I'm having troubles making the Preprocessing layers and the Keras Tuner cooperate.
I am referring to this tutorial Load CSV data | TensorFlow Core for the Preprocessing part, and to the Getting started with KerasTuner documentation for the Keras Tuner part.
Briefly, here's the code.
He loads the data:
titanic = pd.read_csv("https://storage.googleapis.com/tf-datasets/titanic/train.csv")
titanic_features = titanic.copy()
titanic_labels = titanic_features.pop('survived')
He creates the symbolic tensors of the features in a dictionary
inputs = {}
for name, column in titanic_features.items():
dtype = column.dtype
if dtype == object:
dtype = tf.string
else:
dtype = tf.float32
inputs[name] = tf.keras.Input(shape=(1,), name=name, dtype=dtype)
inputs
Then he applies normalization on the numerical features:
numeric_inputs = {name:input for name,input in inputs.items()
if input.dtype==tf.float32}
x = layers.Concatenate()(list(numeric_inputs.values()))
norm = layers.Normalization()
norm.adapt(np.array(titanic[numeric_inputs.keys()]))
all_numeric_inputs = norm(x)
all_numeric_inputs
He creates a list
preprocessed_inputs = [all_numeric_inputs]
He one hot encodes the categorical features:
for name, input in inputs.items():
if input.dtype == tf.float32:
continue
lookup = layers.StringLookup(vocabulary=np.unique(titanic_features[name]))
one_hot = layers.CategoryEncoding(num_tokens=lookup.vocabulary_size())
x = lookup(input)
x = one_hot(x)
preprocessed_inputs.append(x)
and then He concatenates it:
preprocessed_inputs_cat = layers.Concatenate()(preprocessed_inputs)
titanic_preprocessing = tf.keras.Model(inputs, preprocessed_inputs_cat)
Now what I want to do is insert this preprocessing part in KerasTuner. I tried this:
def titanic_model(units, activation):
model_inputs = tf.keras.Input(shape=28)
dense_1 = layers.Dense(units=units, activation=activation)(model_inputs)
dense_output = layers.Dense(1)(dense_1)
body = tf.keras.Model(inputs = model_inputs, outputs = dense_output)
return body
def build_model(hp,preprocessing_head, inputs):
units = hp.Int("units", min_value=32, max_value=512, step=32)
activation = hp.Choice("activation", ["relu", "tanh"])
preprocessed_inputs = preprocessing_head(inputs)
result = titanic_model(units,
activation)(preprocessed_inputs)
model = tf.keras.Model(inputs, result)
model.compile(loss=tf.keras.losses.BinaryCrossentropy(from_logits=True),
optimizer=tf.keras.optimizers.Adam(),
metrics = ['accuracy'])
return model
titanic_model = build_model(keras_tuner.HyperParameters(),titanic_preprocessing, inputs)
but it gives me the following error:
Inputs to a layer should be tensors. Got: <keras_tuner.engine.hyperparameters.HyperParameters
object at 0x7ff52844da30>
I cannot understand if I am close to the solution, or this is not the right way to proceed.
However, the workaround i found was to insert directly in the build_model function the preprocessing layer (titanic_preprocessing) and the inputs dictionary, without passing it as an argument of the function.
Hence:
def titanic_model(units, activation):
model_inputs = tf.keras.Input(shape=28)
dense_1 = layers.Dense(units=units, activation=activation)(model_inputs)
dense_output = layers.Dense(1)(dense_1)
body = tf.keras.Model(inputs = model_inputs, outputs = dense_output)
return body
def build_model(hp):
units = hp.Int("units", min_value=32, max_value=512, step=32)
activation = hp.Choice("activation", ["relu", "tanh"])
preprocessed_inputs = titanic_preprocessing(inputs)
result = titanic_model(units,
activation)(preprocessed_inputs)
model = tf.keras.Model(inputs, result)
model.compile(loss=tf.keras.losses.BinaryCrossentropy(from_logits=True),
optimizer=tf.keras.optimizers.Adam(),
metrics = ['accuracy'])
return model
titanic_model = build_model()
In this case it seems to work, and by setting the tuner
tuner = keras_tuner.RandomSearch(
hypermodel = build_model,
objective=keras_tuner.Objective("accuracy", direction="max"),
max_trials = 1,
overwrite = True,
directory = "tuner_dir",
project_name = "regression_tuner")
and searching it works:
tuner.search(x=titanic_features_dict, y=titanic_labels, epochs=10)
However, I have doubts about this solution and would appreciate feedback on this.
Thank you!
Related
I have some code for a mixed model, one that trains on an efficient net and the rest on some external data that I have combined. The following is an example for the model:
def create_model():
# Define parameters
inputShape = (256,256,3)
inputDim = 8
# define MLP network
model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(8, input_dim=inputDim, activation="relu"))
model.add(Dense(4, activation="relu"))
cnnModel = Sequential()
cnnModel.add(EfficientNetB5(include_top = False, input_shape=inputShape))
cnnModel.add(Flatten())
cnnModel.add(Dense(units = 16, activation='relu'))
cnnModel.add(Dense(units = 4, activation='relu'))
# Concatenate them
fullModel = concatenate([cnnModel.output,model.output])
fullModel = Dense(4, activation="relu")(fullModel)
fullModel = Dense(1, activation="sigmoid")(fullModel)
model = Model(inputs=[cnnModel.input,model.input], outputs=fullModel)
return model
However, when I run this through the fit_generator function I recieve the following error:
batch_size = 16
train_steps = TrainData.shape[0]//batch_size
valid_steps = TrainData.shape[0]//batch_size
model = create_model()
opt = Adam(lr=1e-3, decay=1e-3 / 200)
model.compile(loss="binary_crossentropy", optimizer=opt)
print("[INFO] training model...")
model.fit_generator(
train_dl,
epochs=3,
steps_per_epoch = train_steps
)
model.save("models/final_model")
InvalidArgumentError: Incompatible shapes: [16,3,256,256] vs. [1,1,1,3]
[[node model_47/efficientnetb5/normalization_52/sub (defined at <ipython-input-262-76be6a4af4a4>:11) ]] [Op:__inference_train_function_1072272]
I'm unsure where this error is coming from, either in the data loader or in the efficient net. Any ideas?
Edit to include data loader:
def data_generator(image_dir, dataframe, min_max, binary, category, transforms = None, batch_size = 16):
i = 0
samples_per_epoch = dataframe.shape[0]
number_of_batches = samples_per_epoch/batch_size
while True:
batch = {'images': [], 'data': [], 'labels': []} # use a dict for multiple inputs
# Randomly sample images in dataframe
idx = i
img_path = f"{image_dir}/{dataframe.iloc[idx]['image_name']}.jpg"
img = Image.open(img_path)
if transforms:
img = transforms(**{"image": np.array(img)})["image"]
img = np.asarray( img, dtype="int32" )
# make data into tensors
dataframe2 = dataframe.iloc[idx]
data_cont = min_max.transform(np.array(dataframe2['age_approx']).reshape(1, -1))
data_bina = binary.transform(dataframe2['sex'])
data_cate = category.transform(dataframe2['anatom_site_general_challenge'])
data_total = np.concatenate((data_cont, data_bina, data_cate), axis = 1)
label = dataframe2['target']
batch['images'].append(img)
batch['data'].append(data_total)
batch['labels'].append(label)
batch['images'] = np.array(batch['images']) # convert each list to array
batch['data'] = np.array(batch_x['data'])
batch['labels'] = np.array(batch['labels'])
i += 1
if counter >= number_of_batches:
counter = 0
yield [batch['images'], batch['data']], batch['labels']
def get_data(train_df, valid_df, train_tfms, test_tfms, batch_size, min_max, binary, category):
train_dl = data_generator(image_dir='train/', dataframe = train_df, batch_size = batch_size, min_max = min_max, binary = binary, category = category, transforms = train_tfms)
valid_dl = data_generator(image_dir='train/', dataframe = valid_df, batch_size = batch_size*2, min_max = min_max, binary = binary, category = category, transforms = test_tfms)
return train_dl, valid_dl
I seem to have the same issue when I just used the images and the efficient net. It seems like using the Keras inbuilt image data loader functions is the only way I can get it to work (with just images).
I have a VAE architecture script as follows:
import numpy as np
import tensorflow as tf
from tensorflow.keras.layers import Input, Conv2D, Flatten, Dense, Conv2DTranspose, Lambda, Reshape, Layer
from tensorflow.keras.models import Model
from tensorflow.keras.optimizers import Adam
from tensorflow.keras import backend as K
INPUT_DIM = (64,64,3)
CONV_FILTERS = [32,64,64, 128]
CONV_KERNEL_SIZES = [4,4,4,4]
CONV_STRIDES = [2,2,2,2]
CONV_ACTIVATIONS = ['relu','relu','relu','relu']
DENSE_SIZE = 1024
CONV_T_FILTERS = [64,64,32,3]
CONV_T_KERNEL_SIZES = [5,5,6,6]
CONV_T_STRIDES = [2,2,2,2]
CONV_T_ACTIVATIONS = ['relu','relu','relu','sigmoid']
Z_DIM = 32
BATCH_SIZE = 100
LEARNING_RATE = 0.0001
KL_TOLERANCE = 0.5
class Sampling(Layer):
def call(self, inputs):
mu, log_var = inputs
epsilon = K.random_normal(shape=K.shape(mu), mean=0., stddev=1.)
return mu + K.exp(log_var / 2) * epsilon
class VAEModel(Model):
def __init__(self, encoder, decoder, r_loss_factor, **kwargs):
super(VAEModel, self).__init__(**kwargs)
self.encoder = encoder
self.decoder = decoder
self.r_loss_factor = r_loss_factor
def train_step(self, data):
if isinstance(data, tuple):
data = data[0]
def compute_kernel(x, y):
x_size = tf.shape(x)[0]
y_size = tf.shape(y)[0]
dim = tf.shape(x)[1]
tiled_x = tf.tile(tf.reshape(x, tf.stack([x_size, 1, dim])), tf.stack([1, y_size, 1]))
tiled_y = tf.tile(tf.reshape(y, tf.stack([1, y_size, dim])), tf.stack([x_size, 1, 1]))
return tf.exp(-tf.reduce_mean(tf.square(tiled_x - tiled_y), axis=2) / tf.cast(dim, tf.float32))
def compute_mmd(x, y):
x_kernel = compute_kernel(x, x)
y_kernel = compute_kernel(y, y)
xy_kernel = compute_kernel(x, y)
return tf.reduce_mean(x_kernel) + tf.reduce_mean(y_kernel) - 2 * tf.reduce_mean(xy_kernel)
with tf.GradientTape() as tape:
z_mean, z_log_var, z = self.encoder(data)
reconstruction = self.decoder(z)
reconstruction_loss = tf.reduce_mean(
tf.square(data - reconstruction), axis = [1,2,3]
)
reconstruction_loss *= self.r_loss_factor
kl_loss = 1 + z_log_var - tf.square(z_mean) - tf.exp(z_log_var)
kl_loss = tf.reduce_sum(kl_loss, axis = 1)
kl_loss *= -0.5
true_samples = tf.random.normal(tf.stack([BATCH_SIZE, Z_DIM]))
loss_mmd = compute_mmd(true_samples, z)
total_loss = reconstruction_loss + loss_mmd
grads = tape.gradient(total_loss, self.trainable_weights)
self.optimizer.apply_gradients(zip(grads, self.trainable_weights))
return {
"loss": total_loss,
"reconstruction_loss": reconstruction_loss,
"kl_loss": kl_loss,
"mmd_loss": loss_mmd
}
def call(self,inputs):
latent = self.encoder(inputs)
return self.decoder(latent)
class VAE():
def __init__(self):
self.models = self._build()
self.full_model = self.models[0]
self.encoder = self.models[1]
self.decoder = self.models[2]
self.input_dim = INPUT_DIM
self.z_dim = Z_DIM
self.learning_rate = LEARNING_RATE
self.kl_tolerance = KL_TOLERANCE
def _build(self):
vae_x = Input(shape=INPUT_DIM, name='observation_input')
vae_c1 = Conv2D(filters = CONV_FILTERS[0], kernel_size = CONV_KERNEL_SIZES[0], strides = CONV_STRIDES[0], activation=CONV_ACTIVATIONS[0], name='conv_layer_1')(vae_x)
vae_c2 = Conv2D(filters = CONV_FILTERS[1], kernel_size = CONV_KERNEL_SIZES[1], strides = CONV_STRIDES[1], activation=CONV_ACTIVATIONS[0], name='conv_layer_2')(vae_c1)
vae_c3= Conv2D(filters = CONV_FILTERS[2], kernel_size = CONV_KERNEL_SIZES[2], strides = CONV_STRIDES[2], activation=CONV_ACTIVATIONS[0], name='conv_layer_3')(vae_c2)
vae_c4= Conv2D(filters = CONV_FILTERS[3], kernel_size = CONV_KERNEL_SIZES[3], strides = CONV_STRIDES[3], activation=CONV_ACTIVATIONS[0], name='conv_layer_4')(vae_c3)
vae_z_in = Flatten()(vae_c4)
vae_z_mean = Dense(Z_DIM, name='mu')(vae_z_in)
vae_z_log_var = Dense(Z_DIM, name='log_var')(vae_z_in)
vae_z = Sampling(name='z')([vae_z_mean, vae_z_log_var])
#### DECODER:
vae_z_input = Input(shape=(Z_DIM,), name='z_input')
vae_dense = Dense(1024, name='dense_layer')(vae_z_input)
vae_unflatten = Reshape((1,1,DENSE_SIZE), name='unflatten')(vae_dense)
vae_d1 = Conv2DTranspose(filters = CONV_T_FILTERS[0], kernel_size = CONV_T_KERNEL_SIZES[0] , strides = CONV_T_STRIDES[0], activation=CONV_T_ACTIVATIONS[0], name='deconv_layer_1')(vae_unflatten)
vae_d2 = Conv2DTranspose(filters = CONV_T_FILTERS[1], kernel_size = CONV_T_KERNEL_SIZES[1] , strides = CONV_T_STRIDES[1], activation=CONV_T_ACTIVATIONS[1], name='deconv_layer_2')(vae_d1)
vae_d3 = Conv2DTranspose(filters = CONV_T_FILTERS[2], kernel_size = CONV_T_KERNEL_SIZES[2] , strides = CONV_T_STRIDES[2], activation=CONV_T_ACTIVATIONS[2], name='deconv_layer_3')(vae_d2)
vae_d4 = Conv2DTranspose(filters = CONV_T_FILTERS[3], kernel_size = CONV_T_KERNEL_SIZES[3] , strides = CONV_T_STRIDES[3], activation=CONV_T_ACTIVATIONS[3], name='deconv_layer_4')(vae_d3)
#### MODELS
vae_encoder = Model(vae_x, [vae_z_mean, vae_z_log_var, vae_z], name = 'encoder')
vae_decoder = Model(vae_z_input, vae_d4, name = 'decoder')
vae_full = VAEModel(vae_encoder, vae_decoder, 10000)
opti = Adam(lr=LEARNING_RATE)
vae_full.compile(optimizer=opti)
return (vae_full,vae_encoder, vae_decoder)
def set_weights(self, filepath):
self.full_model.load_weights(filepath)
def train(self, data):
self.full_model.fit(data, data,
shuffle=True,
epochs=1,
batch_size=BATCH_SIZE)
def save_weights(self, filepath):
self.full_model.save_weights(filepath)
Problem:
vae = VAE()
vae.set_weights(filepath)
throws:
File
"/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/keras/engine/training.py",
line 2200, in load_weights
'Unable to load weights saved in HDF5 format into a subclassed ' ValueError: Unable to load weights saved in HDF5 format into a
subclassed Model which has not created its variables yet. Call the
Model first, then load the weights.
I am not sure what this means since I am not that proficient in OOP. The surprising bit is that the above code was working until it stopped working. The model is training from scratch and it saves the weights in filepath. But when I am loading the same weights now it is throwing the above error!
If you set model.built = True prior to loading the model weights it works.
i was getting same same error while loading weights via
model.load_weights("Detection_model.h5")
ValueError: Unable to load weights saved in HDF5 format into a subclassed Model which has not created its variables yet. Call the Model first, then load the weights.
solved it by building model before loading weights
model.build(input_shape = <INPUT_SHAPE>)
model.load_weights("Detection_model.h5")
ps, tensorflow Version: 2.5.0
What version of TF are you running? For a while the default saving format was hdf5, but this format cannot support subclassed models as easily, so you get this error. It may be solvable by first training it on a single batch and then loading the weights (to determine how the parts are connected, which is not saved in hdf5).
In the future I would recommend making sure that all saves are done with the TF file format though, it will save you from extra work.
As alwaysmvp45 pointed out "hdf5 does not store how the layers are connected". To make these layers be connected, another way is that you call the model to predict a zeros array with input shape ((1,w,h,c)) before loading weights:
model(np.zeros((1,w,h,c)))
Not sure if this has changed in more recent versions (I'm on 2.4). but I had to go this route:
# Do all the build and training
# ...
# Save the weights
model.save('path/to/location.h5')
# delete any reference to the model
del model
# Now do the load for testing
from tensorflow import keras
model = keras.models.load_model('path/to/location.h5')
If I tried the other suggestions, I got warnings about the layers not being present and I had to build the same model that I did the training on. No big deal, stick it in in a function somewhere, but this works better for me.
I am building a small network using some custom network boxes for each use case, It looks like this :
def top_block(dropout = None, training = None):
# scaled input
input_1 = tf.keras.Input(shape=(1,15), dtype='float32')
input_2 = tf.keras.Input(shape=(1,15), dtype='float32')
if dropout:
layer_one = tf.keras.layers.Dropout(rate = dropout)(input_1, training = training)
layer_two = tf.keras.layers.Dropout(rate = dropout)(input_2, training = training)
return [layer_one,layer_two]
return [input_1,input_2]
def bottom_layer(input_layers):
data = tf.reduce_mean(input_layers,0)
cls_layer = tf.keras.layers.Dense(1,
kernel_initializer = keras.initializers.glorot_uniform(seed=200),
activation = 'sigmoid')(data)
model = tf.keras.Model([input_layers[0], input_layers[1]], cls_layer , name = 'model_1')
model.compile(loss = 'binary_crossentropy', optimizer = 'adam', metrics=['accuracy'])
model.summary()
return model
If I am trying to access this network without dropout, it's working fine :
top_ = top_block()
model = bottom_layer(top_ )
But if I am accessing with dropout, it's giving error:
top_ = top_block(dropout = 0.2, training = True)
model = bottom_layer(top_ )
ValueError: Graph disconnected: cannot obtain value for tensor Tensor("input_72:0", shape=(None, 1, 15), dtype=float32) at layer "input_72". The following previous layers were accessed without issue: []
How to access the model with dropout layer?
How to disable training = False during evaluate? Do I need to load full model and old model weights?
Thank You!
I just realized my input is coming from intermediate layer (dropout layer), It should come directly from Input layer :
def top_block():
# scaled input
input_1 = tf.keras.Input(shape=(1,15), dtype='float32')
input_2 = tf.keras.Input(shape=(1,15), dtype='float32')
return [input_1, input_2]
def apply_dropout(layers_data, dropout_val, training):
layer_one = tf.keras.layers.Dropout(rate = dropout_val)(layers_data[0], training = training)
layer_two = tf.keras.layers.Dropout(rate = dropout_val)(layers_data[1], training = training)
return [layer_one, layer_two]
def bottom_layer(input_layers, data):
data = tf.reduce_mean(data, 0)
cls_layer = tf.keras.layers.Dense(1,
kernel_initializer = keras.initializers.glorot_uniform(seed=200),
activation = 'sigmoid')(data)
model = tf.keras.Model(input_layers, cls_layer , name = 'model_1')
model.compile(loss = 'binary_crossentropy', optimizer = 'adam', metrics=['accuracy'])
model.summary()
return model
It's working now
top_ = top_block()
dropout_ = apply_dropout(top_, 0.2, True)
model = bottom_layer(top_ , dropout_)
I have a TF 1.0.1 code of seq2seq model. I am trying to rewrite it using Tensorflow Keras.
TF 1.0.1 code has following decoder architecure:
with tf.variable_scope("decoder_scope") as decoder_scope:
# output projection
# we need to specify output projection manually, because sampled softmax needs to have access to the the projection matrix
output_projection_w_t = tf.get_variable("output_projection_w", [vocabulary_size, state_size], dtype=DTYPE)
output_projection_w = tf.transpose(output_projection_w_t)
output_projection_b = tf.get_variable("output_projection_b", [vocabulary_size], dtype=DTYPE)
decoder_cell = tf.contrib.rnn.LSTMCell(num_units=state_size)
decoder_cell = DtypeDropoutWrapper(cell=decoder_cell, output_keep_prob=tf_keep_probabiltiy, dtype=DTYPE)
decoder_cell = contrib_rnn.MultiRNNCell(cells=[decoder_cell] * num_lstm_layers, state_is_tuple=True)
# define decoder train netowrk
decoder_outputs_tr, _ , _ = dynamic_rnn_decoder(
cell=decoder_cell,
decoder_fn= simple_decoder_fn_train(last_encoder_state, name=None),
inputs=decoder_inputs,
sequence_length=decoder_sequence_lengths,
parallel_iterations=None,
swap_memory=False,
time_major=False)
# define decoder inference network
decoder_scope.reuse_variables()
Here is how the sampled_softmax_loss is calculated:
decoder_forward_outputs = tf.reshape(decoder_outputs_tr,[-1, state_size])
decoder_target_labels = tf.reshape(decoder_labels ,[-1, 1]) #decoder_labels is target sequnce of decoder
sampled_softmax_losses = tf.nn.sampled_softmax_loss(
weights = output_projection_w_t,
biases = output_projection_b,
inputs = decoder_forward_outputs,
labels = decoder_target_labels ,
num_sampled = 500,
num_classes=vocabulary_size,
num_true = 1,
)
total_loss_op = tf.reduce_mean(sampled_softmax_losses)
And, this is my decoder in Keras:
decoder_inputs = tf.keras.Input(shape=(None,), name='decoder_input')
emb_layer = tf.keras.layers.Embedding(vocabulary_size, state_size)
x_d = emb_layer(decoder_inputs)
d_lstm_layer = tf.keras.layers.LSTM(embed_dim, return_sequences=True)
d_lstm_out = d_lstm_layer(x_d, initial_state=encoder_states)
This is my sampled_softmax_loss function I use for Keras model:
class SampledSoftmaxLoss(object):
def __init__(self, model):
self.model = model
output_layer = model.layers[-1]
self.input = output_layer.input
self.weights = output_layer.weights
def loss(self, y_true, y_pred, **kwargs):
loss = tf.nn.sampled_softmax_loss(
weights=self.weights[0],
biases=self.weights[1],
labels=tf.reshape(y_true ,[-1, 1]),
inputs=tf.reshape(d_lstm_out,[-1, state_size]),
num_sampled = 500,
num_classes = vocabulary_size
)
But, it does not work.
Can anyone help me to implement sampled_loss_funtion in Keras correctly.
I would like to write a custom loss function in Keras that takes in a tensor of predicted values and then for each process it through another function before adding to the loss. Here is what this looks like. This is a complete code example, please look at the function sample_loss.
class AE():
def __init__(self,inputSize=78,numNeurons = 50, latentSize=5,expSize = 10,batchSize = 1, activation="relu"):
K.clear_session()
self.inputSize = inputSize
self.latentSize = latentSize
self.activation = activation
self.numNeurons = numNeurons
self.expSize = expSize
self.batchSize = batchSize
self.encoder = self.createEncoder()
self.decoder = self.createDecoder()
self.filterModel = self.createFilterModel()
self.AE = self.createAE()
def sample_loss(self,y_pred ):
loss = 0.0
for j in tf.range(0,self.inputSize ,2):
pt = y_pred[j:j+2]
loss += K.sum(self.filterModel.predict(pt))
return loss
def createEncoder(self):
# create the encoder
xIn = Input(shape=(self.inputSize,), name="data_in")
y_train = Input(shape=(self.latentSize,), name='y_train')
x = Dense(self.numNeurons,activation=self.activation)(xIn)
xlatent = Dense(self.latentSize,activation=self.activation)(x)
# create the encoder
encoder = Model(xIn,xlatent)
return encoder
def createDecoder(self):
# create the decoder
latentIn = Input(shape=(self.latentSize,))
x = Dense(self.numNeurons,activation=self.activation)(latentIn)
out = Dense(self.inputSize,activation="linear")(x)
# create a decoder
decoder = Model(latentIn,out)
return decoder
def createAE(self):
xIn = Input(shape=(self.inputSize,), name="ae_data_in")
# create the total model
latentOutput = self.encoder(xIn)
dataOutput = self.decoder(latentOutput)
model = Model(inputs=xIn,outputs=dataOutput)
model.add_loss( self.sample_loss( dataOutput) )
model.summary()
return model
def createFilterModel(self):
xIn = Input(shape=(2,), name="filter_data_in")
x = Dense(4, activation='sigmoid')(xIn)
x = Dense(1, activation='sigmoid')(x)
model = Model(xIn,x)
model.compile(optimizer='adam', loss='binary_crossentropy')
return model
modelAE = AE()
modelAE.AE.compile(optimizer='adam',loss="mse", metrics=['accuracy'])
So I have a dictionary of models, filterModels. These are actually predictive models in Keras. For each model in this dictionary, I want to pass it the corresponding part of y_pred and then add its output to the loss.
How can I do this?
Here is the error the current code gives me:
'''
ValueError: When feeding symbolic tensors to a model, we expect the tensors to have a static batch size. Got tensor with shape: (None, 78)
'''