Develop Reference

Running scripts at the same time but on different consoles [duplicate]

Apart from the scripts own console (which does nothing) I want to open two consoles and print the variables con1 and con2 in different consoles, How can I achieve this.
con1 = 'This is Console1'
con2 = 'This is Console2'
I've no idea how to achieve this and spent several hours trying to do so with modules such as subprocess but with no luck. I'm on windows by the way.
Edit:
Would the threading module do the job? or is multiprocessing needed?
Eg:

If you don't want to reconsider your problem and use a GUI such as in #Kevin's answer then you could use subprocess module to start two new consoles concurrently and display two given strings in the opened windows:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import sys
import time
from subprocess import Popen, PIPE, CREATE_NEW_CONSOLE
messages = 'This is Console1', 'This is Console2'
# open new consoles
processes = [Popen([sys.executable, "-c", """import sys
for line in sys.stdin: # poor man's `cat`
sys.stdout.write(line)
sys.stdout.flush()
"""],
stdin=PIPE, bufsize=1, universal_newlines=True,
# assume the parent script is started from a console itself e.g.,
# this code is _not_ run as a *.pyw file
creationflags=CREATE_NEW_CONSOLE)
for _ in range(len(messages))]
# display messages
for proc, msg in zip(processes, messages):
proc.stdin.write(msg + "\n")
proc.stdin.flush()
time.sleep(10) # keep the windows open for a while
# close windows
for proc in processes:
proc.communicate("bye\n")
Here's a simplified version that doesn't rely on CREATE_NEW_CONSOLE:
#!/usr/bin/env python
"""Show messages in two new console windows simultaneously."""
import sys
import platform
from subprocess import Popen
messages = 'This is Console1', 'This is Console2'
# define a command that starts new terminal
if platform.system() == "Windows":
new_window_command = "cmd.exe /c start".split()
else: #XXX this can be made more portable
new_window_command = "x-terminal-emulator -e".split()
# open new consoles, display messages
echo = [sys.executable, "-c",
"import sys; print(sys.argv[1]); input('Press Enter..')"]
processes = [Popen(new_window_command + echo + [msg]) for msg in messages]
# wait for the windows to be closed
for proc in processes:
proc.wait()

You can get something like two consoles using two Tkinter Text widgets.
from Tkinter import *
import threading
class FakeConsole(Frame):
def __init__(self, root, *args, **kargs):
Frame.__init__(self, root, *args, **kargs)
#white text on black background,
#for extra versimilitude
self.text = Text(self, bg="black", fg="white")
self.text.pack()
#list of things not yet printed
self.printQueue = []
#one thread will be adding to the print queue,
#and another will be iterating through it.
#better make sure one doesn't interfere with the other.
self.printQueueLock = threading.Lock()
self.after(5, self.on_idle)
#check for new messages every five milliseconds
def on_idle(self):
with self.printQueueLock:
for msg in self.printQueue:
self.text.insert(END, msg)
self.text.see(END)
self.printQueue = []
self.after(5, self.on_idle)
#print msg to the console
def show(self, msg, sep="\n"):
with self.printQueueLock:
self.printQueue.append(str(msg) + sep)
#warning! Calling this more than once per program is a bad idea.
#Tkinter throws a fit when two roots each have a mainloop in different threads.
def makeConsoles(amount):
root = Tk()
consoles = [FakeConsole(root) for n in range(amount)]
for c in consoles:
c.pack()
threading.Thread(target=root.mainloop).start()
return consoles
a,b = makeConsoles(2)
a.show("This is Console 1")
b.show("This is Console 2")
a.show("I've got a lovely bunch of cocounts")
a.show("Here they are standing in a row")
b.show("Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet")
b.show("consectetur adipisicing elit")
Result:

I don't know if it suits you, but you can open two Python interpreters using Windows start command:
from subprocess import Popen
p1 = Popen('start c:\python27\python.exe', shell=True)
p2 = Popen('start c:\python27\python.exe', shell=True)
Of course there is problem that now Python runs in interactive mode which is not what u want (you can also pass file as parameter and that file will be executed).
On Linux I would try to make named pipe, pass the name of the file to python.exe and write python commands to that file. 'Maybe' it will work ;)
But I don't have an idea how to create named pipe on Windows. Windows API ... (fill urself).

pymux
pymux gets close to what you want: https://github.com/jonathanslenders/pymux
Unfortunately it is mostly a CLI tool replacement for tmux and does not have a decent programmatic API yet.
But hacking it up to expose that API is likely the most robust option if you are serious about this.
The README says:
Parts of pymux could become a library, so that any prompt_toolkit application can embed a vt100 terminal. (Imagine a terminal emulator embedded in pyvim.)

If you are on windows you can use win32console module to open a second console for your thread or subprocess output. This is the most simple and easiest way that works if you are on windows.
Here is a sample code:
import win32console
import multiprocessing
def subprocess(queue):
win32console.FreeConsole() #Frees subprocess from using main console
win32console.AllocConsole() #Creates new console and all input and output of subprocess goes to this new console
while True:
print(queue.get())
#prints any output produced by main script passed to subprocess using queue
queue = multiprocessing.Queue()
multiprocessing.Process(Target=subprocess, args=[queue]).start()
while True:
print("Hello World")
#and whatever else you want to do in ur main process
You can also do this with threading. You have to use queue module if you want the queue functionality as threading module doesn't have queue
Here is the win32console module documentation

I used jfs' response. Here is my embellishment/theft of jfs response.
This is tailored to run on Win10 and also handles Unicode:
# https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19479504/how-can-i-open-two-consoles-from-a-single-script
import sys, time, os, locale
from subprocess import Popen, PIPE, CREATE_NEW_CONSOLE
class console(Popen) :
NumConsoles = 0
def __init__(self, color=None, title=None):
console.NumConsoles += 1
cmd = "import sys, os, locale"
cmd += "\nos.system(\'color " + color + "\')" if color is not None else ""
title = title if title is not None else "console #" + str(console.NumConsoles)
cmd += "\nos.system(\"title " + title + "\")"
# poor man's `cat`
cmd += """
print(sys.stdout.encoding, locale.getpreferredencoding() )
endcoding = locale.getpreferredencoding()
for line in sys.stdin:
sys.stdout.buffer.write(line.encode(endcoding))
sys.stdout.flush()
"""
cmd = sys.executable, "-c", cmd
# print(cmd, end="", flush=True)
super().__init__(cmd, stdin=PIPE, bufsize=1, universal_newlines=True, creationflags=CREATE_NEW_CONSOLE, encoding='utf-8')
def write(self, msg):
self.stdin.write(msg + "\n" )
if __name__ == "__main__":
myConsole = console(color="c0", title="test error console")
myConsole.write("Thank you jfs. Cool explanation")
NoTitle= console()
NoTitle.write("default color and title! This answer uses Windows 10")
NoTitle.write(u"♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥")
NoTitle.write("♥")
time.sleep(5)
myConsole.terminate()
NoTitle.write("some more text. Run this at the python console.")
time.sleep(4)
NoTitle.terminate()
time.sleep(5)

Do you know about screen/tmux?
How about tmuxp? For example, you can try to run cat in split panes and use "sendkeys" to send output (but dig the docs, may be there is even easier ways to achieve this).
As a side bonus this will work in the text console or GUI.

Redirecting stdout to tkinter immediately (without waiting for the process to complete)

I am writing a python app to take some inputs from the user and call a shell script based on these inputs.
This shell script can run for quite sometime, and I want to redirect the output it produces (in realtime) to tkinter.
I managed to do that, but it only happens after the shell script is completely finished, not as soon as the shell script "echos" something for example.
So main problem:
1. Output appears in the text widget only after shellScript.sh is exited (although if I run the same in the terminal manually, I see continuous output).
2. Side problem: all the "\n" printed in the output are just printed as "\n" and no new lines are added in the text widget.
here is what I have:
class RedirectText(object):
def __init__(self, text_ctrl):
"""Constructor"""
self.output = text_ctrl
def write(self, string):
self.output.insert(tk.END, string[2:])
class Gui(GuiApp):
def __init__(self, master=None):
redir = RedirectText(self.text_Output)
sys.stdout = redir
def testRun(self, event=None):
p = subprocess.Popen(["./shellScript.sh"], stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
print(p.communicate()[0])

As p.communicate() will wait for the process to complete, so use p.poll() and p.stdout.readline() instead. Also put the process in a thread to avoid blocking the main thread:
import threading
...
class Gui(GuiApp):
...
def runScript(self):
print('started')
p = subprocess.Popen(['./shellScript.sh'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE, bufsize=1, text=True)
while p.poll() is None: # check whether process is still running
msg = p.stdout.readline().strip() # read a line from the process output
if msg:
print(msg)
print('finished')
def testRun(self, event=None):
# create a thread to run the script
threading.Thread(target=self.runScript, daemon=True).start()

Get the command line output of a thread

I have a main scirpt that run several other programms in some order (to avoid lauching them manually). Hence I use thread to call them.
The first one is a Windows application and I call it like that:
class NepThread(threading.Thread):
def run(self):
subprocess.call('PATH_TO_PRGM.exe')
pass
#...
nepThread = NepThread()
nepThread.daemon = True
nepThread.start()
Then I run a Python script in kind of same way:
class UsbCameraThread(threading.Thread):
def run(self):
subprocess.call(["python", 'PATH\\USBcamera.py'])
pass
#...
usbCameraThread = UsbCameraThread()
usbCameraThread.daemon = True
usbCameraThread.start()
But for this one, I need to wait it is started before running the next script.
When USBcamera script is ready, it writes something on cout and then starts an infinite loop:
print('Start Video recording!')
while True:
My question is: how can I got the command line output to know if the script is started?
Thanks in advance!
Dark Patate

You can probably use the subprocess.Popen() instruction to capture the stdout stream. Here is a sample of its usage:
proc = subprocess.Popen( command, stdout = subprocess.PIPE, stderr = subprocess.PIPE )
stdout_stream, stderr_stream = proc.communicate()
stdout_stream = stdout_stream.decode( "ascii" )
Then print out the contents of stdout_stream.

How can I open two consoles from a single script

Apart from the scripts own console (which does nothing) I want to open two consoles and print the variables con1 and con2 in different consoles, How can I achieve this.
con1 = 'This is Console1'
con2 = 'This is Console2'
I've no idea how to achieve this and spent several hours trying to do so with modules such as subprocess but with no luck. I'm on windows by the way.
Edit:
Would the threading module do the job? or is multiprocessing needed?
Eg:

If you don't want to reconsider your problem and use a GUI such as in #Kevin's answer then you could use subprocess module to start two new consoles concurrently and display two given strings in the opened windows:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import sys
import time
from subprocess import Popen, PIPE, CREATE_NEW_CONSOLE
messages = 'This is Console1', 'This is Console2'
# open new consoles
processes = [Popen([sys.executable, "-c", """import sys
for line in sys.stdin: # poor man's `cat`
sys.stdout.write(line)
sys.stdout.flush()
"""],
stdin=PIPE, bufsize=1, universal_newlines=True,
# assume the parent script is started from a console itself e.g.,
# this code is _not_ run as a *.pyw file
creationflags=CREATE_NEW_CONSOLE)
for _ in range(len(messages))]
# display messages
for proc, msg in zip(processes, messages):
proc.stdin.write(msg + "\n")
proc.stdin.flush()
time.sleep(10) # keep the windows open for a while
# close windows
for proc in processes:
proc.communicate("bye\n")
Here's a simplified version that doesn't rely on CREATE_NEW_CONSOLE:
#!/usr/bin/env python
"""Show messages in two new console windows simultaneously."""
import sys
import platform
from subprocess import Popen
messages = 'This is Console1', 'This is Console2'
# define a command that starts new terminal
if platform.system() == "Windows":
new_window_command = "cmd.exe /c start".split()
else: #XXX this can be made more portable
new_window_command = "x-terminal-emulator -e".split()
# open new consoles, display messages
echo = [sys.executable, "-c",
"import sys; print(sys.argv[1]); input('Press Enter..')"]
processes = [Popen(new_window_command + echo + [msg]) for msg in messages]
# wait for the windows to be closed
for proc in processes:
proc.wait()

You can get something like two consoles using two Tkinter Text widgets.
from Tkinter import *
import threading
class FakeConsole(Frame):
def __init__(self, root, *args, **kargs):
Frame.__init__(self, root, *args, **kargs)
#white text on black background,
#for extra versimilitude
self.text = Text(self, bg="black", fg="white")
self.text.pack()
#list of things not yet printed
self.printQueue = []
#one thread will be adding to the print queue,
#and another will be iterating through it.
#better make sure one doesn't interfere with the other.
self.printQueueLock = threading.Lock()
self.after(5, self.on_idle)
#check for new messages every five milliseconds
def on_idle(self):
with self.printQueueLock:
for msg in self.printQueue:
self.text.insert(END, msg)
self.text.see(END)
self.printQueue = []
self.after(5, self.on_idle)
#print msg to the console
def show(self, msg, sep="\n"):
with self.printQueueLock:
self.printQueue.append(str(msg) + sep)
#warning! Calling this more than once per program is a bad idea.
#Tkinter throws a fit when two roots each have a mainloop in different threads.
def makeConsoles(amount):
root = Tk()
consoles = [FakeConsole(root) for n in range(amount)]
for c in consoles:
c.pack()
threading.Thread(target=root.mainloop).start()
return consoles
a,b = makeConsoles(2)
a.show("This is Console 1")
b.show("This is Console 2")
a.show("I've got a lovely bunch of cocounts")
a.show("Here they are standing in a row")
b.show("Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet")
b.show("consectetur adipisicing elit")
Result:

I don't know if it suits you, but you can open two Python interpreters using Windows start command:
from subprocess import Popen
p1 = Popen('start c:\python27\python.exe', shell=True)
p2 = Popen('start c:\python27\python.exe', shell=True)
Of course there is problem that now Python runs in interactive mode which is not what u want (you can also pass file as parameter and that file will be executed).
On Linux I would try to make named pipe, pass the name of the file to python.exe and write python commands to that file. 'Maybe' it will work ;)
But I don't have an idea how to create named pipe on Windows. Windows API ... (fill urself).

pymux
pymux gets close to what you want: https://github.com/jonathanslenders/pymux
Unfortunately it is mostly a CLI tool replacement for tmux and does not have a decent programmatic API yet.
But hacking it up to expose that API is likely the most robust option if you are serious about this.
The README says:
Parts of pymux could become a library, so that any prompt_toolkit application can embed a vt100 terminal. (Imagine a terminal emulator embedded in pyvim.)

If you are on windows you can use win32console module to open a second console for your thread or subprocess output. This is the most simple and easiest way that works if you are on windows.
Here is a sample code:
import win32console
import multiprocessing
def subprocess(queue):
win32console.FreeConsole() #Frees subprocess from using main console
win32console.AllocConsole() #Creates new console and all input and output of subprocess goes to this new console
while True:
print(queue.get())
#prints any output produced by main script passed to subprocess using queue
queue = multiprocessing.Queue()
multiprocessing.Process(Target=subprocess, args=[queue]).start()
while True:
print("Hello World")
#and whatever else you want to do in ur main process
You can also do this with threading. You have to use queue module if you want the queue functionality as threading module doesn't have queue
Here is the win32console module documentation

I used jfs' response. Here is my embellishment/theft of jfs response.
This is tailored to run on Win10 and also handles Unicode:
# https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19479504/how-can-i-open-two-consoles-from-a-single-script
import sys, time, os, locale
from subprocess import Popen, PIPE, CREATE_NEW_CONSOLE
class console(Popen) :
NumConsoles = 0
def __init__(self, color=None, title=None):
console.NumConsoles += 1
cmd = "import sys, os, locale"
cmd += "\nos.system(\'color " + color + "\')" if color is not None else ""
title = title if title is not None else "console #" + str(console.NumConsoles)
cmd += "\nos.system(\"title " + title + "\")"
# poor man's `cat`
cmd += """
print(sys.stdout.encoding, locale.getpreferredencoding() )
endcoding = locale.getpreferredencoding()
for line in sys.stdin:
sys.stdout.buffer.write(line.encode(endcoding))
sys.stdout.flush()
"""
cmd = sys.executable, "-c", cmd
# print(cmd, end="", flush=True)
super().__init__(cmd, stdin=PIPE, bufsize=1, universal_newlines=True, creationflags=CREATE_NEW_CONSOLE, encoding='utf-8')
def write(self, msg):
self.stdin.write(msg + "\n" )
if __name__ == "__main__":
myConsole = console(color="c0", title="test error console")
myConsole.write("Thank you jfs. Cool explanation")
NoTitle= console()
NoTitle.write("default color and title! This answer uses Windows 10")
NoTitle.write(u"♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥")
NoTitle.write("♥")
time.sleep(5)
myConsole.terminate()
NoTitle.write("some more text. Run this at the python console.")
time.sleep(4)
NoTitle.terminate()
time.sleep(5)

Do you know about screen/tmux?
How about tmuxp? For example, you can try to run cat in split panes and use "sendkeys" to send output (but dig the docs, may be there is even easier ways to achieve this).
As a side bonus this will work in the text console or GUI.

Writing to easygui textbox as function is running?

I am currently running a script using easygui to receive the user input. The old script that ran in a command line would just print anything the user needed to know in the command line, but I've changed it to output notifications in new easygui boxes when there are required inputs.
Want I want to do is have the progress, each action inside the functions that are running, print into a text box as they complete. In command line I could just use print "text" but I can't get it to happen realtime in easygui. Currently I'm appending a list so I have a textbox that displays the results of the function once everything is complete, but I'd like for the large textbox window to pop up and print the line out whenever a process of note completes. Is this doable?
Here is how I'm appending the list:
result_list = []
record_str = "\n Polling has completed for 502."
result_list.append(record_str)
eg.textbox("Polling Status", "Daily polling completion status:", result_list)

I don't think there's any simple way of getting EasyGUI's textbox function to do what you want short of modifying the module. Since it's a function not a class, you can't even derive a subclass from it in order to easily reuse its code.
However it's completely feasible to create a separate Tkinter window that just displays lines of text as they are sent to it using an enhanced version of some code I found once in a thread on the comp.lang.python newsgroup.
The original code was designed to catch and display only stderr output from a GUI application which normally doesn't have stderr output handle, so the module was named errorwindow. However I modified it to be able redirect both stderr and stdout to such windows in one easygui-based app I developed, but I never got around to renaming it or updating the comments in it to also mention stdout redirection. ;¬)
Anyway, the module works by defining and creating two instances of a file-like class named OutputPipe when it's imported and assigns them to the sys.stdout and sys.stderr I/O stream file objects which are usually None in a Python .pyw GUI applications (on Windows). When output is first sent to either one of these, the same module is launched as separate Python process with its stdin, stdout, and stderr I/O handles piped with the original process.
There's a lot going on, but if nothing else, with a little study of it might give you some ideas about how to get easygui's textbox to do what you want. Hope this helps.
Note: The code posted is for Python 2.x, there's a modified version that will work in both Python 2 and 3 in my answer to another question, if anyone is interested.
File errorwindow.py:
# Code derived from Bryan Olson's source posted in this related Usenet discussion:
# https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.lang.python/HWPhLhXKUos/TpFeWxEE9nsJ
# https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.lang.python/HWPhLhXKUos/eEHYAl4dH9YJ
#
# Here's a module to show stderr output from console-less Python
# apps, and stay out of the way otherwise. I plan to make a ASPN
# recipe of it, but I thought I'd run it by this group first.
#
# To use it, import the module. That's it. Upon import it will
# assign sys.stderr.
#
# In the normal case, your code is perfect so nothing ever gets
# written to stderr, and the module won't do much of anything.
# Upon the first write to stderr, if any, the module will launch a
# new process, and that process will show the stderr output in a
# window. The window will live until dismissed; I hate, hate, hate
# those vanishing-consoles-with-critical-information.
#
# The code shows some arguably-cool tricks. To fit everthing in
# one file, the module runs the Python interpreter on itself; it
# uses the "if __name__ == '__main__'" idiom to behave radically
# differently upon import versus direct execution. It uses TkInter
# for the window, but that's in a new process; it does not import
# TkInter into your application.
#
# To try it out, save it to a file -- I call it "errorwindow.py" -
# - and import it into some subsequently-incorrect code. For
# example:
#
# import errorwindow
#
# a = 3 + 1 + nonesuchdefined
#
# should cause a window to appear, showing the traceback of a
# Python NameError.
#
# --
# --Bryan
# ----------------------------------------------------------------
#
# martineau - Modified to use subprocess.Popen instead of the os.popen
# which has been deprecated since Py 2.6. Changed so it
# redirects both stdout and stderr. Added numerous
# comments, and also inserted double quotes around paths
# in case they have embedded space characters in them, as
# they did on my Windows system.
"""
Import this module into graphical Python apps to provide a
sys.stderr. No functions to call, just import it. It uses
only facilities in the Python standard distribution.
If nothing is ever written to stderr, then the module just
sits there and stays out of your face. Upon write to stderr,
it launches a new process, piping it error stream. The new
process throws up a window showing the error messages.
"""
import subprocess
import sys
import thread
import os
if __name__ == '__main__': # when spawned as separate process
# create window in which to display output
# then copy stdin to the window until EOF
# will happen when output is sent to each OutputPipe created
from Tkinter import BOTH, END, Frame, Text, TOP, YES
import tkFont
import Queue
queue = Queue.Queue(100)
def read_stdin(app, bufsize=4096):
fd = sys.stdin.fileno() # gets file descriptor
read = os.read
put = queue.put
while True:
put(read(fd, bufsize))
class Application(Frame):
def __init__(self, master=None, font_size=8, text_color='#0000AA', rows=25, cols=100):
Frame.__init__(self, master)
# argv[0]: name of this script (not used)
# argv[1]: name of script that imported this module
# argv[2]: name of redirected stream (optional)
if len(sys.argv) < 3:
title = "Output Stream from %s" % (sys.argv[1],)
else:
title = "Output Stream '%s' from %s" % (sys.argv[2], sys.argv[1])
self.master.title(title)
self.pack(fill=BOTH, expand=YES)
font = tkFont.Font(family='Courier', size=font_size)
width = font.measure(' '*(cols+1))
height = font.metrics('linespace')*(rows+1)
self.configure(width=width, height=height)
self.pack_propagate(0) # force frame to be configured size
self.logwidget = Text(self, font=font)
self.logwidget.pack(side=TOP, fill=BOTH, expand=YES)
# Disallow key entry, but allow copy with <Control-c>
self.logwidget.bind('<Key>', lambda x: 'break')
self.logwidget.bind('<Control-c>', lambda x: None)
self.logwidget.configure(foreground=text_color)
#self.logwidget.insert(END, '==== Start of Output Stream ====\n\n')
#self.logwidget.see(END)
self.after(200, self.start_thread, ())
def start_thread(self, _):
thread.start_new_thread(read_stdin, (self,))
self.after(200, self.check_q, ())
def check_q(self, _):
log = self.logwidget
log_insert = log.insert
log_see = log.see
queue_get_nowait = queue.get_nowait
go = True
while go:
try:
data = queue_get_nowait()
if not data:
data = '[EOF]'
go = False
log_insert(END, data)
log_see(END)
except Queue.Empty:
self.after(200, self.check_q, ())
go = False
app = Application()
app.mainloop()
else: # when module is first imported
import traceback
class OutputPipe(object):
def __init__(self, name=''):
self.lock = thread.allocate_lock()
self.name = name
def __getattr__(self, attr):
if attr == 'pipe': # pipe attribute hasn't been created yet
# launch this module as a separate process to display any output
# it receives.
# Note: It's important to put double quotes around everything in case
# they have embedded space characters.
command = '"%s" "%s" "%s" "%s"' % (sys.executable, # command
__file__, # argv[0]
os.path.basename(sys.argv[0]), # argv[1]
self.name) # argv[2]
# sample command and arg values on receiving end:
# E:\Program Files\Python\python[w].exe # command
# H:\PythonLib\TestScripts\PyRemindWrk\errorwindow.py # argv[0]
# errorwindow.py # argv[1]
# stderr # argv[2]
# execute this script as __main__ with a stdin PIPE for sending output to it
try:
# had to make stdout and stderr PIPEs too, to make it work with pythonw.exe
self.pipe = subprocess.Popen(command, bufsize=0,
stdin=subprocess.PIPE,
stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
stderr=subprocess.PIPE).stdin
except Exception:
# output exception info to a file since this module isn't working
exc_type, exc_value, exc_traceback = sys.exc_info()
msg = ('%r exception in %s\n' %
(exc_type.__name__, os.path.basename(__file__)))
with open('exc_info.txt', 'wt') as info:
info.write('msg:' + msg)
traceback.print_exc(file=info)
sys.exit('fatal error occurred spawning output process')
return super(OutputPipe, self).__getattribute__(attr)
def write(self, data):
with self.lock:
self.pipe.write(data) # 1st reference to pipe attr will cause it to be created
# redirect standard output streams in the process importing the module
sys.stderr = OutputPipe('stderr')
sys.stdout = OutputPipe('stdout')