Develop Reference

Python Enumerate Function Auto Sorts

When I run this code here:
nums = [1,7,3,4,10]
sorts = nums
sorts.sort()
count=0
for i,e in enumerate(nums):
print(i,e)
if sorts[i] != e:
count+=1
print(count)
the i and e values inside the enumerate loop seem to be auto sorted. However, once I remove the sorts.sort(), it doesn't auto sort. Why is this?

The name nums is a reference represents the [1,7,3,4,10] list.
Line 2, you create a new name sorts that also represents that same list.
Line 3, you use sorts.sort() to sort it, so it changes the same list that nums represented. Hence, it is not auto-sort.
If you remove the sorts.sort(), then the nums list will keep the same.

well obviously. if you don't sort them then they will not be sorted.. the program doesn't update the list from run to run.

You used a sort method. Remove it and you will get your values listed the way it is in the list.

by declaring sorts = nums you've made a shallow copy of sorts and so by calling sort(), the references are sorted in memory and the nums list will be using those references. if you want a deep copy do this: sorts = [i for i in nums]. The enumerate function will of course always produce an incrementation

Organize/Formatting the python code to one line

Is there any way to rewrite the below python code in one line
for i in range(len(main_list)):
if main_list[i] != []:
for j in range(len(main_list[i])):
main_list[i][j][6]=main_list[i][j][6].strftime('%Y-%m-%d')
something like below,
[main_list[i][j][6]=main_list[i][j][6].strftime('%Y-%m-%d') for i in range(len(main_list)) if main_list[i] != [] for j in range(len(main_list[i]))]
I got SyntaxError for this.
Actually, i'm trying to storing all the values fetched from table into one list. Since the table contains date method/datatype, my requirement needs to convert it to string as i faced with malformed string error.
So my approach is to convert that element of list from datetime.date() to str. And i got it working. Just wanted it to work with one line

Use the explicit for loop. There's no better option.
A list comprehension is used to create a new list, not to modify certain elements of an existing list.
You may be able to update values via a list comprehension, e.g. [L.__setitem__(i, 'some_value') for i in range(len(L))], but this is not recommended as you are using a side-effect and in the process creating a list of None values which you then discard.
You could also write a convoluted list comprehension with a ternary statement indicating when you meet the 6th element in a 3rd nested sublist. But this will make your code difficult to maintain.
In short, use the for loop.

You're getting a syntax error because you're not allowed to perform assignments within a list comprehension. Python forbids assignments because it is discouraging over complex list comprehensions in favour of for loops.
Obviously you shouldn't do this on one line, but this is how to do it:
import datetime
# Example from your comment:
type1 = "some type"
main_list = [[], [],
[[1, 2, 3, datetime.date(2016, 8, 18), type1],
[3, 4, 5, datetime.date(2016, 8, 18), type1]], [], []]
def fmt_times(lst):
"""Format the fourth value of each element of each non-empty sublist"""
for i in range(len(lst)):
if lst[i] != []:
for j in range(len(lst[i])):
lst[i][j][3] = lst[i][j][3].strftime('%Y-%m-%d')
return lst
def fmt_times_one_line(main_list):
"""Format the fourth value of each element of each non-empty sublist"""
return [[] if main_list[i] == [] else [[main_list[i][j][k] if k != 3 else main_list[i][j][k].strftime('%Y-%m-%d') for k in range(len(main_list[i][j]))] for j in range(len(main_list[i])) ] for i in range(len(main_list))]
import copy
# Deep copy needed because fmt_times modifies the sublists.
assert fmt_times(copy.deepcopy(main_list)) == fmt_times_one_line(main_list)
The list comprehension is a functional thing. If you know how map() works in python or javascript then it's the same thing. In a map() or comprehension we generally don't mutate the data we're mapping over (and python discourages attempting it) so instead we recreate the entire object, substituting only the values we wanted to modify.

One line?
main_list = convert_list(main_list)
You will have to put a few more lines somewhere else though:
def convert_list(main_list):
for i, ml in enumerate(main_list):
if isinstance(ml, list) and len(ml) > 0:
main_list[i] = convert_list(ml)
elif isinstance(ml, datetime.date):
main_list[i] = ml.strftime('%Y-%m-%d')
return main_list
You might be able to whack this together with a list comprehension but it's a terrible idea (for reasons better explained in the other answer).

Remove duplicates from list python

I'm trying to write a program that removes duplicates from a list, but my program keeps throwing the error "list index out of range" on line 5, if n/(sequence[k]) == 1:. I can't figure this out. Am I right in thinking that the possible values of "k" are 0, 1, and 2? How is "sequence" with any of those as the index outside of the possible index range?
def remove_duplicates(sequence):
new_list = sequence
for n in sequence:
for k in range(len(sequence)):
if n/(sequence[k]) == 1:
new_list.remove(sequence[k])
print new_list
remove_duplicates([1,2,3])

I strongly suggest Akavall's answer:
list(set(your_list))
As to why you get out of range errors: Python passes by reference, that is sequence and new_list still point at the same memory location. Changing new_list also changes sequence.
And finally, you are comparing items with themselves, and then remove them. So basically even if you used a copy of sequence, like:
new_list = list(sequence)
or
new_list = sequence[:]
It would return an empty list.

Your error is concurrent modification of the list:
for k in range(len(sequence)):
if n/(sequence[k]) == 1:
new_list.remove(sequence[k])
It may seem removing from new_list shouldn't effect sequence, but you did new_list = sequence at the beginning of the function. This means new_list actually literally is sequence, perhaps what you meant is new_list=list(sequence), to copy the list?
If you accept that they are the same list, the error is obvious. When you remove items, the length, and the indexes change.
P.S. As mentioned in a comment by #Akavall, all you need is:
sequence=list(set(sequence))
To make sequence contain no dupes. Another option, if you need to preserve ordering, is:
from collections import OrderedDict
sequence=list(OrderedDict.fromkeys(sequence))

If you don't like list(set(your_list)) because it's not guaranteed to preserved order, you could grab the OrderedSet recipe and then do:
from ordered_set import OrderedSet
foo = list("face a dead cabbage")
print foo
print list(set(foo)) # Order might change
print list(OrderedSet(foo)) # Order preserved

# like #Akavall suggested
def remove_duplicates(sequence):
# returns unsorted unique list
return list(set(sequence))
# create a list, if ele from input not in that list, append.
def remove_duplicates(sequence):
lst = []
for i in sequence:
if i not in lst:
lst.append(i)
# returns unsorted unique list
return lst

Accessing elements of a list

I have a list of strings, and calling a function on each string which returns a string. The thing I want is to update the string in the list. How can I do that?
for i in list:
func(i)
The function func() returns a string. i want to update the list with this string. How can it be done?

If you need to update your list in place (not create a new list to replace it), you'll need to get indexes that corresponds to each item you get from your loop. The easiest way to do that is to use the built-in enumerate function:
for index, item in enumerate(lst):
lst[index] = func(item)

You can reconstruct the list with list comprehension like this
list_of_strings = [func(str_obj) for str_obj in list_of_strings]
Or, you can use the builtin map function like this
list_of_strings = map(func, list_of_strings)
Note : If you are using Python 3.x, then you need to convert the map object to a list, explicitly, like this
list_of_strings = list(map(func, list_of_strings))
Note 1: You don't have to worry about the old list and its memory. When you make the variable list_of_strings refer a new list by assigning to it, the reference count of the old list reduces by 1. And when the reference count drops to 0, it will be automatically garbage collected.

First, don't call your lists list (that's the built-in list constructor).
The most Pythonic way of doing what you want is a list comprehension:
lst = [func(i) for i in lst]
or you can create a new list:
lst2 = []
for i in lst:
lst2.append(func(i))
and you can even mutate the list in place
for n, i in enumerate(lst):
lst[n] = func(i)
Note: most programmers will be confused by calling the list item i in the loop above since i is normally used as a loop index counter, I'm just using it here for consistency.
You should get used to the first version though, it's much easier to understand when you come back to the code six months from now.
Later you might also want to use a generator...
g = (func(i) for i in lst)
lst = list(g)

You can use map() to do that.
map(func, list)

How to iterate a list while deleting items from list using range() function? [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Strange result when removing item from a list while iterating over it
(8 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
This is the most common problem I face while trying to learn programming in python. The problem is, when I try to iterate a list using "range()" function to check if given item in list meets given condition and if yes then to delete it, it will always give "IndexError". So, is there a particular way to do this without using any other intermediate list or "while" statement? Below is an example:
l = range(20)
for i in range(0,len(l)):
if l[i] == something:
l.pop(i)

First of all, you never want to iterate over things like that in Python. Iterate over the actual objects, not the indices:
l = range(20)
for i in l:
...
The reason for your error was that you were removing an item, so the later indices cease to exist.
Now, you can't modify a list while you are looping over it, but that isn't a problem. The better solution is to use a list comprehension here, to filter out the extra items.
l = range(20)
new_l = [i for i in l if not i == something]
You can also use the filter() builtin, although that tends to be unclear in most situations (and slower where you need lambda).
Also note that in Python 3.x, range() produces a generator, not a list.
It would also be a good idea to use more descriptive variable names - I'll presume here it's for example, but names like i and l are hard to read and make it easier to introduce bugs.
Edit:
If you wish to update the existing list in place, as pointed out in the comments, you can use the slicing syntax to replace each item of the list in turn (l[:] = new_l). That said, I would argue that that case is pretty bad design. You don't want one segment of code to rely on data being updated from another bit of code in that way.
Edit 2:
If, for any reason, you need the indices as you loop over the items, that's what the enumerate() builtin is for.

You can always do this sort of thing with a list comprehension:
newlist=[i for i in oldlist if not condition ]

As others have said, iterate over the list and create a new list with just the items you want to keep.
Use a slice assignment to update the original list in-place.
l[:] = [item for item in l if item != something]

You should look the problem from the other side: add an element to a list when it is equal with "something". with list comprehension:
l = [i for i in xrange(20) if i != something]

you should not use for i in range(0,len(l)):, use for i, item in enumerate(l): instead if you need the index, for item in l: if not
you should not manipulate a structure you are iterating over. when faced to do so, iterate over a copy instead
don't name a variable l (may be mistaken as 1 or I)
if you want to filter a list, do so explicitly. use filter() or list comprehensions
BTW, in your case, you could also do:
while something in list_: list_.remove(something)
That's not very efficient, though. But depending on context, it might be more readable.

The reason you're getting an IndexError is because you're changing the length of the list as you iterate in the for-loop. Basically, here's the logic...
#-- Build the original list: [0, 1, 2, ..., 19]
l = range(20)
#-- Here, the range function builds ANOTHER list, in this case also [0, 1, 2, ..., 19]
#-- the variable "i" will be bound to each element of this list, so i = 0 (loop), then i = 1 (loop), i = 2, etc.
for i in range(0,len(l)):
if i == something:
#-- So, when i is equivalent to something, you "pop" the list, l.
#-- the length of l is now *19* elements, NOT 20 (you just removed one)
l.pop(i)
#-- So...when the list has been shortened to 19 elements...
#-- we're still iterating, i = 17 (loop), i = 18 (loop), i = 19 *CRASH*
#-- There is no 19th element of l, as l (after you popped out an element) only
#-- has indices 0, ..., 18, now.
NOTE also, that you're making the "pop" decision based on the index of the list, not what's in the indexed cell of the list. This is unusual -- was that your intention? Or did you
mean something more like...
if l[i] == something:
l.pop(i)
Now, in your specific example, (l[i] == i) but this is not a typical pattern.
Rather than iterating over the list, try the filter function. It's a built-in (like a lot of other list processing functions: e.g. map, sort, reverse, zip, etc.)
Try this...
#-- Create a function for testing the elements of the list.
def f(x):
if (x == SOMETHING):
return False
else:
return True
#-- Create the original list.
l = range(20)
#-- Apply the function f to each element of l.
#-- Where f(l[i]) is True, the element l[i] is kept and will be in the new list, m.
#-- Where f(l[i]) is False, the element l[i] is passed over and will NOT appear in m.
m = filter(f, l)
List processing functions go hand-in-hand with "lambda" functions - which, in Python, are brief, anonymous functions. so, we can re-write the above code as...
#-- Create the original list.
l = range(20)
#-- Apply the function f to each element of l.
#-- Where lambda is True, the element l[i] is kept and will be in the new list, m.
#-- Where lambda is False, the element l[i] is passed over and will NOT appear in m.
m = filter(lambda x: (x != SOMETHING), l)
Give it a go and see it how it works!