I have a dataframe (df):
| A | B | C |
| --- | ----- | ----------------------- |
| CA | Jon | [sales, engineering] |
| NY | Sarah | [engineering, IT] |
| VA | Vox | [services, engineering] |
I am trying to group by each item in the C column list (sales, engineering, IT, etc.).
Tried:
df.groupby('C')
but got list not hashable, which is expected. I came across another post where it was recommended to convert the C column to tuple which is hashable, but I need to groupby each item and not the combination.
My goal is to get the count of each row in the df for each item in the C column list. So:
sales: 1
engineering: 3
IT: 1
services: 1
While there is probably a simpler way to obtain this than using groupby, I am still curious if groupby can be used in this case.
You can explode & value_counts :
out = df.explode("C").value_counts("C")
Output :
print(out)
C
engineering 3
IT 1
sales 1
services 1
dtype: int64
Related
I want to get all the possible combinations of size 2 of a column in pyspark dataframe.
My pyspark dataframe looks like
| id |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
For above input, I want to get output as
| id1 | id2 |
| 1 | 2 |
| 1 | 3 |
| 1 | 4 |
| 2 | 3 |
and so on..
One way would be to collect the values and get them into python iterable (list, pandas df) and use itertools.combinations to generate all combinations.
values = df.select(F.collect_list('id')).first()[0]
combns = list(itertools.combinations(values, 2))
However, I want to avoid collecting the dataframe column to the driver since the rows can be extremely large. Is there a better way to achieve this using spark APIs?
You can use the crossJoin method, and then cull the lines with id1 > id2.
df = df.toDF('id1').crossJoin(df.toDF('id2')).filter('id1 < id2')
Let's say I have a dataframe df looking like this:
|ColA |
|---------|
|B=7 |
|(no data)|
|C=5 |
|B=3,C=6 |
How do I extract the data into new colums, so it looks like this:
|ColA | B | C |
|------|---|---|
|True | 7 | |
|False | | |
|True | | 5 |
|True | 3 | 6 |
For filling the columns I know I can use regex .extract, as shown in this solution.
But how do I set the Column name at the same time? So far I use a loop over df.ColA.loc[df["ColA"].isna()].iteritems(), but that does not seem like the best option for a lot of data.
You could use str.extractall to get the data, then reshape the output and join to a derivative of the original dataframe:
# create the B/C columns
df2 = (df['ColA'].str.extractall('([^=]+)=([^=,]+),?')
.set_index(0, append=True)
.droplevel('match')[1]
.unstack(0, fill_value='')
)
# rework ColA and join previous output
df.notnull().join(df2).fillna('')
# or if several columns:
df.assign(ColA=df['ColA'].notnull()).join(df2).fillna('')
output:
ColA B C
0 True 7
1 False
2 True 5
3 True 3 6
Suppose the data frame below:
|id |day | order |
|---|--- |-------|
| a | 2 | 6 |
| a | 4 | 0 |
| a | 7 | 4 |
| a | 8 | 8 |
| b | 11 | 10 |
| b | 15 | 15 |
I want to apply a function to day and order column of each group by rows on id column.
The function is:
def mean_of_differences(my_list):
return sum([ my_list[i] - my_list[i-1] for i in range(1, len(my_list))]) / len(my_list)
This function calculates mean of differences of each element and the next one. For example, for id=a, day would be 2+3+1 divided by 4. I know how to use lambda, but didn't find a way to implement this in a pandas group by. Also, each column should be ordered to get my desired output, so apparently it is not possible to sort by one column before group by
The output should be like this:
|id |day| order |
|---|---|-------|
| a |1.5| 2 |
| b | 2 | 2.5 |
Any one know how to do so in a group by?
First, sort your data by day then group by id and finally compute your diff/mean.
df = df.sort_values('day') \
.groupby('id') \
.agg({'day': lambda x: x.diff().fillna(0).mean()}) \
.reset_index()
Output:
>>> df
id day
0 a 1.5
1 b 2.0
My question is very similar to the one asked but unanswered here
Replicating GROUP_CONCAT for pandas.DataFrame
I have a Pandas DataFame which I want to group concat into a data frame
+------+---------+
| team | user |
+------+---------+
| A | elmer |
| A | daffy |
| A | bugs |
| B | dawg |
| A | foghorn |
+------+---------+
Becoming
+------+---------------------------------------+
| team | group_concat(user) |
+------+---------------------------------------+
| A | elmer,daffy,bugs,foghorn |
| B | dawg |
+------+---------------------------------------+
As answeed in the original topic, it can be done via any of these:
df.groupby('team').apply(lambda x: ','.join(x.user))
df.groupby('team').apply(lambda x: list(x.user))
df.groupby('team').agg({'user' : lambda x: ', '.join(x)})
But the resulting object is not a Pandas Dataframe anymore.
How can I get the GROUP_CONCAT results in the original Pandas DataFrame as a new column?
Cheers
You can apply list and join after grouping by, then reset_index to get the dataframe.
output_df = df.groupby('team')['user'].apply(lambda x: ",".join(list(x))).reset_index()
output_df.rename(columns={'user': 'group_concat(user)'})
team group_concat(user)
0 A elmer,daffy,bugs,foghorn
1 B dawg
Let's break down the below code:
Firstly, groupby team and, use apply on the user to join it's elements using a ,
Then, reset the index, and rename the resulting dataframe (axis=1, refers to columns and not rows)
res = (df.groupby('team')['user']
.apply(lambda x: ','.join(str(i) for i in x))).reset_index().rename({'user':'group_concat(user)'},axis=1)
Output:
team group_concat(user)
0 A elmer,daffy,bugs,foghorn
1 B dawg
I'm sure what I'm trying to do is fairly simple for those with better knowledge of PD, but I'm simply stuck at transforming:
+---------+------------+-------+
| Trigger | Date | Value |
+---------+------------+-------+
| 1 | 01/01/2016 | a |
+---------+------------+-------+
| 2 | 01/01/2016 | b |
+---------+------------+-------+
| 3 | 01/01/2016 | c |
+---------+------------+-------+
...etc, into:
+------------+---------------------+---------+---------+---------+
| Date | #of triggers | count a | count b | count c |
+------------+---------------------+---------+---------+---------+
| 01/01/2016 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
+------------+---------------------+---------+---------+---------+
| 02/01/2016 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
+------------+---------------------+---------+---------+---------+
... and so on
The issue is, I've got no bloody idea of how to achieve this..
I've scoured SO, but I can't seem to find anything that applies to my specific case.
I presume I'd have to group it all by date, but then once that is done, what do I need to do to get the remaining columns?
The initial DF is loaded from an SQL Alchemy query object, and then I want to manipulate it to get the result I described above. How would one do this?
Thanks
df.groupby(['Date','Value']).count().unstack(level=-1)
You can use GroupBy.size with unstack, also parameter sort=False is helpful:
df1 = df.groupby(['Date','Value'])['Value'].size().unstack(fill_value=0)
df1['Total'] = df1.sum(axis=1)
cols = df1.columns[-1:].union(df1.columns[:-1])
df1 = df1[cols]
print (df1)
Value Total a b c
Date
01/01/2016 3 1 1 1
The difference between size and count is:
size counts NaN values, count does not.