Progressive loading of large arbitrary datasets in keras - python

I'm training my keras dense models on very large datasets.
For practical reasons, I am saving them on my disk on separate .txt files. I have 1e4 text files, each containing 1e4 examples.
I would like to find a way to fit my keras model on this dataset as a whole. For now, I am only able to use "model.fit" on individual text files, i.e. :
for k in range(10000):
X = np.loadtxt('/path/X_'+str(k)+'.txt')
Y = np.loadtxt('/path/Y_'+str(k)+'.txt')
mod = model.fit(x=X, y=Y, batch_size=batch_size, epochs=epochs)
Which is problematic if I want for instance to perform several epochs on the whole datasets.
Ideally, I would like to have a dataloader function that could be used in the following way to feed all the sub-datasets as a single one:
mod = model.fit(dataloader('/path/'), batch_size=batch_size, epochs=epochs)
I think I found what I want, but only for datasets composed of images: tf.keras.preprocessing.image.ImageDataGenerator.flow_from_directory
Is there any tf/keras function doing something similar, but for datasets which are not composed of images?
Thanks!

You can create a generator function and then use tensorflow Dataset class using from_generator method to create a dataset, see bellow a dummy example:
def mygenerator():
for k in range(1000):
x = np.random.normal(size=1000,)
y = np.random.randint(low=0, high=5, size=1000)
yield x, y
from tensorflow.data import Dataset
mydataset = Dataset.from_generator(mygenerator, output_signature=(tf.TensorSpec(shape=(1000,), dtype=tf.float32), tf.TensorSpec(shape=(1000,), dtype=tf.int32)))
mytraindata = mydataset.batch(batch_size)

Related

How to load numpy array in a tensorflow dataset

I'm trying to create a Dataset object in tensorflow 1.14 (I have some legacy code that i can't change for this specific project) starting from numpy arrays, but everytime i try i get everything copied on my graph and for this reason when i create an event log file it is huge (719 MB in this case).
Originally i tried using this function "tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices()", but it didn't work, then i read it is a common problem and someone suggested me to try with generators, thus i tried with the following code, but again i got a huge event file (719 MB again)
def fetch_batch(x, y, batch):
i = 0
while i < batch:
yield (x[i,:,:,:], y[i])
i +=1
train, test = tf.keras.datasets.fashion_mnist.load_data()
images, labels = train
images = images/255
training_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_generator(fetch_batch,
args=[images, np.int32(labels), batch_size], output_types=(tf.float32, tf.int32),
output_shapes=(tf.TensorShape(features_shape), tf.TensorShape(labels_shape)))
file_writer = tf.summary.FileWriter("/content", graph=tf.get_default_graph())
I know in this case I could use tensorflow_datasets API and it would be easier, but this is a more general question, and it involves how to create datasets in general, not only using the mnist one.
Could you explain to me what am i doing wrong? Thank you
I guess it's because you are using args in from_generator. This will surely put the provided args in the graph.
What you could do is define a function that will return a generator that will iterate through your set, something like (haven't tested):
def data_generator(images, labels):
def fetch_examples():
i = 0
while True:
example = (images[i], labels[i])
i += 1
i %= len(labels)
yield example
return fetch_examples
This would give in your example:
train, test = tf.keras.datasets.fashion_mnist.load_data()
images, labels = train
images = images/255
training_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_generator(data_generator(images, labels), output_types=(tf.float32, tf.int32),
output_shapes=(tf.TensorShape(features_shape), tf.TensorShape(labels_shape))).batch(batch_size)
file_writer = tf.summary.FileWriter("/content", graph=tf.get_default_graph())
Note that I changed fetch_batch to fetch_examples since you probably want to batch using the dataset utilities (.batch).

TF2.0 Data API get n_i samples from each class label

I have to classify inputs of shape 32x32 into 3 classes using a TF2 Keras model. My training set has 7000 examples
>>> X_train.shape # (7000, 32, 32)
>>> Y_train.shape # (7000, 3)
The number of examples for each class varies (e.g. class_0 has ~2500 examples while class_1 has ~800, etc.)
I want to use the tf.data API to create a dataset object that returns batches of training data with no. of examples from each class specified by [n_0, n_1, n_2].
I would like to have these n_i samples from each class randomly drawn with replacement from X_train, Y_train
For example, if I call get_batch([100, 150, 125]) it should return 100 random samples from X_batch from class_0, 150 from class_1, and 125 from class_2.
How can I achieve this using the TF2.0 Data API so I could use it for training a Keras model?
One possible approach is to proceed as follows:
Load the data from X_train & Y_train into a single tf.data Dataset so that we ensure we keep each X matched with the correct Y
.shuffle() then split the dataset into each n_i using a filter()
Write our get_batch function to return the correct number of samples from each dataset, shuffle() the sample then split it back into X & Y
Something like this:
# 1: Load the data into a Dataset
raw_data = tf.data.Dataset.zip(
(
tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices(X_train),
tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices(Y_train)
)
).shuffle(7000)
# 2: Split for each category
def get_filter_fn(n):
def filter_fn(x, y):
return tf.equal(1.0, y[n])
return filter_fn
n_0s = raw_data.filter(get_filter_fn(0))
n_1s = raw_data.filter(get_filter_fn(1))
n_2s = raw_data.filter(get_filter_fn(2))
# 3:
def get_batch(n_0,n_1,n_2):
sample = n_0s.take(n_0).concatenate(n_1s.take(n_1)).concatenate(n_2s.take(n_2))
shuffled = sample.shuffle(n_0 + n_1 + n_2)
return shuffled.map(lambda x,y: x),shuffled.map(lambda x,y: y)
So now we can do:
x_batch, y_batch = get_batch(100, 150, 125)
Note that I've used some potentially wasteful operations here pursuing an approach I find intuitive and straightforward (specifically reading the raw_data dataset 3 times for the filter operations) so I make no claim that this is the most efficient way to accomplish what you need but for a dataset that fits in memory like the one you describe I'm sure such inefficiencies will be negligible
Keras' train_test_split actually has a parameter for that. While it doesn't let you pick exact number of samples, it selects them evenly from the classes.
X_train_stratified, X_test_stratified, y_train_strat, y_test_strat = train_test_split(X_train, y_train, test_size=0.2, stratify=y)
If you want to do cross validation you can also use stratified shuffle split
I hope I understood your question correctly

Reason for huge slowdown usinf TF Dataset API

I'm trying to generate batches for triplet loss where there are always pairs in the batch. The code below achieves this but it's very, very slow. In particular the choose_from_datasets method seems to be the source of the slowness.
Is there something wrong with my code that's creating the slowdown? Or is there a smarter way to do this?
I tried switching to sample_from_datasets instead, but this didn't help.
def batch_pairs3(dataset, num_classes, shuffle=True, num_classes_per_batch=10, num_images_per_class=2):
# Isolate each class into its own dataset
datasets = []
for cl in range(num_classes):
this_dataset = dataset.filter(lambda xx, yy: tf.equal(tf.reshape(yy, []), cl))
if shuffle:
this_dataset = this_dataset.shuffle(100)
datasets += [this_dataset]
# if shuffle:
# random.shuffle(datasets)
selector = tf.contrib.data.Counter().map(
lambda x: generator3(x, num_classes, num_classes_per_batch, num_images_per_class))
selector = selector.apply(tf.contrib.data.unbatch())
dataset = tf.contrib.data.choose_from_datasets(datasets, selector)
# Batch
batch_size = num_classes_per_batch * num_images_per_class
return dataset.batch(batch_size)
tf data pipeline does not handle these kind of applications where you are processing your data on the fly by iterating through it very well, unless you can independently map every data point to do such processing. For what you are doing, you may be better off pre-processing and storing your data, in something like tfrecord format and then using the data pipeline to read it in an optimized way.
Refer this official example, which kind of works on a similar problem involving triplet loss: Time Contrastive Networks, the data provider

Tensorflow: Batching whole dataset (MNIST Tutorial)

Following this tutorial: https://www.tensorflow.org/versions/r1.3/get_started/mnist/pros
I wanted to solve a classification problem with labeled images by myself. Since I'm not using the MNIST database, I spent days creating my own dataset inside tensorflow. It looks like this:
#variables
batch_size = 50
dimension = 784
stages = 10
#step 1 read Dataset
filenames = tf.constant(filenamesList)
labels = tf.constant(labelsList)
#step 2 create Dataset
dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((filenames, labels))
#step 3: parse every image in the dataset using `map`
def _parse_function(filename, label):
#convert label to one-hot encoding
one_hot = tf.one_hot(label, stages)
#read image file
image_string = tf.read_file(filename)
image_decoded = tf.image.decode_image(image_string, channels=3)
image = tf.cast(image_decoded, tf.float32)
return image, one_hot
#step 4 final input tensor
dataset = dataset.map(_parse_function)
dataset = dataset.batch(batch_size) #batch_size = 100
iterator = dataset.make_one_shot_iterator()
images, labels = iterator.get_next()
images = tf.reshape(images, [batch_size,dimension]).eval()
labels = tf.reshape(labels, [batch_size,stages]).eval()
for _ in range(10):
dataset = dataset.shuffle(buffer_size = 100)
dataset = dataset.batch(batch_size)
iterator = dataset.make_one_shot_iterator()
images, labels = iterator.get_next()
images = tf.reshape(images, [batch_size,dimension]).eval()
labels = tf.reshape(labels, [batch_size,stages]).eval()
train_step.run(feed_dict={x: images, y_:labels})
Somehow using a higher batch_sizes will break python. What I'm trying to do is to train my neural network with new batches on each iteration. That's why Im also using dataset.shuffle(...). Using dataset.shuffle also breaks my Python.
What I wanted to do (because shuffle breaks) is to batch the whole dataset. By evaluating ('.eval()') I will get a numpy array. I will then shuffle the array with numpy.random.shuffle(images) and then pick up some the first elements to train it.
e.g.
for _ in range(1000):
images = tf.reshape(images, [batch_size,dimension]).eval()
labels = tf.reshape(labels, [batch_size,stages]).eval()
#shuffle
np.random.shuffle(images)
np.random.shuffle(labels)
train_step.run(feed_dict={x: images[0:train_size], y_:labels[0:train_size]})
But then here comes the problem that I can't batch the my whole dataset. It looks like that the data is too big for python to work with.
How should I solve this differently?
Since I'm not using the MNIST database there isn't a function like mnist.train.next_batch(100) which comes handy for me.
Notice how you call shuffle and batch inside your for loop? This is wrong. Datasets in TF work in the style of functional programming, so you are actually defining a pipeline for preprocessing the data to feed into your model. In a way, you give a recipe that answers the question "given this raw data, which operations (map, etc.) should I do to get batches that I can feed into my neural network?"
Now you are modifying that pipeline for every batch! What happens is that the first iteration, the batch size is, say [32 3600]. The next iteration, the elements of this shape are batched again, to [32 32 3600], and so on.
There's a great tutorial on the TF website where you can find out more how Datasets work, but here are a few suggestions how you can resolve your problem.
Move the shuffling to right after "Step 2" in your code. Then you are shuffling the whole dataset so your batches will have a good mixture of examples. Also increase the buffer_size argument, this works in a different way than you probably assume. It's usually a good idea to shuffle as early as possible, as it can be a slow operation if you have a large dataset -- the shuffled part of dataset will have to be read into memory. Here it does not really matter whether you shuffle the filenames and labels, or the read images and labels -- but the latter will have more work to do since the dataset is larger by that time.
Move batching and the iterator generator to be the last steps, just before starting your training loop.
Don't use feed_dict with Dataset iterators to input data into your model. Instead, define your model in terms of the outputs of iterator.get_next() and omit the feed_dict argument. See more details from this Q&A: Tensorflow: create minibatch from numpy array > 2 GB
Ive been getting through a lot of problems with creating tensorflow datasets. So I decided to use OpenCV to import images.
import opencv as cv
imgDataset = []
for i in range(len(files)):
imgDataset.append(cv2.imread(files[i]))
imgDataset = np.asarray(imgDataset)
the shape of imgDataset is (num_img, height, width, col_channels). Getting the i-th image should be imgDataset[i].
shuffling the dataset and getting only batches of it can be done like this:
from sklearn.utils import shuffle
X,y = shuffle(X, y)
X_feed = X[batch_size]
y_feed = y[batch_size]
Then you feed X_feed and y_feed into your model

Streaming large training and test files into Tensorflow's DNNClassifier

I have a huge training CSV file (709M) and a large testing CSV file (125M) that I want to send into a DNNClassifier in the context of using the high-level Tensorflow API.
It appears that the input_fn param accepted by fit and evaluate must hold all feature and label data in memory, but I currently would like to run this on my local machine, and thus expect it to run out of memory rather quickly if I read these files into memory and then process them.
I skimmed the doc on streamed-reading of data, but the sample code for reading CSVs appears to be for the low-level Tensorflow API.
And - if you'll forgive a bit of whining - it seems overly-complex for the trivial use case of sending well-prepared files of training and test data into an Estimator ... although, perhaps that level of complexity is actually required for training and testing large volumes of data in Tensorflow?
In any case, I'd really appreciate an example of using that approach with the high-level API, if it's even possible, which I'm beginning to doubt.
After poking around, I did manage to find DNNClassifier#partial_fit, and will attempt to use it for training.
Examples of how to use this method would save me some time, though hopefully I'll stumble into the correct usage in the next few hours.
However, there doesn't seem to be a corresponding DNNClassifier#partial_evaluate ... though I suspect that I could break-up the testing data into smaller pieces and run DNNClassifier#evaluate successively on each batch, which might actually be a great way to do it since I could segment the testing data into cohorts, and thereby obtain per-cohort accuracy.
==== Update ====
Short version:
DomJack's recommendation should be the accepted answer.
However, my Mac's 16GB of RAM enough for it to hold the entire 709Mb training data set in memory without crashing. So, while I will use the DataSets feature when I eventually deploy the app, I'm not using it yet for local dev work.
Longer version:
I started by using the partial_fit API as described above, but upon every use it emitted a warning.
So, I went to look at the source for the method here, and discovered that its complete implementation looks like this:
logging.warning('The current implementation of partial_fit is not optimized'
' for use in a loop. Consider using fit() instead.')
return self.fit(x=x, y=y, input_fn=input_fn, steps=steps,
batch_size=batch_size, monitors=monitors)
... which reminds me of this scene from Hitchhiker's Guide:
Arthur Dent: What happens if I press this button?
Ford Prefect: I wouldn't-
Arthur Dent: Oh.
Ford Prefect: What happened?
Arthur Dent: A sign lit up, saying 'Please do not press this button again'.
Which is to say: partial_fit seems to exist for the sole purpose of telling you not to use it.
Furthermore, the model generated by using partial_fit iteratively on training file chunks was much smaller than the one generated by using fit on the whole training file, which strongly suggests that only the last partial_fit training chunk actually "took".
Check out the tf.data.Dataset API. There are a number of ways to create a dataset. I'll outline four - but you'll only have to implement one.
I assume each row of your csv files is n_features float values followed by a single int value.
Creating a tf.data.Dataset
Wrap a python generator with Dataset.from_generator
The easiest way to get started is to wrap a native python generator. This can have performance issues, but may be fine for your purposes.
def read_csv(filename):
with open(filename, 'r') as f:
for line in f.readlines():
record = line.rstrip().split(',')
features = [float(n) for n in record[:-1]]
label = int(record[-1])
yield features, label
def get_dataset():
filename = 'my_train_dataset.csv'
generator = lambda: read_csv(filename)
return tf.data.Dataset.from_generator(
generator, (tf.float32, tf.int32), ((n_features,), ()))
This approach is highly versatile and allows you to test your generator function (read_csv) independently of TensorFlow.
Use Tensorflow Datasets API
Supporting tensorflow versions 1.12+, tensorflow datasets is my new favourite way of creating datasets. It automatically serializes your data, collects statistics and makes other meta-data available to you via info and builder objects. It can also handle automatic downloading and extracting making collaboration simple.
import tensorflow_datasets as tfds
class MyCsvDatasetBuilder(tfds.core.GeneratorBasedBuilder):
VERSION = tfds.core.Version("0.0.1")
def _info(self):
return tfds.core.DatasetInfo(
builder=self,
description=(
"My dataset"),
features=tfds.features.FeaturesDict({
"features": tfds.features.Tensor(
shape=(FEATURE_SIZE,), dtype=tf.float32),
"label": tfds.features.ClassLabel(
names=CLASS_NAMES),
"index": tfds.features.Tensor(shape=(), dtype=tf.float32)
}),
supervised_keys=("features", "label"),
)
def _split_generators(self, dl_manager):
paths = dict(
train='/path/to/train.csv',
test='/path/to/test.csv',
)
# better yet, if the csv files were originally downloaded, use
# urls = dict(train=train_url, test=test_url)
# paths = dl_manager.download(urls)
return [
tfds.core.SplitGenerator(
name=tfds.Split.TRAIN,
num_shards=10,
gen_kwargs=dict(path=paths['train'])),
tfds.core.SplitGenerator(
name=tfds.Split.TEST,
num_shards=2,
gen_kwargs=dict(cvs_path=paths['test']))
]
def _generate_examples(self, csv_path):
with open(csv_path, 'r') as f:
for i, line in enumerate(f.readlines()):
record = line.rstrip().split(',')
features = [float(n) for n in record[:-1]]
label = int(record[-1])
yield dict(features=features, label=label, index=i)
Usage:
builder = MyCsvDatasetBuilder()
builder.download_and_prepare() # will only take time to run first time
# as_supervised makes output (features, label) - good for model.fit
datasets = builder.as_dataset(as_supervised=True)
train_ds = datasets['train']
test_ds = datasets['test']
Wrap an index-based python function
One of the downsides of the above is shuffling the resulting dataset with a shuffle buffer of size n requires n examples to be loaded. This will either create periodic pauses in your pipeline (large n) or result in potentially poor shuffling (small n).
def get_record(i):
# load the ith record using standard python, return numpy arrays
return features, labels
def get_inputs(batch_size, is_training):
def tf_map_fn(index):
features, labels = tf.py_func(
get_record, (index,), (tf.float32, tf.int32), stateful=False)
features.set_shape((n_features,))
labels.set_shape(())
# do data augmentation here
return features, labels
epoch_size = get_epoch_size()
dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((tf.range(epoch_size,))
if is_training:
dataset = dataset.repeat().shuffle(epoch_size)
dataset = dataset.map(tf_map_fn, (tf.float32, tf.int32), num_parallel_calls=8)
dataset = dataset.batch(batch_size)
# prefetch data to CPU while GPU processes previous batch
dataset = dataset.prefetch(1)
# Also possible
# dataset = dataset.apply(
# tf.contrib.data.prefetch_to_device('/gpu:0'))
features, labels = dataset.make_one_shot_iterator().get_next()
return features, labels
In short, we create a dataset just of the record indices (or any small record ID which we can load entirely into memory). We then do shuffling/repeating operations on this minimal dataset, then map the index to the actual data via tf.data.Dataset.map and tf.py_func. See the Using with Estimators and Testing in isolation sections below for usage. Note this requires your data to be accessible by row, so you may need to convert from csv to some other format.
TextLineDataset
You can also read the csv file directly using a tf.data.TextLineDataset.
def get_record_defaults():
zf = tf.zeros(shape=(1,), dtype=tf.float32)
zi = tf.ones(shape=(1,), dtype=tf.int32)
return [zf]*n_features + [zi]
def parse_row(tf_string):
data = tf.decode_csv(
tf.expand_dims(tf_string, axis=0), get_record_defaults())
features = data[:-1]
features = tf.stack(features, axis=-1)
label = data[-1]
features = tf.squeeze(features, axis=0)
label = tf.squeeze(label, axis=0)
return features, label
def get_dataset():
dataset = tf.data.TextLineDataset(['data.csv'])
return dataset.map(parse_row, num_parallel_calls=8)
The parse_row function is a little convoluted since tf.decode_csv expects a batch. You can make it slightly simpler if you batch the dataset before parsing.
def parse_batch(tf_string):
data = tf.decode_csv(tf_string, get_record_defaults())
features = data[:-1]
labels = data[-1]
features = tf.stack(features, axis=-1)
return features, labels
def get_batched_dataset(batch_size):
dataset = tf.data.TextLineDataset(['data.csv'])
dataset = dataset.batch(batch_size)
dataset = dataset.map(parse_batch)
return dataset
TFRecordDataset
Alternatively you can convert the csv files to TFRecord files and use a TFRecordDataset. There's a thorough tutorial here.
Step 1: Convert the csv data to TFRecords data. Example code below (see read_csv from from_generator example above).
with tf.python_io.TFRecordWriter("my_train_dataset.tfrecords") as writer:
for features, labels in read_csv('my_train_dataset.csv'):
example = tf.train.Example()
example.features.feature[
"features"].float_list.value.extend(features)
example.features.feature[
"label"].int64_list.value.append(label)
writer.write(example.SerializeToString())
This only needs to be run once.
Step 2: Write a dataset that decodes these record files.
def parse_function(example_proto):
features = {
'features': tf.FixedLenFeature((n_features,), tf.float32),
'label': tf.FixedLenFeature((), tf.int64)
}
parsed_features = tf.parse_single_example(example_proto, features)
return parsed_features['features'], parsed_features['label']
def get_dataset():
dataset = tf.data.TFRecordDataset(['data.tfrecords'])
dataset = dataset.map(parse_function)
return dataset
Using the dataset with estimators
def get_inputs(batch_size, shuffle_size):
dataset = get_dataset() # one of the above implementations
dataset = dataset.shuffle(shuffle_size)
dataset = dataset.repeat() # repeat indefinitely
dataset = dataset.batch(batch_size)
# prefetch data to CPU while GPU processes previous batch
dataset = dataset.prefetch(1)
# Also possible
# dataset = dataset.apply(
# tf.contrib.data.prefetch_to_device('/gpu:0'))
features, label = dataset.make_one_shot_iterator().get_next()
estimator.train(lambda: get_inputs(32, 1000), max_steps=1e7)
Testing the dataset in isolation
I'd strongly encourage you to test your dataset independently of your estimator. Using the above get_inputs, it should be as simple as
batch_size = 4
shuffle_size = 100
features, labels = get_inputs(batch_size, shuffle_size)
with tf.Session() as sess:
f_data, l_data = sess.run([features, labels])
print(f_data, l_data) # or some better visualization function
Performance
Assuming your using a GPU to run your network, unless each row of your csv file is enormous and your network is tiny you probably won't notice a difference in performance. This is because the Estimator implementation forces data loading/preprocessing to be performed on the CPU, and prefetch means the next batch can be prepared on the CPU as the current batch is training on the GPU. The only exception to this is if you have a massive shuffle size on a dataset with a large amount of data per record, which will take some time to load in a number of examples initially before running anything through the GPU.
I agree with DomJack about using the Dataset API, except the need to read the whole csv file and then convert to TfRecord. I am hereby proposing to emply TextLineDataset - a sub-class of the Dataset API to directly load data into a TensorFlow program. An intuitive tutorial can be found here.
The code below is used for the MNIST classification problem for illustration and hopefully, answer the question of the OP. The csv file has 784 columns, and the number of classes is 10. The classifier I used in this example is a 1-hidden-layer neural network with 16 relu units.
Firstly, load libraries and define some constants:
# load libraries
import tensorflow as tf
import os
# some constants
n_x = 784
n_h = 16
n_y = 10
# path to the folder containing the train and test csv files
# You only need to change PATH, rest is platform independent
PATH = os.getcwd() + '/'
# create a list of feature names
feature_names = ['pixel' + str(i) for i in range(n_x)]
Secondly, we create an input function reading a file using the Dataset API, then provide the results to the Estimator API. The return value must be a two-element tuple organized as follows: the first element must be a dict in which each input feature is a key, and then a list of values for the training batch, and the second element is a list of labels for the training batch.
def my_input_fn(file_path, batch_size=32, buffer_size=256,\
perform_shuffle=False, repeat_count=1):
'''
Args:
- file_path: the path of the input file
- perform_shuffle: whether the data is shuffled or not
- repeat_count: The number of times to iterate over the records in the dataset.
For example, if we specify 1, then each record is read once.
If we specify None, iteration will continue forever.
Output is two-element tuple organized as follows:
- The first element must be a dict in which each input feature is a key,
and then a list of values for the training batch.
- The second element is a list of labels for the training batch.
'''
def decode_csv(line):
record_defaults = [[0.]]*n_x # n_x features
record_defaults.insert(0, [0]) # the first element is the label (int)
parsed_line = tf.decode_csv(records=line,\
record_defaults=record_defaults)
label = parsed_line[0] # First element is the label
del parsed_line[0] # Delete first element
features = parsed_line # Everything but first elements are the features
d = dict(zip(feature_names, features)), label
return d
dataset = (tf.data.TextLineDataset(file_path) # Read text file
.skip(1) # Skip header row
.map(decode_csv)) # Transform each elem by applying decode_csv fn
if perform_shuffle:
# Randomizes input using a window of 256 elements (read into memory)
dataset = dataset.shuffle(buffer_size=buffer_size)
dataset = dataset.repeat(repeat_count) # Repeats dataset this # times
dataset = dataset.batch(batch_size) # Batch size to use
iterator = dataset.make_one_shot_iterator()
batch_features, batch_labels = iterator.get_next()
return batch_features, batch_labels
Then, the mini-batch can be computed as
next_batch = my_input_fn(file_path=PATH+'train1.csv',\
batch_size=batch_size,\
perform_shuffle=True) # return 512 random elements
Next, we define the feature columns are numeric
feature_columns = [tf.feature_column.numeric_column(k) for k in feature_names]
Thirdly, we create an estimator DNNClassifier:
classifier = tf.estimator.DNNClassifier(
feature_columns=feature_columns, # The input features to our model
hidden_units=[n_h], # One layer
n_classes=n_y,
model_dir=None)
Finally, the DNN is trained using the test csv file, while the evaluation is performed on the test file. Please change the repeat_count and steps to ensure that the training meets the required number of epochs in your code.
# train the DNN
classifier.train(
input_fn=lambda: my_input_fn(file_path=PATH+'train1.csv',\
perform_shuffle=True,\
repeat_count=1),\
steps=None)
# evaluate using the test csv file
evaluate_result = classifier.evaluate(
input_fn=lambda: my_input_fn(file_path=PATH+'test1.csv',\
perform_shuffle=False))
print("Evaluation results")
for key in evaluate_result:
print(" {}, was: {}".format(key, evaluate_result[key]))

Categories

Resources