"
docker build -t dash-example .
echo "Running for parameter_1: $1 "
echo "Running for parameter_2: $2 "
docker run --rm -it -p 8080:8080 --memory=10g dash-example $1 $2
Dockerfile:
FROM python:3.8
WORKDIR /app
COPY src/requirements.txt ./
RUN pip install -r requirements.txt
COPY src /app
EXPOSE 8080
ENTRYPOINT [ "python", "app.py", "-g", "-v"]
When I use this command:
sudo sh create_dashboard.sh 6
the docker container runs perfectly, with parameter_2 being None.

You can pass a command into the shell of a container like this:
docker run --rm -it -p 8080:8080 dash-example sh -c "--memory=10g dash-example $1 $2"
So it allows arguments and any other command.

When you docker run ... dash-example $1 $2, the additional parameters are interpreted as the "command" the container should run. Since your image has an ENTRYPOINT, the words of the command are just tacked on to the end of the words of the entrypoint (see Understand how CMD and ENTRYPOINT interact in the Dockerfile documentation). There's no way to cause the words of one command to be interspersed with the words of another; you are effectively getting a command line of
python app.py -g -v 6 4
The approach I'd recommend here is to not use an ENTRYPOINT at all. Make sure you can directly run the application script (its first line should be #!/usr/bin/env python3, it should be executable) and make the image's default CMD be to run the script:
FROM python:3.9
...
# RUN chmod +x app.py # if needed
# no ENTRYPOINT at all
CMD ["./app.py"] # finds "python" via the shebang line
Then your wrapper can supply a complete command line, including the options you need to run:
#!/bin/sh
docker run --rm -it -p 8080:8080 --memory=10g dash-example \
./app.py -g "$1" -v "$2"
(There is an alternate "container as command" pattern, where the ENTRYPOINT contains the command to run and the CMD its options. This can lead to awkward docker run --entrypoint command lines for routine debugging tasks, and if the command itself is short it doesn't really save you a lot. You'd still need to repeat the -g and -v options in the wrapper.)

Missing environment variables on running python cronjob in Docker

I'm running a python script inside a docker container using crontab. Also, I set some environment variables (as database host, password, etc.) in .env file in the project's directory. If I run the script manually inside the container (python3 main.py) everything is working properly. But when the script is run by crontab the environment variables are not found (None).
I have the following setup:
Dockerfile
FROM ubuntu:latest
RUN apt-get update -y
RUN apt-get -y install cron
RUN apt-get install -y python3-pip python-dev
WORKDIR /home/me/theservice
COPY . .
RUN chmod 0644 theservice-cron
RUN touch /var/log/theservice-cron.log
RUN chmod +x run.sh
ENTRYPOINT ./run.sh
run.sh
#!/bin/bash
crontab theservice-cron
cron -f
docker-compose.yml
version: '3.7'
services:
theservice:
build: .
env_file:
- ./.env
theservice-cron
HOME=/home/me/theservice
* * * * * python3 /home/me/theservice/main.py >> /var/log/theservice-cron.log 2>&1
#* * * * * cd /home/me/theservice && python3 main.py >> /var/log/theservice-cron.log 2>&1
I assumed that the cronjob is running in another directory and there the environment variables set in /home/me/theservice/.env are not accessible. So I tried to add HOME=/home/me/theservice line in the theservice-cron file or just to execute /home/me/theservice before running the script but it didn't help.
In the python script, I use os to access environment variables
import os
print(os.environ['db_host'])
How I can fix this problem?

I had similar problem.
I did fix it using the following:
CMD printenv > /etc/environment && cron && tail -f /var/log/theservice-cron.log
According to
https://askubuntu.com/questions/700107/why-do-variables-set-in-my-etc-environment-show-up-in-my-cron-environment, cron reads env vars from /etc/enviroment

For those fighting to get ENV variables from docker-compose into docker, simply have a shell script run at ENTRYPOINT in your Dockerfile, with
printenv > /etc/environment
again, the naming of "/etc/environment" is CRUCIAL !
And then in your crontab, have it call a shell script:
* * * * * bash -c "sh /var/www/html/cron_php.sh"
The scripts simply does :
#!/bin/bash
cd /var/www/html
php whatever.php
You will now have the docker-compose environment variables in your php cron application. It took me a full day to figure this out. Hope i save someone's trouble now !
UPDATE:
In Azure Docker (Web app) the mechanism doesn't seem to work. A small tweak is needed:
In the Dockerfile, in the ENTRYPOINT sh script, write a file (and CHMOD to execution rights chmod 770 ) /etc/environments.sh using this command:
eval $(printenv | awk -F= '{print "export " $1"=""""$2""" }' >> /etc/environments.sh)
Then, in your crontab shell where you execute php, do this:
#!/bin/bash
. /etc/environments.sh
php whatever.php
Notice the "." instead of source. Even though the Docker container is Linux using bash, source did not do the trick, the . did work.
Note: In my local Windows Docker the first solution, using /etc/envrionment worked fine. I was baffled to find out that on Azure the second fix was needed.

Docker_Error_Python_Couchdb sh: 1: docker: not found

I tried to run docker image but have this problem. All the files are saved in the directory "my_new_docker_build". This is the Dockerfile:
FROM python:2.7.14
RUN mkdir /my_new_docker_build
WORKDIR /my_new_docker_build
ADD . /my_new_docker_build/
EXPOSE 5984
CMD ["python", "/my_new_docker_build/py_couchdb.py"]
And this is is my Python code cadded "py_couchdb.py":
from os import system
# Launch volume docker couchdb from command line
system("docker run --name my-couchdb -v /my/custom-config-dir:/opt/couchdb/etc/local.d -d couchdb")
# Coudchdb visible in open world
system("docker run -p 5984:5984 -d couchdb")