Id like to run some specific Python scripts in my C# Library. Specifically id like to run AudioOwl (https://github.com/dodiku/AudioOwl) or its underlying library Madmom (https://github.com/CPJKU/madmom) to find BPM of Music and maybe even the position of at least one beat.
I tried making my own Beat detection Algorithm and while it works better than expected, its not reliable enough. I couldn't find any decent C# libraries for it either tho.
I did find the above mentioned Python libraries tho. I tried IronPython but I'm having a hard time with the packages as far as i can tell. I have little experience in python, so i haven't been successful in solving this one myself.
How would i go about Getting a BPM to be returned? Are there .Net versions/alternatives i still haven't found?
Related
I am developing proprietary software that would be distributed in a form of .exe file. In order to use it, users will have to authenticate with their whitelist credentials (username + password).
The issue I have encountered is that in the industry I am selling on, there are a lot of "hackers" who will try to decompile your executable file, get the source code and distribute it for free to other people.
To combat these reverse-engineering attempts, I have tried to both obfuscate my code and use various compilers, but so far to no success.
What I have tried:
Use py2exe compiler: "hackers" managed to decompile executable in an hour.
Use pyinstaller compiler: same as with py2exe.
Use pyminifier to obfuscate the code: "hackers" managed to deobfuscate the code.
Use Oxyry Python Obfuscator: same as with pyminifier.
Those who managed to decompile and deobfuscate my program explained that the open-source nature of the 4 tools mentioned above means that their algorithms are well-known and there are solutions out there made to reverse-engineer programs that use these open-source compilers and obfuscators.
What I didn't try yet:
Using Pyarmor to obfuscate my code. I've heard it is good, but it costs 50$, so I want to be sure that it is the best obfuscation tool out there before purchasing the license.
Using Cython library to create a C-wrapper for my program, making it compiled in C instead of Python. Since C binaries are much harder to read, it will make the program significantly harder to decompile. However, I have never programmed in C, and I want to know if there are better ways to compile my source Python code, without the need to learn C.
What I am not going to try:
Completely rewrite my whole program in a language other than Python. I am not strong in other languages, plus the program itself consists of over 1,000 lines of code, so I can't just completely rewrite it for the sole purpose of making it harder to decompile.
Making program open-source: This is a for-profit software, so I am not going to release the proprietary code, thank you for understanding.
Making the program a web-app: Since my program directly interacts with files on the user's PC, I can't make it web-based, it has to be on the user's PC.
Please also consider that if "hacker" will be able to disable the whitelist system without even accessing the source code, he will be able to distribute it to other users with no limitation. Therefore, I am looking for a way that will not only make it extremely hard to decompile the program, but also make it almost impossible to meddle with binaries and turn off certain parts of the program's code.
Since people in this thread did not provide any satisfiable answers, I will explain what I did to secure my program. As I mentioned previously, my goal is not to create an "uncrackable" program, just one that is secure enough to deter away amateurs.
I got help on one of the reverse-engineering forums, so props to those people!
Firstly, I used Nuitka to convert .py file into a C-based standalone executable. Then, I passed a resulting .exe file through VMProtect to obfuscate the binaries.
I've tested it on a few CS graduates, and they weren't able to crack or deobfuscate the program, so this is good enough for me.
P.S. Those who said that "it is impossible" or "your business model is wrong", please do not share your opinions unless you have a reverse-engineering experience, thank you :)
I guess I'll be the brave one to post as the answer: There is no technical means you can take to prevent software running on end user machines from being cracked.
You can perhaps make it more difficult, but since you've stated that in this market, people will always prefer cracked software to legit at any price, this is a situation you have essentially no hope of winning: if you have determined pirates, they will win every time.
So: You can't; give up
Sorry :-(
I am developing a solution using a comercial computer vision software called Halcon. I am thinking on migrating or convert my solution to OpenCV in Python. I will like to start developing my other computer vision solution in Halcon because the IDE is incredible, and them generate a script to migrate them to OpenCV.
Does anyone know any library for this task?
I will like to start developing an open source SDK to convert Halcon to OpenCV. I and thinking to start developing all internal function from Halcon to Python. Any advice?
I wouldn't invest time in such an effort. These are some reasons:
For simple functions (blur, erode, dilate) Halcon and OpenCV have different implementations of the same function and probably you will have slightly different outputs (one may round up and the other round down, for example). A complex program that runs properly in Halcon may fail in OpenCV for these small differences (a butterfly effect).
Probably there are complex functions (pattern matching algorithms, deep learning), that exist in one environment and don't exist in the other.
OpenCV users typically don't have Halcon IDE. I like OpenCV because it is open source and free, I won't consider using Halcon IDE because it is not. Moreover OpenCV has many functions and it improves very fast (I don't know Halcon). If Halcon was much better than OpenCV (more popular, faster, cross platform, with all OpenCV functions implemented in Halcon) and my project had the money, I would use Halcon IDE for development and I would use it in production as well (and completely ignore OpenCV). In either case, I wouldn't use a tool that converts one to the other. It is like writing the Linux kernel with Visual Studio, maybe someone does it, but I guess it is not the majority.
If I had to spend time in an open source project, I would write a better OpenCV interface (as Vladimir Perković suggests). There are some efforts in that direction (probably there is something else if you search):
Interactive Visual Debugging: https://docs.opencv.org/3.3.0/d7/dcf/tutorial_cvv_introduction.html I haven't tried that, but I have written and used similar tools in the past and is usually enough.
Debug images in Visual Studio: https://docs.opencv.org/2.4/doc/tutorials/introduction/windows_visual_studio_image_watch/windows_visual_studio_image_watch.html
What I really want to see some day is a visual programming language editor, where you drag and drop boxes and connect them (like in a flowchart). Something similar to LabVIEW, VPL, but open source and for OpenCV.
It looks like the future (or the present) is web based, and there are many flowchart programming tools that are open source like Node-Red, No-Flo UI or Apache NiFi. Probably you can modify them to use OpenCV functions (a quick search returns this and this)
Blender is a 3D editor (with a video editor and many other features) that you can program in python and also has a flowchart programming language ("Compositing Nodes"). I don't see a better place to integrate OpenCV!
It depends on which Halcon functionalities are you using and why you want to do it. The question appears to be very general. I would recommend you to convert your Halcon Program to C++ and write a wrapper function to pass arguments to/from your openCV program.This would be the simplest option to provide interaction between your opencv and halcon program. Hope it helps.
This is unfortunately not possible because Halcon itself is not an open source library and every single function is locked.
The reason behind is runtime licencing.
Let me start off by saying my python knowledge is beginner-to-intermediate level, and I recently started using the language again after a long time.
The Goal:
This morning I came across a bunch of word documents I wanted to convert and concatenate to PDF files, with 2 .doc files creating one PDF.
seemed like a fairly trivial task, so I figured I'd try to learn how to do it in python.
concatenating PDFs wasn't too bad, I found PyPDF2 and managed to write a script that did just that.
But 7 hours later, after countless scripts with broken dependencies- I still can't find a way to automate the doc-pdf conversion.
The Problem(s):
every script I found either:
uses python-docx (my documents are word 2003 .docs)
uses unoconv bridge (which I installed along with OpenOffice, then searched around for documentation but found none- thus I have no idea how to call from a python script or the shell. I saw one example for this but it keeps throwing errors)
uses win32com or win32com.client or pywin32 or somesuch.
I ran into numerous issues with these- installed one but couldn't import it from code (as happened to the guy here), now I can't even find them with pip. searched for documentation for them (are they modules or classes? I have no idea) and found practically nothing that I could understand, beyond that they're connected to ActivePython. (which is apparantly a superset of Python with more capabilities?).
Uses comtypes, which I installed but was unable to use/import either for some reason (maybe I'm using pip wrong somehow?)
I know my question is hardly focused but honestly by now my brain is fried from information overload. any simplifications for a noob would be more than welcome.
TL;DR:
assuming no knowledge of COM stuff and little experience with any external frameworks:
what would I have to do to convert Word 2003 .doc files to .pdf files? I'm running python3.5.1 32-bit on a Windows 10 64-bit machine.
where can I learn more about accessing other software APIs from python? are there big prerequisites for this stuff like knowing how the OS works on a lower level?
Thanks!
From my experience, converting between the various office formats is best done outside of python. With the subprocess module, you can call the external command
soffice --convert-to pdf file.doc --headless
where soffice is the command that comes with LibreOffice.
Based on my project, which is the best version of Python to use? Which is the best IDE to use that runs on Linux (Ubuntu) and Windows? Here is the background for these questions:
I'm building a small application GUI that features "drill-down" views and direct manipulation on personalized calendars. Should I use Python 3, the newest version, or an older version is better at this GUI task? I've heard that some of the old GUI libraries do not support the new version yet, but not quite sure if this will matter a lot. Could you please name the libraries that might be relevant? Even better if you could suggest your preferred IDE either under Windows or Ubuntu. Many thanks.
You can use vim as IDE.Start program with 2.7 version with 3.0 in mind.Have a look at this python 2 or 3
Depends a bit on which GUI you use. If you're using PyQt, it supports v3. wxPython, however, does not.
As a rule of thumb, for now, you can pretty much use python 3.0 syntax in 2.7, and keep things compatible going forward. I'd say, except for print statements, the differences aren't that mind-blowingly different between 2-3. IDE's pretty much support both - and gnud's links are pretty good for that.
Popularity
When selecting a framework to learn, popularity is a reasonable gauge of how good a framework is, and how easy it will be to get support when you run into problems. The tags on stackoverflow are a quick way to get a ballpark idea.
Environment
Start with what you're the most familiar with. When learning something new, there is so much to absorb, that having something familiar really helps.
For example, when I taught myself python a year ago, I used pydev in eclipse, because I've been a cross-platform java developer using eclipse for quite some time. Made life much easier.
If you're starting from ground zero, it doesn't matter very much. Pick something popular that you feel comfortable in and start coding. As you become familiar with what you're doing, you'll be able to compare other packages and determine if it's right to switch.
The popular IDE's are cross-platform. Graphics packages too, although usually one is stronger on unix or windows.
SublimeText2 has excellent Python support.
Also you can use PyDev for Eclipse.
About versions: I think you should write 2.7-compatible code, but be ready( and know how) to update it to 3.2 or later.
I'd recommend starting with 2.7 since most libraries work with it. The differences between both are not too big, so you might even be able to switch if you want to in the future. But before you choose Python 3 and you find a library you really want to use and it's not available for Python 3 you would regret choosing.
wxPython and PyQt are pretty popular. wxPython doesnt support 3 yet...
I prefer PyCharm it's not free but it's so great and it has so many features...
One of the best code-completion i ever had for Python.
P.S.: if its really simple you mgiht even consider using tkinter.
I'm trying to write my own media player (like Foobar), and I'm having trouble tracking down a Python library that'll play MP3s. I know Pymedia does mp3s, but it looks outdated - the latest installer is for Python version 2.4, and I'm using 2.6. I've never had much success with Pygame, and Pyglet doesn't look like it has too much in the way of documentation. Are there any other alternatives?
There is http://pyglet.org/ and also have you tried http://code.google.com/p/mp3play/? It's also available from PyPi (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mp3play/) However, I think mp3play is Win32 only for now.
Looking at the updates, there were commits within last couple of months.
I've been using PyMedia in Python 2.6.5 on Windows successfully. Caveats: the documentation is bad and wrong -- many of the tutorials have glaring errors or otherwise don't work -- so I had to do some experimentation and Googling to get my code to work right. Also for whatever reason the maintainers seem to have stopped updating the project site 4 years ago, though they seem to be actively doing something.
I found installers here:
http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/
The semi-active forum linked from their website includes some code maintainers who are semi-helpful. I'm jboyd99 if anyone is looking for tips.
For reasons that are beyond me the focus is on car audio systems, despite the fact that it is a fairly fully featured library that does some things no other free Python library does, like read MP3s into raw PCM data. The library has some flaws -- I'll probably use PyAudio or PyAudiere for actual playback for better control of synchrony issues.
Maybe it'd be simpler to write that part of your application in Python 2.4 as a separate "backend". This way you could use PyMedia (http://pymedia.org/) (as you mentioned) for the actual playback. It'd allow you to write your GUI in another Python version (like 2.6), which would also mean more decoupling of program components and parallelism (smoother GUI).
If you target only the Windows platform, then using Media Player via COM might help:
http://www.daniweb.com/code/snippet216465.html