Is there a way to use exec inside a function? - python

The function:
def thefunction():
exec("x = 'text'")
return x
print(thefunction())
and it doesnt work...
this is for python 3

Give it a dict as a storage for variables.
def thefunction():
vars = {}
exec("x = 'text'", vars)
return vars['x']
print(thefunction())
In any case, read the documentation and warnings about exec.

you need to pass in your locals or it will only be local to that ...
def thefunction():
my_locals = locals()
exec("x = 'text'",globals(),my_locals)
return my_locals['x']
print(thefunction())
you can make it a little safer by sending in an isolated environment... but the bottom line is that its not safe to exec untrusted input

Related

Access things outside of module with eval and exec

If I import a module that uses exec or eval, is it possible to give it access to the main program?
myExec.py
def myExec(code):
exec(code)
main.py
import myExec
def test():
print("ok")
myExec.myExec("test()")
Yes!
exec has a few optional parameters, globals and locals. These basically tell it what global and local variables its allowed to use, in the form of a dictionary. Calling globals() or locals() functions returns the dictionary with all the global and local variables where you are calling from, so you can use:
myExec.py:
def myExec(code, globals_=None, locals_=None): # the trailing underscore is so that there are no name conflicts
exec(code, globals_, locals_)
main.py:
import myExec
def test():
print("ok")
myExec.myExec("test()", globals())

Python: Calling functions from the same module

I am designing a module, say mymodule.py and I write the code for the module as follows:
def charCount(my_string, my_char):
a = my_string.count(my_char)
return a
def aCount(my_string):
a = charCount(my_string, 'a')
return a
Inside Python shell, I use the following command:
import mymodule as mm
and then,
mString = 'ghghghghgaaaaa'
and then
a = mm.aCount(mString)
It is seen that there is an error. Apparently, the function is not able to be called from the same module. How can this be avoided?
You need to put return statement in both the functions and it would work fine.
Try this:
def charCount(my_string, my_char):
a = my_string.count(my_char)
return a
def aCount(my_string):
a = charCount(my_string, 'a')
return a

How to pass a string as an object to getattr python

I have a number of functions that need to get called from various imported files.
The functions are formated along the lines of this:
a.foo
b.foo2
a.bar.foo4
a.c.d.foo5
and they are passed in to my script as a raw string.
I'm looking for a clean way to run these, with arguments, and get the return values
Right now I have a messy system of splitting the strings then feeding them to the right getattr call but this feels kind of clumsy and is very un-scalable. Is there a way I can just pass the object portion of getattr as a string? Or some other way of doing this?
import a, b, a.bar, a.c.d
if "." in raw_script:
split_script = raw_script.split(".")
if 'a' in raw_script:
if 'a.bar' in raw_script:
out = getattr(a.bar, split_script[-1])(args)
if 'a.c.d' in raw_script:
out = getattr(a.c.d, split_script[-1])(args)
else:
out = getattr(a, split_script[-1])(args)
elif 'b' in raw_script:
out = getattr(b, split_script[-1])(args)
It's hard to tell from your question, but it sounds like you have a command line tool you run as my-tool <function> [options]. You could use importlib like this, avoiding most of the getattr calls:
import importlib
def run_function(name, args):
module, function = name.rsplit('.', 1)
module = importlib.import_module(module)
function = getattr(module, function)
function(*args)
if __name__ == '__main__':
# Elided: retrieve function name and args from command line
run_function(name, args)
Try this:
def lookup(path):
obj = globals()
for element in path.split('.'):
try:
obj = obj[element]
except KeyError:
obj = getattr(obj, element)
return obj
Note that this will handle a path starting with ANY global name, not just your a and b imported modules. If there are any possible concerns with untrusted input being provided to the function, you should start with a dict containing the allowed starting points, not the entire globals dict.

Python: good way to pass variable to multiple function calls

Need a help with the next situation. I want to implement debug mode in my script through printing small completion report in functions with command executed name and ellapsed time like:
def cmd_exec(cmd):
if isDebug:
commandStart = datetime.datetime.now()
print commandStart
print cmd
...
... exucuting commands
...
if isDebug:
print datetime.datetime.now() - command_start
return
def main():
...
if args.debug:
isDebug = True
...
cmd_exec(cmd1)
...
cmd_exec(cmd2)
...
How can isDebug variable be simply passed to functions?
Should I use "global isDebug"?
Because
...
cmd_exec(cmd1, isDebug)
...
cmd_exec(cmd2, isDebug)
...
looks pretty bad. Please help me find more elegant way.
isDebug is state that applies to the application of a function cmd_exec. Sounds like a use-case for a class to me.
class CommandExecutor(object):
def __init__(self, debug):
self.debug = debug
def execute(self, cmd):
if self.debug:
commandStart = datetime.datetime.now()
print commandStart
print cmd
...
... executing commands
...
if self.debug:
print datetime.datetime.now() - command_start
def main(args):
ce = CommandExecutor(args.debug)
ce.execute(cmd1)
ce.execute(cmd2)
Python has a built-in __debug__ variable that could be useful.
if __debug__:
print 'information...'
When you run your program as python test.py, __debug__ is True. If you run it as python -O test.py, it will be False.
Another option which I do in my projects is set a global DEBUG var at the beginning of the file, after importing:
DEBUG = True
You can then reference this DEBUG var in the scope of the function.
You can use a module to create variables that are shared. This is better than a global because it only affects code that is specifically looking for the variable, it doesn't pollute the global namespace. It also lets you define something without your main module needing to know about it.
This works because modules are shared objects in Python. Every import gets back a reference to the same object, and modifications to the contents of that module get shared immediately, just like a global would.
my_debug.py:
isDebug = false
main.py:
import my_debug
def cmd_exec(cmd):
if my_debug.isDebug:
# ...
def main():
# ...
if args.debug:
my_debug.isDebug = True
Specifically for this, I would use partials/currying, basically pre-filling a variable.
import sys
from functools import partial
import datetime
def _cmd_exec(cmd, isDebug=False):
if isDebug:
command_start = datetime.datetime.now()
print command_start
print cmd
else:
print 'isDebug is false' + cmd
if isDebug:
print datetime.datetime.now() - command_start
return
#default, keeping it as is...
cmd_exec = _cmd_exec
#switch to debug
def debug_on():
global cmd_exec
#pre-apply the isDebug optional param
cmd_exec = partial(_cmd_exec, isDebug=True)
def main():
if "-d" in sys.argv:
debug_on()
cmd_exec("cmd1")
cmd_exec("cmd2")
main()
In this case, I check for -d on the command line to turn on debug mode and I do pre-populate isDebug on the function call by creating a new function with isDebug = True.
I think even other modules will see this modified cmd_exec, because I replaced the function at the module level.
output:
jluc#explore$ py test_so64.py
isDebug is falsecmd1
isDebug is falsecmd2
jluc#explore$ py test_so64.py -d
2016-10-13 17:00:33.523016
cmd1
0:00:00.000682
2016-10-13 17:00:33.523715
cmd2
0:00:00.000009

Preprocessing function text in runtime bofore compilation

I decided to try to preprocess function text before it's compilation into byte-code and following execution. This is merely for training. I hardly imagine situations where it'll be a satisfactory solution to be used. I have faced one problem which I wanted to solve in this way, but eventually a better way was found. So this is just for training and to learn something new, not for real usage.
Assume we have a function, which source code we want to be modified quite a bit before compilation:
def f():
1;a()
print('Some statements 1')
1;a()
print('Some statements 2')
Let, for example, mark some lines of it with 1;, for them to be sometimes commented and sometimes not. I just take it for example, modifications of the function may be different.
To comment these lines I made a decorator. The whole code it bellow:
from __future__ import print_function
def a():
print('a()')
def comment_1(s):
lines = s.split('\n')
return '\n'.join(line.replace(';','#;',1) if line.strip().startswith('1;') else line for line in lines)
def remove_1(f):
import inspect
source = inspect.getsource(f)
new_source = comment_1(source)
with open('temp.py','w') as file:
file.write(new_source)
from temp import f as f_new
return f_new
def f():
1;a()
print('Some statements 1')
1;a()
print('Some statements 2')
f = remove_1(f) #If decorator #remove is used above f(), inspect.getsource includes #remove inside the code.
f()
I used inspect.getsourcelines to retrieve function f code. Then I made some text-processing (in this case commenting lines starting with 1;). After that I saved it to temp.py module, which is then imported. And then a function f is decorated in the main module.
The output, when decorator is applied, is this:
Some statements 1
Some statements 2
when NOT applied is this:
a()
Some statements 1
a()
Some statements 2
What I don't like is that I have to use hard drive to load compiled function. Can it be done without writing it to temporary module temp.py and importing from it?
The second question is about placing decorator above f: #replace. When I do this, inspect.getsourcelines returns f text with this decorator. I could manually be deleted from f's text. but that would be quite dangerous, as there may be more than one decorator applied. So I resorted to the old-style decoration syntax f = remove_1(f), which does the job. But still, is it possible to allow normal decoration technique with #replace?
One can avoid creating a temporary file by invoking the exec statement on the source. (You can also explicitly call compile prior to exec if you want additional control over compilation, but exec will do the compilation for you, so it's not necessary.) Correctly calling exec has the additional benefit that the function will work correctly if it accesses global variables from the namespace of its module.
The problem described in the second question can be resolved by temporarily blocking the decorator while it is running. That way the decorator remains, along all the other ones, but is a no-op.
Here is the updated source.
from __future__ import print_function
import sys
def a():
print('a()')
def comment_1(s):
lines = s.split('\n')
return '\n'.join(line.replace(';','#;',1) if line.strip().startswith('1;') else line for line in lines)
_blocked = False
def remove_1(f):
global _blocked
if _blocked:
return f
import inspect
source = inspect.getsource(f)
new_source = comment_1(source)
env = sys.modules[f.__module__].__dict__
_blocked = True
try:
exec new_source in env
finally:
_blocked = False
return env[f.__name__]
#remove_1
def f():
1;a()
print('Some statements 1')
1;a()
print('Some statements 2')
f()
def remove_1(f):
import inspect
source = inspect.getsource(f)
new_source = comment_1(source)
env = sys.modules[f.__module__].__dict__.copy()
exec new_source in env
return env[f.__name__]
I'll leave a modified version of the solution given in the answer by user4815162342. It uses ast module to delete some parts of f, as was suggested in the comment to the question. To make it I majorly relied on the information in this article.
This implementation deletes all occurrences of a as standalone expression.
from __future__ import print_function
import sys
import ast
import inspect
def a():
print('a() is called')
_blocked = False
def remove_1(f):
global _blocked
if _blocked:
return f
import inspect
source = inspect.getsource(f)
a = ast.parse(source) #get ast tree of f
class Transformer(ast.NodeTransformer):
'''Will delete all expressions containing 'a' functions at the top level'''
def visit_Expr(self, node): #visit all expressions
try:
if node.value.func.id == 'a': #if expression consists of function with name a
return None #delete it
except(ValueError):
pass
return node #return node unchanged
transformer = Transformer()
a_new = transformer.visit(a)
f_new_compiled = compile(a_new,'<string>','exec')
env = sys.modules[f.__module__].__dict__
_blocked = True
try:
exec(f_new_compiled,env)
finally:
_blocked = False
return env[f.__name__]
#remove_1
def f():
a();a()
print('Some statements 1')
a()
print('Some statements 2')
f()
The output is:
Some statements 1
Some statements 2

Categories

Resources