Is it possible to get another thread's print content? - python

I will execute two methods get and post at the same time in diffrent threads, the first method get will last for a long time(100 seconds), and the second request post will repeat every 5 seconds. Here get request will print a lot as follow
import time
def get():
for i in range(100):
print(i)
print("\n")
time.sleep(1)
What post need to do is to collect all the print content from get and append to a txt every time it executes(if file exists, add new contents to txt). Here is the pseudocode.
def post(request):
print_from_get = sys.stdout
with open("output.txt", "w") as text_file:
text_file.write(print_from_get)
My question is whether we can collect the print from get, if possible, how should I do it?

I present at the end a way for doing what is requested but I do not recommend using bare prints for this. There are better tools, and if you still want to stick with print, you can use the file keyword to specify where the output should go.
import time
import sys
def get(out_stream=sys.stdout):
for i in range(100):
print(i, file=out_stream)
print("\n")
time.sleep(1)
you can pass a file object opened with open as the argument, and the output will go to that file. Alternatively, you can use a io.StringIO as #barmar suggested, and write the contents to a file once get finishes.
All other options mess with sys.stdout, that is the default file object that print uses (it is the default value of the file keyword argument). This affects everything that uses sys.stdout, which can be more than all the print statements that get executed.
If you need to redirect bare print statements (not using print's file keyword), you must replace sys.stdout. The most obvious replacement would be to use an output file object:
from threading import Thread
import time
import sys
def get():
for i in range(100):
print(i)
time.sleep(1)
if __name__ == "__main__":
old_stdout = sys.stdout
with open("output.txt", "a") as text_fil:
sys.stdout = text_fil
get_thread = Thread(None, get)
get_thread.start()
get_thread.join()
sys.stdout = old_stdout
If you need to have one writing thread and a reading thread, exactly as the question states, you can use Queues, but a simpler approach uses pipes (I added a dummy thread (postthread) that calls post to make it similar to OP's use):
from threading import Thread
import time
import sys
import os
def get():
for i in range(100):
print(i)
time.sleep(1)
def post(read_pipe):
with open("output.txt", "ab") as text_fil: # os.read yields bytes
try:
data = os.read(read_pipe, 65535) # arbitrary (but large) number
text_fil.write(data)
except Exception as e:
return True # the read descriptor was closed: quit
return len(data) == 0 # the write descriptor was closed: quit
def postthread(read_pipe):
for _ in range(21):
time.sleep(5)
if post(read_pipe):
return
if __name__ == "__main__":
old_stdout = sys.stdout
r_fd, w_fd = os.pipe()
with os.fdopen(w_fd, 'wt') as write_pipe: # write pipe is a file object
read_pipe = r_fd
sys.stdout = write_pipe
get_thread = Thread(None, get)
post_thread = Thread(None, postthread, args=(read_pipe, ))
post_thread.start()
get_thread.start()
get_thread.join()
sys.stdout = old_stdout
# closing the write pipe (and its file descriptor) causes read to see EOF.
post_thread.join()
os.close(r_fd)
sys.stdout = old_stdout

Related

Jupyter Notebook exports the output of a cell to a file in REAL TIME [duplicate]

How do I redirect stdout to an arbitrary file in Python?
When a long-running Python script (e.g, web application) is started from within the ssh session and backgounded, and the ssh session is closed, the application will raise IOError and fail the moment it tries to write to stdout. I needed to find a way to make the application and modules output to a file rather than stdout to prevent failure due to IOError. Currently, I employ nohup to redirect output to a file, and that gets the job done, but I was wondering if there was a way to do it without using nohup, out of curiosity.
I have already tried sys.stdout = open('somefile', 'w'), but this does not seem to prevent some external modules from still outputting to terminal (or maybe the sys.stdout = ... line did not fire at all). I know it should work from simpler scripts I've tested on, but I also didn't have time yet to test on a web application yet.
If you want to do the redirection within the Python script, setting sys.stdout to a file object does the trick:
# for python3
import sys
with open('file', 'w') as sys.stdout:
print('test')
A far more common method is to use shell redirection when executing (same on Windows and Linux):
$ python3 foo.py > file
There is contextlib.redirect_stdout() function in Python 3.4+:
from contextlib import redirect_stdout
with open('help.txt', 'w') as f:
with redirect_stdout(f):
print('it now prints to `help.text`')
It is similar to:
import sys
from contextlib import contextmanager
#contextmanager
def redirect_stdout(new_target):
old_target, sys.stdout = sys.stdout, new_target # replace sys.stdout
try:
yield new_target # run some code with the replaced stdout
finally:
sys.stdout = old_target # restore to the previous value
that can be used on earlier Python versions. The latter version is not reusable. It can be made one if desired.
It doesn't redirect the stdout at the file descriptors level e.g.:
import os
from contextlib import redirect_stdout
stdout_fd = sys.stdout.fileno()
with open('output.txt', 'w') as f, redirect_stdout(f):
print('redirected to a file')
os.write(stdout_fd, b'not redirected')
os.system('echo this also is not redirected')
b'not redirected' and 'echo this also is not redirected' are not redirected to the output.txt file.
To redirect at the file descriptor level, os.dup2() could be used:
import os
import sys
from contextlib import contextmanager
def fileno(file_or_fd):
fd = getattr(file_or_fd, 'fileno', lambda: file_or_fd)()
if not isinstance(fd, int):
raise ValueError("Expected a file (`.fileno()`) or a file descriptor")
return fd
#contextmanager
def stdout_redirected(to=os.devnull, stdout=None):
if stdout is None:
stdout = sys.stdout
stdout_fd = fileno(stdout)
# copy stdout_fd before it is overwritten
#NOTE: `copied` is inheritable on Windows when duplicating a standard stream
with os.fdopen(os.dup(stdout_fd), 'wb') as copied:
stdout.flush() # flush library buffers that dup2 knows nothing about
try:
os.dup2(fileno(to), stdout_fd) # $ exec >&to
except ValueError: # filename
with open(to, 'wb') as to_file:
os.dup2(to_file.fileno(), stdout_fd) # $ exec > to
try:
yield stdout # allow code to be run with the redirected stdout
finally:
# restore stdout to its previous value
#NOTE: dup2 makes stdout_fd inheritable unconditionally
stdout.flush()
os.dup2(copied.fileno(), stdout_fd) # $ exec >&copied
The same example works now if stdout_redirected() is used instead of redirect_stdout():
import os
import sys
stdout_fd = sys.stdout.fileno()
with open('output.txt', 'w') as f, stdout_redirected(f):
print('redirected to a file')
os.write(stdout_fd, b'it is redirected now\n')
os.system('echo this is also redirected')
print('this is goes back to stdout')
The output that previously was printed on stdout now goes to output.txt as long as stdout_redirected() context manager is active.
Note: stdout.flush() does not flush
C stdio buffers on Python 3 where I/O is implemented directly on read()/write() system calls. To flush all open C stdio output streams, you could call libc.fflush(None) explicitly if some C extension uses stdio-based I/O:
try:
import ctypes
from ctypes.util import find_library
except ImportError:
libc = None
else:
try:
libc = ctypes.cdll.msvcrt # Windows
except OSError:
libc = ctypes.cdll.LoadLibrary(find_library('c'))
def flush(stream):
try:
libc.fflush(None)
stream.flush()
except (AttributeError, ValueError, IOError):
pass # unsupported
You could use stdout parameter to redirect other streams, not only sys.stdout e.g., to merge sys.stderr and sys.stdout:
def merged_stderr_stdout(): # $ exec 2>&1
return stdout_redirected(to=sys.stdout, stdout=sys.stderr)
Example:
from __future__ import print_function
import sys
with merged_stderr_stdout():
print('this is printed on stdout')
print('this is also printed on stdout', file=sys.stderr)
Note: stdout_redirected() mixes buffered I/O (sys.stdout usually) and unbuffered I/O (operations on file descriptors directly). Beware, there could be buffering issues.
To answer, your edit: you could use python-daemon to daemonize your script and use logging module (as #erikb85 suggested) instead of print statements and merely redirecting stdout for your long-running Python script that you run using nohup now.
you can try this too much better
import sys
class Logger(object):
def __init__(self, filename="Default.log"):
self.terminal = sys.stdout
self.log = open(filename, "a")
def write(self, message):
self.terminal.write(message)
self.log.write(message)
sys.stdout = Logger("yourlogfilename.txt")
print "Hello world !" # this is should be saved in yourlogfilename.txt
The other answers didn't cover the case where you want forked processes to share your new stdout.
To do that:
from os import open, close, dup, O_WRONLY
old = dup(1)
close(1)
open("file", O_WRONLY) # should open on 1
..... do stuff and then restore
close(1)
dup(old) # should dup to 1
close(old) # get rid of left overs
Quoted from PEP 343 -- The "with" Statement (added import statement):
Redirect stdout temporarily:
import sys
from contextlib import contextmanager
#contextmanager
def stdout_redirected(new_stdout):
save_stdout = sys.stdout
sys.stdout = new_stdout
try:
yield None
finally:
sys.stdout = save_stdout
Used as follows:
with open(filename, "w") as f:
with stdout_redirected(f):
print "Hello world"
This isn't thread-safe, of course, but neither is doing this same dance manually. In single-threaded programs (for example in scripts) it is a popular way of doing things.
import sys
sys.stdout = open('stdout.txt', 'w')
Here is a variation of Yuda Prawira answer:
implement flush() and all the file attributes
write it as a contextmanager
capture stderr also
.
import contextlib, sys
#contextlib.contextmanager
def log_print(file):
# capture all outputs to a log file while still printing it
class Logger:
def __init__(self, file):
self.terminal = sys.stdout
self.log = file
def write(self, message):
self.terminal.write(message)
self.log.write(message)
def __getattr__(self, attr):
return getattr(self.terminal, attr)
logger = Logger(file)
_stdout = sys.stdout
_stderr = sys.stderr
sys.stdout = logger
sys.stderr = logger
try:
yield logger.log
finally:
sys.stdout = _stdout
sys.stderr = _stderr
with log_print(open('mylogfile.log', 'w')):
print('hello world')
print('hello world on stderr', file=sys.stderr)
# you can capture the output to a string with:
# with log_print(io.StringIO()) as log:
# ....
# print('[captured output]', log.getvalue())
You need a terminal multiplexer like either tmux or GNU screen
I'm surprised that a small comment by Ryan Amos' to the original question is the only mention of a solution far preferable to all the others on offer, no matter how clever the python trickery may be and how many upvotes they've received. Further to Ryan's comment, tmux is a nice alternative to GNU screen.
But the principle is the same: if you ever find yourself wanting to leave a terminal job running while you log-out, head to the cafe for a sandwich, pop to the bathroom, go home (etc) and then later, reconnect to your terminal session from anywhere or any computer as though you'd never been away, terminal multiplexers are the answer. Think of them as VNC or remote desktop for terminal sessions. Anything else is a workaround. As a bonus, when the boss and/or partner comes in and you inadvertently ctrl-w / cmd-w your terminal window instead of your browser window with its dodgy content, you won't have lost the last 18 hours-worth of processing!
Based on this answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/5916874/1060344, here is another way I figured out which I use in one of my projects. For whatever you replace sys.stderr or sys.stdout with, you have to make sure that the replacement complies with file interface, especially if this is something you are doing because stderr/stdout are used in some other library that is not under your control. That library may be using other methods of file object.
Check out this way where I still let everything go do stderr/stdout (or any file for that matter) and also send the message to a log file using Python's logging facility (but you can really do anything with this):
class FileToLogInterface(file):
'''
Interface to make sure that everytime anything is written to stderr, it is
also forwarded to a file.
'''
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
if 'cfg' not in kwargs:
raise TypeError('argument cfg is required.')
else:
if not isinstance(kwargs['cfg'], config.Config):
raise TypeError(
'argument cfg should be a valid '
'PostSegmentation configuration object i.e. '
'postsegmentation.config.Config')
self._cfg = kwargs['cfg']
kwargs.pop('cfg')
self._logger = logging.getlogger('access_log')
super(FileToLogInterface, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
def write(self, msg):
super(FileToLogInterface, self).write(msg)
self._logger.info(msg)
Programs written in other languages (e.g. C) have to do special magic (called double-forking) expressly to detach from the terminal (and to prevent zombie processes). So, I think the best solution is to emulate them.
A plus of re-executing your program is, you can choose redirections on the command-line, e.g. /usr/bin/python mycoolscript.py 2>&1 1>/dev/null
See this post for more info: What is the reason for performing a double fork when creating a daemon?
I know this question is answered (using python abc.py > output.log 2>&1 ), but I still have to say:
When writing your program, don't write to stdout. Always use logging to output whatever you want. That would give you a lot of freedom in the future when you want to redirect, filter, rotate the output files.
As mentioned by #jfs, most solutions will not properly handle some types of stdout output such as that from C extensions. There is a module that takes care of all this on PyPI called wurlitzer. You just need its sys_pipes context manager. It's as easy as using:
from contextlib import redirect_stdout
import os
from wurlitzer import sys_pipes
log = open("test.log", "a")
with redirect_stdout(log), sys_pipes():
print("print statement")
os.system("echo echo call")
Based on previous answers on this post I wrote this class for myself as a more compact and flexible way of redirecting the output of pieces of code - here just to a list - and ensure that the output is normalized afterwards.
class out_to_lt():
def __init__(self, lt):
if type(lt) == list:
self.lt = lt
else:
raise Exception("Need to pass a list")
def __enter__(self):
import sys
self._sys = sys
self._stdout = sys.stdout
sys.stdout = self
return self
def write(self,txt):
self.lt.append(txt)
def __exit__(self, type, value, traceback):
self._sys.stdout = self._stdout
Used as:
lt = []
with out_to_lt(lt) as o:
print("Test 123\n\n")
print(help(str))
Updating. Just found a scenario where I had to add two extra methods, but was easy to adapt:
class out_to_lt():
...
def isatty(self):
return True #True: You're running in a real terminal, False:You're being piped, redirected, cron
def flush(self):
pass
There are other versions using context but nothing this simple. I actually just googled to double check it would work and was surprised not to see it, so for other people looking for a quick solution that is safe and directed at only the code within the context block, here it is:
import sys
with open('test_file', 'w') as sys.stdout:
print('Testing 1 2 3')
Tested like so:
$ cat redirect_stdout.py
import sys
with open('test_file', 'w') as sys.stdout:
print('Testing 1 2 3')
$ python redirect_stdout.py
$ cat test_file
Testing 1 2 3

How do I get sys.stdout to be monitored by GObject.io_add_watch?

How do I get sys.stdout to be monitored by GObject.io_add_watch?
code:
GObject.io_add_watch(os.fdopen(self.builder), GObject.IO_IN, self.write_to_buffer)
I tried to get the stdout stream of my main GTK process via os.fdopen(self.builder),
yet it raises the exception:
TypeError: an integer is required
Could you please explain how I have to properly advise GObject.io_add_watch to
watch the sys.stdout stream?
Thanks!
The API will let you pass sys.stdout directly, since it's a file-like object with a fileno() method. It won't work right, though, because you can't read from sys.stdout. If you want to capture all attempts to write to stdout, you can replace it with a pipe:
import gobject
import sys
import os
def ok(stream, condition):
s = os.fdopen(stream)
data = s.readline()
with open("called.txt", "w") as f:
f.write("got {} ".format(data))
return False
def do_print():
print "hey there"
sys.stdout.flush()
rpipe, wpipe = os.pipe()
wpipe = os.fdopen(wpipe, "w", 0)
sys.stdout = wpipe # Replace sys.stdout
gobject.io_add_watch(rpipe, gobject.IO_IN, ok)
gobject.idle_add(do_print)
gobject.MainLoop().run()
Contents of "called.txt" after running the script:
got hey there

Python output on both console and file

I'm writing a code to analyze PDF file. I want to display the output on the console as well as to have a copy of the output in a file, I used this code save the output in a file:
import sys
sys.stdout = open('C:\\users\\Suleiman JK\\Desktop\\file.txt',"w")
print "test"
but could I display the output into console as well but without using classes because I'm not good with them?
(This answer uses Python 3 and you will have to adapt it if you prefer Python 2.)
Start by importing the Python logging package (and sys for accessing the standard output stream):
import logging
import sys
In your entry point, set up a handler for both the standard output stream and your output file:
targets = logging.StreamHandler(sys.stdout), logging.FileHandler('test.log')
and configure the logging package to output only the message without the log level:
logging.basicConfig(format='%(message)s', level=logging.INFO, handlers=targets)
Now you can use it:
>>> logging.info('testing the logging system')
testing the logging system
>>> logging.info('second message')
second message
>>> print(*open('test.log'), sep='')
testing the logging system
second message
sys.stdout can point to any object that has a write method, so you can create a class that writes to both a file and the console.
import sys
class LoggingPrinter:
def __init__(self, filename):
self.out_file = open(filename, "w")
self.old_stdout = sys.stdout
#this object will take over `stdout`'s job
sys.stdout = self
#executed when the user does a `print`
def write(self, text):
self.old_stdout.write(text)
self.out_file.write(text)
#executed when `with` block begins
def __enter__(self):
return self
#executed when `with` block ends
def __exit__(self, type, value, traceback):
#we don't want to log anymore. Restore the original stdout object.
sys.stdout = self.old_stdout
print "Entering section of program that will be logged."
with LoggingPrinter("result.txt"):
print "I've got a lovely bunch of coconuts."
print "Exiting logged section of program."
Result:
Console:
Entering section of program that will be logged.
I've got a lovely bunch of coconuts.
Exiting logged section of program.
result.txt:
I've got a lovely bunch of coconuts.
This method may be preferable to codesparkle's in some circumstances, because you don't have to replace all your existing prints with logging.info. Just put everything you want logged into a with block.
You could make a function which prints both to console and to file. You can either do it by switching stdout, e.g. like this:
def print_both(file, *args):
temp = sys.stdout #assign console output to a variable
print ' '.join([str(arg) for arg in args])
sys.stdout = file
print ' '.join([str(arg) for arg in args])
sys.stdout = temp #set stdout back to console output
or by using file write method (I suggest using this unless you have to use stdout)
def print_both(file, *args):
toprint = ' '.join([str(arg) for arg in args])
print toprint
file.write(toprint)
Note that:
The file argument passed to the function must be opened outside of the function (e.g. at the beginning of the program) and closed outside of the function (e.g. at the end of the program). You should open it in append mode.
Passing *args to the function allows you to pass arguments the same way you do to a print function. So you pass arguments to print...
...like this:
print_both(open_file_variable, 'pass arguments as if it is', 'print!', 1, '!')
Otherwise, you'd have to turn everything into a single argument i.e. a single string. It would look like this:
print_both(open_file_variable, 'you should concatenate'+str(4334654)+'arguments together')
I still suggest you learn to use classes properly, you'd benefit from that very much. Hope this helps.
I was too lazy to write a function, so when I needed to print to both the console and file I wrote this quick and (not so) dirty code:
import sys
...
with open('myreport.txt', 'w') as f:
for out in [sys.stdout, f]:
print('some data', file=out)
print('some mre data', file=out)

writing the console output to a file in python [duplicate]

How do I redirect stdout to an arbitrary file in Python?
When a long-running Python script (e.g, web application) is started from within the ssh session and backgounded, and the ssh session is closed, the application will raise IOError and fail the moment it tries to write to stdout. I needed to find a way to make the application and modules output to a file rather than stdout to prevent failure due to IOError. Currently, I employ nohup to redirect output to a file, and that gets the job done, but I was wondering if there was a way to do it without using nohup, out of curiosity.
I have already tried sys.stdout = open('somefile', 'w'), but this does not seem to prevent some external modules from still outputting to terminal (or maybe the sys.stdout = ... line did not fire at all). I know it should work from simpler scripts I've tested on, but I also didn't have time yet to test on a web application yet.
If you want to do the redirection within the Python script, setting sys.stdout to a file object does the trick:
# for python3
import sys
with open('file', 'w') as sys.stdout:
print('test')
A far more common method is to use shell redirection when executing (same on Windows and Linux):
$ python3 foo.py > file
There is contextlib.redirect_stdout() function in Python 3.4+:
from contextlib import redirect_stdout
with open('help.txt', 'w') as f:
with redirect_stdout(f):
print('it now prints to `help.text`')
It is similar to:
import sys
from contextlib import contextmanager
#contextmanager
def redirect_stdout(new_target):
old_target, sys.stdout = sys.stdout, new_target # replace sys.stdout
try:
yield new_target # run some code with the replaced stdout
finally:
sys.stdout = old_target # restore to the previous value
that can be used on earlier Python versions. The latter version is not reusable. It can be made one if desired.
It doesn't redirect the stdout at the file descriptors level e.g.:
import os
from contextlib import redirect_stdout
stdout_fd = sys.stdout.fileno()
with open('output.txt', 'w') as f, redirect_stdout(f):
print('redirected to a file')
os.write(stdout_fd, b'not redirected')
os.system('echo this also is not redirected')
b'not redirected' and 'echo this also is not redirected' are not redirected to the output.txt file.
To redirect at the file descriptor level, os.dup2() could be used:
import os
import sys
from contextlib import contextmanager
def fileno(file_or_fd):
fd = getattr(file_or_fd, 'fileno', lambda: file_or_fd)()
if not isinstance(fd, int):
raise ValueError("Expected a file (`.fileno()`) or a file descriptor")
return fd
#contextmanager
def stdout_redirected(to=os.devnull, stdout=None):
if stdout is None:
stdout = sys.stdout
stdout_fd = fileno(stdout)
# copy stdout_fd before it is overwritten
#NOTE: `copied` is inheritable on Windows when duplicating a standard stream
with os.fdopen(os.dup(stdout_fd), 'wb') as copied:
stdout.flush() # flush library buffers that dup2 knows nothing about
try:
os.dup2(fileno(to), stdout_fd) # $ exec >&to
except ValueError: # filename
with open(to, 'wb') as to_file:
os.dup2(to_file.fileno(), stdout_fd) # $ exec > to
try:
yield stdout # allow code to be run with the redirected stdout
finally:
# restore stdout to its previous value
#NOTE: dup2 makes stdout_fd inheritable unconditionally
stdout.flush()
os.dup2(copied.fileno(), stdout_fd) # $ exec >&copied
The same example works now if stdout_redirected() is used instead of redirect_stdout():
import os
import sys
stdout_fd = sys.stdout.fileno()
with open('output.txt', 'w') as f, stdout_redirected(f):
print('redirected to a file')
os.write(stdout_fd, b'it is redirected now\n')
os.system('echo this is also redirected')
print('this is goes back to stdout')
The output that previously was printed on stdout now goes to output.txt as long as stdout_redirected() context manager is active.
Note: stdout.flush() does not flush
C stdio buffers on Python 3 where I/O is implemented directly on read()/write() system calls. To flush all open C stdio output streams, you could call libc.fflush(None) explicitly if some C extension uses stdio-based I/O:
try:
import ctypes
from ctypes.util import find_library
except ImportError:
libc = None
else:
try:
libc = ctypes.cdll.msvcrt # Windows
except OSError:
libc = ctypes.cdll.LoadLibrary(find_library('c'))
def flush(stream):
try:
libc.fflush(None)
stream.flush()
except (AttributeError, ValueError, IOError):
pass # unsupported
You could use stdout parameter to redirect other streams, not only sys.stdout e.g., to merge sys.stderr and sys.stdout:
def merged_stderr_stdout(): # $ exec 2>&1
return stdout_redirected(to=sys.stdout, stdout=sys.stderr)
Example:
from __future__ import print_function
import sys
with merged_stderr_stdout():
print('this is printed on stdout')
print('this is also printed on stdout', file=sys.stderr)
Note: stdout_redirected() mixes buffered I/O (sys.stdout usually) and unbuffered I/O (operations on file descriptors directly). Beware, there could be buffering issues.
To answer, your edit: you could use python-daemon to daemonize your script and use logging module (as #erikb85 suggested) instead of print statements and merely redirecting stdout for your long-running Python script that you run using nohup now.
you can try this too much better
import sys
class Logger(object):
def __init__(self, filename="Default.log"):
self.terminal = sys.stdout
self.log = open(filename, "a")
def write(self, message):
self.terminal.write(message)
self.log.write(message)
sys.stdout = Logger("yourlogfilename.txt")
print "Hello world !" # this is should be saved in yourlogfilename.txt
The other answers didn't cover the case where you want forked processes to share your new stdout.
To do that:
from os import open, close, dup, O_WRONLY
old = dup(1)
close(1)
open("file", O_WRONLY) # should open on 1
..... do stuff and then restore
close(1)
dup(old) # should dup to 1
close(old) # get rid of left overs
Quoted from PEP 343 -- The "with" Statement (added import statement):
Redirect stdout temporarily:
import sys
from contextlib import contextmanager
#contextmanager
def stdout_redirected(new_stdout):
save_stdout = sys.stdout
sys.stdout = new_stdout
try:
yield None
finally:
sys.stdout = save_stdout
Used as follows:
with open(filename, "w") as f:
with stdout_redirected(f):
print "Hello world"
This isn't thread-safe, of course, but neither is doing this same dance manually. In single-threaded programs (for example in scripts) it is a popular way of doing things.
import sys
sys.stdout = open('stdout.txt', 'w')
Here is a variation of Yuda Prawira answer:
implement flush() and all the file attributes
write it as a contextmanager
capture stderr also
.
import contextlib, sys
#contextlib.contextmanager
def log_print(file):
# capture all outputs to a log file while still printing it
class Logger:
def __init__(self, file):
self.terminal = sys.stdout
self.log = file
def write(self, message):
self.terminal.write(message)
self.log.write(message)
def __getattr__(self, attr):
return getattr(self.terminal, attr)
logger = Logger(file)
_stdout = sys.stdout
_stderr = sys.stderr
sys.stdout = logger
sys.stderr = logger
try:
yield logger.log
finally:
sys.stdout = _stdout
sys.stderr = _stderr
with log_print(open('mylogfile.log', 'w')):
print('hello world')
print('hello world on stderr', file=sys.stderr)
# you can capture the output to a string with:
# with log_print(io.StringIO()) as log:
# ....
# print('[captured output]', log.getvalue())
You need a terminal multiplexer like either tmux or GNU screen
I'm surprised that a small comment by Ryan Amos' to the original question is the only mention of a solution far preferable to all the others on offer, no matter how clever the python trickery may be and how many upvotes they've received. Further to Ryan's comment, tmux is a nice alternative to GNU screen.
But the principle is the same: if you ever find yourself wanting to leave a terminal job running while you log-out, head to the cafe for a sandwich, pop to the bathroom, go home (etc) and then later, reconnect to your terminal session from anywhere or any computer as though you'd never been away, terminal multiplexers are the answer. Think of them as VNC or remote desktop for terminal sessions. Anything else is a workaround. As a bonus, when the boss and/or partner comes in and you inadvertently ctrl-w / cmd-w your terminal window instead of your browser window with its dodgy content, you won't have lost the last 18 hours-worth of processing!
Based on this answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/5916874/1060344, here is another way I figured out which I use in one of my projects. For whatever you replace sys.stderr or sys.stdout with, you have to make sure that the replacement complies with file interface, especially if this is something you are doing because stderr/stdout are used in some other library that is not under your control. That library may be using other methods of file object.
Check out this way where I still let everything go do stderr/stdout (or any file for that matter) and also send the message to a log file using Python's logging facility (but you can really do anything with this):
class FileToLogInterface(file):
'''
Interface to make sure that everytime anything is written to stderr, it is
also forwarded to a file.
'''
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
if 'cfg' not in kwargs:
raise TypeError('argument cfg is required.')
else:
if not isinstance(kwargs['cfg'], config.Config):
raise TypeError(
'argument cfg should be a valid '
'PostSegmentation configuration object i.e. '
'postsegmentation.config.Config')
self._cfg = kwargs['cfg']
kwargs.pop('cfg')
self._logger = logging.getlogger('access_log')
super(FileToLogInterface, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
def write(self, msg):
super(FileToLogInterface, self).write(msg)
self._logger.info(msg)
Programs written in other languages (e.g. C) have to do special magic (called double-forking) expressly to detach from the terminal (and to prevent zombie processes). So, I think the best solution is to emulate them.
A plus of re-executing your program is, you can choose redirections on the command-line, e.g. /usr/bin/python mycoolscript.py 2>&1 1>/dev/null
See this post for more info: What is the reason for performing a double fork when creating a daemon?
I know this question is answered (using python abc.py > output.log 2>&1 ), but I still have to say:
When writing your program, don't write to stdout. Always use logging to output whatever you want. That would give you a lot of freedom in the future when you want to redirect, filter, rotate the output files.
As mentioned by #jfs, most solutions will not properly handle some types of stdout output such as that from C extensions. There is a module that takes care of all this on PyPI called wurlitzer. You just need its sys_pipes context manager. It's as easy as using:
from contextlib import redirect_stdout
import os
from wurlitzer import sys_pipes
log = open("test.log", "a")
with redirect_stdout(log), sys_pipes():
print("print statement")
os.system("echo echo call")
Based on previous answers on this post I wrote this class for myself as a more compact and flexible way of redirecting the output of pieces of code - here just to a list - and ensure that the output is normalized afterwards.
class out_to_lt():
def __init__(self, lt):
if type(lt) == list:
self.lt = lt
else:
raise Exception("Need to pass a list")
def __enter__(self):
import sys
self._sys = sys
self._stdout = sys.stdout
sys.stdout = self
return self
def write(self,txt):
self.lt.append(txt)
def __exit__(self, type, value, traceback):
self._sys.stdout = self._stdout
Used as:
lt = []
with out_to_lt(lt) as o:
print("Test 123\n\n")
print(help(str))
Updating. Just found a scenario where I had to add two extra methods, but was easy to adapt:
class out_to_lt():
...
def isatty(self):
return True #True: You're running in a real terminal, False:You're being piped, redirected, cron
def flush(self):
pass
There are other versions using context but nothing this simple. I actually just googled to double check it would work and was surprised not to see it, so for other people looking for a quick solution that is safe and directed at only the code within the context block, here it is:
import sys
with open('test_file', 'w') as sys.stdout:
print('Testing 1 2 3')
Tested like so:
$ cat redirect_stdout.py
import sys
with open('test_file', 'w') as sys.stdout:
print('Testing 1 2 3')
$ python redirect_stdout.py
$ cat test_file
Testing 1 2 3

Capture stdout from a script?

suppose there is a script doing something like this:
# module writer.py
import sys
def write():
sys.stdout.write("foobar")
Now suppose I want to capture the output of the write function and store it in a variable for further processing. The naive solution was:
# module mymodule.py
from writer import write
out = write()
print out.upper()
But this doesn't work. I come up with another solution and it works, but please, let me know if there is a better way to solve the problem. Thanks
import sys
from cStringIO import StringIO
# setup the environment
backup = sys.stdout
# ####
sys.stdout = StringIO() # capture output
write()
out = sys.stdout.getvalue() # release output
# ####
sys.stdout.close() # close the stream
sys.stdout = backup # restore original stdout
print out.upper() # post processing
For future visitors: Python 3.4 contextlib provides for this directly (see Python contextlib help) via the redirect_stdout context manager:
from contextlib import redirect_stdout
import io
f = io.StringIO()
with redirect_stdout(f):
help(pow)
s = f.getvalue()
Setting stdout is a reasonable way to do it. Another is to run it as another process:
import subprocess
proc = subprocess.Popen(["python", "-c", "import writer; writer.write()"], stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
out = proc.communicate()[0]
print out.upper()
Here is a context manager version of your code. It yields a list of two values; the first is stdout, the second is stderr.
import contextlib
#contextlib.contextmanager
def capture():
import sys
from cStringIO import StringIO
oldout,olderr = sys.stdout, sys.stderr
try:
out=[StringIO(), StringIO()]
sys.stdout,sys.stderr = out
yield out
finally:
sys.stdout,sys.stderr = oldout, olderr
out[0] = out[0].getvalue()
out[1] = out[1].getvalue()
with capture() as out:
print 'hi'
Starting with Python 3 you can also use sys.stdout.buffer.write() to write (already) encoded byte strings to stdout (see stdout in Python 3).
When you do that, the simple StringIO approach doesn't work because neither sys.stdout.encoding nor sys.stdout.buffer would be available.
Starting with Python 2.6 you can use the TextIOBase API, which includes the missing attributes:
import sys
from io import TextIOWrapper, BytesIO
# setup the environment
old_stdout = sys.stdout
sys.stdout = TextIOWrapper(BytesIO(), sys.stdout.encoding)
# do some writing (indirectly)
write("blub")
# get output
sys.stdout.seek(0) # jump to the start
out = sys.stdout.read() # read output
# restore stdout
sys.stdout.close()
sys.stdout = old_stdout
# do stuff with the output
print(out.upper())
This solution works for Python 2 >= 2.6 and Python 3.
Please note that our sys.stdout.write() only accepts unicode strings and sys.stdout.buffer.write() only accepts byte strings.
This might not be the case for old code, but is often the case for code that is built to run on Python 2 and 3 without changes.
If you need to support code that sends byte strings to stdout directly without using stdout.buffer, you can use this variation:
class StdoutBuffer(TextIOWrapper):
def write(self, string):
try:
return super(StdoutBuffer, self).write(string)
except TypeError:
# redirect encoded byte strings directly to buffer
return super(StdoutBuffer, self).buffer.write(string)
You don't have to set the encoding of the buffer the sys.stdout.encoding, but this helps when using this method for testing/comparing script output.
Or maybe use functionality that is already there...
from IPython.utils.capture import capture_output
with capture_output() as c:
print('some output')
c()
print c.stdout
This is the decorator counterpart of my original code.
writer.py remains the same:
import sys
def write():
sys.stdout.write("foobar")
mymodule.py sligthly gets modified:
from writer import write as _write
from decorators import capture
#capture
def write():
return _write()
out = write()
# out post processing...
And here is the decorator:
def capture(f):
"""
Decorator to capture standard output
"""
def captured(*args, **kwargs):
import sys
from cStringIO import StringIO
# setup the environment
backup = sys.stdout
try:
sys.stdout = StringIO() # capture output
f(*args, **kwargs)
out = sys.stdout.getvalue() # release output
finally:
sys.stdout.close() # close the stream
sys.stdout = backup # restore original stdout
return out # captured output wrapped in a string
return captured
Here's a context manager taking inspiration from #JonnyJD's answer supporting writing bytes to buffer attributes abut also taking advantage of sys's dunder-io referenes for further simplification.
import io
import sys
import contextlib
#contextlib.contextmanager
def capture_output():
output = {}
try:
# Redirect
sys.stdout = io.TextIOWrapper(io.BytesIO(), sys.stdout.encoding)
sys.stderr = io.TextIOWrapper(io.BytesIO(), sys.stderr.encoding)
yield output
finally:
# Read
sys.stdout.seek(0)
sys.stderr.seek(0)
output['stdout'] = sys.stdout.read()
output['stderr'] = sys.stderr.read()
sys.stdout.close()
sys.stderr.close()
# Restore
sys.stdout = sys.__stdout__
sys.stderr = sys.__stderr__
with capture_output() as output:
print('foo')
sys.stderr.buffer.write(b'bar')
print('stdout: {stdout}'.format(stdout=output['stdout']))
print('stderr: {stderr}'.format(stderr=output['stderr']))
Output is:
stdout: foo
stderr: bar
The question here (the example of how to redirect output, not the tee part) uses os.dup2 to redirect a stream at the OS level. That is nice because it will apply to commands that you spawn from your program as well.
I think You should look at these four objects:
from test.test_support import captured_stdout, captured_output, \
captured_stderr, captured_stdin
Example:
from writer import write
with captured_stdout() as stdout:
write()
print stdout.getvalue().upper()
UPD: As Eric said in a comment, one shouldn't use they directly, so I copied and pasted it.
# Code from test.test_support:
import contextlib
import sys
#contextlib.contextmanager
def captured_output(stream_name):
"""Return a context manager used by captured_stdout and captured_stdin
that temporarily replaces the sys stream *stream_name* with a StringIO."""
import StringIO
orig_stdout = getattr(sys, stream_name)
setattr(sys, stream_name, StringIO.StringIO())
try:
yield getattr(sys, stream_name)
finally:
setattr(sys, stream_name, orig_stdout)
def captured_stdout():
"""Capture the output of sys.stdout:
with captured_stdout() as s:
print "hello"
self.assertEqual(s.getvalue(), "hello")
"""
return captured_output("stdout")
def captured_stderr():
return captured_output("stderr")
def captured_stdin():
return captured_output("stdin")
I like the contextmanager solution however if you need the buffer stored with the open file and fileno support you could do something like this.
import six
from six.moves import StringIO
class FileWriteStore(object):
def __init__(self, file_):
self.__file__ = file_
self.__buff__ = StringIO()
def __getattribute__(self, name):
if name in {
"write", "writelines", "get_file_value", "__file__",
"__buff__"}:
return super(FileWriteStore, self).__getattribute__(name)
return self.__file__.__getattribute__(name)
def write(self, text):
if isinstance(text, six.string_types):
try:
self.__buff__.write(text)
except:
pass
self.__file__.write(text)
def writelines(self, lines):
try:
self.__buff__.writelines(lines)
except:
pass
self.__file__.writelines(lines)
def get_file_value(self):
return self.__buff__.getvalue()
use
import sys
sys.stdout = FileWriteStore(sys.stdout)
print "test"
buffer = sys.stdout.get_file_value()
# you don't want to print the buffer while still storing
# else it will double in size every print
sys.stdout = sys.stdout.__file__
print buffer
Another way when third party code has already copied a reference to sys.stdout is to temporarily replace the write() method itself:
from types import MethodType
...
f = io.StringIO()
def new_write(self, data):
f.write(data)
old_write = sys.stdout.write
sys.stdout.write = MethodType(new_write, sys.stdout)
error = command.run(args)
sys.stdout.write = old_write
output = f.getvalue()

Categories

Resources