I've looked around (including StackOverflow) but can't really find something similar to my case so I'll just ask it here. I'm building an application with Python (it is currently a source code that I'm planning to turn into a Windows executable) and is using this library: https://github.com/xiph/rnnoise. It is not a Python package but a third-party library written primarily in C.
Since I have to install it into my computer in order to use the library inside my code, I want to ask if there is a way to include this library along with the executable so that anyone can just download and use it without having to set up the library? This is important since I can only set up the library on a Linux machine and the executable needs to work with the library platform-independently.
Update: Thanks to Vimalan E and Marat, I had a bit more clue on what I need to do. I was managed to locate the .so files of my required library after running make install on it. The question left is I don't know how to link it with an executable that will be made from my Python source code. For now, I want to include the library as a binary file along with my application (though I am not sure how to achieve that, maybe putting putting the .so near the .exe should do the trick).
Thank you.
Related
I've successfully embedded Python in a multi-platform C++ project.
This required linking to a libpython, which needs to be provided for each platform I'm targeting. For OSX it was easy, I just pulled it out of some homebrew folder.
But I would like my Python scripts to use imports from the standard library (e.g. this one)
What is that going to involve?
Standard Library documentation for Python 3 says that the standard library is a mix of compiled units and .py files, so I'm expecting I will have to maybe link my project against a second library, and somehow inform the Python runtime of the location of the folder containing the standard library's .py files.
But is it really going to be this simple? Is this process documented anywhere?
Am I going to run into trouble on mobile platforms? It looks as though Kivy might be on their way towards solving this problem...
I don't even know the right way to put my question but i will try my best.
I downloaded (Python-3.4.2.tar) the source code of a python interpreter from www.python.org
I extracted the files(using 7-zip).
Now lets say i latter want to use the unziped/extracted fies to create an installer i.e put it in a form that i can double click and Python-3.4.2 will be installed in my computer.
i guess it is called creating a build distriution.
I know i can just download Python-3.4.2.exe from the site and install right away but i want to know how it goes from being source code to becoming something one can install.
Here's a starting point for compiling:
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/2.7/PCbuild/readme.txt
I was able to compile 2.7.13 with:
cd PCBuild
cmd /c get_externals.bat
cmd /c build.bat -e --no-tkinter "/p:PlatformToolset=v100"
3.4 may require a later compiler.
Here's how to build an installer:
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/2.7/Tools/msi/README.txt
For building the CPython python interpreter from source, you'll want to have a look at the instructions at https://docs.python.org/devguide/
These instructions probably also (somewhere) contain the steps to produce a Windows installer, which seems to be done with some tool called PCbuild.
Basically, I think what you are asking is how you can distribute the Python runtime along with your program. The process is pretty simple. First, you may want to take a look at Python's distutils. Secondly, you will need to distribute the Python runtime. Python is currently released within installation binaries for pretty much every major operating system. You have the option of compiling target system(s) yourself in order to make Python silently install.
You will then need to decide where you want the files to go. Most people don't like this sort of behavior, so I recommend putting the files in your programs directory. Shortcuts, system variables, et cetera will need to be looked into.
As another option you can consider porting your script(s) to Jython, as most people tend to have at least the Java runtime. In the process of porting your code there is a way of constructing Java .class files with Jython when coded a certain way. They can then be placed into an executable Jar file. Easy peasy, but I haven't tried this myself, to be honest.
If you want to stick with pure Python, the last hurtle is putting everything in one file. There are plenty of tools for that. I would try Github for starters. For bonus points you can always code your own self-extracting binary.
Post Script: With the title changed, I think you are looking for Creating Build Distributions. It is the second link within the Google results for the query "how to compile python installer". Further down the same page I found this gem.
I've spent countless hours trying to understand this and unfortunately I haven't gotten to an answer yet. Or at least I don't think I have.
First up I should say that I am a Java Developer. I've only recently started working with Python and the build-process is a bit...odd for me.
In my mind I write an application, I compile it to run and I package it into a .jar for other people to use. Either as a library or for end-users to execute and have fun with it. (ignoring stuff like maven or gradle...)
I wrote a little CLT in python that consists of ~6 files and I wanted to distribute it. From what I could find I was supposed to write a setup.py and I found some guides on how to do that but ... to be honest I'm not even sure what that did. I could get my source code bundled into a tar.gz with some other meta data or it would create some weird files that I don't know what to do with.
Then I found PyInstaller and it worked great to package everything into a binary. However I've run into some problems trying to create a Debian package and it has made me re-assess and question the fact that there doesn't seem to be something in Python (without having to use an external tool) that lets me package/ bundle/ whatever my application into a single file to be run.
And that's something I can't get my head around. I mean...before there were tools like PyInstaller and P2Exe and what not, how did people distribute their applications? Am I expected to write a C application, somehow include the python code in there and compile that? Sorry if this seems like a stupid question but I'm really asking. I've googled around so much and spent so much time on it and haven't found a satisfactory answer so I hope someone here can help me with this! Thanks.
If you package your Python code for pip, you can include some executable scripts that start your program. I don't know how the situation was 5 years ago when this question got asked, but nowadays pip is pretty much integrated with Python, to the point that there's a standard library module to bootstrap pip in case it's missing:
https://docs.python.org/3/library/ensurepip.html
The situation is different if you want to package an application for some other package manager, like Anaconda or the package managers of various Linux distributions, or as a Windows installer. Obviously, you'll have to create a separate package for each package manager or installation technique you want to support.
I have written a program. I don't know if it is important how it is written but you can find it here: http://pastebin.com/Z3ZvVPV8 Basically, it asks you to assign values to variables and will perform calculations depending on what variables you chose, and prints the answer.
I would like to know how I can make the program run in a window other than cmd (I am using Windows Vista 32bit). I don't need much at all in terms of GUI, just a window that is a bit more user friendly/easier to look at when they are using the program.
EDIT: To those suggesting using IDLE, while that would work for me, if others want to use the program they would have to download it, so I was hoping for a way for that not to happen.
Python comes with a sort of default GUI package TkInter you can use it.
Also there is a lot of other GUI packages available.
The Python standard library offers a lot of ways to implemt simple (but also rather complex) GUIs. I'd like to point you at the documentation of TK (tool kit for graphical interfaces) http://docs.python.org/library/tk.html where you will find also some useful example of use.
Py2Exe is a viable option if you really don't need a gui. This will make it run and look like a command prompt, but it will be an .exe file. Here is a quick quote from thier page: "py2exe is a Python Distutils extension which converts Python scripts into executable Windows programs, able to run without requiring a Python installation."
Another alternative is to get Portable Python. Here is a quote from thier webpage: "Portable Python is a Python® programming language preconfigured to run directly from any USB storage device, enabling you to have, at any time, a portable programming environment. Just download it, extract to your portable storage device or hard drive and in 10 minutes you are ready to create your next Python® application." After packaging the portable python and your .py or .pyc file then create a .bat file that runs the portable python "Python-Portable.exe" with the correct command line parameters for loading your script. Be sure to use relative paths in the batch file in case they are running it from a flash drive, or something other than the same location as you.
NOTE: This is really not a good way to do this as thier download page states: "Installed size: based on selected packages, between 49MB and 480MB". Also be sure to read the the current Python Software Foundation License, as that is what Portable Python is released under, and it may or may not be legal to package it in a closed source project. I haven't really looked at the license myself to be able to tell you. If you are releasing it as open source, then there would not be an issue though. As a quick side note, if you need that .bat file to be a .exe file then you can use a .bat to .exe converter battoexe.com is one. This is really going the long way about doing the whole thing, but it is an option.
Sources:
Working with Python on and off for 7 years now, a lot that using a portable version on a flash drive, and also dealing with Batch files much longer.
It's my understanding that py2exe can only dynamically link a python2x.dll file. Are there any Python "compilers" out there that can package it all into one standalone .exe file for easier portability?
If so or if not, which is the best compiler z0mg!
If you check the bottom of the py2exe SingleFileExecutable wiki page you'll see that it can create one-file executables. They do include the DLL inside, but you shouldn't notice that. I believe it works with a freakish hack that intercepts the LoadLibrary calls to allow them to read from elsewhere in the .exe file, but again you shouldn't notice that. We've used it before... it works.
PyInstaller claims to be able to create a single-executable that's user-friendly. Perhaps that would meet your needs. I've never used it.
py2exe can package it all in single executable, without needing any python installation on target system, it may include python2x.dll with it, but for the end user how does it matter
From what I understand, it is possible to statically link python into an executable, but then you lose your ability to load other dynamic modules (.pyd files) like os and zlib and math. Unless you are able to statically compile those as well into your main program.
And as far as I know, the only compiler that can do this is the C compiler that is compiling python from source. :)
I'm not sure its worth the effort at all.
Better just use p2exe and create a directory of files that can be zipped and shipped.