Flask SQLAlchemy update more than one rows - python

I'm building basic reservation application with Flask.
I need to update Guests table rows with posted data from client side.
The user wants to update NAMESURNAME and IDENTITYNUMBER fields by specific res_id.
Here is my Guests model in models.py file
class Guests(Base):
__tablename__ = "GUESTS"
RESID = db.Column(db.Integer,db.ForeignKey("RESERVATION.ID"))
NAMESURNAME = db.Column(sqlite.VARCHAR(50))
IDENTITYNUMBER = db.Column(sqlite.VARCHAR(50))
This the function that is supposed to update guest info but I am building for loop wrong.How can I properly write this for loop.
def update_guests(request,res_id):
request = request.form.to_dict()
guests = db.session.query(Guests).filter(Guests.RESID == res_id).all()
for value,guest in zip(request.values(),guests):
guest.NAMESURNAME = value
guest.IDENTITYNUMBER = value
db.session.commit()
Also request object might be containing these key and values as an example.
Guest name and Guest identity number must be inserted into NAMESURNAME and IDENTITYNUMBER fields.
{"guest0" : "Name1", "identity0" : "245", "guest1" : "Name2" : "identity1" : "441"}

Related

How to create a route with python and flask based on user input?

I am using python with flask as a backend and I am trying to create a route to a table in my database based on user input. During one of my post requests a table is created in the database. I then want to create a connection to this table. The table name also depends on user input. I want to emphasize that I am able to create the tables in the database based on user input and now need to create the route to these tables.
Is there a way to create such route?
I understand that doing something like this may lead to security vulnerability so I am open to suggestions for different approaches.
I am attaching below my current python code for creating routes:
# Destination Class/model
class Destinations(db.Model):
ID = db.Column(db.Integer, primary_key=True)
city = db.Column(db.String(100))
country = db.Column(db.String(100))
def __init__(self, city, country):
self.city = city
self.country = country
# Destinations Schema
class DestinationsSchema(ma.Schema):
class Meta:
fields = ('ID', 'city', 'country')
# Init Destinations Schema
destination_schema = DestinationsSchema()
destinations_schema = DestinationsSchema(many=True)
# Create a Destination
#app.route('/destinations', methods=['POST'])
def add_destination():
city = request.json['city']
country = request.json['country']
new_destination = Destinations(city, country)
db.session.add(new_destination)
db.session.commit()
return destination_schema.jsonify(new_destination)
# Get All Destinations
#app.route('/destinations', methods=['GET'])
def get_destinations():
all_destinations = Destinations.query.all()
result = destinations_schema.dump(all_destinations)
return jsonify(result)
This is my answer to what I understood from your question. I hope it helps you:
You can put a variable in the url. Something like this:
#app.route('/destinations/<tablename>', methods=['GET'])
def get_destination(tablename):
destination = Destinations.query.filter_by(name=tablename)
result = destinations_schema.dump(destination )
return jsonify(result)

Python/Django/Q search, How to find B field info. by searching A field info

Most examples are in the form of finding A in data A to Z.
A DB table does not have a single field from A to Z. When a DB table has several fields together, I want to know the field I'm looking for as a field value and I want to figure out another value with that field value.
For example, searching for a specific name in a DB that contains information from all the students will determine the age.
from Python, Django DB
My data consists of 3 rows:
{title:'1', price:'20'}
{title:'2', price:'30'}
{title:'1', price:'10'}
I want to find title '1' and then return price fileds
Expexted Output:
{title:'1', price:'20'}
{title:'1', price:'10'}
Views.py:
#csrf_exempt
def searching(request):
if request.method == "POST":
parameter = request.POST.get('title')
searchResult = NaverData.objects.filter(Q(title__icontains=parameter)).distinct()
ouput = searchResult
return HttpResponse(ouput)
else:
#GET request
return HttpResponse('GET REQUEST')
Try below code:
searchResult = NaverData.objects.all().filter(title=parameter)
check this
searchresult= NaverData.objects.values("prize").filter(title__exact=parameter)

flask-admin form: Constrain Value of Field 2 depending on Value of Field 1

One feature I have been struggling to implement in flask-admin is when the user edits a form, to constrain the value of Field 2 once Field 1 has been set.
Let me give a simplified example in words (the actual use case is more convoluted). Then I will show a full gist that implements that example, minus the "constrain" feature.
Let's say we have a database that tracks some software "recipes" to output reports in various formats. The recipe table of our sample database has two recipes: "Serious Report", "ASCII Art".
To implement each recipe, we choose one among several methods. The method table of our database has two methods: "tabulate_results", "pretty_print".
Each method has parameters. The methodarg table has two parameter names for "tabulate_results" ("rows", "display_total") and two parameters for "pretty_print" ("embellishment_character", "lines_to_jump").
Now for each of the recipes ("Serious Report", "ASCII Art") we need to provide the value of the arguments of their respective methods ("tabulate_results", "pretty_print").
For each record, the recipearg table lets us select a recipe (that's Field 1, for instance "Serious Report") and an argument name (that's Field 2). The problem is that all possible argument names are shown, whereas they need to be constrained based on the value of Field 1.
What filtering / constraining mechanism can we implement such that once we select "Serious Report", we know we will be using the "tabulate_results" method, so that only the "rows" and "display_total" arguments are available?
I'm thinking some AJAX wizardry that checks Field 1 and sets a query for Field 2 values, but have no idea how to proceed.
You can see this by playing with the gist: click on the Recipe Arg tab. In the first row ("Serious Report"), if you try to edit the "Methodarg" value by clicking on it, all four argument names are available, instead of just two.
# full gist: please run this
from flask import Flask
from flask_admin import Admin
from flask_admin.contrib import sqla
from flask_sqlalchemy import SQLAlchemy
from sqlalchemy import Column, ForeignKey, Integer, String
from sqlalchemy.orm import relationship
# Create application
app = Flask(__name__)
# Create dummy secrey key so we can use sessions
app.config['SECRET_KEY'] = '123456790'
app.config['SQLALCHEMY_DATABASE_URI'] = 'sqlite:///a_sample_database.sqlite'
app.config['SQLALCHEMY_ECHO'] = True
db = SQLAlchemy(app)
# Create admin app
admin = Admin(app, name="Constrain Values", template_mode='bootstrap3')
# Flask views
#app.route('/')
def index():
return 'Click me to get to Admin!'
class Method(db.Model):
__tablename__ = 'method'
mid = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
method = Column(String(20), nullable=False, unique=True)
methodarg = relationship('MethodArg', backref='method')
recipe = relationship('Recipe', backref='method')
def __str__(self):
return self.method
class MethodArg(db.Model):
__tablename__ = 'methodarg'
maid = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
mid = Column(ForeignKey('method.mid', ondelete='CASCADE', onupdate='CASCADE'), nullable=False)
methodarg = Column(String(20), nullable=False, unique=True)
recipearg = relationship('RecipeArg', backref='methodarg')
inline_models = (Method,)
def __str__(self):
return self.methodarg
class Recipe(db.Model):
__tablename__ = 'recipe'
rid = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
mid = Column(ForeignKey('method.mid', ondelete='CASCADE', onupdate='CASCADE'), nullable=False)
recipe = Column(String(20), nullable=False, index=True)
recipearg = relationship('RecipeArg', backref='recipe')
inline_models = (Method,)
def __str__(self):
return self.recipe
class RecipeArg(db.Model):
__tablename__ = 'recipearg'
raid = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
rid = Column(ForeignKey('recipe.rid', ondelete='CASCADE', onupdate='CASCADE'), nullable=False)
maid = Column(ForeignKey('methodarg.maid', ondelete='CASCADE', onupdate='CASCADE'), nullable=False)
strvalue = Column(String(80), nullable=False)
inline_models = (Recipe, MethodArg)
def __str__(self):
return self.strvalue
class MethodArgAdmin(sqla.ModelView):
column_list = ('method', 'methodarg')
column_editable_list = column_list
class RecipeAdmin(sqla.ModelView):
column_list = ('recipe', 'method')
column_editable_list = column_list
class RecipeArgAdmin(sqla.ModelView):
column_list = ('recipe', 'methodarg', 'strvalue')
column_editable_list = column_list
admin.add_view(RecipeArgAdmin(RecipeArg, db.session))
# More submenu
admin.add_view(sqla.ModelView(Method, db.session, category='See Other Tables'))
admin.add_view(MethodArgAdmin(MethodArg, db.session, category='See Other Tables'))
admin.add_view(RecipeAdmin(Recipe, db.session, category='See Other Tables'))
if __name__ == '__main__':
db.drop_all()
db.create_all()
db.session.add(Method(mid=1, method='tabulate_results'))
db.session.add(Method(mid=2, method='pretty_print'))
db.session.commit()
db.session.add(MethodArg(maid=1, mid=1, methodarg='rows'))
db.session.add(MethodArg(maid=2, mid=1, methodarg='display_total'))
db.session.add(MethodArg(maid=3, mid=2, methodarg='embellishment_character'))
db.session.add(MethodArg(maid=4, mid=2, methodarg='lines_to_jump'))
db.session.add(Recipe(rid=1, mid=1, recipe='Serious Report'))
db.session.add(Recipe(rid=2, mid=2, recipe='ASCII Art'))
db.session.commit()
db.session.add(RecipeArg(raid=1, rid=1, maid=2, strvalue='true' ))
db.session.add(RecipeArg(raid=2, rid=1, maid=1, strvalue='12' ))
db.session.add(RecipeArg(raid=3, rid=2, maid=4, strvalue='3' ))
db.session.commit()
# Start app
app.run(debug=True)
I see two ways of tacking this problem:
1- When Flask-Admin generate the form, add data attributes with the mid of each methodArg on each option tag in the methodArg select. Then have some JS code filter the option tags based on the recipe selected.
EDIT
Here is a tentative try at putting a data-mid attribute on each option:
def monkeypatched_call(self, field, **kwargs):
kwargs.setdefault('id', field.id)
if self.multiple:
kwargs['multiple'] = True
html = ['<select %s>' % html_params(name=field.name, **kwargs)]
for (val, label, selected), (_, methodarg) in zip(field.iter_choices(), field._get_object_list()):
html.append(self.render_option(val, label, selected, **{'data-mid': methodarg.mid}))
html.append('</select>')
return HTMLString(''.join(html))
Select.__call__ = monkeypatched_call
The blocker is in the fact that those render calls are triggered from the jinja templates, so you are pretty much stuck updating a widget (Select being the most low-level one in WTForms, and is used as a base for Flask-Admin's Select2Field).
After getting those data-mid on each of your options, you can proceed with just binding an change on your recipe's select and display the methodarg's option that have a matching data-mid. Considering Flask-Admin uses select2, you might have to do some JS tweaking (easiest ugly solution would be to clean up the widget and re-create it for each change event triggered)
Overall, I find this one less robust than the second solution. I kept the monkeypatch to make it clear this should not be used in production imho. (the second solution is slightly less intrusive)
2- Use the supported ajax-completion in Flask-Admin to hack your way into getting the options that you want based on the selected recipe:
First, create a custom AjaxModelLoader that will be responsible for executing the right selection query to the DB:
class MethodArgAjaxModelLoader(sqla.ajax.QueryAjaxModelLoader):
def get_list(self, term, offset=0, limit=10):
query = self.session.query(self.model).filter_by(mid=term)
return query.offset(offset).limit(limit).all()
class RecipeArgAdmin(sqla.ModelView):
column_list = ('recipe', 'methodarg', 'strvalue')
form_ajax_refs = {
'methodarg': MethodArgAjaxModelLoader('methodarg', db.session, MethodArg, fields=['methodarg'])
}
column_editable_list = column_list
Then, update Flask-Admin's form.js to get the browser to send you the recipe information instead of the methodArg name that needs to be autocompleted. (or you could send both in query and do some arg parsing in your AjaxLoader since Flask-Admin does no parsing whatsoever on query, expecting it to be a string I suppose [0]. That way, you would keep the auto-completion)
data: function(term, page) {
return {
query: $('#recipe').val(),
offset: (page - 1) * 10,
limit: 10
};
},
This snippet is taken from Flask-Admin's form.js [1]
Obviously, this needs some tweaking and parametrising (because doing such a hacky solution would block you from using other ajax-populated select in the rest of your app admin + the update on form.js directly like that would make upgrading Flask-Admin extremely cumbersome)
Overall, I am unsatisfied with both solutions and this showcase that whenever you want to go out of the tracks of a framework / tool, you can end up in complex dead ends. This might be an interesting feature request / project for someone willing to contribute a real solution upstream to Flask-Admin though.
There is another easy solution that I made and it works
1- Create your first select option normally with data loaded on it and add a hook to it which will add js event listener when it selects change like this.
from wtforms import SelectField
form_extra_fields = {
'streetname': SelectField(
'streetname',
coerce=str,
choices=([street.streetname for street in StreetsMetadata.query.all()]),
render_kw={'onchange': "myFunction()"}
)
}
**2- Add a JavaScript URL file to the view you want to use this function in, for example.
def render(self, template, **kwargs):
#using extra js in render method allow use url_for that itself requires an app context
self.extra_js = [url_for("static", filename="admin/js/users.js")]
response = render_miror(self, template,**kwargs)
return response
3- Create a role-protected endpoint that you used for this view that will accept a GET request from JS based on the first value specified for the entry, for example this route returns a list of house numbers by querying the street name that came from the first entry
#super_admin_permission.require(http_exception=403)
#adminapp.route('/get_houses_numbers')
def gethouses():
request_data = request.args
if request_data and 'street' in request_data:
street = StreetsMetadata.query.filter(StreetsMetadata.streetname == request_data['street']).one_or_none()
street_houses = lambda:giveMeAllHousesList(street.excluded, street.min, street.max)
if street_houses:
return jsonify({'code': 200, 'houses': street_houses()})
else:
return jsonify({'code': 404, 'houses': []})
else:
return jsonify({'code': 400, 'street': []})
now python part completed time for JavaScript
4- We have to define three functions, the first of which will be called when the form build page is loaded and which do two things first,
A dummy select entry will be created using JS and append that entry to the same string input container
Make string entry read-only to improve user experience
Second, it will send a GET request to the specified route to get a list of house numbers using the specified street input value
Then get the result and create the option elements and append these options to the dummy selection, you can also select the first option while appending the options.
5- The second function "myFunction" is the hook defined in Python in this part
render_kw={'onchange': "myFunction()"}
This function will do nothing new, it will only send a GET request when the first specified input value is changed, send a GET request to get a list of new house numbers based on the given street name input value by doing a query on the database, then dump the inner HTML of the dummy selection entry , then create and append new options to it.
6- The last function is the callback function which listens for the change on the dummy select entry created with JS when the user chooses the house number which will be reflected in the main string entry, finally you can click save and you will see it working
Note that this whole idea I created is not as good as the built in flask admin, but if you are looking for the end goal and without any problems you can use it
My JS code
/*
This Function when run when a form included it will create JS select input with the
default loaded streetname and add house number on that select this select will used
to guide creator of the house number or to select the house number
*/
async function onFlaskFormLoad(){
const streetSelect = document.querySelector("#streetname");
const checkIfForm = document.querySelector("form.admin-form");
if (checkIfForm){
let checkSelect = document.querySelector("#realSelect");
if (!checkSelect){
const mySelectBox = document.createElement("select");
const houseString = document.querySelector("#housenumber");
const houseStringCont = houseString.parentElement;
mySelectBox.classList.add("form-control")
mySelectBox.id = "realSelect";
houseStringCont.appendChild(mySelectBox);
mySelectBox.addEventListener("change", customFlaskAdminUnpredefinedSelect);
houseString.setAttribute("readonly", "readonly");
const res = await fetch(`/get_houses_numbers?street=${streetSelect.value}`);
const data = await res.json();
console.log(data);
if (data.code == 200 && mySelectBox){
data.houses.forEach( (houseOption, index)=>{
if (index == 0){
houseString.value = houseOption;
}
let newHouse = document.createElement("option");
newHouse.setAttribute("value", houseOption);
newHouse.innerText = houseOption;
mySelectBox.appendChild(newHouse);
});
}
}
}
}
onFlaskFormLoad();
/*
this function will called to change the string input value to my custom js select
value and then use that string to house number which required by flask-admin
*/
function customFlaskAdminUnpredefinedSelect(){
const theSelect = document.querySelector("#realSelect");
const houseString = document.querySelector("#housenumber");
houseString.value = theSelect.value;
return true;
}
/*
flask admin hook that will listen on street input change and then it will send
get request to secured endpoint with role superadmin required and get the housenumbers
using the streetname selected and then create options and add to my select input
*/
async function myFunction(){
const streetSelect = document.querySelector("#streetname");
const houseString = document.querySelector("#housenumber");
const houseStringCont = houseString.parentElement;
const theSelect = document.querySelector("#realSelect");
const res = await fetch(`/get_houses_numbers?street=${streetSelect.value}`);
const data = await res.json();
console.log(data);
if (data.code == 200 && theSelect){
theSelect.innerHTML = "";
data.houses.forEach( (houseOption, index)=>{
if (index == 0){
houseString.value = houseOption;
}
let newHouse = document.createElement("option");
newHouse.setAttribute("value", houseOption);
newHouse.innerText = houseOption;
theSelect.appendChild(newHouse);
});
}
}
Now if I change the street name of the first specified input I will get a new list containing the numbers based on the first input value, note if you have a way to create a python field that accepts the non-predefined options then there is no need to create dummy input you can create and append the new options Directly to second select input
final result

NDB query using filters on Structured property which is also repeated ?

I am creating a sample application storing user detail along with its class information.
Modal classes being used are :
Model class for saving user's class data
class MyData(ndb.Model):
subject = ndb.StringProperty()
teacher = ndb.StringProperty()
strength = ndb.IntegerProperty()
date = ndb.DateTimeProperty()
Model class for user
class MyUser(ndb.Model):
user_name = ndb.StringProperty()
email_id = ndb.StringProperty()
my_data = ndb.StructuredProperty(MyData, repeated = True)
I am able to successfully store data into the datastore and can also make simple query on the MyUser entity using some filters based on email_id and user_name.
But when I try to query MyUser result using filter on a property from the MyUser modal's Structured property that is my_data, its not giving correct result.
I think I am querying incorrectly.
Here is my query function
function to query based upon the repeated structure property
def queryMyUserWithStructuredPropertyFilter():
shail_users_query = MyUser.query(ndb.AND(MyUser.email_id == "napolean#gmail.com", MyUser.my_data.strength > 30))
shail_users_list = shail_users_query.fetch(10)
maindatalist=[]
for each_user in shail_users_list:
logging.info('NEW QUERY :: The user details are : %s %s'% (each_user.user_name, each_user.email_id))
# Class data
myData = each_user.my_data
for each_my_data in myData:
templist = [each_my_data.strength, str(each_my_data.date)]
maindatalist.append(templist)
logging.info('NEW QUERY :: The class data is : %s %s %s %s'% (each_my_data.subject, each_my_data.teacher, str(each_my_data.strength),str(each_my_data.date)))
return maindatalist
I want to fetch that entity with repeated Structured property (my_data) should be a list which has strength > 30.
Please help me in knowing where I am doing wrong.
Thanks.
Queries over StructuredProperties return objects for which at least one of the structured ones satisfies the conditions. If you want to filter those properties, you'll have to do it afterwards.
Something like this should do the trick:
def queryMyUserWithStructuredPropertyFilter():
shail_users_query = MyUser.query(MyUser.email_id == "napolean#gmail.com", MyUser.my_data.strength > 30)
shail_users_list = shail_users_query.fetch(10)
# Here, shail_users_list has at most 10 users with email being
# 'napolean#gmail.com' and at least one element in my_data
# with strength > 30
maindatalist = [
[[data.strength, str(data.date)] for data in user.my_data if data.strength > 30] for user in shail_users_list
]
# Now in maindatalist you have ONLY those my_data with strength > 30
return maindatalist

(Django) Cannot assign "u'1'": "StaffProfile.user" must be a "User" instance

I have a model like below:
class StaffProfile(models.Model):
user = models.ForeignKey(User)
maas = models.FloatField()
maas_gunu = models.CharField(max_length=5)
When I try to insert data with a code like below:
staffprofilesay = StaffProfile.objects.filter(user = user_id).count()
if staffprofilesay > 0:
staffprofile = StaffProfile.objects.get(user = user_id)
else:
staffprofile = StaffProfile()
staffprofile.user = user_id
staffprofile.maas = calisan_formu.cleaned_data["maas"]
staffprofile.maas_gunu = calisan_formu.cleaned_data["maas_gunu"]
staffprofile.save()
I get an error like this:
Cannot assign "u'1'": "StaffProfile.user" must be a "User" instance.
What am I supposed to do?
PS: I'm using Django's User model
You need to assign a User object e.g.
from django.contrib.auth.models import User
user = User.objects.get(id=user_id)
staffprofile.user = user
user needs to be an instance of the User model, not a unicode object (which is what you are passing it).
Yes you have to pass User instance in staffprofile.user = user_id user id place.
As #david-s pointed out in a comment, if you don't have a user instance, you have to fetch from DB with an additional query.
Instead you can directly do is
staffprofile.user_id = user_id because Django behind the scene append _id in table for foreign keys so staffprofile.user will end staffprofile.user_id

Categories

Resources