Develop Reference

Python Inserting a string

I need to insert a string (character by character) into another string at every 3rd position
For example:- string_1:-wwwaabkccgkll
String_2:- toadhp
Now I need to insert string2 char by char into string1 at every third position
So the output must be wwtaaobkaccdgkhllp
Need in Python.. even Java is ok
So i tried this
Test_str="hiimdumbiknow"
challenge="toadh"
new_st=challenge [k]
Last=list(test_str)
K=0
For i in range(Len(test_str)):
if(i%3==0):
last.insert(i,new_st)
K+=1
and the output i get
thitimtdutmbtiknow

You can split test_str into sub-strings to length 2, and then iterate merging them with challenge:
def concat3(test_str, challenge):
chunks = [test_str[i:i+2] for i in range(0,len(test_str),2)]
result = []
i = j = 0
while i<len(chunks) or j<len(challenge):
if i<len(chunks):
result.append(chunks[i])
i += 1
if j<len(challenge):
result.append(challenge[j])
j += 1
return ''.join(result)
test_str = "hiimdumbiknow"
challenge = "toadh"
print(concat3(test_str, challenge))
# hitimoduambdikhnow
This method works even if the lengths of test_str and challenge are mismatching. (The remaining characters in the longest string will be appended at the end.)

You can split Test_str in to groups of two letters and then re-join with each letter from challenge in between as follows;
import itertools
print(''.join(f'{two}{letter}' for two, letter in itertools.zip_longest([Test_str[i:i+2] for i in range(0,len(Test_str),2)], challenge, fillvalue='')))
Output:
hitimoduambdikhnow
*edited to split in to groups of two rather than three as originally posted

you can try this, make an iter above the second string and iterate over the first one and select which character should be part of the final string according the position
def add3(s1, s2):
def n():
try:
k = iter(s2)
for i,j in enumerate(s1):
yield (j if (i==0 or (i+1)%3) else next(k))
except:
try:
yield s1[i+1:]
except:
pass
return ''.join(n())

def insertstring(test_str,challenge):
result = ''
x = [x for x in test_str]
y = [y for y in challenge]
j = 0
for i in range(len(x)):
if i % 2 != 0 or i == 0:
result += x[i]
else:
if j < 5:
result += y[j]
result += x[i]
j += 1
get_last_element = x[-1]
return result + get_last_element
print(insertstring(test_str,challenge))
#output: hitimoduambdikhnow

How to find the longest repeating sequence using python

I went through an interview, where they asked me to print the longest repeated character sequence.
I got stuck is there any way to get it?
But my code prints only the count of characters present in a string is there any approach to get the expected output
import pandas as pd
import collections
a = 'abcxyzaaaabbbbbbb'
lst = collections.Counter(a)
df = pd.Series(lst)
df
Expected output :
bbbbbbb
How to add logic to in above code?

A regex solution:
max(re.split(r'((.)\2*)', a), key=len)
Or without library help (but less efficient):
s = ''
max((s := s * (c in s) + c for c in a), key=len)
Both compute the string 'bbbbbbb'.

Without any modules, you could use a comprehension to go backward through possible sizes and get the first character multiplication that is present in the string:
next(c*s for s in range(len(a),0,-1) for c in a if c*s in a)
That's quite bad in terms of efficiency though
another approach would be to detect the positions of letter changes and take the longest subrange from those
chg = [i for i,(x,y) in enumerate(zip(a,a[1:]),1) if x!=y]
s,e = max(zip([0]+chg,chg+[len(a)]),key=lambda se:se[1]-se[0])
longest = a[s:e]
Of course a basic for-loop solution will also work:
si,sc = 0,"" # current streak (start, character)
ls,le = 0,0 # longest streak (start, end)
for i,c in enumerate(a+" "): # extra space to force out last char.
if i-si > le-ls: ls,le = si,i # new longest
if sc != c: si,sc = i,c # new streak
longest = a[ls:le]
print(longest) # bbbbbbb

A more long winded solution, picked wholesale from:
maximum-consecutive-repeating-character-string
def maxRepeating(str):
len_s = len(str)
count = 0
# Find the maximum repeating
# character starting from str[i]
res = str[0]
for i in range(len_s):
cur_count = 1
for j in range(i + 1, len_s):
if (str[i] != str[j]):
break
cur_count += 1
# Update result if required
if cur_count > count :
count = cur_count
res = str[i]
return res, count
# Driver code
if __name__ == "__main__":
str = "abcxyzaaaabbbbbbb"
print(maxRepeating(str))
Solution:
('b', 7)

How can I fix this error for popping a word in a list/string? (Python 3.x)

I'm not exactly the kind of guy you call "good" at coding. In this particular scenario, on line 13, I'm trying to pop the first word in the list until I'm done, but it keeps giving me the 'str' object can not be interpreted as an integer issue.
What am I doing wrong here?
n = n.split(" ")
N = n[0]
K = n[1]
f1 = input()
f1 = f1.split(" ")
f1 = list(f1)
current = 0
for x in f1:
while current <= 7:
print(x)
f1 = list(f1.pop()[0])
current = current + len(x)
if current > 7:
print("\n")
current = 0

According your comments, this program will split lines to contain max K characters:
K = 7
s = "hello my name is Bessie and this is my essay"
out, cnt = [], 0
for word in s.split():
l = len(word)
if cnt + l <= K:
cnt += l
if not out:
out.append([word])
else:
out[-1].append(word)
else:
cnt = l
out.append([word])
print("\n".join(" ".join(line) for line in out))
Prints:
hello my
name is
Bessie
and this
is my
essay

You could try splitting the string on the index, and inserting a newline there. Each time you do this your string gets one character longer, so we can use enumerate (which starts counting at zero) to add a number to our slice indexes.
s = 'Thanks for helping me'
new_line_index = [7,11, 19]
for i, x in enumerate(new_line_index):
s = s[:x+i] + '\n' + s[x+i:]
print(s)
Output
Thanks
for
helping
me

when a word in a sentence is input the program identifies all the positions where the word occurs [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
How to find all occurrences of a substring?
(32 answers)
Closed 12 months ago.
How do I find multiple occurrences of a string within a string in Python? Consider this:
>>> text = "Allowed Hello Hollow"
>>> text.find("ll")
1
>>>
So the first occurrence of ll is at 1 as expected. How do I find the next occurrence of it?
Same question is valid for a list. Consider:
>>> x = ['ll', 'ok', 'll']
How do I find all the ll with their indexes?

Using regular expressions, you can use re.finditer to find all (non-overlapping) occurences:
>>> import re
>>> text = 'Allowed Hello Hollow'
>>> for m in re.finditer('ll', text):
print('ll found', m.start(), m.end())
ll found 1 3
ll found 10 12
ll found 16 18
Alternatively, if you don't want the overhead of regular expressions, you can also repeatedly use str.find to get the next index:
>>> text = 'Allowed Hello Hollow'
>>> index = 0
>>> while index < len(text):
index = text.find('ll', index)
if index == -1:
break
print('ll found at', index)
index += 2 # +2 because len('ll') == 2
ll found at 1
ll found at 10
ll found at 16
This also works for lists and other sequences.

I think what you are looking for is string.count
"Allowed Hello Hollow".count('ll')
>>> 3
Hope this helps
NOTE: this only captures non-overlapping occurences

For the list example, use a comprehension:
>>> l = ['ll', 'xx', 'll']
>>> print [n for (n, e) in enumerate(l) if e == 'll']
[0, 2]
Similarly for strings:
>>> text = "Allowed Hello Hollow"
>>> print [n for n in xrange(len(text)) if text.find('ll', n) == n]
[1, 10, 16]
this will list adjacent runs of "ll', which may or may not be what you want:
>>> text = 'Alllowed Hello Holllow'
>>> print [n for n in xrange(len(text)) if text.find('ll', n) == n]
[1, 2, 11, 17, 18]

FWIW, here are a couple of non-RE alternatives that I think are neater than poke's solution.
The first uses str.index and checks for ValueError:
def findall(sub, string):
"""
>>> text = "Allowed Hello Hollow"
>>> tuple(findall('ll', text))
(1, 10, 16)
"""
index = 0 - len(sub)
try:
while True:
index = string.index(sub, index + len(sub))
yield index
except ValueError:
pass
The second tests uses str.find and checks for the sentinel of -1 by using iter:
def findall_iter(sub, string):
"""
>>> text = "Allowed Hello Hollow"
>>> tuple(findall_iter('ll', text))
(1, 10, 16)
"""
def next_index(length):
index = 0 - length
while True:
index = string.find(sub, index + length)
yield index
return iter(next_index(len(sub)).next, -1)
To apply any of these functions to a list, tuple or other iterable of strings, you can use a higher-level function —one that takes a function as one of its arguments— like this one:
def findall_each(findall, sub, strings):
"""
>>> texts = ("fail", "dolly the llama", "Hello", "Hollow", "not ok")
>>> list(findall_each(findall, 'll', texts))
[(), (2, 10), (2,), (2,), ()]
>>> texts = ("parallellized", "illegally", "dillydallying", "hillbillies")
>>> list(findall_each(findall_iter, 'll', texts))
[(4, 7), (1, 6), (2, 7), (2, 6)]
"""
return (tuple(findall(sub, string)) for string in strings)

For your list example:
In [1]: x = ['ll','ok','ll']
In [2]: for idx, value in enumerate(x):
...: if value == 'll':
...: print idx, value
0 ll
2 ll
If you wanted all the items in a list that contained 'll', you could also do that.
In [3]: x = ['Allowed','Hello','World','Hollow']
In [4]: for idx, value in enumerate(x):
...: if 'll' in value:
...: print idx, value
...:
...:
0 Allowed
1 Hello
3 Hollow

This code might not be the shortest/most efficient but it is simple and understandable
def findall(f, s):
l = []
i = -1
while True:
i = s.find(f, i+1)
if i == -1:
return l
l.append(s.find(f, i))
findall('test', 'test test test test')
# [0, 5, 10, 15]

For the first version, checking a string:
def findall(text, sub):
"""Return all indices at which substring occurs in text"""
return [
index
for index in range(len(text) - len(sub) + 1)
if text[index:].startswith(sub)
]
print(findall('Allowed Hello Hollow', 'll'))
# [1, 10, 16]
No need to import re. This should run in linear time, as it only loops through the string once (and stops before the end, once there aren't enough characters left to fit the substring). I also find it quite readable, personally.
Note that this will find overlapping occurrences:
print(findall('aaa', 'aa'))
# [0, 1]

>>> for n,c in enumerate(text):
... try:
... if c+text[n+1] == "ll": print n
... except: pass
...
1
10
16

This version should be linear in length of the string, and should be fine as long as the sequences aren't too repetitive (in which case you can replace the recursion with a while loop).
def find_all(st, substr, start_pos=0, accum=[]):
ix = st.find(substr, start_pos)
if ix == -1:
return accum
return find_all(st, substr, start_pos=ix + 1, accum=accum + [ix])
bstpierre's list comprehension is a good solution for short sequences, but looks to have quadratic complexity and never finished on a long text I was using.
findall_lc = lambda txt, substr: [n for n in xrange(len(txt))
if txt.find(substr, n) == n]
For a random string of non-trivial length, the two functions give the same result:
import random, string; random.seed(0)
s = ''.join([random.choice(string.ascii_lowercase) for _ in range(100000)])
>>> find_all(s, 'th') == findall_lc(s, 'th')
True
>>> findall_lc(s, 'th')[:4]
[564, 818, 1872, 2470]
But the quadratic version is about 300 times slower
%timeit find_all(s, 'th')
1000 loops, best of 3: 282 µs per loop
%timeit findall_lc(s, 'th')
10 loops, best of 3: 92.3 ms per loop

Brand new to programming in general and working through an online tutorial. I was asked to do this as well, but only using the methods I had learned so far (basically strings and loops). Not sure if this adds any value here, and I know this isn't how you would do it, but I got it to work with this:
needle = input()
haystack = input()
counter = 0
n=-1
for i in range (n+1,len(haystack)+1):
for j in range(n+1,len(haystack)+1):
n=-1
if needle != haystack[i:j]:
n = n+1
continue
if needle == haystack[i:j]:
counter = counter + 1
print (counter)

The following function finds all the occurrences of a string inside another while informing the position where each occurrence is found.
You can call the function using the test cases in the table below. You can try with words, spaces and numbers all mixed up.
The function works well with overlapping characters.
theString
aString
"661444444423666455678966"
"55"
"661444444423666455678966"
"44"
"6123666455678966"
"666"
"66123666455678966"
"66"
Calling examples:
1. print("Number of occurrences: ", find_all("123666455556785555966", "5555"))
output:
Found in position: 7
Found in position: 14
Number of occurrences: 2
2. print("Number of occurrences: ", find_all("Allowed Hello Hollow", "ll "))
output:
Found in position: 1
Found in position: 10
Found in position: 16
Number of occurrences: 3
3. print("Number of occurrences: ", find_all("Aaa bbbcd$###abWebbrbbbbrr 123", "bbb"))
output:
Found in position: 4
Found in position: 21
Number of occurrences: 2
def find_all(theString, aString):
count = 0
i = len(aString)
x = 0
while x < len(theString) - (i-1):
if theString[x:x+i] == aString:
print("Found in position: ", x)
x=x+i
count=count+1
else:
x=x+1
return count

#!/usr/local/bin python3
#-*- coding: utf-8 -*-
main_string = input()
sub_string = input()
count = counter = 0
for i in range(len(main_string)):
if main_string[i] == sub_string[0]:
k = i + 1
for j in range(1, len(sub_string)):
if k != len(main_string) and main_string[k] == sub_string[j]:
count += 1
k += 1
if count == (len(sub_string) - 1):
counter += 1
count = 0
print(counter)
This program counts the number of all substrings even if they are overlapped without the use of regex. But this is a naive implementation and for better results in worst case it is advised to go through either Suffix Tree, KMP and other string matching data structures and algorithms.

Here is my function for finding multiple occurrences. Unlike the other solutions here, it supports the optional start and end parameters for slicing, just like str.index:
def all_substring_indexes(string, substring, start=0, end=None):
result = []
new_start = start
while True:
try:
index = string.index(substring, new_start, end)
except ValueError:
return result
else:
result.append(index)
new_start = index + len(substring)

A simple iterative code which returns a list of indices where the substring occurs.
def allindices(string, sub):
l=[]
i = string.find(sub)
while i >= 0:
l.append(i)
i = string.find(sub, i + 1)
return l

You can split to get relative positions then sum consecutive numbers in a list and add (string length * occurence order) at the same time to get the wanted string indexes.
>>> key = 'll'
>>> text = "Allowed Hello Hollow"
>>> x = [len(i) for i in text.split(key)[:-1]]
>>> [sum(x[:i+1]) + i*len(key) for i in range(len(x))]
[1, 10, 16]
>>>

Maybe not so Pythonic, but somewhat more self-explanatory. It returns the position of the word looked in the original string.
def retrieve_occurences(sequence, word, result, base_counter):
indx = sequence.find(word)
if indx == -1:
return result
result.append(indx + base_counter)
base_counter += indx + len(word)
return retrieve_occurences(sequence[indx + len(word):], word, result, base_counter)

I think there's no need to test for length of text; just keep finding until there's nothing left to find. Like this:
>>> text = 'Allowed Hello Hollow'
>>> place = 0
>>> while text.find('ll', place) != -1:
print('ll found at', text.find('ll', place))
place = text.find('ll', place) + 2
ll found at 1
ll found at 10
ll found at 16

You can also do it with conditional list comprehension like this:
string1= "Allowed Hello Hollow"
string2= "ll"
print [num for num in xrange(len(string1)-len(string2)+1) if string1[num:num+len(string2)]==string2]
# [1, 10, 16]

I had randomly gotten this idea just a while ago. Using a While loop with string splicing and string search can work, even for overlapping strings.
findin = "algorithm alma mater alison alternation alpines"
search = "al"
inx = 0
num_str = 0
while True:
inx = findin.find(search)
if inx == -1: #breaks before adding 1 to number of string
break
inx = inx + 1
findin = findin[inx:] #to splice the 'unsearched' part of the string
num_str = num_str + 1 #counts no. of string
if num_str != 0:
print("There are ",num_str," ",search," in your string.")
else:
print("There are no ",search," in your string.")
I'm an amateur in Python Programming (Programming of any language, actually), and am not sure what other issues it could have, but I guess it's working fine?
I guess lower() could be used somewhere in it too if needed.

Finding longest substring in alphabetical order

EDIT: I am aware that a question with similar task was already asked in SO but I'm interested to find out the problem in this specific piece of code. I am also aware that this problem can be solved without using recursion.
The task is to write a program which will find (and print) the longest sub-string in which the letters occur in alphabetical order. If more than 1 equally long sequences were found, then the first one should be printed. For example, the output for a string abczabcd will be abcz.
I have solved this problem with recursion which seemed to pass my manual tests. However when I run an automated tests set which generate random strings, I have noticed that in some cases, the output is incorrect. For example:
if s = 'hixwluvyhzzzdgd', the output is hix instead of luvy
if s = 'eseoojlsuai', the output is eoo instead of jlsu
if s = 'drurotsxjehlwfwgygygxz', the output is dru instead of ehlw
After some time struggling, I couldn't figure out what is so special about these strings that causes the bug.
This is my code:
pos = 0
maxLen = 0
startPos = 0
endPos = 0
def last_pos(pos):
if pos < (len(s) - 1):
if s[pos + 1] >= s[pos]:
pos += 1
if pos == len(s)-1:
return len(s)
else:
return last_pos(pos)
return pos
for i in range(len(s)):
if last_pos(i+1) != None:
diff = last_pos(i) - i
if diff - 1 > maxLen:
maxLen = diff
startPos = i
endPos = startPos + diff
print s[startPos:endPos+1]

There are many things to improve in your code but making minimum changes so as to make it work. The problem is you should have if last_pos(i) != None: in your for loop (i instead of i+1) and you should compare diff (not diff - 1) against maxLen. Please read other answers to learn how to do it better.
for i in range(len(s)):
if last_pos(i) != None:
diff = last_pos(i) - i + 1
if diff > maxLen:
maxLen = diff
startPos = i
endPos = startPos + diff - 1

Here. This does what you want. One pass, no need for recursion.
def find_longest_substring_in_alphabetical_order(s):
groups = []
cur_longest = ''
prev_char = ''
for c in s.lower():
if prev_char and c < prev_char:
groups.append(cur_longest)
cur_longest = c
else:
cur_longest += c
prev_char = c
return max(groups, key=len) if groups else s
Using it:
>>> find_longest_substring_in_alphabetical_order('hixwluvyhzzzdgd')
'luvy'
>>> find_longest_substring_in_alphabetical_order('eseoojlsuai')
'jlsu'
>>> find_longest_substring_in_alphabetical_order('drurotsxjehlwfwgygygxz')
'ehlw'
Note: It will probably break on strange characters, has only been tested with the inputs you suggested. Since this is a "homework" question, I will leave you with the solution as is, though there is still some optimization to be done, I wanted to leave it a little bit understandable.

You can use nested for loops, slicing and sorted. If the string is not all lower-case then you can convert the sub-strings to lower-case before comparing using str.lower:
def solve(strs):
maxx = ''
for i in xrange(len(strs)):
for j in xrange(i+1, len(strs)):
s = strs[i:j+1]
if ''.join(sorted(s)) == s:
maxx = max(maxx, s, key=len)
else:
break
return maxx
Output:
>>> solve('hixwluvyhzzzdgd')
'luvy'
>>> solve('eseoojlsuai')
'jlsu'
>>> solve('drurotsxjehlwfwgygygxz')
'ehlw'

Python has a powerful builtin package itertools and a wonderful function within groupby
An intuitive use of the Key function can give immense mileage.
In this particular case, you just have to keep a track of order change and group the sequence accordingly. The only exception is the boundary case which you have to handle separately
Code
def find_long_cons_sub(s):
class Key(object):
'''
The Key function returns
1: For Increasing Sequence
0: For Decreasing Sequence
'''
def __init__(self):
self.last_char = None
def __call__(self, char):
resp = True
if self.last_char:
resp = self.last_char < char
self.last_char = char
return resp
def find_substring(groups):
'''
The Boundary Case is when an increasing sequence
starts just after the Decresing Sequence. This causes
the first character to be in the previous group.
If you do not want to handle the Boundary Case
seperately, you have to mak the Key function a bit
complicated to flag the start of increasing sequence'''
yield next(groups)
try:
while True:
yield next(groups)[-1:] + next(groups)
except StopIteration:
pass
groups = (list(g) for k, g in groupby(s, key = Key()) if k)
#Just determine the maximum sequence based on length
return ''.join(max(find_substring(groups), key = len))
Result
>>> find_long_cons_sub('drurotsxjehlwfwgygygxz')
'ehlw'
>>> find_long_cons_sub('eseoojlsuai')
'jlsu'
>>> find_long_cons_sub('hixwluvyhzzzdgd')
'luvy'

Simple and easy.
Code :
s = 'hixwluvyhzzzdgd'
r,p,t = '','',''
for c in s:
if p <= c:
t += c
p = c
else:
if len(t) > len(r):
r = t
t,p = c,c
if len(t) > len(r):
r = t
print 'Longest substring in alphabetical order is: ' + r
Output :
Longest substring in alphabetical order which appeared first: luvy

Here is a single pass solution with a fast loop. It reads each character only once. Inside the loop operations are limited to
1 string comparison (1 char x 1 char)
1 integer increment
2 integer subtractions
1 integer comparison
1 to 3 integer assignments
1 string assignment
No containers are used. No function calls are made. The empty string is handled without special-case code. All character codes, including chr(0), are properly handled. If there is a tie for the longest alphabetical substring, the function returns the first winning substring it encountered. Case is ignored for purposes of alphabetization, but case is preserved in the output substring.
def longest_alphabetical_substring(string):
start, end = 0, 0 # range of current alphabetical string
START, END = 0, 0 # range of longest alphabetical string yet found
prev = chr(0) # previous character
for char in string.lower(): # scan string ignoring case
if char < prev: # is character out of alphabetical order?
start = end # if so, start a new substring
end += 1 # either way, increment substring length
if end - start > END - START: # found new longest?
START, END = start, end # if so, update longest
prev = char # remember previous character
return string[START : END] # return longest alphabetical substring
Result
>>> longest_alphabetical_substring('drurotsxjehlwfwgygygxz')
'ehlw'
>>> longest_alphabetical_substring('eseoojlsuai')
'jlsu'
>>> longest_alphabetical_substring('hixwluvyhzzzdgd')
'luvy'
>>>

a lot more looping, but it gets the job done
s = raw_input("Enter string")
fin=""
s_pos =0
while s_pos < len(s):
n=1
lng=" "
for c in s[s_pos:]:
if c >= lng[n-1]:
lng+=c
n+=1
else :
break
if len(lng) > len(fin):
fin= lng`enter code here`
s_pos+=1
print "Longest string: " + fin

def find_longest_order():
`enter code here`arr = []
`enter code here`now_long = ''
prev_char = ''
for char in s.lower():
if prev_char and char < prev_char:
arr.append(now_long)
now_long = char
else:
now_long += char
prev_char = char
if len(now_long) == len(s):
return now_long
else:
return max(arr, key=len)
def main():
print 'Longest substring in alphabetical order is: ' + find_longest_order()
main()

Simple and easy to understand:
s = "abcbcd" #The original string
l = len(s) #The length of the original string
maxlenstr = s[0] #maximum length sub-string, taking the first letter of original string as value.
curlenstr = s[0] #current length sub-string, taking the first letter of original string as value.
for i in range(1,l): #in range, the l is not counted.
if s[i] >= s[i-1]: #If current letter is greater or equal to previous letter,
curlenstr += s[i] #add the current letter to current length sub-string
else:
curlenstr = s[i] #otherwise, take the current letter as current length sub-string
if len(curlenstr) > len(maxlenstr): #if current cub-string's length is greater than max one,
maxlenstr = curlenstr; #take current one as max one.
print("Longest substring in alphabetical order is:", maxlenstr)

s = input("insert some string: ")
start = 0
end = 0
temp = ""
while end+1 <len(s):
while end+1 <len(s) and s[end+1] >= s[end]:
end += 1
if len(s[start:end+1]) > len(temp):
temp = s[start:end+1]
end +=1
start = end
print("longest ordered part is: "+temp)

I suppose this is problem set question for CS6.00.1x on EDX. Here is what I came up with.
s = raw_input("Enter the string: ")
longest_sub = ""
last_longest = ""
for i in range(len(s)):
if len(last_longest) > 0:
if last_longest[-1] <= s[i]:
last_longest += s[i]
else:
last_longest = s[i]
else:
last_longest = s[i]
if len(last_longest) > len(longest_sub):
longest_sub = last_longest
print(longest_sub)

I came up with this solution
def longest_sorted_string(s):
max_string = ''
for i in range(len(s)):
for j in range(i+1, len(s)+1):
string = s[i:j]
arr = list(string)
if sorted(string) == arr and len(max_string) < len(string):
max_string = string
return max_string

Assuming this is from Edx course:
till this question, we haven't taught anything about strings and their advanced operations in python
So, I would simply go through the looping and conditional statements
string ="" #taking a plain string to represent the then generated string
present ="" #the present/current longest string
for i in range(len(s)): #not len(s)-1 because that totally skips last value
j = i+1
if j>= len(s):
j=i #using s[i+1] simply throws an error of not having index
if s[i] <= s[j]: #comparing the now and next value
string += s[i] #concatinating string if above condition is satisied
elif len(string) != 0 and s[i] > s[j]: #don't want to lose the last value
string += s[i] #now since s[i] > s[j] #last one will be printed
if len(string) > len(present): #1 > 0 so from there we get to store many values
present = string #swapping to largest string
string = ""
if len(string) > len(present): #to swap from if statement
present = string
if present == s[len(s)-1]: #if no alphabet is in order then first one is to be the output
present = s[0]
print('Longest substring in alphabetical order is:' + present)

I agree with #Abhijit about the power of itertools.groupby() but I took a simpler approach to (ab)using it and avoided the boundary case problems:
from itertools import groupby
LENGTH, LETTERS = 0, 1
def longest_sorted(string):
longest_length, longest_letters = 0, []
key, previous_letter = 0, chr(0)
def keyfunc(letter):
nonlocal key, previous_letter
if letter < previous_letter:
key += 1
previous_letter = letter
return key
for _, group in groupby(string, keyfunc):
letters = list(group)
length = len(letters)
if length > longest_length:
longest_length, longest_letters = length, letters
return ''.join(longest_letters)
print(longest_sorted('hixwluvyhzzzdgd'))
print(longest_sorted('eseoojlsuai'))
print(longest_sorted('drurotsxjehlwfwgygygxz'))
print(longest_sorted('abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz'))
OUTPUT
> python3 test.py
luvy
jlsu
ehlw
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
>

s = 'azcbobobegghakl'
i=1
subs=s[0]
subs2=s[0]
while(i<len(s)):
j=i
while(j<len(s)):
if(s[j]>=s[j-1]):
subs+=s[j]
j+=1
else:
subs=subs.replace(subs[:len(subs)],s[i])
break
if(len(subs)>len(subs2)):
subs2=subs2.replace(subs2[:len(subs2)], subs[:len(subs)])
subs=subs.replace(subs[:len(subs)],s[i])
i+=1
print("Longest substring in alphabetical order is:",subs2)

s = 'gkuencgybsbezzilbfg'
x = s.lower()
y = ''
z = [] #creating an empty listing which will get filled
for i in range(0,len(x)):
if i == len(x)-1:
y = y + str(x[i])
z.append(y)
break
a = x[i] <= x[i+1]
if a == True:
y = y + str(x[i])
else:
y = y + str(x[i])
z.append(y) # fill the list
y = ''
# search of 1st longest string
L = len(max(z,key=len)) # key=len takes length in consideration
for i in range(0,len(z)):
a = len(z[i])
if a == L:
print 'Longest substring in alphabetical order is:' + str(z[i])
break

first_seq=s[0]
break_seq=s[0]
current = s[0]
for i in range(0,len(s)-1):
if s[i]<=s[i+1]:
first_seq = first_seq + s[i+1]
if len(first_seq) > len(current):
current = first_seq
else:
first_seq = s[i+1]
break_seq = first_seq
print("Longest substring in alphabetical order is: ", current)