When to use events versus pass a reference to a parent (PyQT)

When to use events versus pass a reference to a parent (PyQT) - python

I'm trying to understand which of the following approaches is better. I'll use PyQt5 to illustrate the example, as that's the system I'm working with.
We have a Class ControlWidget(QWidget) that provides UI components and spawns helper threads that are just workers executing some task. If one of the workers experiences a failure, we want to notify the parent so it can visually update the user and do some other things like cleanup/disable user input.
Approach 1 would be to send an event from the worker that encounters the error and catch it in the parent instance. The worker Class has an errorSignal that simply indicates the presence of an error.
# The worker class
Class Worker(QObject, Thread):
errorSignal = pyqtSignal(bool)
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self._running = True
def run(self):
while self._running:
try:
# do some work here that might fail
except:
# notify parent that there was an error
errorSignal.emit(True)
self._running = False
def terminate(self):
self._running = False
# The parent class
class ControlWidget(QWidget):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
# instantiate the workers
self.worker1 = Worker()
self.worker2 = Worker()
# connect to the error signal
self.worker1.errorSignal.connect(self.handle_error)
self.worker2.errorSignal.connect(self.handle_error)
# start the workers
self.worker1.start()
self.worker2.start()
def handle_error(self, error):
if error:
# clean up worker threads
self.worker1.terminate()
self.worker1.join()
self.worker2.terminate()
self.worker2.join()
# notify user
self.setStyleSheet('background: red;')
# disable UI input etc
self.button.setEnabled(False)
...
Approach 2 would be to make an error_status property on the parent, and pass a reference to each child worker, so it can toggle the error bit directly.
# The worker class
Class Worker(QObject, Thread):
def __init__(self, parent):
super().__init__()
self._running = True
self.parent = parent
def run(self):
while self._running:
try:
# do some work here that might fail
except:
# notify parent that there was an error
self.parent.error_status = True
def terminate(self):
self._running = False
# The parent class
class ControlWidget(QWidget):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
# instantiate the workers
self.worker1 = Worker(parent=self)
self.worker2 = Worker(parent=self)
# no signals here :)
# start the workers
self.worker1.start()
self.worker2.start()
#property
def error_status(self):
return self._error_status
#error_status.setter
def error_status(self, value):
self._error_status = value
self.handle_error(value)
def handle_error(self, error):
if error:
# clean up worker threads
self.worker1.terminate()
self.worker1.join()
self.worker2.terminate()
self.worker2.join()
# notify user
self.setStyleSheet('background: red;')
# disable UI input etc
self.button.setEnabled(False)
...
Events per second limits?
Functionally both approaches will work, however, I suppose I'm worried that if I have a lot of events in my application (I do) I'll overload the event queue and lock up or miss some. I read somewhere that Qt has a limit of about 2 million events per second (although now I can't find the reference). It may just depend on available memory. If I may conceivably reach this limit, isn't it better to try to offload some event handling where possible?
Is approach 2 a better way to handle this type of issue (presuming I've addressed the thread safety issue with my edit)? It does feel slightly gross to pass references to parent/child objects all over the place.
Perhaps this is 6 of one, a half dozen of the other? Any feedback would be appreciated.

Events cannot be missed, they are all processed and eventually discarded if not handled and/or ignored (which are two related but different things).
Both your approaches have flaws, though.
Signals
You should not use terminate() (the docs clearly say that it's dangerous and its use is discouraged).
QThread also doesn't have a join() method, it has wait() which does the same, but you should not use it in the main thread: Qt automatically calls the connected slot in the receiver's thread, and since the signal is connected to handle_error (which is a member of an object in the main thread) the result is that it will block the main thread until the thread has actually finished execution. To avoid that, wait() must be executed in the worker thread, so you can eventually consider a two-signal approach: first react to the error signal, then do something until the thread's finished() signal is finally emitted.
Flag setter
Doing this would only partially work, since the setter is called from the worker thread, so wait() will be correctly called from there. Unfortunately, you're also trying to access the UI in the same function, which is forbidden since UI elements are not thread safe. Best case scenario, you'll have some graphic artifacts and some widgets won't be properly updated; worst (and more likely, especially due to setStyleSheet()) case, the program will crash.
Signals are the only proper and safe way to communicate with the main thread, since they allow correct event handling and prevent freezing of the UI while waiting for the thread to quit.
If you need to change something in the UI when something else happens in a thread, create a function in an object that resides in the main thread and connect it to the appropriate signal that will be emitted from the other thread. If you need to do something that is potentially blocking while waiting for the thread, do it in that thread.

I'm posting an answer to my own here based on helpful comments from #ekhumoro and #musicamante, as well as some further digging I've done.
My main pushback is that it seems like the suggestions so far maintain that the only way to communicate data between threads is via signals. While this may be the best choice in many/most cases, and a good rule of thumb, there are other safe ways to do it. The reason I continue to beat this possibly dead horse is that in the Qt documentation it mentions a limit on the number of signals:
On an i586-500, you can emit around 2,000,000 signals per second connected to one receiver, or around 1,200,000 per second connected to two receivers.
Granted the hardware suggested here is dated and the current Qt version documentation makes no such reference. However, signals do impart additional overhead vs a normal callback (this is noted in both past and present versions of Qt docs). While this limit is unlikely to be reached in my case, I'm now more interested in understanding both approaches merits and drawbacks.
I think both approaches can be used in a thread-safe manner, although that wasn't properly addressed in the original question. Both approaches are posted here with full MWE.
Approach 1: Using Signals
# thread-signal.py
from PyQt5.QtCore import QObject, pyqtSignal
from PyQt5.QtWidgets import QApplication, QMainWindow, QWidget, QPushButton, QVBoxLayout
from threading import Thread
import time
# The worker class
class Worker(QObject, Thread):
errorSignal = pyqtSignal(bool)
def __init__(self, id=""):
super().__init__()
self.id = id
self._running = True
def run(self):
while self._running:
try:
# do some work here that might fail
time.sleep(2)
raise ValueError(f"Worker Failure")
except:
# notify parent that there was an error
print(f"Worker {self.id} failed")
self.errorSignal.emit(True)
self._running = False
def terminate(self):
self._running = False
# The parent class
class ControlWidget(QWidget):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
# set up UI
vbox = QVBoxLayout()
self.button = QPushButton("Test")
vbox.addWidget(self.button)
self.setLayout(vbox)
# instantiate the workers
self.worker1 = Worker(id=1)
self.worker2 = Worker(id=2)
# connect to the error signal
self.worker1.errorSignal.connect(self.handle_error)
self.worker2.errorSignal.connect(self.handle_error)
# start the workers
self.worker1.start()
self.worker2.start()
def handle_error(self, error):
if error:
# clean up worker threads
self.worker1.terminate()
self.worker2.terminate()
# notify user
self.button.setStyleSheet('background: red;')
# disable UI input etc
self.button.setEnabled(False)
print(f"Worker 1 isAlive = {self.worker1.is_alive()}")
print(f"Worker 2 isAlive = {self.worker2.is_alive()}")
if __name__=='__main__':
app = QApplication([])
window = QMainWindow()
window.show()
ctrl = ControlWidget()
window.setCentralWidget(ctrl)
# window.setLayout(layout)
app.exec()
The result of running the example is that after 2 seconds, the workers fail (Worker 1 fails first because it was started first - although this may not always be the case depending on how the GIL is shared between threads). In the end, both workers are shutdown and the control widget is deactivated.
$ python thread-signal.py
Worker 1 failed
Worker 1 isAlive = False
Worker 2 isAlive = True
Worker 2 failed
Worker 1 isAlive = False
Worker 2 isAlive = False
Approach 2: Using parent References
# thread-reference.py
from PyQt5.QtCore import QObject, pyqtSignal
from PyQt5.QtWidgets import QApplication, QMainWindow, QWidget, QPushButton, QVBoxLayout
from threading import Thread, Lock
import time
# global thread lock
lock = Lock()
# The worker class
class Worker(Thread):
def __init__(self, id="", parent=None):
super().__init__()
self.id = id
self.parent = parent
self._running = True
def run(self):
while self._running:
try:
# do some work here that might fail
time.sleep(2)
raise ValueError(f"Worker Failure")
except:
with lock:
# notify parent that there was an error
print(f"Worker {self.id} failed")
self._running = False
self.parent.error_status = True
def terminate(self):
self._running = False
# The parent class
class ControlWidget(QWidget):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
# set up UI
vbox = QVBoxLayout()
self.button = QPushButton("Test")
vbox.addWidget(self.button)
self.setLayout(vbox)
# instantiate the workers
self.worker1 = Worker(id=1, parent=self)
self.worker2 = Worker(id=2, parent=self)
# start the workers
self.worker1.start()
self.worker2.start()
def handle_error(self, error):
if error:
# clean up worker threads
self.worker1.terminate()
self.worker2.terminate()
# notify user
self.button.setStyleSheet('background: red;')
# disable UI input etc
self.button.setEnabled(False)
print(f"Worker 1 isAlive = {self.worker1.is_alive()}")
print(f"Worker 2 isAlive = {self.worker2.is_alive()}")
#property
def error_status(self):
return self._error_status
#error_status.setter
def error_status(self, value):
self._error_status = value
self.handle_error(value)
if __name__=='__main__':
app = QApplication([])
window = QMainWindow()
window.show()
ctrl = ControlWidget()
window.setCentralWidget(ctrl)
app.exec()
The end result is similar in this case, the workers are shut down and the control widget deactivated, but inspection of the output shows an interesting difference:
$ python thread-reference.py
Worker 1 failed
Worker 1 isAlive = True
Worker 2 isAlive = True
Worker 2 failed
Worker 1 isAlive = False
Worker 2 isAlive = True
The isAlive() value of the thread doesn't resolve to False until after the handle_error method is complete. I'm guessing this is just the way the bytecode execution comes out due to the GIL.

Related

How to prevent the main window from freezing using PyQt5? [duplicate]

I have a program which interfaces with a radio I am using via a gui I wrote in PyQt. Obviously one of the main functions of the radio is to transmit data, but to do this continuously, I have to loop the writes, which causes the gui to hang. Since I have never dealt with threading, I tried to get rid of these hangs using QCoreApplication.processEvents(). The radio needs to sleep between transmissions, though, so the gui still hangs based on how long these sleeps last.
Is there a simple way to fix this using QThread? I have looked for tutorials on how to implement multithreading with PyQt, but most of them deal with setting up servers and are much more advanced than I need them to be. I honestly don't even really need my thread to update anything while it is running, I just need to start it, have it transmit in the background, and stop it.

I created a little example that shows 3 different and simple ways of dealing with threads. I hope it will help you find the right approach to your problem.
import sys
import time
from PyQt5.QtCore import (QCoreApplication, QObject, QRunnable, QThread,
QThreadPool, pyqtSignal)
# Subclassing QThread
# http://qt-project.org/doc/latest/qthread.html
class AThread(QThread):
def run(self):
count = 0
while count < 5:
time.sleep(1)
print("A Increasing")
count += 1
# Subclassing QObject and using moveToThread
# http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2007/07/05/qthreads-no-longer-abstract
class SomeObject(QObject):
finished = pyqtSignal()
def long_running(self):
count = 0
while count < 5:
time.sleep(1)
print("B Increasing")
count += 1
self.finished.emit()
# Using a QRunnable
# http://qt-project.org/doc/latest/qthreadpool.html
# Note that a QRunnable isn't a subclass of QObject and therefore does
# not provide signals and slots.
class Runnable(QRunnable):
def run(self):
count = 0
app = QCoreApplication.instance()
while count < 5:
print("C Increasing")
time.sleep(1)
count += 1
app.quit()
def using_q_thread():
app = QCoreApplication([])
thread = AThread()
thread.finished.connect(app.exit)
thread.start()
sys.exit(app.exec_())
def using_move_to_thread():
app = QCoreApplication([])
objThread = QThread()
obj = SomeObject()
obj.moveToThread(objThread)
obj.finished.connect(objThread.quit)
objThread.started.connect(obj.long_running)
objThread.finished.connect(app.exit)
objThread.start()
sys.exit(app.exec_())
def using_q_runnable():
app = QCoreApplication([])
runnable = Runnable()
QThreadPool.globalInstance().start(runnable)
sys.exit(app.exec_())
if __name__ == "__main__":
#using_q_thread()
#using_move_to_thread()
using_q_runnable()

Take this answer updated for PyQt5, python 3.4
Use this as a pattern to start a worker that does not take data and return data as they are available to the form.
1 - Worker class is made smaller and put in its own file worker.py for easy memorization and independent software reuse.
2 - The main.py file is the file that defines the GUI Form class
3 - The thread object is not subclassed.
4 - Both thread object and the worker object belong to the Form object
5 - Steps of the procedure are within the comments.
# worker.py
from PyQt5.QtCore import QThread, QObject, pyqtSignal, pyqtSlot
import time
class Worker(QObject):
finished = pyqtSignal()
intReady = pyqtSignal(int)
#pyqtSlot()
def procCounter(self): # A slot takes no params
for i in range(1, 100):
time.sleep(1)
self.intReady.emit(i)
self.finished.emit()
And the main file is:
# main.py
from PyQt5.QtCore import QThread
from PyQt5.QtWidgets import QApplication, QLabel, QWidget, QGridLayout
import sys
import worker
class Form(QWidget):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.label = QLabel("0")
# 1 - create Worker and Thread inside the Form
self.obj = worker.Worker() # no parent!
self.thread = QThread() # no parent!
# 2 - Connect Worker`s Signals to Form method slots to post data.
self.obj.intReady.connect(self.onIntReady)
# 3 - Move the Worker object to the Thread object
self.obj.moveToThread(self.thread)
# 4 - Connect Worker Signals to the Thread slots
self.obj.finished.connect(self.thread.quit)
# 5 - Connect Thread started signal to Worker operational slot method
self.thread.started.connect(self.obj.procCounter)
# * - Thread finished signal will close the app if you want!
#self.thread.finished.connect(app.exit)
# 6 - Start the thread
self.thread.start()
# 7 - Start the form
self.initUI()
def initUI(self):
grid = QGridLayout()
self.setLayout(grid)
grid.addWidget(self.label,0,0)
self.move(300, 150)
self.setWindowTitle('thread test')
self.show()
def onIntReady(self, i):
self.label.setText("{}".format(i))
#print(i)
app = QApplication(sys.argv)
form = Form()
sys.exit(app.exec_())

According to the Qt developers, subclassing QThread is incorrect (see http://blog.qt.io/blog/2010/06/17/youre-doing-it-wrong/). But that article is really hard to understand (plus the title is a bit condescending). I found a better blog post that gives a more detailed explanation about why you should use one style of threading over another: http://mayaposch.wordpress.com/2011/11/01/how-to-really-truly-use-qthreads-the-full-explanation/
Also, I would highly recommend this video from KDAB on signals and slots between threads.
In my opinion, you should probably never subclass thread with the intent to overload the run method. While that does work, you're basically circumventing how Qt wants you to work. Plus you'll miss out on things like events and proper thread safe signals and slots. Plus as you'll likely see in the above blog post, the "correct" way of threading forces you to write more testable code.
Here's a couple of examples of how to take advantage of QThreads in PyQt (I posted a separate answer below that properly uses QRunnable and incorporates signals/slots, that answer is better if you have a lot of async tasks that you need to load balance).
import sys
from PyQt4 import QtCore
from PyQt4 import QtGui
from PyQt4.QtCore import Qt
# very testable class (hint: you can use mock.Mock for the signals)
class Worker(QtCore.QObject):
finished = QtCore.pyqtSignal()
dataReady = QtCore.pyqtSignal(list, dict)
#QtCore.pyqtSlot()
def processA(self):
print "Worker.processA()"
self.finished.emit()
#QtCore.pyqtSlot(str, list, list)
def processB(self, foo, bar=None, baz=None):
print "Worker.processB()"
for thing in bar:
# lots of processing...
self.dataReady.emit(['dummy', 'data'], {'dummy': ['data']})
self.finished.emit()
class Thread(QtCore.QThread):
"""Need for PyQt4 <= 4.6 only"""
def __init__(self, parent=None):
QtCore.QThread.__init__(self, parent)
# this class is solely needed for these two methods, there
# appears to be a bug in PyQt 4.6 that requires you to
# explicitly call run and start from the subclass in order
# to get the thread to actually start an event loop
def start(self):
QtCore.QThread.start(self)
def run(self):
QtCore.QThread.run(self)
app = QtGui.QApplication(sys.argv)
thread = Thread() # no parent!
obj = Worker() # no parent!
obj.moveToThread(thread)
# if you want the thread to stop after the worker is done
# you can always call thread.start() again later
obj.finished.connect(thread.quit)
# one way to do it is to start processing as soon as the thread starts
# this is okay in some cases... but makes it harder to send data to
# the worker object from the main gui thread. As you can see I'm calling
# processA() which takes no arguments
thread.started.connect(obj.processA)
thread.start()
# another way to do it, which is a bit fancier, allows you to talk back and
# forth with the object in a thread safe way by communicating through signals
# and slots (now that the thread is running I can start calling methods on
# the worker object)
QtCore.QMetaObject.invokeMethod(obj, 'processB', Qt.QueuedConnection,
QtCore.Q_ARG(str, "Hello World!"),
QtCore.Q_ARG(list, ["args", 0, 1]),
QtCore.Q_ARG(list, []))
# that looks a bit scary, but its a totally ok thing to do in Qt,
# we're simply using the system that Signals and Slots are built on top of,
# the QMetaObject, to make it act like we safely emitted a signal for
# the worker thread to pick up when its event loop resumes (so if its doing
# a bunch of work you can call this method 10 times and it will just queue
# up the calls. Note: PyQt > 4.6 will not allow you to pass in a None
# instead of an empty list, it has stricter type checking
app.exec_()
# Without this you may get weird QThread messages in the shell on exit
app.deleteLater()

Very nice example from Matt, I fixed the typo and also pyqt4.8 is common now so I removed the dummy class as well and added an example for the dataReady signal
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
import sys
from PyQt4 import QtCore, QtGui
from PyQt4.QtCore import Qt
# very testable class (hint: you can use mock.Mock for the signals)
class Worker(QtCore.QObject):
finished = QtCore.pyqtSignal()
dataReady = QtCore.pyqtSignal(list, dict)
#QtCore.pyqtSlot()
def processA(self):
print "Worker.processA()"
self.finished.emit()
#QtCore.pyqtSlot(str, list, list)
def processB(self, foo, bar=None, baz=None):
print "Worker.processB()"
for thing in bar:
# lots of processing...
self.dataReady.emit(['dummy', 'data'], {'dummy': ['data']})
self.finished.emit()
def onDataReady(aList, aDict):
print 'onDataReady'
print repr(aList)
print repr(aDict)
app = QtGui.QApplication(sys.argv)
thread = QtCore.QThread() # no parent!
obj = Worker() # no parent!
obj.dataReady.connect(onDataReady)
obj.moveToThread(thread)
# if you want the thread to stop after the worker is done
# you can always call thread.start() again later
obj.finished.connect(thread.quit)
# one way to do it is to start processing as soon as the thread starts
# this is okay in some cases... but makes it harder to send data to
# the worker object from the main gui thread. As you can see I'm calling
# processA() which takes no arguments
thread.started.connect(obj.processA)
thread.finished.connect(app.exit)
thread.start()
# another way to do it, which is a bit fancier, allows you to talk back and
# forth with the object in a thread safe way by communicating through signals
# and slots (now that the thread is running I can start calling methods on
# the worker object)
QtCore.QMetaObject.invokeMethod(obj, 'processB', Qt.QueuedConnection,
QtCore.Q_ARG(str, "Hello World!"),
QtCore.Q_ARG(list, ["args", 0, 1]),
QtCore.Q_ARG(list, []))
# that looks a bit scary, but its a totally ok thing to do in Qt,
# we're simply using the system that Signals and Slots are built on top of,
# the QMetaObject, to make it act like we safely emitted a signal for
# the worker thread to pick up when its event loop resumes (so if its doing
# a bunch of work you can call this method 10 times and it will just queue
# up the calls. Note: PyQt > 4.6 will not allow you to pass in a None
# instead of an empty list, it has stricter type checking
app.exec_()

In PyQt there are a lot of options for getting asynchronous behavior. For things that need event processing (ie. QtNetwork, etc) you should use the QThread example I provided in my other answer on this thread. But for the vast majority of your threading needs, I think this solution is far superior than the other methods.
The advantage of this is that the QThreadPool schedules your QRunnable instances as tasks. This is similar to the task pattern used in Intel's TBB. It's not quite as elegant as I like but it does pull off excellent asynchronous behavior.
This allows you to utilize most of the threading power of Qt in Python via QRunnable and still take advantage of signals and slots. I use this same code in several applications, some that make hundreds of asynchronous REST calls, some that open files or list directories, and the best part is using this method, Qt task balances the system resources for me.
import time
from PyQt4 import QtCore
from PyQt4 import QtGui
from PyQt4.QtCore import Qt
def async(method, args, uid, readycb, errorcb=None):
"""
Asynchronously runs a task
:param func method: the method to run in a thread
:param object uid: a unique identifier for this task (used for verification)
:param slot updatecb: the callback when data is receieved cb(uid, data)
:param slot errorcb: the callback when there is an error cb(uid, errmsg)
The uid option is useful when the calling code makes multiple async calls
and the callbacks need some context about what was sent to the async method.
For example, if you use this method to thread a long running database call
and the user decides they want to cancel it and start a different one, the
first one may complete before you have a chance to cancel the task. In that
case, the "readycb" will be called with the cancelled task's data. The uid
can be used to differentiate those two calls (ie. using the sql query).
:returns: Request instance
"""
request = Request(method, args, uid, readycb, errorcb)
QtCore.QThreadPool.globalInstance().start(request)
return request
class Request(QtCore.QRunnable):
"""
A Qt object that represents an asynchronous task
:param func method: the method to call
:param list args: list of arguments to pass to method
:param object uid: a unique identifier (used for verification)
:param slot readycb: the callback used when data is receieved
:param slot errorcb: the callback used when there is an error
The uid param is sent to your error and update callbacks as the
first argument. It's there to verify the data you're returning
After created it should be used by invoking:
.. code-block:: python
task = Request(...)
QtCore.QThreadPool.globalInstance().start(task)
"""
INSTANCES = []
FINISHED = []
def __init__(self, method, args, uid, readycb, errorcb=None):
super(Request, self).__init__()
self.setAutoDelete(True)
self.cancelled = False
self.method = method
self.args = args
self.uid = uid
self.dataReady = readycb
self.dataError = errorcb
Request.INSTANCES.append(self)
# release all of the finished tasks
Request.FINISHED = []
def run(self):
"""
Method automatically called by Qt when the runnable is ready to run.
This will run in a separate thread.
"""
# this allows us to "cancel" queued tasks if needed, should be done
# on shutdown to prevent the app from hanging
if self.cancelled:
self.cleanup()
return
# runs in a separate thread, for proper async signal/slot behavior
# the object that emits the signals must be created in this thread.
# Its not possible to run grabber.moveToThread(QThread.currentThread())
# so to get this QObject to properly exhibit asynchronous
# signal and slot behavior it needs to live in the thread that
# we're running in, creating the object from within this thread
# is an easy way to do that.
grabber = Requester()
grabber.Loaded.connect(self.dataReady, Qt.QueuedConnection)
if self.dataError is not None:
grabber.Error.connect(self.dataError, Qt.QueuedConnection)
try:
result = self.method(*self.args)
if self.cancelled:
# cleanup happens in 'finally' statement
return
grabber.Loaded.emit(self.uid, result)
except Exception as error:
if self.cancelled:
# cleanup happens in 'finally' statement
return
grabber.Error.emit(self.uid, unicode(error))
finally:
# this will run even if one of the above return statements
# is executed inside of the try/except statement see:
# https://docs.python.org/2.7/tutorial/errors.html#defining-clean-up-actions
self.cleanup(grabber)
def cleanup(self, grabber=None):
# remove references to any object or method for proper ref counting
self.method = None
self.args = None
self.uid = None
self.dataReady = None
self.dataError = None
if grabber is not None:
grabber.deleteLater()
# make sure this python obj gets cleaned up
self.remove()
def remove(self):
try:
Request.INSTANCES.remove(self)
# when the next request is created, it will clean this one up
# this will help us avoid this object being cleaned up
# when it's still being used
Request.FINISHED.append(self)
except ValueError:
# there might be a race condition on shutdown, when shutdown()
# is called while the thread is still running and the instance
# has already been removed from the list
return
#staticmethod
def shutdown():
for inst in Request.INSTANCES:
inst.cancelled = True
Request.INSTANCES = []
Request.FINISHED = []
class Requester(QtCore.QObject):
"""
A simple object designed to be used in a separate thread to allow
for asynchronous data fetching
"""
#
# Signals
#
Error = QtCore.pyqtSignal(object, unicode)
"""
Emitted if the fetch fails for any reason
:param unicode uid: an id to identify this request
:param unicode error: the error message
"""
Loaded = QtCore.pyqtSignal(object, object)
"""
Emitted whenever data comes back successfully
:param unicode uid: an id to identify this request
:param list data: the json list returned from the GET
"""
NetworkConnectionError = QtCore.pyqtSignal(unicode)
"""
Emitted when the task fails due to a network connection error
:param unicode message: network connection error message
"""
def __init__(self, parent=None):
super(Requester, self).__init__(parent)
class ExampleObject(QtCore.QObject):
def __init__(self, parent=None):
super(ExampleObject, self).__init__(parent)
self.uid = 0
self.request = None
def ready_callback(self, uid, result):
if uid != self.uid:
return
print "Data ready from %s: %s" % (uid, result)
def error_callback(self, uid, error):
if uid != self.uid:
return
print "Data error from %s: %s" % (uid, error)
def fetch(self):
if self.request is not None:
# cancel any pending requests
self.request.cancelled = True
self.request = None
self.uid += 1
self.request = async(slow_method, ["arg1", "arg2"], self.uid,
self.ready_callback,
self.error_callback)
def slow_method(arg1, arg2):
print "Starting slow method"
time.sleep(1)
return arg1 + arg2
if __name__ == "__main__":
import sys
app = QtGui.QApplication(sys.argv)
obj = ExampleObject()
dialog = QtGui.QDialog()
layout = QtGui.QVBoxLayout(dialog)
button = QtGui.QPushButton("Generate", dialog)
progress = QtGui.QProgressBar(dialog)
progress.setRange(0, 0)
layout.addWidget(button)
layout.addWidget(progress)
button.clicked.connect(obj.fetch)
dialog.show()
app.exec_()
app.deleteLater() # avoids some QThread messages in the shell on exit
# cancel all running tasks avoid QThread/QTimer error messages
# on exit
Request.shutdown()
When exiting the application you'll want to make sure you cancel all of the tasks or the application will hang until every scheduled task has completed

Based on the Worker objects methods mentioned in other answers, I decided to see if I could expand on the solution to invoke more threads - in this case the optimal number the machine can run and spin up multiple workers with indeterminate completion times.
To do this I still need to subclass QThread - but only to assign a thread number and to 'reimplement' the signals 'finished' and 'started' to include their thread number.
I've focused quite a bit on the signals between the main gui, the threads, and the workers.
Similarly, others answers have been a pains to point out not parenting the QThread but I don't think this is a real concern. However, my code also is careful to destroy the QThread objects.
However, I wasn't able to parent the worker objects so it seems desirable to send them the deleteLater() signal, either when the thread function is finished or the GUI is destroyed. I've had my own code hang for not doing this.
Another enhancement I felt was necessary was was reimplement the closeEvent of the GUI (QWidget) such that the threads would be instructed to quit and then the GUI would wait until all the threads were finished. When I played with some of the other answers to this question, I got QThread destroyed errors.
Perhaps it will be useful to others. I certainly found it a useful exercise. Perhaps others will know a better way for a thread to announce it identity.
#!/usr/bin/env python3
#coding:utf-8
# Author: --<>
# Purpose: To demonstrate creation of multiple threads and identify the receipt of thread results
# Created: 19/12/15
import sys
from PyQt4.QtCore import QThread, pyqtSlot, pyqtSignal
from PyQt4.QtGui import QApplication, QLabel, QWidget, QGridLayout
import sys
import worker
class Thread(QThread):
#make new signals to be able to return an id for the thread
startedx = pyqtSignal(int)
finishedx = pyqtSignal(int)
def __init__(self,i,parent=None):
super().__init__(parent)
self.idd = i
self.started.connect(self.starttt)
self.finished.connect(self.finisheddd)
#pyqtSlot()
def starttt(self):
print('started signal from thread emitted')
self.startedx.emit(self.idd)
#pyqtSlot()
def finisheddd(self):
print('finished signal from thread emitted')
self.finishedx.emit(self.idd)
class Form(QWidget):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.initUI()
self.worker={}
self.threadx={}
self.i=0
i=0
#Establish the maximum number of threads the machine can optimally handle
#Generally relates to the number of processors
self.threadtest = QThread(self)
self.idealthreadcount = self.threadtest.idealThreadCount()
print("This machine can handle {} threads optimally".format(self.idealthreadcount))
while i <self.idealthreadcount:
self.setupThread(i)
i+=1
i=0
while i<self.idealthreadcount:
self.startThread(i)
i+=1
print("Main Gui running in thread {}.".format(self.thread()))
def setupThread(self,i):
self.worker[i]= worker.Worker(i) # no parent!
#print("Worker object runningt in thread {} prior to movetothread".format(self.worker[i].thread()) )
self.threadx[i] = Thread(i,parent=self) # if parent isn't specified then need to be careful to destroy thread
self.threadx[i].setObjectName("python thread{}"+str(i))
#print("Thread object runningt in thread {} prior to movetothread".format(self.threadx[i].thread()) )
self.threadx[i].startedx.connect(self.threadStarted)
self.threadx[i].finishedx.connect(self.threadFinished)
self.worker[i].finished.connect(self.workerFinished)
self.worker[i].intReady.connect(self.workerResultReady)
#The next line is optional, you may want to start the threads again without having to create all the code again.
self.worker[i].finished.connect(self.threadx[i].quit)
self.threadx[i].started.connect(self.worker[i].procCounter)
self.destroyed.connect(self.threadx[i].deleteLater)
self.destroyed.connect(self.worker[i].deleteLater)
#This is the key code that actually get the worker code onto another processor or thread.
self.worker[i].moveToThread(self.threadx[i])
def startThread(self,i):
self.threadx[i].start()
#pyqtSlot(int)
def threadStarted(self,i):
print('Thread {} started'.format(i))
print("Thread priority is {}".format(self.threadx[i].priority()))
#pyqtSlot(int)
def threadFinished(self,i):
print('Thread {} finished'.format(i))
#pyqtSlot(int)
def threadTerminated(self,i):
print("Thread {} terminated".format(i))
#pyqtSlot(int,int)
def workerResultReady(self,j,i):
print('Worker {} result returned'.format(i))
if i ==0:
self.label1.setText("{}".format(j))
if i ==1:
self.label2.setText("{}".format(j))
if i ==2:
self.label3.setText("{}".format(j))
if i ==3:
self.label4.setText("{}".format(j))
#print('Thread {} has started'.format(self.threadx[i].currentThreadId()))
#pyqtSlot(int)
def workerFinished(self,i):
print('Worker {} finished'.format(i))
def initUI(self):
self.label1 = QLabel("0")
self.label2= QLabel("0")
self.label3= QLabel("0")
self.label4 = QLabel("0")
grid = QGridLayout(self)
self.setLayout(grid)
grid.addWidget(self.label1,0,0)
grid.addWidget(self.label2,0,1)
grid.addWidget(self.label3,0,2)
grid.addWidget(self.label4,0,3) #Layout parents the self.labels
self.move(300, 150)
self.setGeometry(0,0,300,300)
#self.size(300,300)
self.setWindowTitle('thread test')
self.show()
def closeEvent(self, event):
print('Closing')
#this tells the threads to stop running
i=0
while i <self.idealthreadcount:
self.threadx[i].quit()
i+=1
#this ensures window cannot be closed until the threads have finished.
i=0
while i <self.idealthreadcount:
self.threadx[i].wait()
i+=1
event.accept()
if __name__=='__main__':
app = QApplication(sys.argv)
form = Form()
sys.exit(app.exec_())
And the worker code below
#!/usr/bin/env python3
#coding:utf-8
# Author: --<>
# Purpose: Stack Overflow
# Created: 19/12/15
import sys
import unittest
from PyQt4.QtCore import QThread, QObject, pyqtSignal, pyqtSlot
import time
import random
class Worker(QObject):
finished = pyqtSignal(int)
intReady = pyqtSignal(int,int)
def __init__(self, i=0):
'''__init__ is called while the worker is still in the Gui thread. Do not put slow or CPU intensive code in the __init__ method'''
super().__init__()
self.idd = i
#pyqtSlot()
def procCounter(self): # This slot takes no params
for j in range(1, 10):
random_time = random.weibullvariate(1,2)
time.sleep(random_time)
self.intReady.emit(j,self.idd)
print('Worker {0} in thread {1}'.format(self.idd, self.thread().idd))
self.finished.emit(self.idd)
if __name__=='__main__':
unittest.main()

PySide2 Solution:
Unlike in PyQt5, in PySide2 the QThread.started signal is received/handled on the original thread, not the worker thread! Luckily it still receives all other signals on the worker thread.
In order to match PyQt5's behavior, you have to create the started signal yourself.
Here is an easy solution:
# Use this class instead of QThread
class QThread2(QThread):
# Use this signal instead of "started"
started2 = Signal()
def __init__(self):
QThread.__init__(self)
self.started.connect(self.onStarted)
def onStarted(self):
self.started2.emit()

PyQt4: How to pause a Thread until a signal is emitted?

I have the following pyqtmain.py:
#!/usr/bin/python3
import sys
from PyQt4.QtCore import *
from PyQt4.QtGui import *
from pyqtMeasThread import *
class MainWindow(QMainWindow):
def __init__(self, parent=None):
self.qt_app = QApplication(sys.argv)
QMainWindow.__init__(self, parent)
buttonWidget = QWidget()
rsltLabel = QLabel("Result:")
self.rsltFiled = QLineEdit()
self.buttonStart = QPushButton("Start")
verticalLayout = QVBoxLayout(buttonWidget)
verticalLayout.addWidget(rsltLabel)
verticalLayout.addWidget(self.rsltFiled)
verticalLayout.addWidget(self.buttonStart)
butDW = QDockWidget("Control", self)
butDW.setWidget(buttonWidget)
self.addDockWidget(Qt.LeftDockWidgetArea, butDW)
self.mthread = QThread() # New thread to run the Measurement Engine
self.worker = MeasurementEngine() # Measurement Engine Object
self.worker.moveToThread(self.mthread)
self.mthread.finished.connect(self.worker.deleteLater) # Cleanup after thread finished
self.worker.measure_msg.connect(self.showRslt)
self.buttonStart.clicked.connect(self.worker.run)
# Everything configured, start the worker thread.
self.mthread.start()
def run(self):
""" Show the window and start the event loop """
self.show()
self.qt_app.exec_() # Start event loop
#pyqtSlot(str)
def showRslt(self, mystr):
self.rsltFiled.setText(mystr)
def main():
win = MainWindow()
win.run()
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
And another thread script performing the actual measurement:
from PyQt4.QtCore import *
import time
class MeasurementEngine(QObject):
measure_msg = pyqtSignal(str)
def __init__(self):
QObject.__init__(self) # Don't forget to call base class constructor
#pyqtSlot()
def run(self):
self.measure_msg.emit('phase1')
time.sleep(2) # here I would like to make it as an interrupt
self.measure_msg.emit('phase2')
What this code does now is that after the Start button is pressed, the function run in the thread will be executed. However, actually in the function run, there are two phases of the measurement. Right now I used an time delay.
But what I would like to implement actually is that after the 'phase1' measurement is done. A message box will be popped up, and at the same time, the thread will be paused/held. Until the user closed the message box, then the thread function will be resumed.

Use a QWaitCondition from the QtCore module. Using a mutex lock, you set the background thread to wait/sleep until the foreground thread wakes it back up. Then it will continue doing its work from there.
#!/usr/bin/python3
import sys
from PyQt4.QtCore import *
from PyQt4.QtGui import *
from pyqtMeasThread import *
class MainWindow(QMainWindow):
def __init__(self, parent=None):
self.qt_app = QApplication(sys.argv)
QMainWindow.__init__(self, parent)
buttonWidget = QWidget()
rsltLabel = QLabel("Result:")
self.rsltFiled = QLineEdit()
self.buttonStart = QPushButton("Start")
verticalLayout = QVBoxLayout(buttonWidget)
verticalLayout.addWidget(rsltLabel)
verticalLayout.addWidget(self.rsltFiled)
verticalLayout.addWidget(self.buttonStart)
butDW = QDockWidget("Control", self)
butDW.setWidget(buttonWidget)
self.addDockWidget(Qt.LeftDockWidgetArea, butDW)
self.mutex = QMutex()
self.cond = QWaitCondition()
self.mthread = QThread() # New thread to run the Measurement Engine
self.worker = MeasurementEngine(self.mutex, self.cond) # Measurement Engine Object
self.worker.moveToThread(self.mthread)
self.mthread.finished.connect(self.worker.deleteLater) # Cleanup after thread finished
self.worker.measure_msg.connect(self.showRslt)
self.buttonStart.clicked.connect(self.worker.run)
# Everything configured, start the worker thread.
self.mthread.start()
def run(self):
""" Show the window and start the event loop """
self.show()
self.qt_app.exec_() # Start event loop
# since this is a slot, it will always get run in the event loop in the main thread
#pyqtSlot(str)
def showRslt(self, mystr):
self.rsltFiled.setText(mystr)
msgBox = QMessageBox(parent=self)
msgBox.setText("Close this dialog to continue to Phase 2.")
msgBox.exec_()
self.cond.wakeAll()
def main():
win = MainWindow()
win.run()
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
And:
from PyQt4.QtCore import *
import time
class MeasurementEngine(QObject):
measure_msg = pyqtSignal(str)
def __init__(self, mutex, cond):
QObject.__init__(self) # Don't forget to call base class constructor
self.mtx = mutex
self.cond = cond
#pyqtSlot()
def run(self):
# NOTE: do work for phase 1 here
self.measure_msg.emit('phase1')
self.mtx.lock()
try:
self.cond.wait(self.mtx)
# NOTE: do work for phase 2 here
self.measure_msg.emit('phase2')
finally:
self.mtx.unlock()
Your timing is a little bit off in all this though. You create the app and start the thread before you even show your window. Thus, the message box will pop up before the main window even pops up. To get the right sequence of events, you should start your thread as part of the run method of your MainWindow, after you have already made the main window visible. If you want the wait condition to be separate from the setting of the messages, you may need a separate signal and slot to deal with that.

You can't display a QDialog from within a QThread. All GUI related stuff must be done in the GUI thread (the one that created the QApplication object). What you could do is to use 2 QThread:
1st: perform phase1. You can connect the finished signal of this QThread to a slot in the QMainWindow that will display the popup (using QDialog.exec_() so it will be modal).
2nd: perform phase2. You create the QThread after the popup shown here above has been closed.

Your thread can emit a signal to the main window to show the dialog.
If you don't want to close the thread while the dialog is open, the thread could enter a while loop for waiting. In the while loop it can continuously check a variable which the main thread can set to true after the dialog is finished.
This might not be the cleanest solution, but it should work.
To clarify my answer a bit, I added some pseudo code. What you have to care about is how you share the dialog_closed variable. You could e.g. use a member variable of the thread class.
Thread:
emit_signal
dialog_closed = False
while not dialog_closed:
pass
go_on_with_processing
MainThread:
def SignalRecieved():
open_dialog
dialog_closed = True

I recently had to solve pretty much this problem, did a little research and discovered an elegant technique that seems to work reliably. I didn't need the full complexity detailed there, so here's an outline of the steps I took.
My GUI class defines, as class attributes, two signals.
oyn_sig = pyqtSignal(str) # Request for operator yes/no
ryn_sig = pyqtSignal(bool) # Response to yes/no request
Inside the method that initialises the GUI components this signal is connected to the GUI instance's signal handler.
self.oyn_sig.connect(self.operator_yes_no)
Here's the code for the handler method of the GUI:
#pyqtSlot(str)
def operator_yes_no(self, msg):
"Asks the user a `yes/no question on receipt of a signal then signal a bool answer.`"
answer = QMessageBox.question(None,
"Confirm Test Sucess",
msg,
QMessageBox.Yes | QMessageBox.No, QMessageBox.No)
# Signal the caller that the result was received.
self.ryn_sig.emit(answer==QMessageBox.Yes)
As usual the GUI is running in the main thread, and so it needs to be signalled from the thread doing the work in the background. In turn, once it's received the operator's response it raises a response signal to the originating thread.
The worker thread uses the following function to get an operator response.
def operator_yes_no(self, msg):
loop = LoopSpinner(self.gui, msg)
loop.exec_()
return loop.result
This creates a LoopSpinner object and starts executing its event loop, thereby suspend the current thread's event loop until the "inner thread" terminates. Most of the smarts are hidden inside the LoopSpinner class, which should probably have been better named. Here's its definition.
class LoopSpinner(QEventLoop):
def __init__(self, gui, msg):
"Ask for an answer and communicate the result."
QEventLoop.__init__(self)
gui.ryn_sig.connect(self.get_answer)
gui.oyn_sig.emit(msg)
#pyqtSlot(bool)
def get_answer(self, result):
self.result = result
self.quit()
A LoopSpinner instance connects the response signal to its get_answer method and emits the question signal. When the signal is received the answer is stored as an attribute value and the loop quits. The loop is still referenced by its caller, which can safely access the result attribute before the instance is garbage collected.

PyQt thread communication help? QThread and QObject

After read and searching I am trying to use the generate a QObject then use the movetoThread method to run an independent process and allow the QMainWindow to continue to respond. This has not worked when I have tried to implement the operation in a QThread.run() method. The following code is my attempt to make a simple example. While the code works in running thread independent of the MainWindow, it does not abort. The only way I can get a thread to stop is to set worker.end = True. Which I think should not be the way to do it.
"""
This is a program to test Threading with Objects in PyQt4.
"""
from time import sleep
import sys
from PyQt4.QtCore import QObject, pyqtSlot, pyqtSignal, QThread
from PyQt4.QtGui import QMainWindow, QApplication, QProgressBar
from PyQt4.QtGui import QPushButton, QVBoxLayout, QWidget
class workerObject(QObject):
bar_signal = pyqtSignal(int)
res_signal = pyqtSignal(str)
term_signal = pyqtSignal()
def __init__(self, maxIters):
super(workerObject, self).__init__()
self.maxIters = maxIters
def run(self):
self.bar_signal.emit(self.maxIters)
sleep(1)
self.end = False
for step in range(self.maxIters):
if self.end:
self.maxIters = step
break
self.bar_signal.emit(step)
sleep(2)
self.res_signal.emit("Got to {}".format(self.maxIters))
self.term_signal.emit()
#pyqtSlot()
def mystop(self):
print "stop signalled?"
self.end = True
class MCwindow(QMainWindow):
abort_signal = pyqtSignal(name='abort_signal')
def __init__(self):
super(MCwindow,self).__init__()
self.maxIters = 50
widget = QWidget()
layout = QVBoxLayout(widget)
self.go_btn = QPushButton()
self.go_btn.setText('Go')
layout.addWidget(self.go_btn)
self.abort_btn = QPushButton()
self.abort_btn.setText('Stop')
layout.addWidget(self.abort_btn)
self.simulation_bar = QProgressBar()
self.simulation_bar.setRange(0, self.maxIters)
self.simulation_bar.setFormat("%v")
layout.addWidget(self.simulation_bar)
self.setCentralWidget(widget)
self.go_btn.clicked.connect(self.run_mc)
# The button calls the windows method to stop --- it could
# be that is 'clicked' calls the worker.mystop
# self.abort_btn.clicked.connect(self.stop_mc)
# This allows for the abort button to do somethign in the MainWindow
# before the abort_signal is sent, this works
self.abort_btn.clicked.connect(self.stop_mc)
def run_mc(self):
self.thread = QThread()
self.worker = workerObject(self.maxIters)
self.worker.moveToThread(self.thread)
self.thread.started.connect(self.worker.run)
# This is the simple stop method, but does not work
# self.abort_btn.clicked.connect(self.worker.mystop)
# This uses the signal in the MCwindow - this connection does NOT works
self.abort_signal.connect(self.worker.mystop)
# This does NOT stop the thread
# and would not allow for any clean up in the worker.
# self.abort_signal.connect(self.thread.terminate)
# This is a 'bad' way to stop the woker ... It does, however, work
# self.abort_signal.connect(self.stopper)
self.worker.bar_signal.connect(self.setBar)
self.worker.res_signal.connect(self.setData)
self.worker.term_signal.connect(self.thread.terminate)
self.thread.start()
def stop_mc(self):
print "Stopping?!"
# This signal is NEVER seen by the Worker.
self.abort_signal.emit()
def stopper(self):
print "I should stop?!"
# Should use signals to tell the worker to stop - and not setting a attribute
self.worker.end=True
#pyqtSlot(int)
def setBar(self, val):
self.simulation_bar.setValue(val)
#pyqtSlot(str)
def setData(self, txt):
print "Got done Sig!", txt
if __name__ == '__main__':
app = QApplication(sys.argv)
window = MCwindow()
window.show()
sys.exit(app.exec_())

The reason why the slot connected to abort_signal doesn't seem to get called, is because cross-thread signals are queued by default. This means the signal will be wrapped as an event and posted to the event queue of whichever thread the receiver is living in.
In your particular example, the receiver is a worker object which has been moved to a worker thread. Calling start() on the worker thread will start its event-loop, and that is where abort_signal will be queued. However, the run() method of the worker object starts a for loop, which will block the thread's event processing in exactly the same way it would if it was executed in the main gui thread!
You can more clearly see what's happening if you make a few adjustments to your example:
class MCwindow(QMainWindow):
abort_signal = pyqtSignal(name='abort_signal')
def __init__(self):
super(MCwindow,self).__init__()
# use a sane default
self.maxIters = 5
...
# DO NOT use QThread.terminate
self.worker.term_signal.connect(self.thread.quit)
Now run the example, and then click the Go button, click the Stop button, and wait for the worker to complete normally. This should produce output like this:
Stopping?!
Got done Sig! Got to 5
stop signalled?
Note that "stop signalled" is output last - i.e. after run() exits and control has returned to the thread's event-loop. In order to process in-coming signals while the worker is running, you will need to force immediate processing of the thread's pending events. This can be done like this:
for step in range(self.maxIters):
QApplication.processEvents()
...
With that in place, you should then see output like this:
Stopping?!
stop signalled?
Got done Sig! Got to 2
Which is presumably what you intended.

Typically a thread will close when it exits the run method. The other way to get a regular python thread to close is by calling it's join method.
For PyQt the join method should either be the quit or terminate method. You should probably still set your end variable to True.

How to properly terminate a QThread from a GUI application?

I tried using self.terminate() in the QThread class, and also self.thread.terminate() in the GUI class. I also tried putting self.wait() in both cases. However, there are two scenarios that happen:
1) The thread does not terminate at all, and the GUI freezes waiting for the thread to finish. Once the thread finished, the GUI unfreezes and everything is back to normal.
2) The thread indeed does terminate, but at the same time it freezes the entire application.
I also tried using self.thread.exit(). No joy.
To further clarify, I am trying to implement a user-abort button in GUI which would terminate the executing of the thread at any point in time.
Thanks in advance.
EDIT:
Here is the run() method:
def run(self):
if self.create:
print "calling create f"
self.emit(SIGNAL("disableCreate(bool)"))
self.create(self.password, self.email)
self.stop()
self.emit(SIGNAL("finished(bool)"), self.completed)
def stop(self):
#Tried the following, one by one (and all together too, I was desperate):
self.terminate()
self.quit()
self.exit()
self.stopped = True
self.terminated = True
#Neither works
And here is the GUI class' method for aborting the thread:
def on_abort_clicked(self):
self.thread = threadmodule.Thread()
#Tried the following, also one by one and altogether:
self.thread.exit()
self.thread.wait()
self.thread.quit()
self.thread.terminate()
#Again, none work

From the Qt documentation for QThread::terminate:
Warning: This function is dangerous and its use is discouraged. The
thread can be terminated at any point in its code path. Threads can be
terminated while modifying data. There is no chance for the thread to
clean up after itself, unlock any held mutexes, etc. In short, use
this function only if absolutely necessary.
It's probably a much better idea to re-think your threading strategy such that you can e.g. use QThread::quit() to signal the thread to quit cleanly, rather than trying to get the thread to terminate this way. Actually calling thread.exit() from within the thread should do that depending on how you have implemented run(). If you'd like to share the code for your thread run method that might hint as to why it doesn't work.

This is what I did:
class MainWindow(QtWidgets.QMainWindow, Ui_MainWindow):
stop_flag = 1
...
#=========500 ms class ===================
class Timer500msThread(QThread):
signal_500ms = pyqtSignal(str)
....
def timer500msProcess(self):
if MainWindow.stop_flag == 0 :
self.timer_500ms.stop()
#==========
#=========Main Window ===================
app = QtWidgets.QApplication(sys.argv)
window = MainWindow()
window.show()
app.exec()
MainWindow.stop_flag=0 #this sets the flag to 0 and when the next 500ms triggers the
#the thread ends
print("Program Ending")

I had a similar problem and solved it with use of pyqtSignals and pyqtSlots.
You could create a pyqtSignal in your MainWindow-class and use the aboutToQuit-function to your QApplication instance.
Then you connect this aboutToQuit-function with another which emit a signal to the slot in your separate thread.
Then you can define a stop() function in this Thread which runs if the signal is emitted.
In this case the thread would not terminate during its work.
MainWindow:
class mainSignals(QObject):
isClosed = pyqtSignal()
class mainwindow(QMainWindow, Ui_MainWindow):
def __init__(self):
super(mainwindow, self).__init__()
self.mainSignal = mainSignals()
...
...
if __name__ = "__main__":
# This function runs if the application is closed.
# (app.aboutToQuit.connect(windowClose))
def windowClose():
window.mainSignal.isClosed.emit() # Emit the signal to the slot in (sepThread)
app = QApplication(sys.argv)
app.aboutToQuit.connect(windowClose)
window = mainwindow()
window.show()
sys.exit(app.exec())
sepThread:
class sepThread(QRunnable):
def __init__(self, parent):
super(sepThread,self).__init__()
self._parent = parent
self.mainOpen = True
self._parent.mainSignal.isClosed.connect(self.stopThread)
# If the signal was emitted by the Mainapplication
# the stopThread function runs and set the mainOpen-attribute to False
def stopThread(self):
self.mainOpen = False
def run(self):
while self.mainOpen == True:
# Do something in a loop while mainOpen-attribute is True
...
...

Background thread with QThread in PyQt

I have a program which interfaces with a radio I am using via a gui I wrote in PyQt. Obviously one of the main functions of the radio is to transmit data, but to do this continuously, I have to loop the writes, which causes the gui to hang. Since I have never dealt with threading, I tried to get rid of these hangs using QCoreApplication.processEvents(). The radio needs to sleep between transmissions, though, so the gui still hangs based on how long these sleeps last.
Is there a simple way to fix this using QThread? I have looked for tutorials on how to implement multithreading with PyQt, but most of them deal with setting up servers and are much more advanced than I need them to be. I honestly don't even really need my thread to update anything while it is running, I just need to start it, have it transmit in the background, and stop it.

I created a little example that shows 3 different and simple ways of dealing with threads. I hope it will help you find the right approach to your problem.
import sys
import time
from PyQt5.QtCore import (QCoreApplication, QObject, QRunnable, QThread,
QThreadPool, pyqtSignal)
# Subclassing QThread
# http://qt-project.org/doc/latest/qthread.html
class AThread(QThread):
def run(self):
count = 0
while count < 5:
time.sleep(1)
print("A Increasing")
count += 1
# Subclassing QObject and using moveToThread
# http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2007/07/05/qthreads-no-longer-abstract
class SomeObject(QObject):
finished = pyqtSignal()
def long_running(self):
count = 0
while count < 5:
time.sleep(1)
print("B Increasing")
count += 1
self.finished.emit()
# Using a QRunnable
# http://qt-project.org/doc/latest/qthreadpool.html
# Note that a QRunnable isn't a subclass of QObject and therefore does
# not provide signals and slots.
class Runnable(QRunnable):
def run(self):
count = 0
app = QCoreApplication.instance()
while count < 5:
print("C Increasing")
time.sleep(1)
count += 1
app.quit()
def using_q_thread():
app = QCoreApplication([])
thread = AThread()
thread.finished.connect(app.exit)
thread.start()
sys.exit(app.exec_())
def using_move_to_thread():
app = QCoreApplication([])
objThread = QThread()
obj = SomeObject()
obj.moveToThread(objThread)
obj.finished.connect(objThread.quit)
objThread.started.connect(obj.long_running)
objThread.finished.connect(app.exit)
objThread.start()
sys.exit(app.exec_())
def using_q_runnable():
app = QCoreApplication([])
runnable = Runnable()
QThreadPool.globalInstance().start(runnable)
sys.exit(app.exec_())
if __name__ == "__main__":
#using_q_thread()
#using_move_to_thread()
using_q_runnable()

Take this answer updated for PyQt5, python 3.4
Use this as a pattern to start a worker that does not take data and return data as they are available to the form.
1 - Worker class is made smaller and put in its own file worker.py for easy memorization and independent software reuse.
2 - The main.py file is the file that defines the GUI Form class
3 - The thread object is not subclassed.
4 - Both thread object and the worker object belong to the Form object
5 - Steps of the procedure are within the comments.
# worker.py
from PyQt5.QtCore import QThread, QObject, pyqtSignal, pyqtSlot
import time
class Worker(QObject):
finished = pyqtSignal()
intReady = pyqtSignal(int)
#pyqtSlot()
def procCounter(self): # A slot takes no params
for i in range(1, 100):
time.sleep(1)
self.intReady.emit(i)
self.finished.emit()
And the main file is:
# main.py
from PyQt5.QtCore import QThread
from PyQt5.QtWidgets import QApplication, QLabel, QWidget, QGridLayout
import sys
import worker
class Form(QWidget):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.label = QLabel("0")
# 1 - create Worker and Thread inside the Form
self.obj = worker.Worker() # no parent!
self.thread = QThread() # no parent!
# 2 - Connect Worker`s Signals to Form method slots to post data.
self.obj.intReady.connect(self.onIntReady)
# 3 - Move the Worker object to the Thread object
self.obj.moveToThread(self.thread)
# 4 - Connect Worker Signals to the Thread slots
self.obj.finished.connect(self.thread.quit)
# 5 - Connect Thread started signal to Worker operational slot method
self.thread.started.connect(self.obj.procCounter)
# * - Thread finished signal will close the app if you want!
#self.thread.finished.connect(app.exit)
# 6 - Start the thread
self.thread.start()
# 7 - Start the form
self.initUI()
def initUI(self):
grid = QGridLayout()
self.setLayout(grid)
grid.addWidget(self.label,0,0)
self.move(300, 150)
self.setWindowTitle('thread test')
self.show()
def onIntReady(self, i):
self.label.setText("{}".format(i))
#print(i)
app = QApplication(sys.argv)
form = Form()
sys.exit(app.exec_())

According to the Qt developers, subclassing QThread is incorrect (see http://blog.qt.io/blog/2010/06/17/youre-doing-it-wrong/). But that article is really hard to understand (plus the title is a bit condescending). I found a better blog post that gives a more detailed explanation about why you should use one style of threading over another: http://mayaposch.wordpress.com/2011/11/01/how-to-really-truly-use-qthreads-the-full-explanation/
Also, I would highly recommend this video from KDAB on signals and slots between threads.
In my opinion, you should probably never subclass thread with the intent to overload the run method. While that does work, you're basically circumventing how Qt wants you to work. Plus you'll miss out on things like events and proper thread safe signals and slots. Plus as you'll likely see in the above blog post, the "correct" way of threading forces you to write more testable code.
Here's a couple of examples of how to take advantage of QThreads in PyQt (I posted a separate answer below that properly uses QRunnable and incorporates signals/slots, that answer is better if you have a lot of async tasks that you need to load balance).
import sys
from PyQt4 import QtCore
from PyQt4 import QtGui
from PyQt4.QtCore import Qt
# very testable class (hint: you can use mock.Mock for the signals)
class Worker(QtCore.QObject):
finished = QtCore.pyqtSignal()
dataReady = QtCore.pyqtSignal(list, dict)
#QtCore.pyqtSlot()
def processA(self):
print "Worker.processA()"
self.finished.emit()
#QtCore.pyqtSlot(str, list, list)
def processB(self, foo, bar=None, baz=None):
print "Worker.processB()"
for thing in bar:
# lots of processing...
self.dataReady.emit(['dummy', 'data'], {'dummy': ['data']})
self.finished.emit()
class Thread(QtCore.QThread):
"""Need for PyQt4 <= 4.6 only"""
def __init__(self, parent=None):
QtCore.QThread.__init__(self, parent)
# this class is solely needed for these two methods, there
# appears to be a bug in PyQt 4.6 that requires you to
# explicitly call run and start from the subclass in order
# to get the thread to actually start an event loop
def start(self):
QtCore.QThread.start(self)
def run(self):
QtCore.QThread.run(self)
app = QtGui.QApplication(sys.argv)
thread = Thread() # no parent!
obj = Worker() # no parent!
obj.moveToThread(thread)
# if you want the thread to stop after the worker is done
# you can always call thread.start() again later
obj.finished.connect(thread.quit)
# one way to do it is to start processing as soon as the thread starts
# this is okay in some cases... but makes it harder to send data to
# the worker object from the main gui thread. As you can see I'm calling
# processA() which takes no arguments
thread.started.connect(obj.processA)
thread.start()
# another way to do it, which is a bit fancier, allows you to talk back and
# forth with the object in a thread safe way by communicating through signals
# and slots (now that the thread is running I can start calling methods on
# the worker object)
QtCore.QMetaObject.invokeMethod(obj, 'processB', Qt.QueuedConnection,
QtCore.Q_ARG(str, "Hello World!"),
QtCore.Q_ARG(list, ["args", 0, 1]),
QtCore.Q_ARG(list, []))
# that looks a bit scary, but its a totally ok thing to do in Qt,
# we're simply using the system that Signals and Slots are built on top of,
# the QMetaObject, to make it act like we safely emitted a signal for
# the worker thread to pick up when its event loop resumes (so if its doing
# a bunch of work you can call this method 10 times and it will just queue
# up the calls. Note: PyQt > 4.6 will not allow you to pass in a None
# instead of an empty list, it has stricter type checking
app.exec_()
# Without this you may get weird QThread messages in the shell on exit
app.deleteLater()

Very nice example from Matt, I fixed the typo and also pyqt4.8 is common now so I removed the dummy class as well and added an example for the dataReady signal
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
import sys
from PyQt4 import QtCore, QtGui
from PyQt4.QtCore import Qt
# very testable class (hint: you can use mock.Mock for the signals)
class Worker(QtCore.QObject):
finished = QtCore.pyqtSignal()
dataReady = QtCore.pyqtSignal(list, dict)
#QtCore.pyqtSlot()
def processA(self):
print "Worker.processA()"
self.finished.emit()
#QtCore.pyqtSlot(str, list, list)
def processB(self, foo, bar=None, baz=None):
print "Worker.processB()"
for thing in bar:
# lots of processing...
self.dataReady.emit(['dummy', 'data'], {'dummy': ['data']})
self.finished.emit()
def onDataReady(aList, aDict):
print 'onDataReady'
print repr(aList)
print repr(aDict)
app = QtGui.QApplication(sys.argv)
thread = QtCore.QThread() # no parent!
obj = Worker() # no parent!
obj.dataReady.connect(onDataReady)
obj.moveToThread(thread)
# if you want the thread to stop after the worker is done
# you can always call thread.start() again later
obj.finished.connect(thread.quit)
# one way to do it is to start processing as soon as the thread starts
# this is okay in some cases... but makes it harder to send data to
# the worker object from the main gui thread. As you can see I'm calling
# processA() which takes no arguments
thread.started.connect(obj.processA)
thread.finished.connect(app.exit)
thread.start()
# another way to do it, which is a bit fancier, allows you to talk back and
# forth with the object in a thread safe way by communicating through signals
# and slots (now that the thread is running I can start calling methods on
# the worker object)
QtCore.QMetaObject.invokeMethod(obj, 'processB', Qt.QueuedConnection,
QtCore.Q_ARG(str, "Hello World!"),
QtCore.Q_ARG(list, ["args", 0, 1]),
QtCore.Q_ARG(list, []))
# that looks a bit scary, but its a totally ok thing to do in Qt,
# we're simply using the system that Signals and Slots are built on top of,
# the QMetaObject, to make it act like we safely emitted a signal for
# the worker thread to pick up when its event loop resumes (so if its doing
# a bunch of work you can call this method 10 times and it will just queue
# up the calls. Note: PyQt > 4.6 will not allow you to pass in a None
# instead of an empty list, it has stricter type checking
app.exec_()

In PyQt there are a lot of options for getting asynchronous behavior. For things that need event processing (ie. QtNetwork, etc) you should use the QThread example I provided in my other answer on this thread. But for the vast majority of your threading needs, I think this solution is far superior than the other methods.
The advantage of this is that the QThreadPool schedules your QRunnable instances as tasks. This is similar to the task pattern used in Intel's TBB. It's not quite as elegant as I like but it does pull off excellent asynchronous behavior.
This allows you to utilize most of the threading power of Qt in Python via QRunnable and still take advantage of signals and slots. I use this same code in several applications, some that make hundreds of asynchronous REST calls, some that open files or list directories, and the best part is using this method, Qt task balances the system resources for me.
import time
from PyQt4 import QtCore
from PyQt4 import QtGui
from PyQt4.QtCore import Qt
def async(method, args, uid, readycb, errorcb=None):
"""
Asynchronously runs a task
:param func method: the method to run in a thread
:param object uid: a unique identifier for this task (used for verification)
:param slot updatecb: the callback when data is receieved cb(uid, data)
:param slot errorcb: the callback when there is an error cb(uid, errmsg)
The uid option is useful when the calling code makes multiple async calls
and the callbacks need some context about what was sent to the async method.
For example, if you use this method to thread a long running database call
and the user decides they want to cancel it and start a different one, the
first one may complete before you have a chance to cancel the task. In that
case, the "readycb" will be called with the cancelled task's data. The uid
can be used to differentiate those two calls (ie. using the sql query).
:returns: Request instance
"""
request = Request(method, args, uid, readycb, errorcb)
QtCore.QThreadPool.globalInstance().start(request)
return request
class Request(QtCore.QRunnable):
"""
A Qt object that represents an asynchronous task
:param func method: the method to call
:param list args: list of arguments to pass to method
:param object uid: a unique identifier (used for verification)
:param slot readycb: the callback used when data is receieved
:param slot errorcb: the callback used when there is an error
The uid param is sent to your error and update callbacks as the
first argument. It's there to verify the data you're returning
After created it should be used by invoking:
.. code-block:: python
task = Request(...)
QtCore.QThreadPool.globalInstance().start(task)
"""
INSTANCES = []
FINISHED = []
def __init__(self, method, args, uid, readycb, errorcb=None):
super(Request, self).__init__()
self.setAutoDelete(True)
self.cancelled = False
self.method = method
self.args = args
self.uid = uid
self.dataReady = readycb
self.dataError = errorcb
Request.INSTANCES.append(self)
# release all of the finished tasks
Request.FINISHED = []
def run(self):
"""
Method automatically called by Qt when the runnable is ready to run.
This will run in a separate thread.
"""
# this allows us to "cancel" queued tasks if needed, should be done
# on shutdown to prevent the app from hanging
if self.cancelled:
self.cleanup()
return
# runs in a separate thread, for proper async signal/slot behavior
# the object that emits the signals must be created in this thread.
# Its not possible to run grabber.moveToThread(QThread.currentThread())
# so to get this QObject to properly exhibit asynchronous
# signal and slot behavior it needs to live in the thread that
# we're running in, creating the object from within this thread
# is an easy way to do that.
grabber = Requester()
grabber.Loaded.connect(self.dataReady, Qt.QueuedConnection)
if self.dataError is not None:
grabber.Error.connect(self.dataError, Qt.QueuedConnection)
try:
result = self.method(*self.args)
if self.cancelled:
# cleanup happens in 'finally' statement
return
grabber.Loaded.emit(self.uid, result)
except Exception as error:
if self.cancelled:
# cleanup happens in 'finally' statement
return
grabber.Error.emit(self.uid, unicode(error))
finally:
# this will run even if one of the above return statements
# is executed inside of the try/except statement see:
# https://docs.python.org/2.7/tutorial/errors.html#defining-clean-up-actions
self.cleanup(grabber)
def cleanup(self, grabber=None):
# remove references to any object or method for proper ref counting
self.method = None
self.args = None
self.uid = None
self.dataReady = None
self.dataError = None
if grabber is not None:
grabber.deleteLater()
# make sure this python obj gets cleaned up
self.remove()
def remove(self):
try:
Request.INSTANCES.remove(self)
# when the next request is created, it will clean this one up
# this will help us avoid this object being cleaned up
# when it's still being used
Request.FINISHED.append(self)
except ValueError:
# there might be a race condition on shutdown, when shutdown()
# is called while the thread is still running and the instance
# has already been removed from the list
return
#staticmethod
def shutdown():
for inst in Request.INSTANCES:
inst.cancelled = True
Request.INSTANCES = []
Request.FINISHED = []
class Requester(QtCore.QObject):
"""
A simple object designed to be used in a separate thread to allow
for asynchronous data fetching
"""
#
# Signals
#
Error = QtCore.pyqtSignal(object, unicode)
"""
Emitted if the fetch fails for any reason
:param unicode uid: an id to identify this request
:param unicode error: the error message
"""
Loaded = QtCore.pyqtSignal(object, object)
"""
Emitted whenever data comes back successfully
:param unicode uid: an id to identify this request
:param list data: the json list returned from the GET
"""
NetworkConnectionError = QtCore.pyqtSignal(unicode)
"""
Emitted when the task fails due to a network connection error
:param unicode message: network connection error message
"""
def __init__(self, parent=None):
super(Requester, self).__init__(parent)
class ExampleObject(QtCore.QObject):
def __init__(self, parent=None):
super(ExampleObject, self).__init__(parent)
self.uid = 0
self.request = None
def ready_callback(self, uid, result):
if uid != self.uid:
return
print "Data ready from %s: %s" % (uid, result)
def error_callback(self, uid, error):
if uid != self.uid:
return
print "Data error from %s: %s" % (uid, error)
def fetch(self):
if self.request is not None:
# cancel any pending requests
self.request.cancelled = True
self.request = None
self.uid += 1
self.request = async(slow_method, ["arg1", "arg2"], self.uid,
self.ready_callback,
self.error_callback)
def slow_method(arg1, arg2):
print "Starting slow method"
time.sleep(1)
return arg1 + arg2
if __name__ == "__main__":
import sys
app = QtGui.QApplication(sys.argv)
obj = ExampleObject()
dialog = QtGui.QDialog()
layout = QtGui.QVBoxLayout(dialog)
button = QtGui.QPushButton("Generate", dialog)
progress = QtGui.QProgressBar(dialog)
progress.setRange(0, 0)
layout.addWidget(button)
layout.addWidget(progress)
button.clicked.connect(obj.fetch)
dialog.show()
app.exec_()
app.deleteLater() # avoids some QThread messages in the shell on exit
# cancel all running tasks avoid QThread/QTimer error messages
# on exit
Request.shutdown()
When exiting the application you'll want to make sure you cancel all of the tasks or the application will hang until every scheduled task has completed

Based on the Worker objects methods mentioned in other answers, I decided to see if I could expand on the solution to invoke more threads - in this case the optimal number the machine can run and spin up multiple workers with indeterminate completion times.
To do this I still need to subclass QThread - but only to assign a thread number and to 'reimplement' the signals 'finished' and 'started' to include their thread number.
I've focused quite a bit on the signals between the main gui, the threads, and the workers.
Similarly, others answers have been a pains to point out not parenting the QThread but I don't think this is a real concern. However, my code also is careful to destroy the QThread objects.
However, I wasn't able to parent the worker objects so it seems desirable to send them the deleteLater() signal, either when the thread function is finished or the GUI is destroyed. I've had my own code hang for not doing this.
Another enhancement I felt was necessary was was reimplement the closeEvent of the GUI (QWidget) such that the threads would be instructed to quit and then the GUI would wait until all the threads were finished. When I played with some of the other answers to this question, I got QThread destroyed errors.
Perhaps it will be useful to others. I certainly found it a useful exercise. Perhaps others will know a better way for a thread to announce it identity.
#!/usr/bin/env python3
#coding:utf-8
# Author: --<>
# Purpose: To demonstrate creation of multiple threads and identify the receipt of thread results
# Created: 19/12/15
import sys
from PyQt4.QtCore import QThread, pyqtSlot, pyqtSignal
from PyQt4.QtGui import QApplication, QLabel, QWidget, QGridLayout
import sys
import worker
class Thread(QThread):
#make new signals to be able to return an id for the thread
startedx = pyqtSignal(int)
finishedx = pyqtSignal(int)
def __init__(self,i,parent=None):
super().__init__(parent)
self.idd = i
self.started.connect(self.starttt)
self.finished.connect(self.finisheddd)
#pyqtSlot()
def starttt(self):
print('started signal from thread emitted')
self.startedx.emit(self.idd)
#pyqtSlot()
def finisheddd(self):
print('finished signal from thread emitted')
self.finishedx.emit(self.idd)
class Form(QWidget):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.initUI()
self.worker={}
self.threadx={}
self.i=0
i=0
#Establish the maximum number of threads the machine can optimally handle
#Generally relates to the number of processors
self.threadtest = QThread(self)
self.idealthreadcount = self.threadtest.idealThreadCount()
print("This machine can handle {} threads optimally".format(self.idealthreadcount))
while i <self.idealthreadcount:
self.setupThread(i)
i+=1
i=0
while i<self.idealthreadcount:
self.startThread(i)
i+=1
print("Main Gui running in thread {}.".format(self.thread()))
def setupThread(self,i):
self.worker[i]= worker.Worker(i) # no parent!
#print("Worker object runningt in thread {} prior to movetothread".format(self.worker[i].thread()) )
self.threadx[i] = Thread(i,parent=self) # if parent isn't specified then need to be careful to destroy thread
self.threadx[i].setObjectName("python thread{}"+str(i))
#print("Thread object runningt in thread {} prior to movetothread".format(self.threadx[i].thread()) )
self.threadx[i].startedx.connect(self.threadStarted)
self.threadx[i].finishedx.connect(self.threadFinished)
self.worker[i].finished.connect(self.workerFinished)
self.worker[i].intReady.connect(self.workerResultReady)
#The next line is optional, you may want to start the threads again without having to create all the code again.
self.worker[i].finished.connect(self.threadx[i].quit)
self.threadx[i].started.connect(self.worker[i].procCounter)
self.destroyed.connect(self.threadx[i].deleteLater)
self.destroyed.connect(self.worker[i].deleteLater)
#This is the key code that actually get the worker code onto another processor or thread.
self.worker[i].moveToThread(self.threadx[i])
def startThread(self,i):
self.threadx[i].start()
#pyqtSlot(int)
def threadStarted(self,i):
print('Thread {} started'.format(i))
print("Thread priority is {}".format(self.threadx[i].priority()))
#pyqtSlot(int)
def threadFinished(self,i):
print('Thread {} finished'.format(i))
#pyqtSlot(int)
def threadTerminated(self,i):
print("Thread {} terminated".format(i))
#pyqtSlot(int,int)
def workerResultReady(self,j,i):
print('Worker {} result returned'.format(i))
if i ==0:
self.label1.setText("{}".format(j))
if i ==1:
self.label2.setText("{}".format(j))
if i ==2:
self.label3.setText("{}".format(j))
if i ==3:
self.label4.setText("{}".format(j))
#print('Thread {} has started'.format(self.threadx[i].currentThreadId()))
#pyqtSlot(int)
def workerFinished(self,i):
print('Worker {} finished'.format(i))
def initUI(self):
self.label1 = QLabel("0")
self.label2= QLabel("0")
self.label3= QLabel("0")
self.label4 = QLabel("0")
grid = QGridLayout(self)
self.setLayout(grid)
grid.addWidget(self.label1,0,0)
grid.addWidget(self.label2,0,1)
grid.addWidget(self.label3,0,2)
grid.addWidget(self.label4,0,3) #Layout parents the self.labels
self.move(300, 150)
self.setGeometry(0,0,300,300)
#self.size(300,300)
self.setWindowTitle('thread test')
self.show()
def closeEvent(self, event):
print('Closing')
#this tells the threads to stop running
i=0
while i <self.idealthreadcount:
self.threadx[i].quit()
i+=1
#this ensures window cannot be closed until the threads have finished.
i=0
while i <self.idealthreadcount:
self.threadx[i].wait()
i+=1
event.accept()
if __name__=='__main__':
app = QApplication(sys.argv)
form = Form()
sys.exit(app.exec_())
And the worker code below
#!/usr/bin/env python3
#coding:utf-8
# Author: --<>
# Purpose: Stack Overflow
# Created: 19/12/15
import sys
import unittest
from PyQt4.QtCore import QThread, QObject, pyqtSignal, pyqtSlot
import time
import random
class Worker(QObject):
finished = pyqtSignal(int)
intReady = pyqtSignal(int,int)
def __init__(self, i=0):
'''__init__ is called while the worker is still in the Gui thread. Do not put slow or CPU intensive code in the __init__ method'''
super().__init__()
self.idd = i
#pyqtSlot()
def procCounter(self): # This slot takes no params
for j in range(1, 10):
random_time = random.weibullvariate(1,2)
time.sleep(random_time)
self.intReady.emit(j,self.idd)
print('Worker {0} in thread {1}'.format(self.idd, self.thread().idd))
self.finished.emit(self.idd)
if __name__=='__main__':
unittest.main()

PySide2 Solution:
Unlike in PyQt5, in PySide2 the QThread.started signal is received/handled on the original thread, not the worker thread! Luckily it still receives all other signals on the worker thread.
In order to match PyQt5's behavior, you have to create the started signal yourself.
Here is an easy solution:
# Use this class instead of QThread
class QThread2(QThread):
# Use this signal instead of "started"
started2 = Signal()
def __init__(self):
QThread.__init__(self)
self.started.connect(self.onStarted)
def onStarted(self):
self.started2.emit()

Develop Reference

Python is a programming language that lets you work quickly and integrate systems more effectively.