Develop Reference

using #!/usr/bin/env python3 shebang with Windows

I'm trying to run a Python script from the command line as a command on Windows -- so no usage of "Python" or ".py". If my script is named "testing.py", I am attempting to make this name into a command and call "testing" from the command line.
Going through the docs it seems I need to use this shebang #!/usr/bin/env python as long as I have Python in my PATH.
https://docs.python.org/3/using/windows.html#shebang-lines
I also have the script folder in my PATH, so something like
"testing.py" is currently working from the command line.
According to the docs and this tutorial,
https://dbader.org/blog/how-to-make-command-line-commands-with-python
I should be able to evoke my Python script just by "testing" if I have the proper paths within PATH and the above shebang. However, I can't seem to get the script running withouth adding ".py".

The accepted answer by #AKX is incorrect for Windows 10 standard Python 3, certainly in the latest Windows 10 (1903) if not earlier.
(Note: I cannot speak to how this may or may not work under WSL.)
I have several versions of Python installed (2.7, 3.6, 3.7, and most recently Python 3.8b1). I've been using the #!/usr/bin/env shebang for years in my scripts for cross-platform compatibility (usually to distinguish Py2 vs Py3 scripts).
I've created a little script in a folder (C:\so_test\awtest.py):
#!/usr/bin/env python3.6
import sys
print(sys.version)
If I run this with awtest.py or just awtest I get 3.6.x reported (showing it's running with Python 3.6). If I change the shebang to refer to 3.7, I get 3.7.x reported. If I change the shebang to just #!/usr/bin/env python3 I get the latest version of Python installed (3.8).
Now, if I add that folder to my path (path=%PATH%;C:\so_test in the command window you're testing in, or in the main env vars (you will need to restart the command window if you do the latter though)), I can change to a different directory and run awtest or awtest.py and they still work and refer to the folder in the path. If I remove the script folder from the path these files are no longer found.
While I wouldn't necessarily expect this to work on Windows prior to 10 or Python 2.7, this functionality appears to be the way of things going forward.

No, Windows does not support shebang lines.
The documentation you've linked relates to the py launcher installed by Python, which can interpret various shebang lines to choose a Python version to run a script with.
setuptools is able to generate wrapper .exes for your Python scripts, but it gets a little involved and already assumes you have a package with a setup.py and so on.
Locally, if you really, really need this, you probably could add .py to the PATHEXT environment variable, so the Windows command line looks up .pys like it looks up .exes (and various others; the current modern default is .COM;.EXE;.BAT;.CMD;.VBS;.VBE;.JS;.JSE;.WSF;.WSH;.MSC). However, this will naturally not scale for distributing apps, as all of your users would need to set that too.
My recommendation is to stick with just that boring old python testing.py, really.

You can use shebang in windows by setting the path of your interpreter as the first line in the file(you will see a marker on VSCode that says 'set as interpreter ' on that line).
Using windows 10,Python version 3.9 see example:
#!C:/Users/waithira/AppData/Local/Programs/Python/Python39/python.exe
print('hello world')

if you're not going to do this often. You can still add a batch file to your path testing.bat containing the command that you need to execute your code.
#echo off
python testing.py
It's a borring workaround but it works without needing to mention the extention since windows interpret batch files the same way it interpret executables.

Can the Python interpreter and Python app source code be embedded into a compiled program?

I want to put the Python interpreter and all the source files of a fairly large Python application with multiple .py files into an executable Linux file.
Thus when running the application, the Python interpreter will run the Python source code that is embedded into the executable.
Using Python 3.
Is such a thing possible?
Edit: in addition to the selected answer another option is to use Cython.

Sounds like you're looking for a packaging module, like py2exe or cx_Freeze (I prefer the latter). They bundle the interpreter and your files together so that a machine without an installation of Python can run your program.

How to run python files without using terminal or gui?

Hello gyus i have started python and i want to know how can i excecute python file without using terminal.Just like the most games using (exe) file extension but for py files.I have tried py2exe but it doesn't show anything on the screen. I tried to make excecutable the py file with no luck. Please tell me how to excecute the and if there is an option whithout using a specific program for that.
My system is : Windows 7 / Ubuntu 12.04

Here, have a look in my blog, It explains how ca you do it in Ubuntu.
http://insidepython.wordpress.com/2012/08/04/hello-world-or-how-or-say-ni/
but basically:
Add this line to the beginning of your script
#!<location of your python interpreter>
To find out where your python interpreter is installed:
$ sudo find / -name "python"
After executing the previous, you should get the location of your python interpreter, then you need to set the environment variable, in my case python executable is located in /usr/bin/python
$ export PATH="$PATH:/usr/bin/python"
Then you need to set the file attributes to executable, you can look more into file attributes in Unix/Linux here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chmod
$ chmod +x shrubbery.py
And finally to execute your application
$ ./shrubbery.py

For Windows, there's also a python script called GUI2Exe that I have used in the past to create distributable versions of python scripts as apps. It's available at
http://code.google.com/p/gui2exe/ and is, in my opinion, very simple to use. Tutorials and whatnot are easy to find on Google.
It uses py2exe (or any other Python compiler library) to put together the script, but it doesn't require any syntactically annoying setup.py file.

Python 3.2 doesn't work with python 2.7

I already have python 2.7 (installed using activepython). I'm trying to use python 3.2 just to learn more about it so i downloaded it from python.org
python 2.7 still works perfectly, but python 3.2 gives me this error when i try to open the ide.
and then I see the send error window, if i install python 3.2 using activepython i see the same error.
I'm using windows xp pro sp3 32 bit and i had the same error on sp2... How do I fix it?
EDIT #Zuljin
This is the first time that i use dependancy walker so could you give me a hand please
this is what i see
what does that mean? I already have these files...

I saw a lot of answers here. But, I think the file that you are trying to run is not correct
C:\Python32\Pythonw.exe
is not the one you use to open idle.
Open
C:\Python32\Lib\idlelib\idle.pyw

Python 2.x and 3.x can cohabitate perfectly in win xp and win 7, either 32 or 64 bits.
If you first installed the ActiveState Python distribution, be careful when installing python-3.2.2.msi.
When you arrive to the customize python 3.2.2 screen, (un)check 'register extensions' to make the feature unavailable (that is: do not register extensions).
I have installed this way both distributions in different computers without any problem so far.
Note: Check your environment variables. Only python 2.7 should be in the path (if you installed before the two distros you could have them both in the path. Remove python 3.2 path)
Edit:
From Ankit post I realized that in fact you were trying to open IDLE, maybe.
If you follow my installation instructions when you call idle.bat from the py3.2 idlelib folder you actually get idle for python 2.7 as this is what the call find in the windows path. To be able to open idle for py3.2 in the presence of python 2.7 as the registered python, I use a .bat file modified from that in the distribution:
idle_stay.bat
#echo off
rem Working IDLE bat for Windows - Custom bat for py3k as secundary python
C:\Python32\pythonw C:\Python32\Lib\idlelib\idle.pyw %1 %2 %3 %4 %5 %6 %7 %8 %9
The name idle_stay.bat is because I put this file in the folder where the official idle.bat is (C:\Python32\Lib\idlelib\idle_stay.bat). In this way it does not get overwritten each time I unisntall and reinstall a new version of python 3

It seems to me you have associated a *.py or *.pyw file extension type to some version of python.exe and/or pythonw.exe you aren't clear about. This is often, but not exclusively done from within Microsoft's "explore.exe" File Manager (I believe in Options).
I disagree that this is a reliable method:
C:\Python32\Lib\idlelib\idle.pyw
as this method will run whichever program is assigned to the "pyw" extension. That could be:
C:\Python32\pythonw.exe
or
C:\Python26\python.exe
or whatever might have happened to your file extension association as per OS or bad PATH environment variable setting. It is better to do something like this:
C:\Python32\pythonw.exe C:\Python32\Lib\idlelib\idle.pyw
where you are explicidly telling the OS to run the python executable from a specific path and selecting a specific python script in the file/folder hiearchy.
Another thing you can try to gather info is just:
python.exe -V
which will tell you the version number.
Another thing you can do:
Open a DOS command prompt and type:
set PATH=C:\Windows;C:\Windows\system32;C:\Python32
python.exe and note the version and whether is runs.
exit()
exit
Once working debug your PATH. You can use this Python script to gather intel.
If you turned off your WinXP findfile stuff (like I have) you can use this script:
inpath.py can help shed some light.
Run this python script like this:
Drop to a DOS prompt
cd to your folder with a working python.exe version.
and type python.exe inpath.py python*
where inpath is in that same folder for this test/debug.
inpath.py will search your path for all files associated as "runable" in your OS and that is in your "PATH" with the python*.* pattern.

How to associate py extension with python launcher on Mac OS X?

Does anyone know how to associate the py extension with the python interpreter on Mac OS X 10.5.7? I have gotten as far as selecting the application with which to associate it (/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.5/bin/python), but the python executable appears as a non-selectable grayed-out item. Any ideas?

The python.org OS X Python installers include an application called "Python Launcher.app" which does exactly what you want. It gets installed into /Applications /Python n.n/ for n.n > 2.6 or /Applications/MacPython n.n/ for 2.5 and earlier. In its preference panel, you can specify which Python executable to launch; it can be any command-line path, including the Apple-installed one at /usr/bin/python2.5. You will also need to ensure that .py is associated with "Python Launcher"; you can use the Finder's Get Info command to do that as described elsewhere. Be aware, though, that this could be a security risk if downloaded .py scripts are automatically launched by your browser(s). (Note, the Apple-supplied Python in 10.5 does not include "Python Launcher.app").

The file associations are done with the "Get Info". You select your .PY file, select the File menu; Get Info menu item.
Mid-way down the Get Info page is "Open With".
You can pick the Python Launcher. There's a Change All.. button that changes the association for all .py files.

Steve, add the following to the top of your python script:
#!/usr/bin/env python
It must occur as the first line of the file.
Then make the file executable as so:
daves-macbookpro ~: chmod +x foo.py
Then all you need to do to run this is type
./foo.py

The default python installation (atleast on 10.6.8) includes the Python Launcher.app in /System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Resources/, which is aliased to the latest/current version of Python installed on the system. This application launches terminal and sets the right environment to run the script.